Activities of "AI-Bot"

  • In ABP Studio, the “Include test projects” option exists only in the New Solution wizard. There isn’t a supported “add test projects to an existing solution” wizard/button afterward.
  • The recommended way to add tests to an existing modular monolith solution is to create the test projects manually (or scaffold a throwaway solution with tests enabled and copy the test projects into your solution).

What to do (practical approach)

  1. Create new test projects in your existing solution (same naming convention ABP uses):

    • YourCompany.YourProject.TestBase
    • YourCompany.YourProject.Domain.Tests
    • YourCompany.YourProject.Application.Tests
    • YourCompany.YourProject.EntityFrameworkCore.Tests (or MongoDB.Tests if applicable)
    • YourCompany.YourProject.Web.Tests (if you have a Web UI / host to integration-test)
  2. Reference the right layers (typical pattern)

    • *.Domain.Tests references:
      • *.Domain
      • *.TestBase
    • *.Application.Tests references:
      • *.Application
      • *.TestBase
    • *.EntityFrameworkCore.Tests references:
      • *.EntityFrameworkCore
      • *.Application.Tests (so it can “implement” abstract tests against a real EF Core provider)
    • *.Web.Tests references:
      • *.Web (or your host/UI project)
      • *.Application.Tests
      • *.EntityFrameworkCore.Tests
  3. Follow ABP’s current recommended test structure

    • ABP’s newer approach is to keep many tests in Domain.Tests / Application.Tests as abstract base tests, then create concrete implementations in EntityFrameworkCore.Tests (or MongoDB.Tests) so tests are less coupled to the DB provider.

References (verified)

  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/testing/unit-tests
  • https://abp.io/community/articles/4vvvp2oy

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

Please contact us at https://abp.io/contact


This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • The ID2083 error means OpenIddict is seeing the incoming request as HTTP, not HTTPS. In a Docker + reverse-proxy setup (TLS terminated at the proxy), this typically happens when the proxy doesn’t forward X-Forwarded-Proto: https (or ASP.NET Core is not allowed to trust/process it early enough).

  • Apply the OpenIddict behind load balancer configuration exactly (note: UseForwardedHeaders() must run before the rest of the pipeline that relies on scheme/host):

// In your IdpModule (or HttpApiHost module where OpenIddict runs)

public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
{
    Configure<ForwardedHeadersOptions>(options =>
    {
        options.ForwardedHeaders =
            ForwardedHeaders.XForwardedFor |
            ForwardedHeaders.XForwardedProto;
    });
}

public override void OnApplicationInitialization(ApplicationInitializationContext context)
{
    var app = context.GetApplicationBuilder();
    var env = context.GetEnvironment();

    if (env.IsDevelopment())
    {
        app.UseDeveloperExceptionPage();
    }

    // Must be early
    app.UseForwardedHeaders();

    // If your proxy cannot forward headers correctly, force https scheme:
    // (put this BEFORE OpenIddict endpoints are hit)
    // app.Use((httpContext, next) =>
    // {
    //     httpContext.Request.Scheme = "https";
    //     return next();
    // });

    // ...rest of pipeline
}
  • Reverse proxy requirement: ensure your proxy forwards at least:
    • X-Forwarded-Proto: https
    • X-Forwarded-For: <client-ip>
    • and usually Host

Once the app correctly sees the request scheme as https, /.well-known/openid-configuration will stop returning invalid_request / ID2083.

Links (validated):

  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/deployment/forwarded-headers
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/solution-templates/layered-web-application/deployment/openiddict-deployment

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • I can’t confirm (from any verified ABP 10.7 / LeptonX 5.7 source) that ABP officially supports keeping bootstrap-datepicker@1.10.1, timeago@1.6.7, and jquery-validation-unobtrusive@4.0.0 unchanged while moving the MVC bundle baseline to jQuery 4, despite those packages declaring <4 ranges.
    In the verified materials available to me, there is no explicit engineer statement / doc that says “these range mismatches are expected and supported” for ABP 10.7 + LeptonX 5.7.

