lastTask, State next, Scope scope, Object state, Boolean isCompleted) 2024-10-10 06:01:07.948 +00:00 [WRN] There

Because of this there is considerable downtime and our customers are severely affected.

We have reported this issue several times and there had not been proper fix, response or support.

There are too many 499 errors in the API. Please let us know more on this.

lastTask, State next, Scope scope, Object state, Boolean isCompleted) 2024-10-08 06:26:20.257 +00:00 [WRN] There

Hi, I found there is no errors inside the log files.

There may be errors.

[image.png](/QA/files/3a15824a251e04677c8d599a2dad3d70.png) Would you advise is there any configuration

As i remember this option was there in previous version. May need your help to advise. !

Is there any SQL configuration i have missed out in order to make this **localhost** works?

** • **Is there a recommended approach or built-in service in ABP Commercial that allows me to authenticate

Hi, There is some discussion here; It will not affect the operation of the application. even if font

> Hi, > > There is some discussion here; It will not affect the operation of the application. even

migration guide and startup template show that 8.3.1 has upgraded Angular to version 18, but it seems like there

Database System**: EF Core (SQL Server) I just enabled hangfire to process background workers, is there

Hello, There is a logs folder under the host project.

When I search for `/opt/homebrew/bin` in the path list above, it is there.

Interesting, there doesn't seem to be any problem with your configuration.

There is a big difference between the Studio 1 month ago and now, both in terms of features and the number

If there are no problems, the new version will be released today 🥳🥳

I know this situation is very annoying but unfortunately, there are very [critical problems](https://

There are no options in ABP Suite for not required, nullable etc for Boolean values (which renders as

. ``` 2024-09-19 11:35:55.893 +12:00 [WRN] There is an entry which is not saved due to concurrency

3d30fde778064b7d83699c8262749fc5", "iss": "CLIENT_URL" }. 2024-09-19 11:35:55.911 +12:00 [WRN] There

It's straightforward, so there won't be any misunderstandings.

This has also been a huge issue for me when deploying to production, seems there may be intermittent

Is there anything configuration or db related that would cause this?

May be helpful to run through the code though to see if there is anything obvious that could be causing

There is the link https://us05web.zoom.us/j/5929668302?pwd=UXl2M2RUeG5PazVSY2ZCOW1NMUxtZz09

Everything is working fine in development, there is just this Auth exception in the test environment.

There is no way to add a group. No group, no FAQ.

you can give it a try, if there any problem you get, you can write it here

in Identity server which model I need to add over there ?

Please confirm if there is some mistake

https://localhost:44300/api/account/verify-authenticator-code service not there

. > and added code present over there?

Sorry, found the issue, there was a typing mistake. Could you please refund this ticket?

Is there any? 2 - Should I suspect about other entities for this issue?

In my application there are too many clients (more than thounsands) trying to get auth token for their

Because there is no meaningful data change in the applicaiton record(only lastmodiftime), I want to prevent

hi > there are two projects in the /apps/blazor directory, ProjectName.Blazor.Client and ProjectName.Blazor

Additionally, there are two projects in the /apps/blazor directory, ProjectName.Blazor.Client and ProjectName.Blazor

Please check again now there is no problem. I apologize for the late reply. Thanks

I note looking at ABP CLI documentations there seems to be switches to not include saas, openid etc,

I note looking at ABP CLI documentations there seems to be switches to not include saas, openid etc,

hi If your entity has implemented the `IMultiTenant` there is no way to ignore it.

Is there a better way to achieve this outcome in the ABP framework? Thank you

hi If your entity has implemented the `IMultiTenant` there is no way to achieve this.

Is there any way to automatically populate this `TenantId` field with the `CurrentTenant`? Thank you

Is there some issue with my usage of CurrentTenant.Id?

Question is if there is a way to define this [IgnoreMultiTenancy] flag on the Entity level.

I saw that there is a check here: !

[image.png](/QA/files/3a157d1bdeb69b8d23c82995fb4912f3.png) Is there something I am missing?