Activities of "AI-Bot"

  1. Solution
  • No, you do not need to create a separate module or your own DbContext for auditing when you use the built-in AbpAuditLoggingDbContext. You also do not need a custom IAuditingStore. Use the provided Audit Logging module and its EF Core integration.

  • Minimal, working setup to persist audit logs in a separate MSSQL database with a single DbMigrator:

    1. Add packages and module dependencies (in your EFCore project):
[DependsOn(
      typeof(Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer.AbpEntityFrameworkCoreSqlServerModule),
      typeof(Volo.Abp.AuditLogging.EntityFrameworkCore.AbpAuditLoggingEntityFrameworkCoreModule)
  )]
  public class YourAppEntityFrameworkCoreModule : AbpModule
  {
      public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
      {
          Configure<AbpDbContextOptions>(options =>
          {
              // Set provider globally (covers AbpAuditLoggingDbContext too)
              options.UseSqlServer();
              // or explicitly per context if you prefer
              options.Configure<Volo.Abp.AuditLogging.EntityFrameworkCore.AbpAuditLoggingDbContext>(c =>
              {
                  c.UseSqlServer();
              });
          });
      }
  }
  1. Provide a dedicated connection string named AbpAuditLogging. If it’s missing, the context falls back to Default:
{
    "ConnectionStrings": {
      "Default": "Server=.;Database=MainDb;Trusted_Connection=True;TrustServerCertificate=true",
      "AbpAuditLogging": "Server=.;Database=AuditDb;Trusted_Connection=True;TrustServerCertificate=true"
    }
  }

Put this in the appsettings.json of:

  • Your DbMigrator project
  • Every host that will write audit logs
  1. Create migrations for AbpAuditLoggingDbContext (no custom context required). Run the command in the project that references Volo.Abp.AuditLogging.EntityFrameworkCore (you can keep these migrations in your EFCore project). If the short context name is not found, use the fully-qualified name:
dotnet ef migrations add Init_Audit_Logging \
    --context Volo.Abp.AuditLogging.EntityFrameworkCore.AbpAuditLoggingDbContext

If design-time discovery fails, add a design-time factory for AbpAuditLoggingDbContext pointing to the AbpAuditLogging connection.

  1. Use a single DbMigrator. Once the AbpAuditLoggingDbContext migrations are compiled into your solution, the standard ABP DbMigrator will execute schema migrators for all registered contexts, creating and updating both MainDb and AuditDb:
dotnet run --project src/YourApp.DbMigrator
  1. Ensure auditing is enabled and middleware is added in your host:
Configure<AbpAuditingOptions>(o => { o.IsEnabled = true; });
  app.UseAuditing();
  • Summary:
    • Keep using the built-in AbpAuditLoggingDbContext.
    • Provide the connection string named AbpAuditLogging.
    • Generate migrations for AbpAuditLoggingDbContext.
    • Run a single DbMigrator; no extra module, no custom IAuditingStore, and no second migrator needed.
  1. Sources
  • Connection strings and named mapping (AbpAuditLogging falls back to Default if not defined):
    • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/fundamentals/connection-strings
  • EF Core integration and per-DbContext provider configuration:
    • https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Entity-Framework-Core
  • Audit Logging module (connection string name and usage):
    • https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Modules/Audit-Logging

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution Below is a checklist to quickly stabilize the ABP Forms module in your setup (Angular main app hosting an MVC sub-module that contains Volo.Forms). It addresses the JSON error on create/view, the unexpected login prompts, and tenant login problems.

A) Fix the JSON error on Create/View Form

  • Common cause: invalid/unsupported DTO members or circular/complex types being posted to the backend. Ensure your DTOs (inputs to create/update forms, question definitions, etc.) contain only serializable primitives/arrays and do not include System.Type or complex runtime types. If a property must exist only for internal logic, mark it to skip validation/serialization.
    • If you have a custom input with a Type property (or similar), remove it or mark it ignored/disabled for validation to avoid recursive/serializer issues:
public class MyFormInputDto
    {
        // Bad: public Type GridDefinitionType { get; set; }

        [DisableValidation] // avoids recursive validation and reflection-related exceptions
        [JsonIgnore]        // make sure it's not serialized over HTTP
        public Type GridDefinitionType { get; set; }
    }
  • If you extended or wrapped the Forms endpoints, ensure your controller action parameter models do not have self-referencing arrays/objects that the model binder can’t handle.
  • Check server logs for exceptions like “Property accessor 'DeclaringMethod' …” or validation errors produced by ABP’s object validator; that indicates you should remove/ignore the problematic field(s) as above.

