Activities of "EngincanV"

I have downloaded Abp suite version 8.1.0 but i still can't create a property of type "DateOnly" and "TimeOnly" inside an entity.
When will this feature be available?

Hi, we have an internal issue for supporting DateOnly and TimeOnly types and we are aiming to introduce it with v8.2.

Hi, is TimeOnly still on track for 8.2? Cannot find anything related in the 8.2 milestone on Github

Hi, yes. We will be supporting TimeOnly and DateOnly types with v8.2. It's in a private repository, this is why you can't track the process, but I can say that we have already implemented and it will be available soon:

Hi, thanks for reporting. I'll check it.

No, they are the same. I mean, all I had to do was delete the .Web folder, but somewhere along the way Abp Suite DEFINITELY created it and put a few files in there along the way. Then on future updates failed because it thought there was a valid Web project there.

I'm still unable to reproduce this problem. When a create an angular project with the seperate authentication server option selected, there is not a .Web folder being created and it successfully generated CRUD pages. I'll try to understand the reason from the code and fix it. FYI.

I am unable to reproduce the problem. I created an application with v8.1.1 in ABP Suite, with angular as the UI option and the seperate authentication server option selected, but I could successfully generate CRUD pages without having a problem.

Is it possible that your ABP CLI and ABP Suite versions are not the same?

Hi, I'll check this asap.

Hi, sorry for the late response. But I'm unable to reproduce it:

Please check https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/latest/abp-suite/create-module-solution#adding-your-new-abp-module-to-your-main-solution

Hi, sorry for the late response. I'll create an internal issue to improve our templating system and format. In the meantime, you can check https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/latest/abp-suite/editing-templates this documentation for the details of some templates' placeholders.

Hi, thanks for the suggestion. I agree that the child entity should have the same audit level as the base class with its master entity. I'll create an internal issue for that.

Regards.

If I can use child entities for multiple levels it would be great.

We have an internal issue for that, but it's in the backlog now. We will try to prioritize it. Regards.

We have previously created entities in this version without encountering such an issue. Will there be any improvements in version 7.1.1?

No, we are not considering to release a patch version for 7.1.1.