Now you're just responding with nonsense. Not even going to try to understand what you're saying now.
I'm sorry Maliming, but the code I gave you access to on Git yesterday was the same code you you commented back on today. I don't buy your excuse regarding this. You told me two different answers in a matter of 90 minutes while you were looking at the latest code that you had access to and that was only because I pressed on understanding the details. Please don't blame this on me.
Come on Maliming!!! Now you're saying something completely different then what you originally did!!! Do you understand why I'm just so frustrated with your responses. I ask you specific questions so I can understand why the ABP framework works the way it does and you ignore the question the first 2 times and then when you finally respond to the specific question you say something completely different regarding the root cause of my issue. I would not have asked my question 3 times had you just told me what the core issue was to begin with!
Look back on your responses!!!! First you tell me it's because I didn't implement the IMultiTenant interface for an entity that isn't even used on the Company Management screen now you tell me it has nothing to do with IMultiTenant?
Not really happy with the support we get from ABP!!
Hi,
Can you please give me the details of this? I spend 3 weeks trying to resolve this issue where as when my code was based on ABP7 it all worked. Now with ABP9 I encountered this issue. You explained the cause of the issue was an entity (not implementing the IMultiTenant interface) that isn't even used on the Company Management screen. So for a 3rd time I am asking you to please provide me with more detail in why this was occurring
Hi,
But you didn't answer my question
"Ok, what you are showing me looks correct....however what I'm not understanding is the UserPermissionView entity that you mentioned isn't even used on the Company Management screen so why would that affect the current tenant not being accessible? My initial problem started when I couldn't see the companies because the current tenant was not set and the datafilter thus didn't get applied for the query behind this page.
Why would an entity not implanting the IMultiTenant interface even be relevant on a page that doesn't use it?"
Ok, what you are showing me looks correct....however what I'm not understanding is the UserPermissionView entity that you mentioned isn't even used on the Company Management screen so why would that affect the current tenant not being accessible? My initial problem started when I couldn't see the companies because the current tenant was not set and the datafilter thus didn't get applied for the query behind this page.
Why would an entity not implanting the IMultiTenant interface even be relevant on a page that doesn't use it?
Companies should have gotten created when you created the new tenant. I'm in the process of building on my side so I can see.....it takes a while though.
Hi,
I'm a little confused. Your commit was only 1 file and had nothing to do with the entity you spoke about. Did you try going to the 'companies' nav item? Do 2 companies show on the Company Management page if you do?
Hi,
Can you commit your changes to github for me please so I can take a look?
Hi,
Thank you for looking into this. No, we don't currently have a site deployed where this issue exists. We are in the process of migrating our code from abp7 to abp9 and now are experiencing this issue.