B) Prevent random re-login when accessing the MVC sub-module from Angular

  • You are mixing Angular (OIDC/OAuth2 via implicit/code flow) with MVC sub-application that uses cookie authentication. When rendering the embedded MVC module, if it is on a different origin or uses a different cookie scheme, you can be prompted to log in again.
  • Ensure these:
    1. IdentityServer client definitions include both your Angular app and the MVC host of the Forms module as separate clients with proper RedirectUris/PostLogoutRedirectUris and AllowedCorsOrigins.
    2. If the Forms (MVC) is served under your same host/gateway, use the same domain and a consistent cookie configuration. For same-site issues when embedding or cross-origin, set cookie SameSite=None and Secure:
ConfigureApplicationCookie(options =>
     {
         options.Cookie.SameSite = SameSiteMode.None;
         options.Cookie.SecurePolicy = CookieSecurePolicy.Always;
     });
  1. If you proxy the MVC forms through a gateway (YARP), make sure the gateway forwards authentication headers and cookies as-is and that CORS/forwarded headers are configured.
  2. If the MVC module requires permissions, ensure the current user has the Forms module permissions; otherwise you may see redirects to login due to authorization challenges.

C) Multi-tenancy consistency (tenant login in forms module)

  • Ensure the tenant resolution is consistent between Angular and the MVC sub-module:
    • If you use subdomain tenancy or header-based tenancy, configure the gateway to forward X-Tenant or host headers unchanged so that the MVC module can resolve the tenant the same way as Angular.
    • If your Angular app sets the tenant via AbpTenantKey header (X-Tenant-ID or X-Abp-Tenant), ensure:
      • The same header is forwarded to the MVC host through the gateway.
      • The MVC app has the same MultiTenancy options.
    • If tenants are selected via domain (e.g., tenant1.example.com), serve the MVC sub-module from the same subdomain or configure proper ForwardedHeaders to preserve Host:
app.UseForwardedHeaders(new ForwardedHeadersOptions
    {
        ForwardedHeaders = ForwardedHeaders.XForwardedProto | ForwardedHeaders.XForwardedHost
    });
  • Double-check the ApplicationUrl, CorsOrigins, and RedirectAllowedUrls for all hosts in appsettings to include your gateway and UI URLs.

D) When hosting SignalR (used by Forms notifications) behind YARP

  • If your Forms UI uses SignalR endpoints (e.g., /signalr-hubs/*), add a small middleware in gateway to translate access_token query into Authorization header (WebSockets/ServerSentEvents):
app.Use(async (ctx, next) =>
  {
      var accessToken = ctx.Request.Query["access_token"];
      if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(accessToken) && ctx.Request.Path.StartsWithSegments("/signalr-hubs"))
      {
          ctx.Request.Headers["Authorization"] = "Bearer " + accessToken;
      }
      await next();
  });
  • Ensure YARP routes map:
    • API endpoints: /api/forms/* (or /api/chat/* in similar examples) to the MVC/HttpApi host
    • Hubs: /signalr-hubs/{**everything} to the same host
  • Make sure the user has the required permissions for any hub endpoints otherwise 401/403 will occur after negotiate.

E) CORS and Redirects (Angular + MVC)

  • In your AuthServer/HttpApiHost appsettings:
    • App:ClientUrl should point to Angular.
    • App:CorsOrigins must include Angular and Gateway origins (comma-separated).
    • App:RedirectAllowedUrls must include Angular and MVC URLs if they do redirects.
  • In Angular environment:
    • oAuthConfig.issuer matches your AuthServer URL.
    • apis.default.url points to your gateway or the HttpApi host consistently.

