Activities of "raif"

• Exception message and full stack trace: Message:  Volo.Abp.Authorization.AbpAuthorizationException : Exception of type 'Volo.Abp.Authorization.AbpAuthorizationException' was thrown.

Stack Trace:  FeatureCheckerExtensions.CheckEnabledAsync(IFeatureChecker featureChecker, Boolean requiresAll, String[] featureNames) MethodInvocationFeatureCheckerService.CheckAsync(MethodInvocationFeatureCheckerContext context) FeatureInterceptor.CheckFeaturesAsync(IAbpMethodInvocation invocation) FeatureInterceptor.InterceptAsync(IAbpMethodInvocation invocation) CastleAsyncAbpInterceptorAdapter1.InterceptAsync(IInvocation invocation, IInvocationProceedInfo proceedInfo, Func3 proceed) AsyncInterceptorBase.ProceedAsynchronous(IInvocation invocation, IInvocationProceedInfo proceedInfo) CastleAbpMethodInvocationAdapter.ProceedAsync() ValidationInterceptor.InterceptAsync(IAbpMethodInvocation invocation) CastleAsyncAbpInterceptorAdapter1.InterceptAsync(IInvocation invocation, IInvocationProceedInfo proceedInfo, Func3 proceed) AsyncInterceptorBase.ProceedAsynchronous(IInvocation invocation, IInvocationProceedInfo proceedInfo) CastleAbpMethodInvocationAdapter.ProceedAsync() UnitOfWorkInterceptor.InterceptAsync(IAbpMethodInvocation invocation) CastleAsyncAbpInterceptorAdapter1.InterceptAsync(IInvocation invocation, IInvocationProceedInfo proceedInfo, Func3 proceed)

• Steps to reproduce the issue:

Suppose we are trying to create a unit/integration test for a method in an application service layer equipped with a [RequiresFeature] attribute

[RequiresFeature(MyFeatures.MyAwesomeNewFeature)]
public virtual async Task< ItemsDto > GetListOfItemsAsync()
{
	return new ItemsDto
	{
		....
	};
}

Already in the ApplicationTestModule module with the AddAlwaysAllowAuthorization() extension all Permissions are being bypassed. But how can we bypass feature requirement for test purposes ?

public class IMyApplicationTestModule : AbpModule
{
    public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
    {
        context.Services.AddAlwaysAllowAuthorization();
        ....
    }
}

I tried to mock IFeatureChecker like in following example. But it broke all other unit test under MyAppService_Tests

    public class MyAppService_Tests : IMyApplicationTestBase
    {
        private readonly IMyAppService _iMyAppService;
        private readonly MyOptions _myOptions;
        private readonly ISettingProvider _settingProvider;

        private IFeatureChecker _featureChecker;

        public IMyAppService_Tests()
        {
            _iMyAppService = GetRequiredService< IMyAppService >();
            _myOptions = GetRequiredService< IOptions < MyOptions > >().Value;
            _settingProvider = GetRequiredService< ISettingProvider >();
        }

        protected override void AfterAddApplication(IServiceCollection services)
        {
            _featureChecker = Substitute.For< IFeatureChecker >();
            _featureChecker.IsEnabledAsync(MyFeatures.MyAwesomeNewFeature).Returns(Task.FromResult(true));
            services.AddSingleton(_featureChecker);
        }
        

        [Fact]
        public async Task GetListOfItems_Should_Return_IItemsDto()
        {
            // Arrange
            ....
            // Act
            var result = await _iMyAppService.GetListOfItemsAsync();

            // Assert
            result.ShouldNotBeNull();
        }}

This usage going to throw following exeception ex;

Volo.Abp.AbpInitializationException : An error occurred during the initialize Volo.Abp.Modularity.OnApplicationInitializationModuleLifecycleContributor phase of the module MyCompany.MyTag.MyApp.IdentityTestBaseModule, MyCompany.MyTag.MyApp.TestBase, Version=0.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null: The input string '' was not in a correct format.. See the inner exception for details.
---- System.FormatException : The input string '' was not in a correct format.

Hello, after updating the framework to 9.1.0 Unit tests are started to fail in our custom SaaS module due missing service registration.

Beside that how you guys managed to release commercial module with failing unit tests :)

Can you guys able to check and fix module accordingly ?

As a workaround; Base on error message, I temporarily added AbpSettingManagementEntityFrameworkCoreModule to the EntityFrameworkCore layer. This automatically registered missing services.

For the tests; I extended existing CreateDatabaseAndGetConnection() method with new SettingManagementDbContext

    private static SqliteConnection CreateDatabaseAndGetConnection()
    {
        var connection = new SqliteConnection("Data Source=:memory:");
        connection.Open();

        new SaasDbContext(
            new DbContextOptionsBuilder<SaasDbContext>().UseSqlite(connection).Options
        ).GetService<IRelationalDatabaseCreator>().CreateTables();

        new SettingManagementDbContext(
            new DbContextOptionsBuilder<SettingManagementDbContext>().UseSqlite(connection).Options
        ).GetService<IRelationalDatabaseCreator>().CreateTables();

        return connection;
    }

hi

Try this

Hi thx a lot.

hi

error NU1101: Unable to find package Siemens.PSSX.Users.EntityFrameworkCore. N
o packages exist with this id in source(s): ABP Commercial NuGet Source,

How can I restore this package?

