Greetings;
Say for example i have this business case:
I have a service based business. I want my tenants to be able to submit a work request to me (the application owner). I want to be able to design a UI such that I can see all of these requests (from all tenants) in one location, and manage them from one central location.
Questions: Can you talk about any design considerations for this scenario? Should the ServiceRequest entity be designed any differently than a normal entity? Another quick side question: I come from the aspnetzero world where there is IMayHaveTenant: does this exist within ABP?
Many thanks,
--Dave
ps: If anybody else out there is/has worked with this scenario, I'd appreciate any of your issues and resolutions too!
3 Answer(s)
-
0
I think I may have answered my own question here.. But I'd appreciate any feedback on this:
https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Data-Filtering
Adapted from the link above. Disable the IMulitiTenant data filter.
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Threading.Tasks; using Volo.Abp; using Volo.Abp.Data; using Volo.Abp.DependencyInjection; using Volo.Abp.Domain.Repositories; namespace Acme.BookStore { public class MyBookService : ITransientDependency { private readonly IDataFilter _dataFilter; private readonly IRepository<Book, Guid> _bookRepository; public MyBookService( IDataFilter dataFilter, IRepository<Book, Guid> bookRepository) { _dataFilter = dataFilter; _bookRepository = bookRepository; } public async Task<List<Book>> GetAllBooksForAllTenantsAsync() { //Temporary disable the IMultitenant filter using (_dataFilter.Disable<IMultiTenant>()) { return await _bookRepository.GetListAsync(); } } } } -
0
Hi,
https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Data-Filtering, just work for a single database.
If a tenant has own database, you need to query all tenants, and then switch each tenant.
example:
var tenants = await _tenantRepository.GetListAsync(); foreach(var tenant in tenants) { using(CurrentTenant.Change(tenant.Id)) { var books = await _bookRepository.GetListAsync(); } } -
0
Ok.. Thank you. I will close this ticket.