F) Quick verification steps

  • Clear caches (Redis/distributed cache) after changing permissions/tenants.
  • Verify the current user has the necessary Forms module permissions.
  • Confirm the browser’s storage has a valid access token for the Angular app and that the MVC app receives a valid cookie or Authorization header (depending on flow).
  • Test in a single-origin setup first (serve Forms MVC under the same domain/port via gateway) to eliminate cross-site cookie issues, then reintroduce separation if needed.
  1. Sources
  • ABP Forms module overview (Pro):
    • https://abp.io/docs/latest/modules/forms
  • Related guidance about avoiding problematic DTO properties during validation/serialization (DisableValidation for non-serializable members) inspired by community support resolution:
    • https://abp.io/support/questions/2902
  • Example of handling SignalR through a gateway and converting access_token to Authorization header (community Q&A pattern):
    • https://abp.io/support/questions/5007

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution
  • ABP localizes exception messages by mapping exception “code namespaces” to a localization resource. Configure this once and all infrastructure errors that have codes (like authorization/validation) will be shown in the current UI culture.
  • Add a resource for your app (Domain.Shared) and map the ABP namespaces that you want to localize.

Example: Map authorization/validation/identity namespaces to your resource and provide translations.

csharp // Domain.Shared module [DependsOn( typeof(AbpExceptionHandlingModule), typeof(AbpValidationModule), typeof(AbpAuthorizationModule), typeof(AbpIdentityDomainSharedModule) )] public class MyProjectDomainSharedModule : AbpModule { public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context) { Configure<AbpLocalizationOptions>(options => { options.Resources .Add<MyProjectResource>("en") .AddVirtualJson("/Localization/MyProject"); });

    Configure&lt;AbpExceptionLocalizationOptions&gt;(options =>
    {
        // Map exception code namespaces to your resource
        options.MapCodeNamespace("Volo.Abp.Authorization", typeof(MyProjectResource));
        options.MapCodeNamespace("Volo.Abp.Validation", typeof(MyProjectResource));
        options.MapCodeNamespace("Volo.Abp.Identity", typeof(MyProjectResource));
        // add more if needed
    });
}

}

  • Create localization JSON files that contain the exception texts for the mapped namespaces.
    • Place under MyProject.Domain.Shared/Localization/MyProject/
    • Example en.json and tr.json (Turkish). Include keys used by ABP’s infrastructure. For “Forbidden” (authorization), ABP uses well-known codes and messages; provide localized texts.

en.json { "culture": "en", "texts": { "Volo.Abp.Authorization:DefaultErrorMessage": "The user represented by the token is not allowed to perform the requested action.", "Volo.Abp.Authorization:Forbidden": "Forbidden" } }

tr.json { "culture": "tr", "texts": { "Volo.Abp.Authorization:DefaultErrorMessage": "Belirteçle temsil edilen kullanıcı bu işlemi yapmaya yetkili değil.", "Volo.Abp.Authorization:Forbidden": "Yasak" } }

Notes:

  • The exact keys used by ABP for authorization exceptions are tied to the exception code namespace Volo.Abp.Authorization. After mapping, any ABP-generated authorization error (like forbidden) is localized via your resource. If a specific key is missing, ABP falls back to the default message; add keys you need.
  • Ensure your MVC UI sets and switches CurrentUICulture (ABP does this via the language selector/cookie). Then the modal error message will automatically be shown in the current language.

Optional: Customize the displayed title/text shape for MVC UI

  • ABP MVC shows RemoteServiceErrorInfo (ProblemDetails) in a modal. To override formatting, implement IExceptionToErrorInfoConverter or subscribe to AbpExceptionEvent to adjust message keys, but in most cases mapping and providing translations is sufficient.
  1. Sources
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/fundamentals/exception-handling
  • https://github.com/abpframework/abp/blob/dev/framework/src/Volo.Abp.Authorization/Volo/Abp/Authorization/AbpAuthorizationErrorCodes.cs

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution Given your configuration:
  • ISaveStaticPermissionsToDatabase = true: ABP will persist statically-defined permissions (from your PermissionDefinitionProvider classes) into the PermissionDefinition records on startup. This avoids runtime reflection lookups and enables querying/managing those definitions via the Permission Management module.
  • IsDynamicPermissionStoreEnabled = false: Disables custom/dynamic permission store providers. ABP will use the built‑in permission store (cached + DB-backed). This can reduce complexity and unexpected provider hits.

