Starts in:
0 DAY
17 HRS
30 MIN
8 SEC
Starts in:
0 D
17 H
30 M
8 S
Open Closed

Need to refresh the list of static permission definitions without site reload #5490


User avatar
0
alexander.nikonov created
  • ABP Framework version: v7.0.1
  • UI Type: Angular
  • Database System: Oracle
  • Auth Server Separated

I create a custom permission definition in DB. On next step I assign it to a user role. This next step is impossible until I restart the app (so the list of permission definitions is being actualized). I do not want app restart - I need a "hot-reload" for permission definitions. How can I implement this? No dramatic changes, no switching to dynamic permissions! - I just need a small "Refresh" method, which would trigger permission definition list reload - so they all would be available for role assignment. Please, show a piece of code.


31 Answer(s)
  • User Avatar
    0
    maliming created
    Support Team Fullstack Developer

    hi

    I will find a way.

  • User Avatar
    0
    alexander.nikonov created

    Not resolved yet

  • User Avatar
    0
    maliming created
    Support Team Fullstack Developer

    hi

    I will find the solution asap.

  • User Avatar
    0
    maliming created
    Support Team Fullstack Developer

    hi

    The InitializeDynamicPermissions is used to initial the dynamic permission system.

    You can copy some code to your app and call it.

    https://github.com/abpframework/abp/blob/dev/modules/permission-management/src/Volo.Abp.PermissionManagement.Domain/Volo/Abp/PermissionManagement/AbpPermissionManagementDomainModule.cs#L64-L107

  • User Avatar
    0
    alexander.nikonov created

    @maliming so basically I need to sequentially call SaveStaticPermissionsToDatabaseAsync and then - PreCacheDynamicPermissionsAsync?

  • User Avatar
    0
    maliming created
    Support Team Fullstack Developer

    hi

    Yes, You can give it a try.

  • User Avatar
    0
    alexander.nikonov created

    Since I'm doing this from AppService not AbpModule as in the original code, I've simplified the code. I took the DI instances of some required services and used the code below (_dynamicPermissionDefinitionStore is not needed at all I think, because we do not use dynamic permissions, anyway, it makes no difference):

        private async Task RefreshAbpStaticAndDynamicPermissionsAsync()
        {
            await Policy
                .Handle<Exception>()
                .WaitAndRetryAsync(8, retryAttempt => TimeSpan.FromSeconds(RandomHelper.GetRandom((int)Math.Pow(2, retryAttempt) * 8, (int)Math.Pow(2, retryAttempt) * 12)))
                .ExecuteAsync(async _ => await _staticPermissionSaver.SaveAsync(), _cancellationTokenProvider.Token);
    
            await _dynamicPermissionDefinitionStore.GetGroupsAsync();
        }
    

    However, it still does not work.

    Do you have any further suggestions?

  • User Avatar
    0
    maliming created
    Support Team Fullstack Developer

    hi

    Can you debug the StaticPermissionSaver class?

    https://github.com/abpframework/abp/blob/dev/modules/permission-management/src/Volo.Abp.PermissionManagement.Domain/Volo/Abp/PermissionManagement/StaticPermissionSaver.cs#L61

    Try to see the changed permissions.

    You can copy these code to a new class and call it.

  • User Avatar
    0
    alexander.nikonov created

    Done. The created permissions are present in permissionRecords collection:

    Despite this fact, when I try to assign them - the assignment is ignored until I restart the app:

  • User Avatar
    0
    maliming created
    Support Team Fullstack Developer

    hi

    Is currentHash changed?

    What about hasChangesInGroups and hasChangesInPermissions?

  • User Avatar
    0
    alexander.nikonov created

    currentHash is changed. hasChangesInPermissions is true (hasChangesInGroups is false). All in all, the method SaveAsync works as expected, no catch triggered... However the permissions are not assigned...

  • User Avatar
    0
    maliming created
    Support Team Fullstack Developer

    hi

    . However the permissions are not assigned...

    Did you manually insert data into the AbpPermissionGrants table?

