What happens by default:
Why: OIDC single logout is a separate step. To sign out of the external Identity Provider (Microsoft Entra), the client must call the Entra “end session” (sign-out) endpoint with appropriate parameters. ABP/OpenIddict doesn’t automatically perform an upstream IdP logout. Some IdPs also restrict third-party initiated sign-outs.
What to do:
If you want to also sign out from Microsoft Entra:
Example (Blazor WASM override of the Authentication page):
// MyAuthentication.razor
@using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly.Authentication
@using Volo.Abp.DependencyInjection
@inherits Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly.LeptonXTheme.Pages.Authentication
@attribute [ExposeServices(typeof(Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly.LeptonXTheme.Pages.Authentication))]
@attribute [Dependency(ReplaceServices = true)]
<RemoteAuthenticatorView Action="@Action" />
// MyAuthentication.razor.cs
public partial class MyAuthentication
{
protected override void OnInitialized()
{
if (Action == "logout-callback")
{
// 1) After app logout completes, sign out from Entra too:
var postLogout = Uri.EscapeDataString(NavigationManager.BaseUri.TrimEnd('/')); // e.g. https://yourapp/
var tenant = "your-tenant-id-or-common";
var entraLogout = $"https://login.microsoftonline.com/{tenant}/oauth2/v2.0/logout?post_logout_redirect_uri={postLogout}";
NavigationManager.NavigateTo(entraLogout, forceLoad: true);
return;
}
}
}
Important:
- Ensure post_logout_redirect_uri is configured in your Entra app registration.
- Use a fully qualified HTTPS URL.
- If you want to send users back to login immediately, set post_logout_redirect_uri to your app root (which is [Authorize] protected) or to /authentication/login.
builder.Services.AddOidcAuthentication(options =>
{
builder.Configuration.Bind("AuthServer", options.ProviderOptions);
options.ProviderOptions.AdditionalProviderParameters.Add("prompt", "select_account");
});
- This does not sign out Entra but prevents silent re-login.
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
@Injectable({ providedIn: 'root' })
export class BookService {
apiName = 'Default';
constructor(private restService: RestService) {}
}
There is no documented or supported option to configure the generator to use Angular’s inject() function instead of constructor injection in generated proxies. If you want to adopt inject() in your own code, you can still use it in your application services/components that consume the generated proxies, but the generated proxies themselves are not configurable to switch to inject().
import { Injectable, inject } from '@angular/core';
import { BookService as GeneratedBookService } from '@proxy/books';
@Injectable({ providedIn: 'root' })
export class BookClient {
private readonly proxy = inject(GeneratedBookService);
getList() {
return this.proxy.getList();
}
}
Alternatively, after generation you could run a custom codemod in your repo to transform constructors to inject(), but note this is outside ABP’s official tooling and you would re-run it after each proxy regeneration.
About the “Tiered (MVC) or Auth Server Separated (Angular): Yes/No” field:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
Root cause
What to check and fix
Ensure you don’t pre-encode ReturnUrl
Don’t re-wrap or re-encode in custom middleware
Validate RedirectAllowedUrls on the Auth Server
Verify client OpenIddict/OIDC handler configuration
Quick detection pattern
Optional safeguard (only if you can’t quickly remove pre-encoding at source)
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
You’re right about DDD: only aggregates should expose invariants and lifecycle of their children. In ABP terms, that usually means:
Current ABP Suite behavior:
Practical, DDD-friendly approach you can implement today (even with Suite output):
Example Aggregate root with child management methods:
public class Order : AggregateRoot<Guid>
{
private readonly List<OrderLine> _lines = new();
public IReadOnlyCollection<OrderLine> Lines => _lines.AsReadOnly();
public void AddLine(Guid productId, int quantity, decimal unitPrice)
{
if (quantity <= 0) throw new BusinessException("QuantityMustBePositive");
_lines.Add(new OrderLine(GuidGenerator.Create(), Id, productId, quantity, unitPrice));
}
public void UpdateLine(Guid lineId, int quantity, decimal unitPrice)
{
var line = _lines.FirstOrDefault(l => l.Id == lineId) ?? throw new BusinessException("LineNotFound");
line.SetQuantity(quantity);
line.SetUnitPrice(unitPrice);
}
public void RemoveLine(Guid lineId)
{
var line = _lines.FirstOrDefault(l => l.Id == lineId) ?? throw new BusinessException("LineNotFound");
_lines.Remove(line);
}
}
public class OrderManager : DomainService
{
// Use when orchestration/rules go beyond a single entity, otherwise prefer entity methods
public void AddLine(Order order, Guid productId, int quantity, decimal unitPrice)
{
// cross-entity checks or policies, then delegate to entity
order.AddLine(productId, quantity, unitPrice);
}
}
Application service using only the aggregate:
public class OrderAppService : ApplicationService
{
private readonly IRepository<Order, Guid> _orderRepository;
private readonly OrderManager _orderManager;
public OrderAppService(IRepository<Order, Guid> orderRepository, OrderManager orderManager)
{
_orderRepository = orderRepository;
_orderManager = orderManager;
}
public async Task AddLineAsync(Guid orderId, Guid productId, int quantity, decimal unitPrice)
{
var order = await _orderRepository.GetAsync(orderId);
_orderManager.AddLine(order, productId, quantity, unitPrice);
await _orderRepository.UpdateAsync(order, autoSave: true);
}
}
What to request for ABP Suite
Workaround to align current Suite output with DDD:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
Current status and recommendation:
Practical options you can apply today:
// In your Domain project (AssemblyInfo.cs or at top of a .cs file)
using System.Runtime.CompilerServices;
[assembly: InternalsVisibleTo("YourProjectName.EntityFrameworkCore")]
[assembly: InternalsVisibleTo("DynamicProxyGenAssembly2")] // if using dynamic proxies (e.g., for mocking)
- Avoid exposing entities across layers. Continue to expose DTOs in the Application layer and map using ObjectMapper in the same assembly that can see internals.
