Multiple tabs causes log outs #9039

burkay created 8 days ago

Exception message and full stack trace:
Volo.Abp.Data.AbpDbConcurrencyException: The database operation was expected to affect 1 row(s), but actually affected 0 row(s); data may have been modified or deleted since entities were loaded. See https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=527962 for information on understanding and handling optimistic concurrency exceptions. ---> Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.DbUpdateConcurrencyException: The database operation was expected to affect 1 row(s), but actually affected 0 row(s); data may have been modified or deleted since entities were loaded. See https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=527962 for information on understanding and handling optimistic concurrency exceptions.
Steps to reproduce the issue:
1. Set the 'Prevent Concurrent Login' setting to 'Logout from all devices.' or 'Logout from same type devices.'
2. Open up any page of the application on multiple tabs
3. Wait for token refresh, which typically happens in 15 minutes.
4. Observe log outs.

This is reproducible on https://demo.abp.io/ as well. We created a new project and observed that it may not happen with two tabs sometimes. To share logs, we opened up 8 tabs and observed the logout behavior. Logs are at https://qtext.io/rgzn . Dev console of one of those tabs is below:

Screenshot 2025-03-26 at 6.26.56 PM.png

This may be somehow related to https://abp.io/support/questions/5257/Occasionally-logging-out-due-to-validating-access-token-error

We are currently experiencing this issue with our web application which is in production. Specifically, when users attempt to access the application through multiple tabs simultaneously, we encounter a concurrency exception that results in unexpected logouts. To temporarily mitigate the issue, we have asked our users to limit their access to a single tab. However, this workaround is inconvenient and reflects poorly on the user experience.

Could you kindly assist us by providing a fix for this issue or suggest an alternative workaround to address the problem? Given the urgency of the situation, we would greatly appreciate your timely support.

Thank you in advance for your help. We look forward to hearing from you soon.

maliming created 7 days ago

Support Team Fullstack Developer

Can you try this solution?

https://abp.io/support/questions/8917/VoloAbpDataAbpDbConcurrencyException-The-database-operation-was-expected-to-affect-1-rows#answer-3a188c6d-831a-c7fb-6404-a2f2e5735118

We will fix this in 9.1.1

Thanks.

burkay created 5 days ago

Hello,

As you wrote in your linked post, we added the following code to our EntityFrameworkCore project:

    using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.ChangeTracking;
    using Volo.Abp.DependencyInjection;
    using Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.ChangeTrackers;
    using Volo.Abp.OpenIddict.Tokens;
    
    namespace Ptr.EntityFrameworkCore;
    
    [Dependency(ReplaceServices = true)]
    [ExposeServices(typeof(AbpEfCoreNavigationHelper))]
    public class PtrAbpEfCoreNavigationHelper : AbpEfCoreNavigationHelper
    {
        public override void ChangeTracker_Tracked(object? sender, EntityTrackedEventArgs e)
        {
            if (e.Entry.Entity.GetType() == typeof(OpenIddictToken))
            {
                return;
            }
    
            base.ChangeTracker_Tracked(sender, e);
        }
    
        public override void ChangeTracker_StateChanged(object? sender, EntityStateChangedEventArgs e)
        {
            if (e.Entry.Entity.GetType() == typeof(OpenIddictToken))
            {
                return;
            }
    
            base.ChangeTracker_StateChanged(sender, e);
        }
    }

With this in place, we ran some tests. We waited for half an hour in 4 tabs. All of them sent requests to connect/token twice at each 15th minute. The system does not kick users out. Thank you! Now we have two questions:

We still see the concurrency exception in logs:
[ERR] The database operation was expected to affect 1 row(s), but actually affected 0 row(s); data may have been modified or deleted since entities were loaded. See https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=527962 for information on understanding and handling optimistic concurrency exceptions.
Volo.Abp.Data.AbpDbConcurrencyException: The database operation was expected to affect 1 row(s), but actually affected 0 row(s); data may have been modified or deleted since entities were loaded. See https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=527962 for information on understanding and handling optimistic concurrency exceptions.
In your above reply, you said this will be fixed in v9.1.1. It is released, we tested using it but the error persisted. When this issue gets fixed in ABP itself, we will remove the above code from our codebase. Could you tell us in which version will this be fixed?

Thank you again and best wishes.

maliming created 5 days ago

Support Team Fullstack Developer

Can you share full logs.txt file with liming.ma@volosoft.com
we tested using it but the error persisted.

Can you also share the debug logs for 9.1.1?
https://abp.io/support/questions/8622/How-to-enable-Debug-logs-for-troubleshoot-problems

Thanks. Your ticket has been refunded.

maliming created 5 days ago

Support Team Fullstack Developer

Can you try to configure the IgnoredNavigationEntitySelectors in 9.1.1

Configure<AbpEntityChangeOptions>(options =>
{
    options.IgnoredNavigationEntitySelectors.Add("DisableOpenIddictApplication", type => type == typeof(OpenIddictApplication) || type = typeof(OpenIddictToken));
});

burkay created about 16 hours ago

Hello again,

First of all thank you for the reply and also for the refund. We really appreciate your prompt responses.

I got the following notification in an e-mail: "Question #9039 has been marked as a bug/problem by the team, ..."

In that case, I think this solution should be built-in the ABP framework as it is considered a bug. I do not think future users should add that configuration once they started a new project using ABP.

Applying your previous suggestion (NavigationHelper), we already have a solution. In that case, what is the use of removing that and adding some other configuration? I just want to know if this will get resolved in a release, and the version number if it will.

Thank you again.
Burkay

maliming created about 16 hours ago

Support Team Fullstack Developer

hi burkay

Yes, we will add OpenIddictToken to framework. I just make sure it works for you. : )

Can you test it?

Thanks.

burkay created about 15 hours ago

Hello Maliming,

Thank you for the follow up. NavigationHelper method works. So, we can wait for the fix in the framework. I intend to close this issue by then:)

You asked for the logs of our test using v9.1.1. Unfortunately, I reverted to v9.1.0 when I could not make it work and do not have the logs available now. I need to start from scratch to generate them again.