Hello,
this https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Multi-Tenancy#imultitenant is not very clear on how should we do multitenancy in "Database per tenant" environment.
If we know that we are not going to share our data accross tenants, can we disable multitenancy all together? If not, should only the aggregates be multitenant or entities under aggregates as well?
This came up in a situation where we had both an aggregate and it's entity defined as IMultitenant but our logic only set the aggregate's tenant id in creation. This created a situation where aggregate's GetAsync, sub collection included, never populated the subcollection. Removin the IMultitenant defintion fron the entity fixed this. This got us thinkin do we still need to define aggregates and entities as multitenant if we know that tenant data will always be separated in tenant specific database?
4 Answer(s)
-
0
use
IMultitenantwhen the entity is not being shared across the tenants. -
0
And we should always set the tenant Id as well?
-
0
yes correct
-
0
see an example https://github.com/abpframework/abp/blob/48c52625f4c4df007f04d5ac6368b07411aa7521/modules/cms-kit/src/Volo.CmsKit.Domain/Volo/CmsKit/Users/CmsUser.cs#L33
