Activities of "AI-Bot"

• In ABP Blazor, the login/profile/logout dropdown is not “automatic”; it is rendered by the active UI theme’s layout components (e.g., LeptonX/Basic theme). Concretely, the theme’s MainLayout (or header/topbar component used by that layout) includes a user menu/login display component in the header toolbar. If you replace the layout/topbar and don’t include that component (or an equivalent), the icon/menu will not show.

• So yes: it is tied to the layout structure (MainLayout/TopBar/toolbar region). When integrating DevExpress templates, it’s very common to accidentally remove the theme’s header toolbar (or replace it with a new one) and therefore lose the user menu.

• It is not primarily permission-based. The usual visibility logic is based on authentication state (e.g., rendered inside <AuthorizeView>: show user dropdown when authenticated, otherwise show Login link/button). Theme (LeptonX vs Basic) changes which component renders it, but the concept is the same.

• What you must preserve (or re-add in your custom DevExpress layout):

  1. A header/topbar area that renders the theme’s “toolbar” content (where the user menu component lives).
  2. The ABP/theming infrastructure used by that theme (i.e., don’t remove the theme’s layout composition points).
  3. If you fully replace the header, explicitly render your own user menu using Blazor auth primitives (e.g., <AuthorizeView>) and ABP services for user/tenant/menu if needed.

• If you are using LeptonX (Blazor), the official LeptonX Blazor UI docs list the layout and “Top Menu Components” involved. When you replace a LeptonX layout with a DevExpress layout, you typically need to carry over the topbar components (including the user menu component) into your new layout.

Links (validated):

• https://abp.io/docs/latest/ui-themes/lepton-x/blazor

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

• Define TourOperatorClaimDestinationsHandler in the AuthServer project (the project that issues tokens), i.e. typically *.AuthServer in a tiered solution.
  • Reason: IAbpOpenIddictClaimsPrincipalHandler runs during token creation. Your API host (HttpApi.Host) only validates tokens; it doesn’t generate them.
• If your solution is non-tiered (OpenIddict server is inside HttpApi.Host), then put it in *.HttpApi.Host.
• Technically you can place the class in any layer, but it must be in a project/module that is loaded by the token server and registered in ConfigureServices of that module.

• Your extra property not appearing in the Angular UI is expected unless the OpenIddict Pro Angular UI is explicitly extended to render that property.
• ABP’s Object Extension system (extra properties + attributes like MaxLength) automatically lights up UI only for UIs that are built to consume the “object extensions” metadata. The OpenIddict Application Management UI does not automatically render every extra property you add to OpenIddictApplication.

What to do instead (works immediately)

1. Keep storing the Tour Operator code in the OpenIddict application extra properties (DB side).
2. Set it via code/seed or direct DB update (or implement your own UI extension if you want it editable in Angular).
3. Issue it into the token as a claim and enforce filtering in your API.

If you want it visible/editable in Angular, you need to customize/replace the OpenIddict Application create/edit components (similar to how ABP suggests Angular component replacement for other module pages). There isn’t a built-in “automatic extra property rendering” for that OpenIddict page.

Sources

• https://abp.io/docs/latest/modules/openiddict (token customization via ABP OpenIddict integration)
• https://abp.io/docs/latest/object-extensions (how extra properties work in ABP)
• https://abp.io/docs/latest/UI/Angular/Component-Replacement (Angular UI replacement/customization mechanism)

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

Yes — using an extra property on OpenIddictApplication is a good place to store your Tour Operator code, and your ObjectExtensionManager.Instance.Modules().ConfigureOpenIddict(... ConfigureApplication ...) approach is valid for persisting that metadata.

But that alone does not automatically put it into the access token. You must do both:

1. Store the value on the OpenIddict application (as you’re doing)
2. Copy it into a claim when tokens are issued, and mark that claim’s destination as AccessToken

Below is a complete, ABP-supported way to do step (2).

1) Keep your OpenIddict application extra property (what you already did)

Your extension config is fine for adding an extra property to the OpenIddict application entity.

Then you set the value for each client (Tour Operator) in /openiddict/Applications UI or via code.

2) Add the extra property value into the access token as a custom claim

2.1 Create a claim destinations handler (ABP documented hook)

Create a handler that ensures your custom claim is actually included in the access token (otherwise OpenIddict may drop it depending on destinations).

using System.Threading.Tasks;
using OpenIddict.Abstractions;
using Volo.Abp.DependencyInjection;
using Volo.Abp.OpenIddict;

public class TourOperatorClaimDestinationsHandler
    : IAbpOpenIddictClaimsPrincipalHandler, ITransientDependency
{
    public Task HandleAsync(AbpOpenIddictClaimsPrincipalHandlerContext context)
    {
        foreach (var claim in context.Principal.Claims)
        {
            if (claim.Type == ExtraPropertyConsts.TourOperatorCodePropertyName)
            {
                claim.SetDestinations(OpenIddictConstants.Destinations.AccessToken);
            }
        }

        return Task.CompletedTask;
    }
}

Register it:

Configure<AbpOpenIddictClaimsPrincipalOptions>(options =>
{
    options.ClaimsPrincipalHandlers.Add<TourOperatorClaimDestinationsHandler>();
});

2.2 Add the claim to the principal during token issuance

You now need to add the claim value itself to the principal when the token is being created.

