To run the AuthServer locally without requiring a certificate, you can disable the HTTPS metadata requirement in your configuration. This allows the server to accept HTTP requests and operate without a certificate for development purposes.
In your appsettings.json (AuthServer project), set:
"AuthServer": {
"Authority": "http://localhost:PORT",
"RequireHttpsMetadata": "false"
}
In your AuthServer's ConfigureServices method, add:
if (!Convert.ToBoolean(configuration["AuthServer:RequireHttpsMetadata"]))
{
Configure<OpenIddictServerAspNetCoreOptions>(options =>
{
options.DisableTransportSecurityRequirement = true;
});
}
This configuration disables the HTTPS requirement, allowing you to run AuthServer locally without a certificate.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
Yes, you can run the AuthServer locally with a hard-coded certificate so that certificates do not need to be regenerated every time. Instead of using the development certificate generation method, you can provide a persistent PFX certificate file (e.g., openiddict.pfx) and its password directly in your configuration. This approach works for both local development and production scenarios.
Here’s how you can configure your AuthServer to use a specific certificate file:
public override void PreConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
{
var hostingEnvironment = context.Services.GetHostingEnvironment();
PreConfigure<AbpOpenIddictAspNetCoreOptions>(options =>
{
options.AddDevelopmentEncryptionAndSigningCertificate = false;
});
PreConfigure<OpenIddictServerBuilder>(serverBuilder =>
{
serverBuilder.AddProductionEncryptionAndSigningCertificate(
"openiddict.pfx", // Path to your persistent certificate
"YourCertificatePassword" // Certificate password
);
});
}
This method is supported and recommended for scenarios where you want consistent credentials across restarts or deployments.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To resolve this, follow these steps:
Expose Integration Services in the Provider Microservice
public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
{
Configure<AbpAspNetCoreMvcOptions>(options =>
{
options.ExposeIntegrationServices = true;
});
}
Reference the HttpApi.Client Package in the Consumer Microservice
HttpApi.Client project of the provider microservice.Configure the Remote Service URL
appsettings.json, set the base URL for the remote service:
"RemoteServices": {
"AbcEmployeeService": {
"BaseUrl": "https://localhost:PORT"
}
}
AbcEmployeeService) should match the remote service name used in your proxy registration.Register the Client Proxy
context.Services.AddStaticHttpClientProxies(
typeof(Abc.EmployeeService.Application.Contracts.EmployeeServiceApplicationContractsModule).Assembly,
"AbcEmployeeService"
);
Use the Integration Service Interface
IEmployeeIntegrationService in your consumer microservice as needed.Restart All Services
If you follow these steps, the error should be resolved and the integration service proxy will be available for HTTP calls between your microservices.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
In ABP microservice solutions, feature values are cached for performance. When you update a feature value (e.g., via the Features modal for a tenant), the cache in the relevant microservice is not immediately invalidated. This means your custom microservice may continue to use the old value until the cache expires or is refreshed.
By default, the cache duration is set internally and may not be short enough for immediate reflection of changes. Logging out/in or waiting may not help if the cache is still valid.
To ensure the feature value is updated immediately after a change, you need to manually clear or refresh the feature value cache in your microservice. This is a common scenario in distributed/microservice setups.
You can clear the feature cache by injecting and using the IFeatureValueStore or the distributed cache service for features, and removing the relevant cache entry when a feature is changed. Alternatively, you can reduce the cache duration in your configuration, but this may impact performance.
For more details and the official approach, see the documentation below.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
The issue you are experiencing is a common one when using custom URI schemes (like portalsystem://) for OAuth redirect URIs in ABP with React Native/Expo, especially when moving from Expo Go (development) to a built APK (production). In Expo Go, deep linking is handled differently than in a standalone build, which can cause redirect issues.
Here are the steps to resolve the problem:
Check Redirect URI Registration in ABP/IdentityServer:
portalsystem://AndroidManifest Configuration:
scheme property in app.json (which you have set to portalsystem).AndroidManifest.xml, but for managed workflow, Expo handles this if the scheme is set.App.json/Build Configuration:
app.json looks correct with "scheme": "portalsystem".Expo AuthSession/Redirect URI:
AuthSession.makeRedirectUri({ useProxy: false }) to generate the redirect URI. This should match portalsystem://.const redirectUri = AuthSession.makeRedirectUri({ useProxy: false });
// Should output: portalsystem://
Production Build Differences:
Check for Typos and Consistency:
Testing:
adb logcat (for Android) to check if the intent is being received by your app.ABP/IdentityServer Logs:
Expo Documentation:
If you follow these steps and ensure all redirect URIs and schemes are consistent, the OAuth flow should work in your built APK as it does in Expo Go.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To ensure that the admin role does not regain permissions after running the migrator multiple times, you need to override the default ABP behavior that grants all permissions to the admin role during data seeding. By default, ABP's PermissionDataSeedContributor grants all permissions to the admin role every time seeding runs, which is why your manual removals are overwritten on each migration.
