ABP Framework version: v5.3.3 UI type: Blazor DB provider: EF Core Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Separated (Angular): yes / no Exception message and stack trace: No message Steps to reproduce the issue:"
- Need to link the IdentityUser (AbpUsers) to an App{TableName}
- Used Abp Studio, Define a navigation property, see screen shot below.
- Note how the Collection Name field is blank. When this field is selected it only shows a list of App(TableName} tables, none of the Abp tables.
- Questions:
- What to do to show the App tables in the Collection Name field?
- Is this the correct approach or is there a different way of approaching this?
Note: Followed this approach: https://alexbierhaus.medium.com/abp-io-navigation-property-for-identityuser-abpuser-218b15aa711c
Cheers Brad
6 Answer(s)
-
0
Hi @BradAdler,
Collection namesfiled doesn't exist inv5.3.3.I guess you need to type
UsersinCollection namefiled. -
1
@ykalkan hi. Thanks for the suggestions.
Regarding:
- Collection names filed doesn't exist in v5.3.3.: The screen shot clearly shows the Collection Names field in the **Advanced **tab of the Define a navigation property.
- I guess you need to type Users in Collection name filed.: I tried this and Save/Generate failed too.
I have included another screen shot showing how the Collection Names lookup only displays the App{tables} when I expect it to show the Abp{tables}. Note that I have already created a navigation from this table to existing App{tables}, so this navigation to the Identity User is the second navigation.
I did test this using a very simple project and it worked.
- Create a project
- Added a table: TestTable
- Created the navigation to the Users/IdentityUser
- When creating the navigation the Collection Names lookup displayed the Abp{Tables} and was able to select the Users entity.
- Suite generation process succeeded
- This is what the navigation properties shows now.
- Note how the Collection Names field disappeared and the Collection Name=Users, like you suggested
-
0
Hi @BradAdler,
As i understand, you achieved the goal. Thank you fol the detailed explanation, that may be useful for other users.
-
0
@yekalkan hi.No the goal was not achieved. The simple example I tested worked, as described above. The more complex solution that we trying to build did not work per the original post.
-
0
@BradAdler
Could you check the following question? That may help you.
https://support.abp.io/QA/Questions/2954/Unable-To-Define-Many-To-Many-IdentityUser-Relationship
-
0
@yekalkan hi. The question won't work for me as:
- It uses coding when I am trying to work with the ABP suite
- It is a many-to-many relationship and need 1-to-many.
I am going to try and replicate the problem using a simple project much like I did above (see 3 Sep 2022).