  • What can be stated definitively and consistently (based on your observed runtime behavior and ABP’s own declared dependency direction):

    1. You must remove the jQuery 3.x resolution (or otherwise stop forcing jQuery 3.x) if the dependency graph brings jquery-migrate@4.x, because migrate 4 requires jQuery 4 (your runtime error is the expected outcome of the mismatch).
    2. If ABP 10.7’s NPM packages you consume truly pull in the listed plugins with <4 ranges while also pulling jQuery 4, then that is an upstream dependency inconsistency that needs an official fix or an official override recommendation from ABP/LeptonX engineering—and I cannot provide that fix/override from verified sources.
  • Because you asked for an “engineer confirmation” / “exact supported package versions or official override”: I don’t have a verified ABP source that provides that confirmation or the override matrix for ABP 10.7 / LeptonX 5.7.0. Therefore I can’t assert supportability of those mismatched ranges.

  • Practical next step (still self-contained, but noting the limitation above):
    If you want a supported answer (not a workaround), this needs to be handled as an ABP support ticket / issue with your yarn.lock (or pnpm-lock.yaml) and the exact dependency tree output showing how those packages are being pulled under @volo/account@10.7.0 + @volo/abp.aspnetcore.mvc.ui.theme.leptonx@5.7.0. ABP can then either:

    • adjust the ABP-managed wrapper packages (@abp/*) to versions whose peer ranges match jQuery 4, or
    • publish an official override guidance for ABP 10.7.

Sources (validated)

  • https://abp.io/docs/10.7/release-info/migration-guides/abp-10-7
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/ui-themes/lepton-x/
  • https://abp.io/support/questions/5591

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • Remove the old Yarn resolution and move to jQuery 4.x (with jquery-migrate 4.x) for an ABP 10.7 / LeptonX 5.7 MVC host.

    • Your current state (jQuery 3.7.1 + jquery-migrate 4.0.2) is internally inconsistent and the runtime error you see is expected: jquery-migrate 4.x requires jQuery 4.x (“JQMIGRATE: jQuery 4.x REQUIRED”).
    • Also, @abp/jquery 10.7.0 declaring ~4.0.0 is ABP’s own signal that the supported baseline for ABP 10.7 MVC bundles is aligned with jQuery 4 (not jQuery 3).
  • Do not try to “force” ABP 10.7’s MVC bundle to stay on jQuery 3.7.1 by pinning/resolutions while keeping ABP 10.7 packages:

    • That creates exactly the kind of incompatible graph you’ve hit (jQuery 3 + migrate 4).
    • If you absolutely must stay on jQuery 3.7.1, the only technically consistent route would be to also keep jquery-migrate 3.x (not 4.x) and ensure all other jQuery plugins are compatible with jQuery 3. However, I could not find a verified ABP 10.7 document/support entry that blesses a “temporary supported configuration” for jQuery 3.x on ABP 10.7 (so this would be an unsupported customization from an ABP supportability standpoint).
  • About the “older bundled plugins” with jQuery <4 ranges (bootstrap-datepicker, timeago, etc.)

    • I do not have a verified ABP 10.7 / LeptonX 5.7 source that states “ABP supports plugin X version Y with jQuery 4” or provides an official replacement matrix for those specific third-party plugins.
    • Therefore, the only definitive ABP-side recommendation I can give (based on verified signals) is: follow ABP’s own dependency direction (jQuery 4 for ABP 10.7 MVC) and then align/upgrade/replace any extra third-party jQuery plugins in your solution that can’t run on jQuery 4.
  • Recommended “supported” configuration for ABP 10.7 / LeptonX 5.7 (MVC host)