Solution:
You should replace the default PermissionDataSeedContributor with your own implementation that only grants the permissions you want. Here’s how to do it:
Create a Custom PermissionDataSeedContributor:
Replace the default contributor by using the Dependency(ReplaceServices = true) attribute and implement your own logic for seeding admin permissions.
[Dependency(ReplaceServices = true)]
[ExposeServices(typeof(PermissionDataSeedContributor), typeof(IDataSeedContributor))]
public class MyPermissionDataSeedContributor : PermissionDataSeedContributor
{
public MyPermissionDataSeedContributor(
IPermissionDefinitionManager permissionDefinitionManager,
IPermissionDataSeeder permissionDataSeeder,
ICurrentTenant currentTenant)
: base(permissionDefinitionManager, permissionDataSeeder, currentTenant)
{
}
public override Task SeedAsync(DataSeedContext context)
{
var multiTenancySide = CurrentTenant.GetMultiTenancySide();
var permissionNames = PermissionDefinitionManager
.GetPermissions()
.Where(p => p.MultiTenancySide.HasFlag(multiTenancySide))
.Where(p => !p.Providers.Any() || p.Providers.Contains(RolePermissionValueProvider.ProviderName))
.Select(p => p.Name)
.Where(x => /* filter only the permissions you want admin to have */)
.ToArray();
return PermissionDataSeeder.SeedAsync(
RolePermissionValueProvider.ProviderName,
"admin",
permissionNames,
context?.TenantId
);
}
}
.Where(x => ...) with your logic to select only the permissions you want the admin role to have.Register Your Contributor: Make sure your custom contributor is registered and the default one is replaced. This is handled by the attributes above.
Remove Manual Permission Removal: You no longer need to manually remove permissions from the admin role in your seeder, as the admin will only be granted the permissions you specify.
Why this works:
ABP’s default seeding always grants all permissions to the admin role. By replacing the default contributor, you control exactly which permissions are seeded for admin, and your changes will persist across migrations and application restarts.
References:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
In ABP v9.2.0, if your GetListAsync(includeDetails: true) call on IRepository<MyEntity, Guid> hangs or does not respond, it is likely due to how the default WithDetails behavior is implemented for your entity's repository. When includeDetails is true, ABP calls the WithDetailsAsync method, which by default may attempt to include all navigation properties. If your entity has deep or circular relationships, or a large object graph, this can cause performance issues or even infinite loops, especially after changes in recent ABP/EF Core versions.
The IReadOnlyRepository works because it does not use the WithDetails/includeDetails mechanism in the same way, avoiding the problematic eager loading.
To resolve this, you should override the WithDetails and WithDetailsAsync methods in your custom repository implementation to explicitly specify which related entities to include, rather than relying on the default behavior. This prevents EF Core from trying to load an overly complex or circular object graph.
Example:
public class MyEntityRepository : EfCoreRepository<MyDbContext, MyEntity, Guid>, IMyEntityRepository
{
public MyEntityRepository(IDbContextProvider<MyDbContext> dbContextProvider)
: base(dbContextProvider)
{
}
public override IQueryable<MyEntity> WithDetails()
{
return GetQueryable().Include(x => x.RelatedEntity1)
.Include(x => x.RelatedEntity2);
// Add further .Include/.ThenInclude as needed, but avoid circular references
}
public override async Task<IQueryable<MyEntity>> WithDetailsAsync()
{
return WithDetails();
}
}
Register your custom repository in the DI container and use it instead of the generic IRepository for this entity.
This approach is recommended in the official ABP documentation and best practices to avoid performance and loading issues with includeDetails.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To resolve the "invalid_request" and "redirect_uri is not valid for this client application" error when authenticating the ABP Hangfire Dashboard with OpenIdConnect, you must ensure that your AuthServer (OpenIddict) client configuration matches the redirect URI used by your API project.