    Please explain it in detail. Thanks

  • User Avatar
    0
    alexander.nikonov created

    No, i did not insert them manually. I used the code shown previously:

    So, after this code I manually run server API request from client which executes the following:

        public virtual async Task RefreshAbpPermissionsAsync()
        {
            if (_cancellationTokenProvider.Token.IsCancellationRequested)
            {
                return;
            }
    
            if (_permissionManagementOptions.Value.SaveStaticPermissionsToDatabase)
            {
                await Policy
                    .Handle<Exception>()
                    .WaitAndRetryAsync(8, retryAttempt => TimeSpan.FromSeconds(RandomHelper.GetRandom((int)Math.Pow(2, retryAttempt) * 8, (int)Math.Pow(2, retryAttempt) * 12)))
                    .ExecuteAsync(async _ => await _staticPermissionSaver.SaveAsync(), _cancellationTokenProvider.Token);
            }
    
            if (_cancellationTokenProvider.Token.IsCancellationRequested)
            {
                return;
            }
    
            if (_permissionManagementOptions.Value.IsDynamicPermissionStoreEnabled)
            {
                await _dynamicPermissionDefinitionStore.GetGroupsAsync();
            }
        }
    

    This code is successful, as well as StaticPermissionSavermethod RunAsync. So I see no reasons why the permission assignment afterwards is unsuccessful. No clue.

  • User Avatar
    0
    maliming created
    Support Team Fullstack Developer

    hi

    Can you share a simple project with your above code? liming.ma@volosoft.com

    The simpler, the better.

  • User Avatar
    0
    alexander.nikonov created

    I don't think it's feasible unfortunately. Our project is commercial and highly customized... Besides, it uses Oracle DB. It would take ages to create a test project based on it.

    Could you please take the method above as a reference instead, wrap it inside API and try calling it from some test Angular app after creating a permission definition from UI in this test app? After calling this method - as we suppose here - I should be able to assign the brand-new permission definition to a user role using ABP PermissionService (as also shown in the code above) without restarting the host...

  • User Avatar
    0
    maliming created
    Support Team Fullstack Developer

    hi

    I create a custom permission definition in DB. On next step I assign it to a user role. This next step is impossible until I restart the app (so the list of permission definitions is being actualized).

    This sounds simple, and you don't need oracle. You can use sql server.

  • User Avatar
    0
    alexander.nikonov created

    Probably you mean I might create a test ABP solution using ABP Suite setting it up for free SQL Server Express version - then add custom Permission Definition provider stuff, then add the UI page in test Angular app for creating custom permission definitions + assigning definitions to a user role, after this - add the API method for "refreshing" permission definition and finally check if the assignment is successful.

    Even if it sounds simple for you - it does not sound simple for me. Our project has been developing during 3 years, becoming more and more complex and customized. Unfortunately, we do not have dedicated time to create custom projects for resolving occured issues. The preparation stage to accomplish all this in test ABP solution seems to take a noticeable amount of time. Plus - even if everything would work out here - it would make little sense for us, since it would mean the problem is somewhere else: for instance, we use a separate host (let's call it "host X") which consumes Domain.Shared and Application.Contracts projects from other hosts (A, B, C). When I create a permission definition - i make API call to this host from host A (it is like an admin host). Then I use RabbitMQ queries to refresh ABP Permission cache in ALL hosts (A, B, C). When I want to assign the created permission definition - I also make API call from host A to host X... So, now until I restart host X - I cannot make this assignment. Probably the problem is actually in this.

    I would prefer try to identify the problem in our site (by debugging, etc.) - step by step. Just let me know where do I need to look and what do I need to look (probably debug PermissionAppService or whatever).

    One more note which maybe is useful, maybe not: the custom permission definition I'm trying to assign is also a role at the same time (we have two-layer role mechanism): So we actually assign a "module role" to an "ordinary role". But it should not be a problem I guess, because there is a custom Permission Definition Provider which just reads "module roles" as usual permissions from DB... Later on we assign "ordinary permissions" to "module roles".

    Everything works fine in this implementation. The only issue is that I need to restart host X to be able to assign "module roles" to "ordinary roles" (user roles).

