Activities of "barrett2474"

So it turns out the application template is using the **wrong **method call - it should be in ConfigureSwaggerServices. If peolple out there are using the code as is from the Blazor Server Template then they have zero security - wide open.

`` services.AddAbpSwaggerGenWithOAuth(
            configuration["AuthServer:Authority"], 
            new Dictionary<string, string>
           {
                    {"xxx", "xAPI"}
           },
            options =>
            {
                options.SwaggerDoc("v1", new OpenApiInfo { Title = "xAPI", Version = "v1" });
                options.DocInclusionPredicate((docName, description) => true);
                options.CustomSchemaIds(type => type.FullName);
            }
        );`
`

NOT

`` services.AddAbpSwaggerGen(
            options =>
            {
                options.SwaggerDoc("v1", new OpenApiInfo { Title = "EL API", Version = "v1" });
                options.DocInclusionPredicate((docName, description) => true);
                options.CustomSchemaIds(type => type.FullName);
            }
        );``

I wish that was true, but i tested it a few times with fresh templated commercial projects and in a private window.

that's great - thanks for the fast response!

I read "Subscribing to the auto events is same as subscribing a regular distributed event" - so I'm guessing if there are no distributed events published for the File Management Module then as alternative i could somehow hook into the events at the EF level.

Just posting my thoughts but would still appreciate the experts opinion! :-)

Thank you once again!

CRUD Generator for type Decimal should cater for scale and precision properties' of a Decimal type.

Cater for binary and XML type would be good.

I also Like to take issue with the number of "questions" I have left - 9 (should be 10). I have asked 5 question and raised 1 bug. I hope this can be rectified as i feel a little peeved at this false tally.

i see

when trying to replace module with source...i think there is a bug

OK, thanks for the answer. may I suggest making the developer do a little less heavy lifting to merely hide a icon in the same way the Web UI does. Happy to close.