Here are the required steps:
Determine the Redirect URI
https://<your-api-host>/signin-oidc
Configure the OpenIddict Client (in AuthServer)
OpenIddictApplications table or via data seed), ensure:
RedirectUri includes your API's /signin-oidc endpoint.PostLogoutRedirectUri (optional) matches your logout redirect.GrantTypes include authorization_code (and optionally hybrid if needed).Permissions include Endpoints.Authorization, Endpoints.Token, GrantTypes.AuthorizationCode, ResponseTypes.CodeIdToken, and all required scopes (e.g., roles, email, phone, MyProjectName).Example (if seeding via code):
await _applicationManager.CreateAsync(new OpenIddictApplicationDescriptor
{
ClientId = "MyProjectName_Hangfire",
ClientSecret = "YOUR_SECRET",
DisplayName = "Hangfire Dashboard",
PostLogoutRedirectUris = { "https://<your-api-host>/" },
RedirectUris = { "https://<your-api-host>/signin-oidc" },
Permissions =
{
Permissions.Endpoints.Authorization,
Permissions.Endpoints.Token,
Permissions.GrantTypes.AuthorizationCode,
Permissions.ResponseTypes.CodeIdToken,
Permissions.Scopes.Email,
Permissions.Scopes.Profile,
Permissions.Scopes.Roles,
"MyProjectName"
},
Requirements =
{
Requirements.Features.ProofKeyForCodeExchange
}
});
Update appsettings.json in API Project
"AuthServer": {
"Authority": "https://<your-auth-server-host>",
"ClientId": "MyProjectName_Hangfire",
"ClientSecret": "YOUR_SECRET",
"RequireHttpsMetadata": "true"
}
Clear Cache
Restart All Services
Test
/hangfire. You should be redirected to the AuthServer login, and after authentication, returned to the dashboard.If you still get the error, double-check that the redirect URI in the error message matches exactly what is registered in your OpenIddict client.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
The ABP Framework does not provide a built-in integration for IBM i (Db2) databases. However, ABP is designed to be database-agnostic at its core, allowing you to use any EF Core-compatible provider. According to the official documentation, you can use any database system by integrating its libraries and APIs, as long as you implement the necessary repository interfaces if you want to use ABP's pre-built modules.
The compatibility between Aumerial.EntityFrameworkCore and Entity Framework Core depends on the version supported by the Aumerial provider. You should check the Aumerial.EntityFrameworkCore documentation or NuGet page to determine which EF Core versions are supported. ABP 9.1.1 uses EF Core 9.x by default, so you must ensure that Aumerial.EntityFrameworkCore is compatible with EF Core 9.x. If it only supports an earlier EF Core version, you may need to downgrade EF Core packages in your ABP solution to match the supported version.
If you use a compatible version of EF Core with Aumerial.EntityFrameworkCore, you can continue using ABP Framework 9.1.1. However, you must ensure that all ABP modules and your project dependencies are aligned with the EF Core version you choose. If you downgrade EF Core, you may need to adjust ABP package versions accordingly.
The recommended approach to use IBM i Db2 in ABP projects is:
Example configuration in your module:
[DependsOn(typeof(AbpEntityFrameworkCoreModule))]
public class MyProjectEntityFrameworkCoreModule : AbpModule
{
public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
{
context.Services.AddAbpDbContext<MyDbContext>(options =>
{
options.AddDefaultRepositories();
});
Configure<AbpDbContextOptions>(options =>
{
options.UseNtiDb2(); // Replace with the actual method from Aumerial.EntityFrameworkCore
});
}
}
Replace UseNtiDb2 with the actual extension method provided by the Aumerial package.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To resolve issues after upgrading ABP from 7.3.2 to 9.2.0 with the new MongoDB driver (3.3.0+), you must update your code and dependencies according to the official migration guides:
Update all MongoDB-related NuGet packages to versions compatible with MongoDB.Driver 3.x. Ensure there are no old references to MongoDB.Bson or MongoDB.Driver from previous versions in your solution or bin/obj folders.
The error regarding IMongoQueryable<> and missing types is likely due to version mismatches or breaking changes in the MongoDB driver. The ABP 9.2 migration guide specifically notes the upgrade to MongoDB.Driver 3.x and provides a link to the official MongoDB migration guide for breaking changes.
Review and update your code according to the MongoDB Driver 2.x to 3.x migration guide. Some APIs and namespaces have changed or been removed. You may need to update usages of IMongoQueryable<> and related LINQ queries to match the new driver’s API.
Clean and rebuild your solution after removing all old MongoDB driver references.
For detailed steps and breaking changes, see:
These guides will help you identify and resolve all breaking changes related to the MongoDB driver upgrade.
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.