Sorry my bad, I forgot this one.. I replaced this one with Volo's Users package and shared it again

hi

Request did not specify a service API version, but multiple candidate actions were found.

Can you share a simple project to reproduce?

liming.ma@volosoft.com

Sent

hi

siemens.pSSX.odms.models.v130.model;

This sample also uses the ajax to get the different results

https://github.com/abpframework/abp-samples/blob/master/Api-Versioning/host/BookStore.WebApp/Pages/Index.cshtml#L9-L35

https://github.com/abpframework/abp-samples/pull/126

As far as I see, my question is not understood clearly,

The examples above are not related to https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/UI/AspNetCore/Data-Tables#ajax-adapter or I cannot make connection

ajax: abp.libs.datatables.createAjax(acme.bookStore.books.book.getList, inputAction, responseCallback)

If there is more than one version of acme.bookStore.books.book.getList, I encounter the following error.

Request did not specify a service API version, but multiple candidate actions were found.

acme.bookStore.books.book.getList('2.0') or similar approach doesn't help here

So what should we do here ?

Check the docs before asking a question: https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/API/API-Versioning https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/7.3/UI/AspNetCore/Data-Tables

Check the samples to see the basic tasks: https://github.com/abpframework/abp-samples/tree/master/Api-Versioning [This example doesn't show how to integrate api versiong with Datatables ]

• ABP Framework version: v7.3.1
• UI Type: MVC /
• Database System: EF Core (SQL Server)
• Tiered (for MVC) or Auth Server Separated (for Angular): ye
• Exception message and full stack trace:
• Request did not specify a service API version, but multiple candidate actions were found. Candidate actions: Siemens.PSSX.Odms.Models.v130.ModelController.GetListAsync (Siemens.PSSX.Odms.HttpApi) Siemens.PSSX.Odms.Models.v131.ModelController.GetListAsync (Siemens.PSSX.Odms.HttpApi)

We have more than one version of one of our APIs. We can easily see the versions through the Swagger interface and working as intended.

JS proxy configuration from .Web project as shown below;

  (function(){

    abp.utils.createNamespace(window, 'siemens.pSSX.odms.models.v130.model');
    
    ... ///
    
    siemens.pSSX.odms.models.v130.model.getList = function(input, ajaxParams) {
      var api_version = api_version ? api_version : '13.0';
      return abp.ajax($.extend(true, {
        url: abp.appPath + 'api/odms/models' + abp.utils.buildQueryString([{ name: 'filterText', value: input.filterText }, { name: 'name', value: input.name }, { name: 'description', value: input.description }, { name: 'serverName', value: input.serverName }, { name: 'cIMVersion', value: input.cIMVersion }, { name: 'creatorId', value: input.creatorId }, { name: 'creationTimeMin', value: input.creationTimeMin }, { name: 'creationTimeMax', value: input.creationTimeMax }, { name: 'lastModifierId', value: input.lastModifierId }, { name: 'lastModificationTimeMin', value: input.lastModificationTimeMin }, { name: 'lastModificationTimeMax', value: input.lastModificationTimeMax }, { name: 'sorting', value: input.sorting }, { name: 'skipCount', value: input.skipCount }, { name: 'maxResultCount', value: input.maxResultCount }, { name: 'api-version', value: input.api_version }]) + '',
        type: 'GET'
      }, ajaxParams));
    };  
 })();
 
  (function(){

    abp.utils.createNamespace(window, 'siemens.pSSX.odms.models.v131.model');

    siemens.pSSX.odms.models.v131.model.getList = function(input, ajaxParams) {
      var api_version = api_version ? api_version : '13.1';
      return abp.ajax($.extend(true, {
        url: abp.appPath + 'api/odms/models' + abp.utils.buildQueryString([{ name: 'filterText', value: input.filterText }, { name: 'name', value: input.name }, { name: 'description', value: input.description }, { name: 'serverName', value: input.serverName }, { name: 'cIMVersion', value: input.cIMVersion }, { name: 'creatorId', value: input.creatorId }, { name: 'creationTimeMin', value: input.creationTimeMin }, { name: 'creationTimeMax', value: input.creationTimeMax }, { name: 'lastModifierId', value: input.lastModifierId }, { name: 'lastModificationTimeMin', value: input.lastModificationTimeMin }, { name: 'lastModificationTimeMax', value: input.lastModificationTimeMax }, { name: 'sorting', value: input.sorting }, { name: 'skipCount', value: input.skipCount }, { name: 'maxResultCount', value: input.maxResultCount }, { name: 'api-version', value: input.api_version }]) + '',
        type: 'GET'
      }, ajaxParams));
    };
 })();

For the sake of simplicity, two different MVC UI were designed for two different API versions.

