It seems when using the Angular UI and creating Navigation properties, ABP Suite tries to invent the type "Guid" in Angular/Typescript even though that does not exist (at least not by default). If you change it to string it will work both development time and run time it seems.
Is any action being taken on this? It seems like we rarely get feedback on bugs etc reported in this thread compared with when creating new ones, but then general threads like this seems kind of pointless. Thanks.
Hello,
Which version does your app use? Also on which page did you test this? When I test it on the Tenants page, I get a result like below:
Using latest version of ABP Suite to generate Angular components/pages and they all have this problem still.
BTW, the name of this thread should probably change now in 2025.
In ABP Suite when creating properties for Entities, it would be nice if you besides "Name" could enter an optional "UI name" or something like that, that would be used in the generated UI instead of Name.
For example, if you create a property "HomepageUrl" for a Company entity, you would probably want that to show up as "Homepage:" rather than "HomepageUrl:" in UI.
We do not typically close tickets unless they are fully resolved or inactive for some time. We understand the issue you are facing and are actively working on a fix to prevent this from happening again. Thanks for your patience.
The problem seems to be an overzealous bot with really poor patience that decides to close even unresolved ticket way too early.
When adding the Public website option, the run-docker.ps1 does not seem to work
! coin-web-public Warning manifest for improwise/coin-web-public:latest not found: manifest unknown: manifest unknown
[coin-web-public 2/3] COPY bin/Release/net9.0/publish/ app/:
failed to solve: failed to compute cache key: failed to calculate checksum of ref redacted::redacted: "/bin/Release/net9.0/publish": not found
Please fix the problem that tickets get closed even though you just reopened them
Thanks you for a quick response to this and also the created ticket on GitHub. And yes, I fully understand that keeping docs updated is somewhat of a PIA.
Since we seem to agree about the need for this, I guess this ticket should be refunded :)
Sure. I have refunded your ticket :)
Thanks.
Please do not share our account specific info here even though it isn't exactly sensitive information :)
Removed 👍
Thanks!
Thanks you for a quick response to this and also the created ticket on GitHub. And yes, I fully understand that keeping docs updated is somewhat of a PIA.
Since we seem to agree about the need for this, I guess this ticket should be refunded :)
Sure. I have refunded your ticket :)
Thanks.
Please do not share our account specific info here even though it isn't exactly sensitive information :)
