Activities of "priyankasynapxe"

[maliming] said: hi

Have you restarted the website after changing the Web Config file?

Is there any 400 error in the app logs?

Can you share the full URL?

Thanks.

yes, I restarted, there is no 400 in logs, it's failing as header size is big. Below is the URL.

https://efc.devhealthgrp.com.sg/UAT/eFCApp/api/app/user/user-organization?userName=healthgrp%5Csim0886h

[maliming] said: hi

Try configuring IIS Request Limits in web config like this to increase the allowed query string length:

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/iis/configuration/system.webserver/security/requestfiltering/requestlimits/

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> 
<configuration> 
  <!-- Any existing configuration you may have --> 
+ <system.webServer> 
+   <security> 
+     <requestFiltering> 
+       <requestLimits maxQueryString="4096" /> 
+     </requestFiltering> 
+   </security> 
+ </system.webServer> 
</configuration> 

Could you please share the request URL that returns a 400 error?

Thanks

Hi, I tried to update config, it is still giving the same error. I'm sharing the URL as well, it is when we get permission details.

Thanks

[maliming] said: hi

What is your web server?

IIS, Kestrel or Nginx?

Thanks.

Hi, it's IIS.

Thanks.

[maliming] said: hi

but on package creation it is coming

Can you share a test project to show it?

liming.ma@volosoft.com Thanks

Can you please confirm if I go by version 9 and above, will it work with .net 8 ?

Thanks, Priyanka

[maliming] said: hi

Your project doesn't reference the Volo.Abp.Cli package.
Can you share how you got the vulnerability details from your project?

Thanks.

I have the same query, If I see in nuget package list, Volo.Abp.Cli is not listed but on package creation it is coming so I wanted to confirm if there is any package which is internally using it ?

Thanks

[maliming] said: hi

I'm getting security vulnerability for the Volo.Abp.Cli 8.3.4

What are the vulnerability details?

Thanks.

It is blocked as per my company policy; I'm sharing CVE link- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43483.

Thanks.

[maliming] said: hi

How can I reproduce this?

Can you share some code and steps

Thanks.

yes, to reproduce refer the below example, here my teams table is child table and its parent is user table, in first example I just updated isActive value from false to true and with that Modifier id and modification time was update but in second example I updated teams so Modifier id and modification time is not updated for user table, it is updated for user and team mapping table, audit information for parent table used to update earlier but it stopped updating after abp version update

{ "userId": "03a062cb-49b9-4b1e-94b9-69bfdb381a8f", "fullName": "test", "email": "testuser@test.sg", "isActive": true, "institutionId": 5, "remark": null, "roleId": "1d761946-076c-dfaa-832f-3a09ec002f59", "teams": [ 23 ] }

{ "userId": "03a062cb-49b9-4b1e-94b9-69bfdb381a8f", "fullName": "test", "email": "testuser@test.sg", "isActive": true, "institutionId": 5, "remark": null, "roleId": "1d761946-076c-dfaa-832f-3a09ec002f59", "teams": [ 23, 25 ] }

let me know if you need more details.

Hi,

Can you share how you configured your Background Jobs in your each application? Including .Web and .Web_Int

Normally, if you disable job execution, it shouldn't even be triggered. It seems some misconfiguration.

I checked, this is happening as my application layer is shared between both solutions, I believe I need to split both solutions.

Hi @priyankasynapxe, did you do that? What's the last status of this?

Hi, after splitting the solution, it is working fine, I cannot see hangfire in .Web_Int now, thanks for the support.

Hi,

Can you share how you configured your Background Jobs in your each application? Including .Web and .Web_Int

Normally, if you disable job execution, it shouldn't even be triggered. It seems some misconfiguration.

I checked, this is happening as my application layer is shared between both solutions, I believe I need to split both solutions.

Hi, can you please confirm how can we manage servers on which hangfire will run, in my case, I have 2 web solution (added screenshot below for reference), 1 is for application and other is for interface, on interface solution background job is disabled and I have not added any hangfire code on WebModule.cs of eFC.Web_Int, I have added code only in WebModule.cs of eFC.Web. My app server and interface servers are different. eFC.Web is deployed on e.g. AppServer1, AppServer2 and eFC.Web_Int is deployed on e.g. InterfaceServer1, InterfaceServer2. My expectation is all the jobs should be processed by AppServer1, AppServer2 but seems like it is going all Interface servers too. How can I restrict that? also, whenever it is going on interface server it is giving below error, which is causing delay in job execution which is why I don't want job to execute in interface server.