About ABP Suite default generation:
Related ABP guidance you can leverage:
public class MyAppService :
AbstractKeyCrudAppService<
MyEntity, // entity
MyEntityDto, // dto
MyKeyType, // key type
PagedAndSortedResultRequestDto,
MyCreateUpdateDto
>, IMyAppService
{
public MyAppService(IRepository<MyEntity, MyKeyType> repo) : base(repo) { }
}
For entities without the conventional Id property, override GetKeys() in your entity:
public class MyEntity : AuditedEntity
{
public Guid MyEntityId { get; set; }
public override object[] GetKeys() => new object[] { MyEntityId };
}
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.ChangeTracking;
using Volo.Abp.Domain.Entities.Events;
using Volo.Abp.EventBus.Local;
using Volo.Abp.Identity;
public class IdentityUserUpdatedHandler :
ILocalEventHandler<EntityUpdatedEventData<IdentityUser>>
{
private readonly IDbContextProvider<IIdentityDbContext> _dbContextProvider; // or your unified DbContext provider
public IdentityUserUpdatedHandler(IDbContextProvider<IIdentityDbContext> dbContextProvider)
{
_dbContextProvider = dbContextProvider;
}
public async Task HandleEventAsync(EntityUpdatedEventData<IdentityUser> eventData)
{
// Ensure we are in the same UoW/DbContext where the change is tracked
var dbContext = await _dbContextProvider.GetDbContextAsync();
// Get the tracked Entry for this entity
var entry = dbContext.Entry(eventData.Entity);
if (entry.State != EntityState.Modified)
{
// Not tracked or not modified in this context
return;
}
// Read original and current values
var originalName = entry.OriginalValues[nameof(IdentityUser.Name)]?.ToString();
var currentName = entry.CurrentValues[nameof(IdentityUser.Name)]?.ToString();
var originalSurname = entry.OriginalValues[nameof(IdentityUser.Surname)]?.ToString();
var currentSurname = entry.CurrentValues[nameof(IdentityUser.Surname)]?.ToString();
var nameChanged = !string.Equals(originalName, currentName, StringComparison.Ordinal);
var surnameChanged = !string.Equals(originalSurname, currentSurname, StringComparison.Ordinal);
if (nameChanged || surnameChanged)
{
// Your logic here (publish another event, call a service, etc.)
}
}
}
Notes:
Inject the IDbContextProvider for the DbContext that tracks IdentityUser (e.g., your unified AppDbContext if you call builder.ConfigureIdentity()).
This handler must run within the same Unit of Work as the update so the Entry has OriginalValues. ABP’s auto entity events are published in the same UoW as of v5+, so this works when your update happens via repositories/UoW.
Alternative: EF Core SaveChanges interceptor If you prefer not to rely on the local event to get original values, you can implement an interceptor that always has access to ChangeTracker before saving:
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Diagnostics;
using Volo.Abp.Identity;
public class UserNameChangeInterceptor : SaveChangesInterceptor
{
public override InterceptionResult<int> SavingChanges(DbContextEventData eventData, InterceptionResult<int> result)
{
var context = eventData.Context;
if (context == null) return base.SavingChanges(eventData, result);
foreach (var entry in context.ChangeTracker.Entries<IdentityUser>().Where(e => e.State == EntityState.Modified))
{
var originalName = entry.OriginalValues[nameof(IdentityUser.Name)]?.ToString();
var currentName = entry.CurrentValues[nameof(IdentityUser.Name)]?.ToString();
var originalSurname = entry.OriginalValues[nameof(IdentityUser.Surname)]?.ToString();
var currentSurname = entry.CurrentValues[nameof(IdentityUser.Surname)]?.ToString();
if (!string.Equals(originalName, currentName, StringComparison.Ordinal) ||
!string.Equals(originalSurname, currentSurname, StringComparison.Ordinal))
{
// Your logic here
}
}
return base.SavingChanges(eventData, result);
}
}
Register the interceptor in your DbContextOptions during module ConfigureServices.
