Hi,
You are right; ABP should have full support for docker; we'll discuss it internally and get back to you
Thanks for responding.
This should for now mean that if you want Docker support, you would have to use the old CLI (or rather the startup templates for that but they seem to be tied together)?
Maybe just trying to actually open the suggested file in something like Notepad could provided some clues on what it is?
Have never seen it myself but thinking perhaps its something trying to render a HTML page or similar with no default browser selected but that is just a guess.
Hi all, it seems like ya are not read my comment well, I'll migrate to 51 but if you guys read the migration guid react expo recommend to update version incrementally. I'll migrate today to 51
https://reactnative.dev/docs/upgrading#expo-projects
Thanks, Masum
Thanks for the clarification.
And it will be TypeScript as well then going forward?
OK, so I decided to uninstall the new CLI and instead install the "old" CLI and use that to create a new similar solution. And to my surprise, that still contained what appears to be full docker support, including Docker Compose and the necessary scripts to build images etc.
With ABP Studio still being in beta (which seem to be true beta in this case with the bugs to go along with it), this really creates some confusion as to what solution to actually use when you want to build something for real production with ABP (not just with regards to Docker).
ABP really need to comment on this...
Hi, do you have web.config in your angular prod folder ? If yes can you please add a custom rule for getEnvConfig endpoint like below
<system.webServer> <rewrite> <rules> <rule name="Redirect" stopProcessing="true"> <match url="getEnvConfig" /> <action type="Redirect" url="dynamic-env.json" /> </rule> </rules> </rewrite> </system.webServer>
Why would there be a web.config in an Angular application?
Can confirm we are also seeing this problem but it seems like the source of it has been identified.
Still waiting for a reply here. Thanks.
have you checked the expo doc ? they said they have removed the support for 49 and 50 , they are only supporting sdk 51 on playstore, I manually tried to migrate all your existing code to 51 , since 49 is js
and 51 is typescript, its a significant rewrite.after converting your existing 180+ files manually to typscript , i got issue in inspecting the elements and localisation library
sdk 49 used ii18 js while i am trying to integrate i 118 next its not working ..
just have a look , I have also attached screenshot about expo dropped sdk 49 and 5o , in the starting of the conversation.
Agreed, SDK 51 and TypeScript should be the only option going forward with this, I see no value in "upgrading" to the out of support SDK 50 with only Javascript support.
Migrate react native to latest expo version with type script compatibility
Totally agree with this. I almost get the feeling that the React Native mobile project has been dropped in ABP in favor of MAUI, which would have been a logical decision if Microsoft ever got MAUI to be a serious alternative. Current state of MAUI is of course not ABPs fault but it leaves us in a situation where there really isn't a viable mobile option in ABP besides creating your own
It used to be that at least ABP Commercial came with full (or at least good) support for Docker, including multi stage Dockerfiles with support for Docker Compose etc. But this does not seem to be the case anymore, the included Dockerfiles are very minimal and isn't even recognized by Visual Studio as Dockerfiles it seems. They also does not seem to work so you can publish to Docker Hub etc. (as Visual Studio claim there is no Dockerfile)
Even finding Docker in the current documentation is hard, we've only been able to find it mentioned in the 8.1 documentation and that seems to be outdated now, for example the build-images-locally.ps1 mentioned there does not seem to exist anymore
https://abp.io/docs/commercial/8.1/startup-templates/application/deployment-docker-compose?UI=BlazorServer&DB=EF&Tiered=Yes
Have tried to find information about this change including updated documentation for the changes that have been made but not found it so:
You can of course build your own Dockerfiles from scratch etc. but my questions here is about what support you get out of the box for Docker in ABP.
Also created an issue on GitHub for this, but the answers might be different between the free and the commercial version of ABP.
https://github.com/abpframework/abp/issues/21057
Thanks.