Addressing your points:

A) “If we refer to other Application layer Contracts, lead to static access storage”

  • Best practice: Place PermissionDefinitionProvider in the Application.Contracts layer of the module that owns those permissions. Other modules can reference the Contracts assembly to access the permission name constants without introducing runtime dependency cycles. This is the standard ABP approach and does not cause runtime permission “static access storage” risks by itself. It’s the recommended source of truth for permission names and localization.

B) “Additional load to other Application permissions”

  • With ISaveStaticPermissionsToDatabase = true, permission definitions are saved once (on startup/first run), then served via cache and DB. Combined with IsDynamicPermissionStoreEnabled = false, ABP will not query additional dynamic providers. This typically reduces load, not increase it. For performance:
    • Ensure distributed cache (e.g., Redis) is properly configured in production.
    • Keep permission grouping/nesting balanced; a very large number of permissions can increase the first application-configuration call cost.
    • Avoid querying permission grants in your overridden AbpApplicationConfigurationAppService.GetAsync beyond what ABP already returns; if you must, cache your extra computations.

C) “Move XXXPermissionDefinitionProvider to Application layer”

  • Correct location is Application.Contracts (not Application). ABP docs and samples define PermissionDefinitionProvider in the *.Application.Contracts project so UI/API layers and seed/migrator can reference it.
  • Seeders (e.g., DbMigrator) should reference Application.Contracts to access permission names and definitions when seeding role grants.

D) Recommended setup

  • Keep PermissionDefinitionProvider in MyModule.Application.Contracts.
  • Keep your configuration as-is if you don’t need dynamic providers:
Configure<PermissionManagementOptions>(options =>
  {
      options.ISaveStaticPermissionsToDatabase = true;
      options.IsDynamicPermissionStoreEnabled = false;
  });
  • If you seed role permissions, implement a data seed contributor that uses IPermissionManager / IPermissionDataSeeder or similar to grant permissions to roles/users at migration time. Ensure the DbMigrator references Application.Contracts so it sees the definitions.

E) Troubleshooting tips

  • If the first /api/abp/application-configuration becomes heavy:
    • Remove custom extra DB scans from overridden GetAsync or wrap them with distributed cache keyed by user/tenant.
    • Rely on ABP’s built-in permission list in ApplicationConfigurationDto unless you must enrich; then precompute and cache module maps.
    • Verify Redis connection and ABP DistributedCache options (timeouts) to avoid slow cache misses.
  1. Sources
  • https://github.com/abpframework/abp (repository with PermissionManagement module and seed contributor patterns)
  • Permission seeding guidance referencing PermissionDataSeedContributor pattern: https://abp.io/support/questions/3174

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution
  • Why DbMigrator didn’t create the audit DB

    • DbMigrator only runs migrations for DbContexts that:
      • are registered in the solution and
      • have migrations compiled into the assembly and
      • have a configured provider/connection string.
    • If AbpAuditLoggingDbContext has no migrations in your solution, DbMigrator won’t create the database.
  • Fix step-by-step

    1. Ensure EF Core provider/config for AbpAuditLoggingDbContext
[DependsOn(
      typeof(Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer.AbpEntityFrameworkCoreSqlServerModule),
      typeof(Volo.Abp.AuditLogging.EntityFrameworkCore.AbpAuditLoggingEntityFrameworkCoreModule)
  )]
  public class YourAppEntityFrameworkCoreModule : AbpModule
  {
      public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
      {
          Configure<AbpDbContextOptions>(options =>
          {
              // Global default or per-context config
              options.UseSqlServer();

              options.Configure<Volo.Abp.AuditLogging.EntityFrameworkCore.AbpAuditLoggingDbContext>(c =>
              {
                  c.UseSqlServer();
              });
          });
      }
  }
  1. Provide a connection string named AbpAuditLogging (or it will fall back to Default)
  • appsettings.json (DbMigrator and all hosts that write audit logs):
{
    "ConnectionStrings": {
      "Default": "Server=.;Database=MainDb;Trusted_Connection=True;TrustServerCertificate=true",
      "AbpAuditLogging": "Server=.;Database=AuditDb;Trusted_Connection=True;TrustServerCertificate=true"
    }
  }
  1. Add migrations for AbpAuditLoggingDbContext into your migrations project
  • Add the AbpAuditLogging.EntityFrameworkCore package reference to the project where you keep migrations (commonly the EFCore or DbMigrator project references it).