  • User Avatar
    0
    maliming created
    Support Team Fullstack Developer

    hi

    You can try to split these method calls into separate unit of work, and maybe you can try clearing Redis after this.

    https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Unit-Of-Work#begin-a-new-unit-of-work

  • User Avatar
    0
    alexander.nikonov created

    Ok, I will try. But we don't use Redis: we use ABP cache in each app and sync them via RabbitMQ. Does it make the difference?

  • User Avatar
    0
    maliming created
    Support Team Fullstack Developer

    hi

    we use ABP cache in each app and sync them via RabbitMQ. Does it make the difference?

    I don't think this is good practice, You can try to using Redis.

  • User Avatar
    0
    alexander.nikonov created

    I think we are not ready to switch to Redis now... We will keep using ABP caches in the nearest time. At least it proved workable with RabbitMQ sync. I will keep you informed if splitting into units would help.

  • User Avatar
    0
    maliming created
    Support Team Fullstack Developer

    We are trying to find the cause of the problem, maybe there is a bug in your implementation, it will work after you fix it.

  • User Avatar
    0
    alexander.nikonov created

    I really cannot switch to Redis, but I checked the UnitOfWork split and it did not help:

        [Authorize(IdentityPermissions.Roles.ManagePermissions)]
        public virtual async Task SetModuleRolesAsPermissionsAsync(Guid id, RoleUpdateDto input)
        {
            var parentRole = await _identityRoleRepository.FindAsync(id, false);
            if (parentRole == null)
            {
                throw new BusinessException(DomainErrorCodes.NotFound, _stringLocalizer.GetString("Roles:RoleNotFound"));
            }
    
            using (CurrentTenant.Change(null))
            {
                input.Permissions = await MergeParentAndChildPermissions(input.Permissions, parentRole.Name, ModulePermissionRoleValueProvider.ProviderName);
            }
    
            await InvalidateModuleRoleNameCache(parentRole.NormalizedName);
    
            using (var uow = _unitOfWorkManager.Begin(requiresNew: true, isTransactional: false))
            {
                await _permissionAppService.UpdateAsync(ModulePermissionRoleValueProvider.ProviderName, parentRole.Name, new UpdatePermissionsDto { Permissions = input.Permissions.ToArray() });
                await uow.CompleteAsync();
            }
    
            using (var uow = _unitOfWorkManager.Begin(requiresNew: true, isTransactional: false))
            {
                await _rabbitMqManager.UpdateAbpPermissionsAsync(input.Permissions.ToArray(), ModulePermissionRoleValueProvider.ProviderName, parentRole.Name, CurrentTenant.Id);
                await uow.CompleteAsync();
            }
        }
        
    

    If this method did not work at all - I would suspect the issue with the method. But it works correctly - however only if I restart the mentioned host X after creating a module role (my permission definition).

    The method which eventually updates ABP Permission Cache is simple:

        private async Task HandleAbpUpdatePermission(AbpPermissionRabbitMqUpdateEto abpPermissionData)
        {
            if (abpPermissionData == null)
            {
                return;
            }
    
            var abpPermissionGrantCache = _serviceProvider.GetService<IDistributedCache<PermissionGrantCacheItem>>();
    
            var currentTenant = _serviceProvider.GetService<ICurrentTenant>();
    
            using (currentTenant.Change(abpPermissionData.AbpTenantId))
            {
                await abpPermissionGrantCache.SetManyAsync(
                    abpPermissionData.Permissions.Select(permission =>
                        new KeyValuePair<string, PermissionGrantCacheItem>(permission.Key, new PermissionGrantCacheItem(permission.Value))));
            }
        }
        
    

    So what is happening after calling ABP PermissionAppService - _rabbitMqManager.UpdateAbpPermissionsAsync sends the message to the RabbitMQ queue and each host updates its own Permission Cache.

    Is it possible to debug PermissionAppService trying to figure out why the update produces no result?

  • User Avatar
    0
    maliming created
    Support Team Fullstack Developer

    hi

    PermissionAppService will update the database.

    You can check the data in the database and cache. Then check them again after restarting the host X

    See what happened to the data change.

  • User Avatar
    0
    alexander.nikonov created

    Will try, thank you. Will keep you posted.

Made with ❤️ on ABP v9.1.0-preview. Updated on November 20, 2024, 13:06