Activities of "viswajwalith"

Hi,

Thanks for the inputs, it got succussed partially when I executed Step 1: proxies got generated only for Sample Controller

There are two API definitions only uppercase and lowercase letters differ,

You can try -m UserTaskService

Also We would like to understand why dynamic proxies are not working

You have to reference the UserTaskService.HttpApi project and add module dependency to AppV3WebModule if you want to use dynamic proxies.

Using dynamic proxies will make things easier, you don't have to generate static proxy files and can remove those files.

After couple of redoing from starting of creation of service, Now we are able to get the Proxies generated with dynamic proxies only and now js proxies are available

and from webgateway the method is being called successfully as well

but now getting some different error When we are trying to call the methods using AppService (IMasterDataObjectsAppService)

getting the below error

error log is below

2023-04-24 08:31:08.942 +05:30 [INF] Executed page /MasterDataObjects/Index in 23651.965ms 2023-04-24 08:31:08.942 +05:30 [INF] Executed endpoint '/MasterDataObjects/Index' 2023-04-24 08:31:08.946 +05:30 [ERR] An unhandled exception has occurred while executing the request. Volo.Abp.AbpException: Could not found remote action for method: System.Threading.Tasks.Task1[Volo.Abp.Application.Dtos.PagedResultDto1[XXX.XX.XX.UserTaskService.MasterDataObjects.MasterDataObjectDto]] GetListAsync(XXX.XX.XX.UserTaskService.MasterDataObjects.GetMasterDataObjectsInput) on the URL: https://localhost:44325 at Volo.Abp.Http.Client.DynamicProxying.ApiDescriptionFinder.FindActionAsync(HttpClient client, String baseUrl, Type serviceType, MethodInfo method) at Volo.Abp.Http.Client.DynamicProxying.DynamicHttpProxyInterceptor1.GetActionApiDescriptionModel(IAbpMethodInvocation invocation) at Volo.Abp.Http.Client.DynamicProxying.DynamicHttpProxyInterceptor1.InterceptAsync(IAbpMethodInvocation invocation) at Volo.Abp.Castle.DynamicProxy.CastleAsyncAbpInterceptorAdapter1.InterceptAsync[TResult](IInvocation invocation, IInvocationProceedInfo proceedInfo, Func3 proceed) at Castle.DynamicProxy.AsyncInterceptorBase.ProceedAsynchronous[TResult](IInvocation invocation, IInvocationProceedInfo proceedInfo) at Volo.Abp.Castle.DynamicProxy.CastleAbpMethodInvocationAdapterWithReturnValue1.ProceedAsync() at Volo.Abp.Validation.ValidationInterceptor.InterceptAsync(IAbpMethodInvocation invocation) at Volo.Abp.Castle.DynamicProxy.CastleAsyncAbpInterceptorAdapter1.InterceptAsync[TResult](IInvocation invocation, IInvocationProceedInfo proceedInfo, Func`3 proceed) at XXX.XX.XX.UserTaskService.Web.Pages.MasterDataObjects.IndexModel.OnGetAsync() in C:\Official\EHSWatchV3\repo\EHSWatch_AppV3Upgrade\services\userTask\src\XXX.XX.XX.UserTaskService.Web\Pages\MasterDataObjectsUT\Index.cshtml.cs:line 30 at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.RazorPages.Infrastructure.ExecutorFactory.NonGenericTaskHandlerMethod.Execute(Object receiver, Object[] arguments) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.RazorPages.Infrastructure.PageActionInvoker.InvokeHandlerMethodAsync() at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.RazorPages.Infrastructure.PageActionInvoker.InvokeNextPageFilterAsync() at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.RazorPages.Infrastructure.PageActionInvoker.Rethrow(PageHandlerExecutedContext context) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.RazorPages.Infrastructure.PageActionInvoker.Next(State& next, Scope& scope, Object& state, Boolean& isCompleted) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.RazorPages.Infrastructure.PageActionInvoker.InvokeInnerFilterAsync() at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ResourceInvoker.

Thanks for the inputs, If we understand correctly we can have different versions of solutions if we move all web pages into web and remove all depended projects (web) from main UI layer. in this case we need to remove reference to contract layer as well? You mention We support this feature after 7.0.0, (It also requires that the service version is 7.0.0.) means this kind of approach will work only after having our entire project running on 7.0 and for future upgraded we can follow this way? please elaborate

  • You need to upgrade your project to at least 7.0.0.
  • Then delete all references to the services in the web app
  • Generate static proxy for web app, it will generate all required files, interfaces, DTO, etc.