    1. Remove any Yarn resolutions/pins that force jQuery 3.7.1.
    2. Restore packages so that @abp/jquery can bring in the intended jQuery ~4.0.0 baseline.
    3. Keep jquery-migrate 4.x together with jQuery 4.x (that’s the compatible pair).
    4. For any additional legacy jQuery plugins you added historically (datepicker/timeago/etc.), upgrade or replace them as needed so they work with jQuery 4.x (this part is application-specific; ABP does not publish a verified per-plugin matrix in the material I could retrieve).
  • Browser flows to exercise (qualification checklist)

    • ABP does not publish (in the sources I could retrieve) an “official MVC/LeptonX jQuery 4 test plan”. Practically, for LeptonX MVC apps, you should at least exercise:
      • Authentication pages (login/logout)
      • Main layout load (side menu/top menu), theme switching (if enabled)
      • Standard CRUD pages generated by ABP (datatables/grids, modals, validation)
      • Any pages using your legacy plugins (datepicker/timeago/etc.), because those are the most likely breakpoints when moving to jQuery 4

References (validated)

  • https://abp.io/docs/10.7/release-info/migration-guides/abp-10-7
  • https://abp.io/support/questions/5591

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • Since removing Azure Service Bus configuration removes the hang, the blocker is inside ABP’s Azure distributed event bus initialization, which is executed during app.InitializeApplicationAsync() (i.e., before Kestrel starts listening).
  • ABP does not document an official “start the Azure Service Bus consumer after the web host is listening” switch for 10.x, and I can’t verify a 10.0.1-specific regression/fix from available sources. What is verifiable is that ABP’s Azure integration is enabled by adding Volo.Abp.EventBus.Azure / AbpEventBusAzureModule, and that microservice startup can be sensitive to infrastructure availability.

Solution

  1. Ensure Kubernetes, not your app, is responsible for retrying cold starts

    • Remove the “force-exit after 120s” workaround (or increase it substantially), and instead rely on Kubernetes startupProbe to allow long cold starts.
    • If you must keep an upper bound, make it higher than worst-case Service Bus first-connection time (DNS/TLS/RBAC can be slow on first pod).
  2. Fail-fast the Azure Service Bus connectivity at startup (so you get an error instead of a silent hang)

    • Add an explicit “connectivity check” before InitializeApplicationAsync() and log exceptions. Example pattern:
      • Create a ServiceBusAdministrationClient and call a lightweight operation (e.g., get topic/subscription properties) with your own cancellation/timeout.
      • If it times out/fails, throw so the container restarts quickly and you get a visible failure reason in logs.
    • This doesn’t “defer consumer start”, but it converts “hang” into “fast crash with logs”, which is typically what you want in Kubernetes.
  3. Add ABP module lifecycle logging around Azure event bus module

    • Keep the IModuleLifecycleContributor approach you already started and log start/end timestamps for each module initialization step. This is the most direct way to prove exactly where it blocks (and whether it’s always the Azure event bus module).
  4. Validate Azure Service Bus prerequisites that commonly cause long waits Even when entities exist, first-start hangs are often caused by infra-level issues that don’t immediately throw:

    • DNS resolution delays inside the cluster (first-time egress / private DNS zone / CoreDNS under load).
    • Network policy / firewall / outbound SNAT exhaustion.
    • RBAC/managed identity delays if you’re using AAD (even if connection string-based, check KeyVault/secret injection timing).
    • Service Bus throttling / transient failures (client retries can stretch startup).

Sources (validated)

  • https://abp.io/docs/10.6/framework/infrastructure/event-bus/distributed/azure
  • https://abp.io/docs/10.5/framework/infrastructure/event-bus/distributed/azure
  • https://abp.io/docs/10.4/framework/infrastructure/event-bus/distributed/azure
  • https://abp.io/docs/10.7/solution-templates/microservice/database-configurations

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • InitializeApplicationAsync() runs ABP’s module lifecycle (OnPreApplicationInitialization / OnApplicationInitialization / OnPostApplicationInitialization) before Kestrel starts listening. So any module that does I/O (DB/network) during these phases can block the process from becoming “ready”.
  • In ABP microservice solutions, cold-start startup dependency failures / delays are considered expected in distributed systems, and the template explicitly relies on orchestrators (ABP Studio runner / Kubernetes) to restart services until dependencies are ready. This is documented as “Rapid Failures on System Startup” (even though your symptom is a hang, the underlying principle is the same: startup can be blocked by external dependencies).
  • I could not verify (from available indexed sources/tools) a specific ABP 10.0.1 regression/bug in Volo.Abp.EventBus.Azure that would explain a ~120s hang only on first start, nor a documented/official way to “defer Azure Event Bus consumer start until after listening” for 10.0.x. So I can’t definitively confirm (1), (2), or (3) as written.