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
Root cause: When using the distributed event bus (RabbitMQ), the handler runs in a background consumer without an HTTP scope, so there is no ambient tenant set automatically. IdentityUserCreatedEto contains TenantId; you must set the tenant context for the duration of your handler to resolve tenant-scoped services/settings correctly.
Quick fix (wrap the handler body in ICurrentTenant.Change):
using Volo.Abp.MultiTenancy;
public class AccountIdentityUserCreatedEventHandler :
IDistributedEventHandler<IdentityUserCreatedEto>,
ITransientDependency
{
protected IdentityUserManager UserManager { get; }
protected IAccountEmailer AccountEmailer { get; }
protected ISettingProvider SettingProvider { get; }
protected ICurrentTenant CurrentTenant { get; }
public AccountIdentityUserCreatedEventHandler(
IdentityUserManager userManager,
IAccountEmailer accountEmailer,
ISettingProvider settingProvider,
ICurrentTenant currentTenant)
{
UserManager = userManager;
AccountEmailer = accountEmailer;
SettingProvider = settingProvider;
CurrentTenant = currentTenant;
}
public async Task HandleEventAsync(IdentityUserCreatedEto eventData)
{
using (CurrentTenant.Change(eventData.TenantId))
{
if (eventData.Properties["SendConfirmationEmail"] == true.ToString().ToUpper() &&
await SettingProvider.IsTrueAsync(IdentitySettingNames.SignIn.RequireConfirmedEmail))
{
var user = await UserManager.GetByIdAsync(eventData.Id);
var confirmationToken = await UserManager.GenerateEmailConfirmationTokenAsync(user);
await AccountEmailer.SendEmailConfirmationLinkAsync(
user,
confirmationToken,
eventData.Properties.GetOrDefault("AppName") ?? "MVC"
);
}
}
}
}
This ensures SettingProvider (and any tenant-scoped logic like repositories, feature checks, etc.) work under the correct tenant.
If you need host-level settings for some reason, wrap only the required code block with Change(null).
Notes:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
A) Override the IdentityUserAppService UpdateAsync (best if you only need to affect this specific endpoint)
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using Volo.Abp.Application.Services;
using Volo.Abp.DependencyInjection;
using Volo.Abp.Identity;
using Volo.Abp.Users;
[Dependency(ReplaceServices = true)]
public class MyIdentityUserAppService : IdentityUserAppService
{
public MyIdentityUserAppService(
IdentityUserManager userManager,
IIdentityUserRepository userRepository,
IIdentityRoleRepository roleRepository)
: base(userManager, userRepository, roleRepository)
{
}
public override async Task<IdentityUserDto> UpdateAsync(Guid id, IdentityUserUpdateDto input)
{
// Load current (old) values
var oldUser = await UserRepository.GetAsync(id);
var oldSurname = oldUser.Surname;
var oldEmail = oldUser.Email;
// Call the default update pipeline
var result = await base.UpdateAsync(id, input);
// Compare with new values
var newSurname = result.Surname;
var newEmail = result.Email;
if (!string.Equals(oldSurname, newSurname, StringComparison.Ordinal))
{
// Your logic when surname changed
// e.g., publish a distributed event, call an external service, etc.
}
if (!string.Equals(oldEmail, newEmail, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase))
{
// Your logic when email changed
}
return result;
}
}
B) Override/extend IdentityUserManager (when you want to enforce logic at the domain level)
C) Use extension to the admin UI and profile UI (if you need UI-driven logic) – not required for backend comparison but helpful when you also need to surface or control fields. For DTO extra properties to flow correctly through built-in services (like profile), ensure module extension mappings are applied to the related DTOs:
public class MyModule : AbpModule
{
private static readonly OneTimeRunner OneTimeRunner = new OneTimeRunner();
public override void PostConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
{
OneTimeRunner.Run(() =>
{
ModuleExtensionConfigurationHelper.ApplyEntityConfigurationToApi(
IdentityModuleExtensionConsts.ModuleName,
IdentityModuleExtensionConsts.EntityNames.User,
getApiTypes: new[] { typeof(IdentityUserDto), typeof(ProfileDto) },
createApiTypes: new[] { typeof(IdentityUserCreateDto) },
updateApiTypes: new[] { typeof(IdentityUserUpdateDto), typeof(UpdateProfileDto) }
);
});
}
}
Notes about “events get called a lot” and comparing old/new data:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