Hummm, In simple words at least for this time we need to upgrade all our projects with minimum of ABP 7.0.0 and may be in next upgrades we can decide to upgrade all projects to latest ABP version or just upgrade the specific projects by choice

and what do u mean by "Generate static proxy for web app, it will generate all required files, interfaces, DTO, etc." means we need to generate static proxies for the Web Layer only right. no need to do the same for all micro service projects right.

abp generate-proxy -m userTaskService -t csharp -url https://localhost:44377 --without-contracts

Thanks for the inputs, it got succussed partially when I executed Step 1: proxies got generated only for Sample Controller

files generated with the step 1 command.

Proxies got generated but only with Sample Controller method

I tried by running

abp generate-proxy -m userTaskService -t csharp -url https://localhost:44377

without the parameter --without-contracts but no luck.

Also We would like to understand why dynamic proxies are not working

Hi,

Please email me when you have time,

BTW, You can also share a project that can reproduce the problem with me shiwei.liang@volosoft.com, I will check it out.

I shared the project files to your email shiwei.liang@volosoft.com , Please have a look and let us know if u face any issues in downloading the file

Hi,

It's possible, but your web project should be completely independent and not refer to any service project.

  • Move all web pages of services to the web app.
  • Remove all service dependencies
  • Generate static proxy for the web app: https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/CLI#options-6

Generate static proxy for the web app: https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/CLI#options-6

We support this feature after 7.0.0, (It also requires that the service version is 7.0.0.) :https://github.com/abpframework/abp/issues/13613 But you can check changes of PR: https://github.com/abpframework/abp/pull/14429/files to customize your project

Thanks for the inputs, If we understand correctly we can have different versions of solutions if we move all web pages into web and remove all depended projects (web) from main UI layer. in this case we need to remove reference to contract layer as well?

You mention We support this feature after 7.0.0, (It also requires that the service version is 7.0.0.) means this kind of approach will work only after having our entire project running on 7.0 and for future upgraded we can follow this way? please elaborate

  • ABP Framework version: v5.1.3
  • UI type: MVC
  • DB provider: EF Core / MongoDB
  • Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Separated (Angular): yes
  • Exception message and stack trace:
  • Steps to reproduce the issue:"

We have a Micro Service Solution (UI, Auth and Services) up and running in ABP 5.1.3, Now we would like to upgrade to ABP 7.1.1.

Ideally we want only the UI layers upgraded to 7.1.1 and Services should run on older versions of ABP (assuming the Restful service can run on any technology or framework), but we had to reference some projects of Individual micro services (.Web.csproj and HttpApi.Client.csproj) in the UI layer(https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/latest/startup-templates/microservice/add-microservice?_ga=2.92313949.1337259771.1681837669-324005759.1662462224#updating-administration-microservice) so we had to upgrade all other Micro Services to ABP 7.1.1 in order to do so, I feel this breaking the micro service based architecture or we mis managed this.

In Nutshell we want only Web Layers should be upgraded to ABP 7.1.1 and want other Micro Services will continue with ABP 5.1.3. Do you think it is possible? As of now we have created a Micro services with UI and referenced the same in Main UI layer, now do you think the Micro Services need to be created without UI to full fill the above requirement?

Please advise with best possible way to update to ABP 7.1.1 without touching the other Micro Services…

shiwei.liang@volosoft.com

Yes we modified the web module as well. You want to connect over Microsoft teams ? or u can send the invite to viswajwalith@exceego.com

Hi,

Well, the client proxy you see is actually I think it should be dynamic client proxy.

See: https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/latest/startup-templates/microservice/add-microservice#updating-administration-microservice

Did you add the module dependency to AdministrationServiceHttpApiHostModule?

Yes we followed all the steps to add the micro service and changes in AdministrationServiceHttpApiHostModule is as follows

abp generate-proxy -t js -m userTaskService -url HttpApi.Host'URL

Finally we are able to see some progress (not 100%) able to run the generate proxy

but still not able to see the the new service related proxies in the main solution(base problem)

still missing in definitions as well

Hi,

I think it should work if you use it to generate client proxy files.

I am also not sure tried many ways, what do u suggest now?

Showing 121 to 130 of 367 entries
Boost Your Development
ABP Live Training
Packages
See Trainings
Mastering ABP Framework Book
The Official Guide
Mastering
ABP Framework
Learn More
Mastering ABP Framework Book
Made with ❤️ on ABP v10.1.0-preview. Updated on December 17, 2025, 07:08
1
ABP Assistant
🔐 You need to be logged in to use the chatbot. Please log in first.