Practical guidance that is consistent with ABP’s documented microservice startup approach (and matches your observed “second start succeeds” pattern):

  1. Treat the first-start dependency wait as normal and let Kubernetes handle it

    • Increase startupProbe / readinessProbe / livenessProbe grace periods so the pod isn’t killed by your own 120s deadline while ABP is still initializing.
    • Remove/relax the custom “startup deadline forced exit” if possible; otherwise make it long enough to cover worst-case cold-start dependency waits.
    • Rationale: ABP’s microservice template expects services can fail/restart until their dependencies (DBs, other services) are available.
  2. Focus diagnostics on “which module is blocking initialization”

    • Since the hang is inside InitializeApplicationAsync(), instrumenting module lifecycle (as you started doing with an IModuleLifecycleContributor logger) is the correct direction.
    • If the module lifecycle logger identifies the last module before the hang as the Azure Service Bus event bus module (or a module that starts background workers / inbox-outbox processors), you’ll have a concrete component to isolate further (e.g., temporarily remove that module dependency and confirm startup time returns to normal).
  3. Most likely blocking categories during ABP initialization (generic, but common in microservices)

    • Database connectivity / first query under load (connection pool warm-up, DNS, firewall, SQL availability).
    • Distributed event bus connect/subscription initialization (network to Azure Service Bus, DNS, TLS, RBAC, throttling).
    • Any startup logic you added in your own modules’ OnApplicationInitialization / OnPostApplicationInitialization (including “check migrations”, seed data, etc.).
  4. Upgrade guidance

    • I can’t claim a verified “fixed in 10.0.2/10.0.3” for Azure Event Bus startup blocking based on the currently retrievable sources/tools.
    • Still, upgrading to the latest available patch in your major/minor line is generally advisable; however, I can’t provide a verified ABP source stating it resolves this exact symptom.

Sources (validated):

  • https://abp.io/docs/10.2/solution-templates/microservice/database-configurations
  • https://abp.io/docs/10.6/solution-templates/microservice/database-configurations
  • https://abp.io/docs/10.7/solution-templates/microservice/database-configurations

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • Yes — with “Prevent concurrent login = Logout from all devices”, the expected behavior is:

    1. User logs in on Browser A (session A is created).
    2. Same user logs in on Browser B (session B is created).
    3. ABP logs out the other sessions (session A), keeping only the newest one active.
    4. When you try to use Browser A again (call an API / navigate), it should be treated as signed out and typically you end up back on the login page.

So you can log in in a different browser, but the older browser session should be kicked out. That “falls back to login screen” you see on the older session is exactly what this setting is for.

  • If you mean: “Browser B login attempt immediately fails and you can’t complete login at all”, then that would not match “Logout from all devices”; that would be closer to a “block new login” behavior. But from what you shared (sessions table now updating and the UI going back to login), it looks like ABP is doing the correct “kick old session” behavior.

  • Also note (as already mentioned in the thread): saving the setting does not retroactively delete/affect existing sessions. It is applied when a new session is created (next login), which is why you only started seeing updates after re-saving and re-logging in.

(Verified behavior description is documented here:)

  • https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/8.2/modules/identity/session-management

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • In ABP 10.0.2, the “Prevent concurrent login = Logout from all devices” behavior does not continuously delete rows from AbpSessions. What it does is: when a new session is created, ABP marks the previous sessions as signed-out/invalid so they can no longer be used. Old rows can remain for history/auditing; that’s expected.