  • Make sure the project builds and can resolve the context at design-time. Typically you either:

    • run the dotnet ef command in the project that contains the DbContext OR
    • create a design-time factory.
  • Example design-time factory (only for migration generation):

using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
  using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design;
  using Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration;
  using System.IO;
  using Volo.Abp.AuditLogging.EntityFrameworkCore;

  public class AbpAuditLoggingDbContextFactory : IDesignTimeDbContextFactory<AbpAuditLoggingDbContext>
  {
      public AbpAuditLoggingDbContext CreateDbContext(string[] args)
      {
          var configuration = new ConfigurationBuilder()
              .SetBasePath(Directory.GetCurrentDirectory())
              .AddJsonFile("appsettings.json", optional: false)
              .AddEnvironmentVariables()
              .Build();

          var builder = new DbContextOptionsBuilder<AbpAuditLoggingDbContext>()
              .UseSqlServer(configuration.GetConnectionString("AbpAuditLogging"));

          return new AbpAuditLoggingDbContext(builder.Options);
      }
  }
  • Generate the migrations (run in the project that references Volo.Abp.AuditLogging.EntityFrameworkCore and contains the factory above):
dotnet ef migrations add Init_Audit_Logging --context Volo.Abp.AuditLogging.EntityFrameworkCore.AbpAuditLoggingDbContext

Notes:

  • Use the full type name if the short name isn’t found.
  • Ensure the startup project specified by --startup-project (if needed) can load your module configuration and has the connection strings.
  1. Run DbMigrator once migrations exist
  • DbMigrator, by default, discovers and runs all registered IDbSchemaMigrator implementations (including AuditLogging’s). With the migrations compiled, it will create the AuditDb and apply its migrations automatically:
dotnet run --project src/YourApp.DbMigrator
  1. Common pitfalls causing “No DbContext named 'AbpAuditLoggingDbContext' was found”
  • You ran dotnet ef in a project that does not reference Volo.Abp.AuditLogging.EntityFrameworkCore.
  • The context is not discoverable at design-time. Add a design-time factory (shown above), or set --startup-project and run the command from the EFCore project that references the module.
  • You used the short context name; prefer the fully-qualified name: Volo.Abp.AuditLogging.EntityFrameworkCore.AbpAuditLoggingDbContext
  1. Ensure auditing is enabled and middleware added (for actual runtime logging)
Configure<AbpAuditingOptions>(options =>
  {
      options.IsEnabled = true;
      options.EntityHistorySelectors.AddAllEntities();
  });

  public override void OnApplicationInitialization(ApplicationInitializationContext context)
  {
      var app = context.GetApplicationBuilder();
      app.UseAuditing();
  }
  • Summary
    • Add the AuditLogging EFCore module and provider config.
    • Add/use the AbpAuditLogging connection string (or it falls back to Default).
    • Create migrations for AbpAuditLoggingDbContext (design-time factory often required).
    • Run DbMigrator; it will then create and migrate the separate audit DB.
  1. Sources
  • EF Core integration and per-context provider configuration:
    • https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Entity-Framework-Core
  • Connection strings (default and per-module names):
    • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/fundamentals/connection-strings
  • Audit Logging module (usage and DB objects):
    • https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Modules/Audit-Logging
  • Support thread confirming provider config and UseAuditing requirement:
    • https://abp.io/support/questions/6880

