Reopenning the question again (it was closed by our support bot). Our QA team tested with PostgreSQL but we could not reproduce the problem.
Can you provide more information to us for reproducing the problem? Unfortunately, currently, we are unable to reproduce your problem.
Regards.
Hi,
Even if I'll set them manually, as you suggest, the repository Update and Delete methods will set them to null.
Yes, you are right. Instead, you can try to change the current principal, which will change the CurrentUser as you stated in the related scope.
We have a section in our documentation for changing the current principal, which you can check out at https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/infrastructure/current-user#changing-the-current-principal
You basically, need to inject the ICurrentPrincipalAccessor service, and use its Change method (which is a disposable method, so you should create a scope as stated in the documentation) and specify the CurrentUser as you wish. With this way, it should set the CreatorId and DeleterId.
Let me know, if it fixes your problem. Regards.
I have just sent you an email. thx
Thanks. We will review your entity metadata and try to reproduce your problem.
Regards.
Hi,
Microsoft 365 uses Azure Active Directory (Azure AD). You can see a tutorial on integrating Azure AD auth here:https://abp.io/community/articles/how-to-setup-azure-active-directory-and-integrate-abp-angular-application-lyk87w5l
Also, you can refer to Microsoft's own documents on the topic: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/enterprise/deploy-identity-solution-identity-model?view=o365-worldwide
So, you can integrate Azure AD like you would do in a plain .NET application, ABP based applications have no difference. When you check the community article, you should be able to integrate Azure AD, but let me know if you stuck at any point.
Regards.
Sorry which module are you talking about? This is a custom sub module I am trying to edit. I have tried building first. Modular monolith design. This seems like a bug.
Hi, actually I meant the module in which you are added as a project/solution in ABP Suite and currently trying to generate entities on it. Can you please provide more information, like sharing some screenshots that indicate what is the defined solution (recent solutions on homepage) etc..?
Hi, we are currently preparing the angular UI version of our modular-monolith development tutorial, which you can see in the progress at https://github.com/abpframework/abp/issues/20827.
. However I am still not be able to view the module when the application starts up
I have shared short info on what you should do in a GitHub issue, you can check at https://github.com/abpframework/abp/issues/20827#issuecomment-2624232973
Also Is there a way to run the modules in a standalone mode? Let's say I have multiple people on my team developing modules invidually, and is there a way they can build the module and run them on their own before install the modules into the main application?
There is a dev-app project in the module templates and they can be used to run related module separately. But, in the future versions, we are aiming to remove the dev-app project from the module template, because modules should not be runnable separately (at least this is what we are suggesting for most of the applications).
Regards.
Hi, ABP Framework itself has no relation to any database provider. But the pre-built modules have. So, it can't be db provider independent by default. There is no startup template that allows you to create a solution without a database.
Thus, you can create a new startup template you want and try to delete all modules, but this would be impractical, and without the power of ABP's modules, there seems to be no need to use the ABP Framework's infrastructure.
Regards.
Hi, can you build your application and then remove & re-add the module and try to regenerate, please?
We would prefer not to hard code the title without the use of localization. So we will try using the abp-page tag.
What is the value of ResourceName? The name of the application? We have tried a few different values and none seem to work. The code seems to imply that it looks defaultResourceName but that is always null as I have stated in the GitHub issue.
I've created an application with the name Issue8909. The defaultResourceName was also Issue8909 and if I try with ::LocalizationName then it does not work, and I have created an internal issue for that, so it's going to be fixed in the next release.
Would you send us the solution so we can attempt to discern any missing pieces? We are still unable to get it working.
I'll recreate the solution and share it with you via email.
The problem is resolved in the meeting, so I'm closing the question. Feel free to reopen if it occurs again. Regards.