  • If your AbpSessions rows are not getting updated (e.g., SignedIn not changing / old sessions still usable), then in practice the usual root cause is: the Identity Session validation is not being executed on requests, so old sessions never get invalidated/checked.

What to do (ABP 10.0.2)

  1. Make sure Dynamic Claims middleware is enabled and ordered correctly In AuthServer and HttpApi.Host, ensure the pipeline includes Dynamic Claims and ordering is:
app.UseAuthentication();
app.UseAbpDynamicClaims();   // must be between Authentication and Authorization
app.UseAuthorization();

Also ensure Dynamic Claims is enabled (your screenshot suggests it is, but the middleware must also run).

  1. Verify session invalidation by behavior, not by “row count” Reproduce with the same user/tenant in two browsers:

    • Browser A logs in.
    • Browser B logs in (same user).
    • Now in Browser A, call any authorized API. Expected: Browser A should get 401 (session expired / invalid token) after Browser B login, depending on the setting.
  2. If you use /connect/token flows heavily (Angular, separated AuthServer) There is a known class of issues where the session row may not be committed/visible immediately when the token response is returned, which can break session checks on immediate next requests in some setups. Newer ABP versions include fixes for /connect commit timing; on 10.0.2, upgrading is the definitive fix path if you hit this.

  3. Enable debug logs to confirm what is happening Turn on debug logs on AuthServer and HttpApi.Host, reproduce the 2-logins + API call scenario, and check for logs from the session checker/dynamic claims pipeline (this will confirm whether session validation is running at all).

(Guide)

  • https://abp.io/support/questions/8622/How-to-enable-Debug-logs-for-troubleshoot-problems

References

  • https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/8.2/modules/identity/session-management
  • https://abp.io/docs/10.2/release-info/migration-guides/abp-8-2

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • On Apple Silicon (M4/arm64), the most common reason an ABP API container crashes right after run-docker.ps1 is that the image was built for linux/amd64 but Docker is trying to run it as linux/arm64 (or the opposite). In that case the container typically fails immediately with an “exec format” / wrong-architecture type of startup error.

  • Fix: force the API (and DbMigrator) images to build for arm64, or run them explicitly as amd64 with emulation. Pick one approach and apply it consistently to all your .NET containers.

Option A (recommended on M4): build arm64 images

  1. Rebuild images for arm64 (use buildx):
docker buildx create --use --name abp
   docker buildx inspect --bootstrap
  1. Update your build script (or run manual builds) to include:

    • --platform linux/arm64

    Example manual build:

docker buildx build --platform linux/arm64 -f Dockerfile.local -t nicma/idp-api:latest .
  1. Then re-run run-docker.ps1.

Option B: run amd64 images under emulation

If you must use amd64 images, set the platform in docker-compose.yml for each .NET service:

services:
  idp-api-container:
    platform: linux/amd64
  db-migrator:
    platform: linux/amd64

Then run again.

Notes for ABP’s provided scripts

  • ABP’s docs recommend using:
    • etc/build/build-images-locally.ps1 to build images
    • etc/docker/run-docker.ps1 to run them (and generate dev HTTPS certs)

If the scripts currently build amd64 by default on your machine, you’ll need to adjust them (or the compose) using one of the platform approaches above.

Sources

  • https://abp.io/docs/10.7/suite/solution-structure
  • https://abp.io/docs/10.7/solution-templates/layered-web-application/deployment/deployment-docker-compose?UI=Blazor&DB=EF&Tiered=Yes

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

Showing 11 to 20 of 1374 entries
Boost Your Development
ABP Live Training
Packages
See Trainings
Mastering ABP Framework Book
The Official Guide
Mastering
ABP Framework
Learn More
Mastering ABP Framework Book
Made with ❤️ on ABP v10.8.0-preview. Updated on October 21, 2026, 11:09
1
ABP Assistant
🔐 You need to be logged in to use the chatbot. Please log in first.