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution
  • Short answer
    • Use the abp-modal options input to pass ng-bootstrap’s NgbModalOptions and set a unique windowClass for that one modal. Then, add a global style targeting that specific windowClass to control the width. This changes only that modal.
  • How to do it
    1. Set a unique windowClass via options on your abp-modal
<abp-modal
    [(visible)]="isOpen"
    [options]="{ windowClass: 'my-wide-modal', size: 'xl' }"
  >
    <ng-template #abpHeader>My Wide Editor</ng-template>
    <ng-template #abpBody> ... complex content ... </ng-template>
    <ng-template #abpFooter>
      <abp-button (click)="isOpen = false">Close</abp-button>
    </ng-template>
  </abp-modal>

Notes:

  • options is forwarded to NgbModal.open(...) internally, so you can use any NgbModalOptions, including windowClass, size, centered, scrollable, keyboard, etc.
  • size can be set here as well, but for a near-full-width modal you’ll typically override width via CSS.
  1. Add a global style that targets only that modal window Put this in styles.scss (or global theme stylesheet):
ngb-modal-window.my-wide-modal .modal-dialog {
    max-width: 90vw !important; /* or a fixed px width */
    width: 90vw;                /* ensure it expands */
    margin: 1.5rem auto;        /* optional: adjust centering/margins */
  }

  /* Optionally control body height/scrolling if needed */
  ngb-modal-window.my-wide-modal .modal-content {
    height: calc(100vh - 3rem);
  }

Why global? NgbModal renders outside the component tree, so ViewEncapsulation styles won’t reach it. A unique windowClass ensures the rule applies only to that single modal, not globally.

  • About dialogClass/modalClass inputs

    • abp-modal does not expose dialogClass or modalClass inputs; hence the Angular template error you saw. Use options.windowClass instead.
  • Is passing custom NgbModal options supported?

    • Yes. abp-modal exposes an options input of type NgbModalOptions and spreads it into NgbModal.open(...). You can set windowClass, size, centered, scrollable, keyboard, etc., and they will be respected.
  • If you prefer a CSS-only approach without options

    • You can still set the unique class via options (recommended), then handle all sizing purely in CSS as shown above. Avoid styling only by Bootstrap’s modal-xl class globally, since that affects all modals.
  • Recommended alternative for very complex editors

    • If the content requires near full-page experience, consider:
      • Routing to a dedicated page for the editor (best UX for heavy forms/tables).
      • Or, still use abp-modal with windowClass and add responsive CSS as above.
  1. Sources
  • ABP Angular Modal component forwards options (NgbModalOptions) including windowClass/size to NgbModal:
    • https://github.com/abpframework/abp/blob/dev/npm/ng-packs/packages/theme-shared/src/lib/components/modal/modal.component.ts
  • ABP Angular Modal docs:
    • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/ui/angular/modal

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution
  • What happened

    • ABP Commercial packages perform a license check at application startup. If the local ABP CLI session is missing/expired, protected packages fail the check and the application stops. The CLI shows a clear message (“You need to log in using abp login …”), but when only running the app you may not see that message in your console/logs depending on environment/logging configuration.
  • Immediate fix (so you can continue working)

    1. Log in to ABP Platform via CLI:
      • abp login
      • or abp login --device
      • or abp login <username> -p ****** --password
    2. Restart your application.
  • Make the failure visible next time

    • Ensure the license error is written to logs:
      • Set logging level to Information (or lower) for startup in your host project so the “ABP-LIC-ERROR” line is captured by your logger (console, Serilog, Application Insights, etc.).
    • If you use containers or services that don’t show interactive console:
      • Run abp login during your build/CI agent user context before publishing or running the app.
      • Or run abp login --device in a provision step and persist the tool’s user profile for the service account.
  • CI/CD and production guidance

    • Never rely on an interactive login at deploy time. Use one of:
      • Perform abp login in the build agent account and publish artifacts from that agent.
      • For container images, run abp login in the Docker build (multi-stage) using the same user that runs the app, then copy the tool’s persisted credentials to the final image layer.
    • If you see “ABP-LIC-ERROR - License check failed … You need to log in using the command abp login <username>”: this is the definitive signal that the environment running the app lacks a valid ABP CLI session. Fix by logging in as the account under which the app runs.
  • Feature request acknowledgement

    • Your request for a specific, explicit runtime exception (e.g., AbpSessionException with a “You must login to your ABP account…” message) makes sense. Today, the clear prompt is emitted by the CLI or appears as a license error log line. I’ve noted your suggestion so it can be considered to surface a dedicated, high-visibility exception including remediation steps when license validation fails at startup.
  1. Sources
  • ABP CLI login command and session requirement:
    • https://abp.io/docs/latest/cli/

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution
  • The AbpAuditLoggingDbContext uses a predefined connection string name: "AbpAuditLogging". If you don’t define it, it falls back to the "Default" connection string.

