Activities of "ElifKaya"

Hi,

When we use child entity with ISoftDelete, we got an exception on deletion function of repository. But, when we remove implementation of ISoftDelete interface, then we completed deletion successfully. Could you solve about this problem? Because, we have previously opened different questions on this problem. I'am sharing with our question link at the bottom.

https://support.abp.io/QA/Questions/2576/Ef-Core-Abp-Extension-can-not-delete-children-entities-without-deleting-parent-entity

Check the docs before asking a question: https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/latest/ Check the samples to see the basic tasks: https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/latest/samples/index The exact solution to your question may have been answered before, and please first use the search on the homepage. Provide us with the following info:

.* ABP Framework version: v7.3.1

• UI Type: / MVC /
• Database System: EF Core SQL Server,
• Tiered (for MVC) or Auth Server Separated (for Angular): yes
• Exception message and full stack trace:
• Steps to reproduce the issue:.

Hi,

Can you add "overrideExisting" as a Boolean parameters to your CreateAsync method in ABP FileDescriptorAppService ? Actually, we are using ABP FileManagement module in all our separated module solutions. And we have a just one FileManagement database for all. We don't want to override ABP FileManagement module' method. For this reason, Can you support option for us about overrideExisting in FileDescriptorAppService?

Check the docs before asking a question: https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/latest/ Check the samples to see the basic tasks: https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/latest/samples/index The exact solution to your question may have been answered before, and please first use the search on the homepage. Provide us with the following info:

ABP Framework version: v7.3.1

UI Type: / MVC /

Database System: SQL Server,

Tiered (for MVC) or Auth Server Separated (for Angular): yes

Exception message and full stack trace:

Steps to reproduce the issue:

hi

I think the UPPY_UPLOAD_ENDPOINT should be your web host url.

But, Our file management module and endpoints are consumed from AuthServer. We want to use File Service as a different microservice actually. So we put it AuthServer for now, we will to move another microservice in the future.

How can I add a current token to microservice endpoint from js. file?

AuthServer/swagger

access_token

Hi,

I couldn't see access_token in my request. I used file management service from AuthServer. I think I can't send a access_token to file managment service from WEB host. Because, I could upload file from AuthServer/Swagger endpoint. But I couldn't do this operation from web MVC UI with using by same endpoint. How should I send access_token?

hi

Authenticationscheme : openIddict. validation.AspNetcore was not authenticated.

Does your request carry the access_token?

Should I add any other permission? I can upload a new file from AuthServer/Swagger endpoint. But I can not do this operation from web MVC UI with using by same endpoint.

Hi,

We used ABP Data Management Module and we can upload file with authserver swagger endpoints successfully.

When I try to upload with web host request, I got some error. Then, I added web host to cors-origin to authserver appsettings file. But I got a an other error from upload request. It returned successful array but id is broken. How can I request from web host?

Check the docs before asking a question: https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/latest/ Check the samples to see the basic tasks: https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/latest/samples/index The exact solution to your question may have been answered before, and please first use the search on the homepage. Provide us with the following info:

• ABP Framework version: v7.3.1
• UI Type: / MVC /
• Database System: SQL Server,
• Tiered (for MVC) or Auth Server Separated (for Angular): yes
• Exception message and full stack trace:
• Steps to reproduce the issue:

Hi,

Here you can see that this the same endpoint Click Here

Thank you so much, I will try again :)

Hi, Just for your information there is HardDeleteAsync method using which you can permanently delete the entity record from database. can you please check this link https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Repositories

Here EntityDeletedEto is trigger when a delete operation is called, even if it is a soft delete it is an delete operation, if you want your moduser to have soft delete please read more on https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Data-Filtering#isoftdelete

Here is the a snip showing delete triggers Thanks,

Hi,

Thank you for your example. Can you show me your delete api request, please? Because, we use "api/identity/users/{id}" this endpoint from ABP Identity Management. And, it doesn't trigger to EntityDeletedEto.

I mean that, I don't want to hard delete or create another delete api. We just use a ABP Identity Management User Delete Action request. And I will continue to delete action from ABP Identity Management. So, Can you check your (api/identity/users/{id}) endpoint, please? Your user delete endpoint makes a soft delete.

Or, Can you give an example by using your (api/identity/users/{id}) as you did above ?

Thanks,

Hi,

can you please handle EntityDeletedEto<T> is published when an entity of type T was deleted just like you have handled EntityUpdatedEto<T>

Please see the documentation here https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Distributed-Event-Bus#event-types

Hi,

ABP User Delete endpoint (api/identity/users/{id}) makes just a SOFT DELETE (not a Hard Delete). Actually, it is a update operation (not a delete operation). IsDeleted property is marked as a TRUE by ABP when we request to delete user endpoint.

So it is not a delete operation and it is a update operation. We should not use a EntityDeletedEto<T>. We need to IsDeleted property in Volo.Abp.Users.UserEto.

Also I tried using it as you said anyway. But as I said, this api/identity/users/{id} api does a soft delete operation, not a hard delete. Therefore, EntityUpdatedEto<T> should be used, not EntityUpdatedEto<T>. Therefore, I think that the isDeleted field should be added to Volo.Abp.Users.UserEto.