var l = abp.localization.getResource("Odms");

var modelService = siemens.pSSX.odms.models.v130.model;

var getFilter = function () {
    return {
        filterText: $("#FilterText").val(),
        name: $("#NameFilter").val(),
        description: $("#DescriptionFilter").val(),
        serverName: $("#ServerNameFilter").val(),
        cIMVersion: $("#CIMVersionFilter").val(),
        creatorId: $("#ServerNameFilter").val(),
        creationTimeMin: $("#CreationTimeFilterMin").val(),
        creationTimeMax: $("#CreationTimeFilterMax").val(),
        lastModifierId: $("#ServerNameFilter").val(),
        lastModificationTimeMin: $("#LastModificationTimeFilterMin").val(),
        lastModificationTimeMax: $("#LastModificationTimeFilterMax").val(),
    };
};
    
 var dataTable = $("#ModelsTable").DataTable(abp.libs.datatables.normalizeConfiguration({
     processing: true,
     serverSide: true,
     paging: true,
     searching: false,
     scrollX: true,
     autoWidth: false,
     scrollCollapse: true,
     order: [[1, "asc"]],
     ajax: **abp.libs.datatables.createAjax(modelService.getList, getFilter),**
     columnDefs: [
         {
             ... ///
         }
      ]
    }));

abp.libs.datatables.createAjax(modelService.getList, getFilter),

How can we specify a service API version when creating ajax ?

Log: 2023-09-18 20:21:27.944 +02:00 [INF] Request did not specify a service API version, but multiple candidate actions were found. Candidate actions: Siemens.PSSX.Odms.Models.v130.ModelController.GetListAsync (Siemens.PSSX.Odms.HttpApi) Siemens.PSSX.Odms.Models.v131.ModelController.GetListAsync (Siemens.PSSX.Odms.HttpApi)

Doh, thx

• ABP Framework version: v7.3.2
• UI Type: MVC
• Database System: EF Core SQL Server
• Tiered (for MVC) or Auth Server Separated (for Angular): yes

context.Services.AddAuthentication()
    //.AddAbpOpenIdConnect("myAuthSchema", "myAuth AD", options =>
    .AddOpenIdConnect("myAuthSchema", "myAuth AD", options =>
    {
        options.Authority = configuration["AzureAd:Authority"].EnsureEndsWith('/') + configuration["AzureAd:TenantId"].EnsureEndsWith('/') + "v2.0".TrimEnd('/');
        options.MetadataAddress = configuration["AzureAd:MetadataAddress"].EnsureEndsWith('/') + configuration["AzureAd:TenantId"].EnsureEndsWith('/') + "v2.0".EnsureEndsWith('/') + ".well-known/openid-configuration";
        options.ResponseType = OpenIdConnectResponseType.CodeIdToken;

        options.ClientId = configuration["AzureAd:ClientId"];
        options.ClientSecret = configuration["AzureAd:ClientSecret"];

        options.UsePkce = true;
        options.GetClaimsFromUserInfoEndpoint = true;

        options.TokenValidationParameters = new TokenValidationParameters()
        {
            ValidateIssuer = true,
        };

        options.TokenValidationParameters.ValidIssuers = new[]
        {
            configuration["AzureAd:MetadataAddress"],
            configuration["AzureAd:Authority"]
        };

        options.Scope.Add("openid");
        options.Scope.Add("profile");
        options.Scope.Add("offline_access");
        options.Scope.Add("email");
    });
    .WithDynamicOptions < OpenIdConnectOptions, OpenIdConnectHandler > (
        "myAuthSchema",
        options =>
        {
            options.WithProperty(x => x.ClientId);
            options.WithProperty(x => x.ClientSecret, isSecret: true);
        }
    );

I would like to provide ClientId and ClientSecret values via Account External Provider Settings

/api/account/external-provider endpoint keeps returning only Google, Twitter and Microsoft values

I also tried to extend provider list via AbpExternalProviderOptions but no luck

context.Services.Configure < AbpExternalProviderOptions > (options =>
{
    options.Definitions.Add(new ExternalProviderDefinition()
    {
        Name = "Test",
        Properties = new List < ExternalProviderDefinitionProperty >()
    });
});

What am i missing ?

• ABP Framework version: v7.0.2
• UI type: MVC
• DB provider: EF Core
• Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Separated (Angular): yes

Hello, We can load module classes as plug-ins without adding reference to project. The relevant explanation is https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/PlugIn-Modules located at here.

Where should we define MyPlugInDemoWebModule class in this example?

using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Builder;
using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection;
using Volo.Abp.Modularity.PlugIns;

namespace MyPlugInDemo.Web
{
    public class Startup
    {
        public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
        {
            services.AddApplication<MyPlugInDemoWebModule>(options =>
            {
                options.PlugInSources.AddFolder(@"D:\Temp\MyPlugIns");
            });
        }

        public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app)
        {
            app.InitializeApplication();
        }
    }
}

This sample code does not seem updated.

Can we replace ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services) part with

public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
{

}

and Configure(IApplicationBuilder app) part with

public override void OnApplicationInitialization(ApplicationInitializationContext context)
{
    var app = context.GetApplicationBuilder();
    
    app.InitializeApplication();    
}

More importantly, Can you share an example where we consume a service in a project that we did add as reference

For example, I want to call MyService : IMyService, ITransientDependency that we created in the plug-in