  • To store audit logs in a separate database, add a dedicated connection string named AbpAuditLogging in your configuration. No extra wiring to the DbContext is needed beyond using the EF Core provider for that context.

Steps:

  1. Add connection strings
{
  "ConnectionStrings": {
    "Default": "Server=.;Database=MainDb;Trusted_Connection=True;TrustServerCertificate=true",
    "AbpAuditLogging": "Server=.;Database=AuditDb;Trusted_Connection=True;TrustServerCertificate=true"
  }
}
  1. Ensure EF Core provider is configured for the audit DbContext
[DependsOn(
    typeof(Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer.AbpEntityFrameworkCoreSqlServerModule),
    typeof(Volo.Abp.AuditLogging.EntityFrameworkCore.AbpAuditLoggingEntityFrameworkCoreModule)
)]
public class YourAppEntityFrameworkCoreModule : AbpModule
{
    public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
    {
        Configure<AbpDbContextOptions>(options =>
        {
            // Global provider or per-context
            options.UseSqlServer();

            options.Configure<Volo.Abp.AuditLogging.EntityFrameworkCore.AbpAuditLoggingDbContext>(c =>
            {
                c.UseSqlServer();
            });
        });
    }
}
  1. (Optional) If you use connection string grouping/mapping
  • Not required just to separate the DB. Defining "AbpAuditLogging" is sufficient because the module resolves that name automatically. Use AbpDbConnectionOptions mapping only if you need advanced grouping scenarios.

Why this works:

  • The Audit Logging module resolves connection strings by the name "AbpAuditLogging". If it exists, AbpAuditLoggingDbContext uses it; otherwise it uses "Default". You don’t need to set a custom name or write a custom IAuditingStore for a different database.
  1. Sources
  • Connection strings (default and per-module names):
    • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/fundamentals/connection-strings
  • EF Core integration and per-DbContext provider configuration:
    • https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Entity-Framework-Core
  • Audit Logging module (connection string name and fallback behavior):
    • https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Modules/Audit-Logging

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution
  • You’re right: AbpDbConnectionOptions.Databases.Configure(...).MappedConnections.Add(...) expects connection name strings, not DbContext types. Use the module’s connection name for Audit Logging.

  • Correct configuration for storing Audit Logs in a separate database:

    1. Define a dedicated connection string name (e.g., "AuditLogging") and set it in appsettings.json:
{
  "ConnectionStrings": {
    "Default": "Server=.;Database=MainDb;Trusted_Connection=True;TrustServerCertificate=true",
    "AuditLogging": "Server=.;Database=AuditDb;Trusted_Connection=True;TrustServerCertificate=true"
  }
}
  1. Map the Audit Logging module’s connection name to "AuditLogging":
Configure<AbpDbConnectionOptions>(options =>
{
    options.Databases.Configure("AuditLogging", db =>
    {
        // Map module connection names (strings), not types
        db.MappedConnections.Add("AbpAuditLogging");
    });
});
  1. Ensure EF Core uses SQL Server for the audit DbContext:
Configure<AbpDbContextOptions>(options =>
{
    options.UseSqlServer();
    options.Configure<Volo.Abp.AuditLogging.EntityFrameworkCore.AbpAuditLoggingDbContext>(opt =>
    {
        opt.UseSqlServer();
    });
});
  1. Make sure the Audit Logging EF Core module is added:
[DependsOn(
    typeof(Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer.AbpEntityFrameworkCoreSqlServerModule),
    typeof(Volo.Abp.AuditLogging.EntityFrameworkCore.AbpAuditLoggingEntityFrameworkCoreModule)
)]
public class YourAppEntityFrameworkCoreModule : AbpModule
{
}
  • Why this works:
    • ABP resolves connection strings by name. The Audit Logging EFCore integration uses the connection name "AbpAuditLogging". Mapping that name to your "AuditLogging" connection groups the audit module to your AuditDb, while other modules fall back to Default. No custom IAuditingStore is needed.
  1. Sources
  • ABP Connection Strings (mapping module connections to a grouped connection):
    • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/fundamentals/connection-strings
  • ABP EF Core integration (per-DbContext provider configuration):
    • https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Entity-Framework-Core
  • ABP Audit Logging module:
    • https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Modules/Audit-Logging

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution
  • Use a single DbMigrator to migrate both databases (your main “Default” DB and the separate Audit Logging DB). ABP’s DbMigrator already supports multiple DbContexts and multiple databases; you only need to map the AbpAuditLoggingDbContext to its own connection and ensure its migrations are included.

  • Steps:

    1. Configure connections and mapping
    • appsettings.json (DbMigrator and any process that runs migrations):
{
    "ConnectionStrings": {
      "Default": "Server=.;Database=MainDb;Trusted_Connection=True;TrustServerCertificate=true",
      "AuditLogging": "Server=.;Database=AuditDb;Trusted_Connection=True;TrustServerCertificate=true"
    }
  }
  • In your EF Core module (e.g., YourApp.EntityFrameworkCoreModule):
[DependsOn(
      typeof(AbpEntityFrameworkCoreSqlServerModule),
      typeof(AbpAuditLoggingEntityFrameworkCoreModule)
  )]
  public class YourAppEntityFrameworkCoreModule : AbpModule
  {
      public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
      {
          Configure<AbpDbContextOptions>(options =>
          {
              options.UseSqlServer();
              options.Configure<AbpAuditLoggingDbContext>(c => c.UseSqlServer());
          });

          Configure<AbpDbConnectionOptions>(options =>
          {
              options.Databases.Configure("AuditLogging", db =>
              {
                  db.MappedConnections.Add(typeof(AbpAuditLoggingDbContext));
              });
          });
      }
  }
  1. Include migrations for both DbContexts
  • Create migrations for your main app DbContext as usual.
  • Create migrations for AbpAuditLoggingDbContext in your migrations project (or unified EFCore project), for example:
dotnet ef migrations add "Init_Audit_Logging" --context AbpAuditLoggingDbContext

Ensure the design-time factory (IDesignTimeDbContextFactory) for AbpAuditLoggingDbContext reads the “AuditLogging” connection.

  1. Make the DbMigrator run all contexts
  • The standard ABP DbMigrator template iterates registered IDbSchemaMigrator implementations for each context. Because AbpAuditLoggingEntityFrameworkCoreModule registers its DbSchemaMigrator for AbpAuditLoggingDbContext, the single DbMigrator will:
    • Migrate Default (main) database.
    • Then migrate the AuditLogging database.
  • No second DbMigrator is needed.
  1. Run the single migrator
cd your-solution/src/YourApp.DbMigrator
  dotnet run

It should apply migrations to MainDb and AuditDb respectively.

  • Notes:
    • Do not call options.UseSqlServer() globally for all contexts if you later need a different provider; instead use options.Configure<TDbContext>(...) per context as above (ABP supports per-DbContext provider selection).
    • If you prefer to group by name instead of type mapping, you can map via the connection name “AbpAuditLogging” and create that connection string; the key is that AbpAuditLoggingDbContext resolves to a distinct connection.
  1. Sources
  • Validated: EF Core integration and per-context database mapping
    • https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Entity-Framework-Core
  • Validated: Connection string grouping and mapping with AbpDbConnectionOptions
    • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/fundamentals/connection-strings
  • Validated: Multiple DbContexts and providers discussion (shows per-context configuration approach)
    • https://abp.io/support/questions/3579

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

Showing 1 to 10 of 726 entries
Boost Your Development
ABP Live Training
Packages
See Trainings
Mastering ABP Framework Book
The Official Guide
Mastering
ABP Framework
Learn More
Mastering ABP Framework Book
Made with ❤️ on ABP v10.1.0-preview. Updated on December 17, 2025, 07:08
1
ABP Assistant
🔐 You need to be logged in to use the chatbot. Please log in first.