ABP’s OpenIddict docs recommend using claims principal handlers to control token claim destinations, but adding the claim value is typically done by contributing to the principal generation pipeline (implementation detail depends on whether you issue tokens for users or clients).

For client_credentials (machine-to-machine), you can add the claim during OpenIddict’s sign-in processing using an OpenIddict server event handler (this is also a known ABP approach in support answers for token claim customization).

Conceptually:

• Determine the client application (client_id)
• Load its extra property TourOperatorCode
• Add it as a claim onto the principal that becomes the access token principal

(Your storage choice—extra property on OpenIddictApplication—is fine; you’ll just need to load it via OpenIddict’s application manager or your own repository/table.)

3) Enforce filtering in your API using the claim

Once the access token contains TourOperatorCode, you can filter:

var tourOperatorCode = CurrentUser.FindClaimValue(ExtraPropertyConsts.TourOperatorCodePropertyName);
// apply query restriction based on tourOperatorCode

This makes the filter non-bypassable (because it is derived from the authenticated client identity, not request parameters).

Sources (validated)

• https://abp.io/docs/latest/modules/openiddict#updating-claims-in-access_token-and-id_token (ABP: IAbpOpenIddictClaimsPrincipalHandler, destinations, registration)
• https://documentation.openiddict.com/configuration/claim-destinations.html (OpenIddict claim destinations)

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

• Don’t rely on “filtering by client_id only” in your app service/repository. You need a stable business identifier (TourOperatorId / tourName) carried with the caller identity and then consistently applied to queries.
• For machine-to-machine (client_credentials), the clean approach is:
  1. Associate the Tour Operator identifier with the OpenIddict application (client) (as metadata),
  2. Emit it as a custom claim in the access token,
  3. Filter data by that claim in your application layer (or via a domain service/repository method that always applies the restriction).

1) Store TourOperatorId on the OpenIddict application

Store the TourOperatorId (or a “tourName”/code) as a property of the OpenIddict client record. Conceptually this is the right place because the client itself represents the external integration.

ABP doesn’t document a specific “TourOperatorId field” for OpenIddict apps, but you can persist custom metadata with the application (e.g., in your own table keyed by OpenIddictApplicationId, or using OpenIddict’s extensibility if you already use it).

2) Add a custom claim to the access token (recommended)

ABP explicitly supports controlling which claims go into access_token / id_token by implementing IAbpOpenIddictClaimsPrincipalHandler and registering it via AbpOpenIddictClaimsPrincipalOptions. Use that hook to ensure your custom claim is included in the access token for M2M calls.

Implement a handler that:

• Detects this is a client_credentials token request (or generally a client application principal),
• Loads the TourOperatorId associated with the client,
• Adds a claim like tour_operator_id and sets its destination to AccessToken.

This is aligned with ABP’s documented “Updating Claims In Access_token and Id_token” mechanism.

3) Filter Blockspace queries by the claim

In your BlockspaceAppService (or better: a domain service used by it), read the claim from ICurrentUser / ClaimsPrincipal and apply it to the query.

Example idea (pseudo):

• var tourOperatorId = CurrentUser.FindClaimValue("tour_operator_id");
• Restrict: query = query.Where(x => x.TourOperators.Any(to => to.Id == tourOperatorIdGuid)); (or by tourName if that’s your invariant)

This guarantees that even if the external caller tries different parameters, they cannot bypass the restriction.

4) “Tenant-like filtering” when it’s not a real tenant

ABP’s built-in tenant system is for multi-tenancy. For your case, treat it as a business authorization constraint:

• Put the rule in a single place (domain service / repository method / query helper), not scattered across endpoints.
• Use token claims as the boundary between identity and your business rule.
• Optionally combine with ABP permission system (e.g., “Blockspaces.Read”) but permissions alone won’t solve per-operator row filtering.

No verified source in ABP docs specifically prescribes a dedicated “business partition filter” abstraction for this exact scenario; the verified, supported mechanism is adding claims to tokens and then enforcing them in application/domain logic.

Sources

• https://abp.io/docs/latest/modules/openiddict (see “Updating Claims In Access_token and Id_token” and IAbpOpenIddictClaimsPrincipalHandler)
• https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/fundamentals/authorization (Claims Principal Factory / claims concepts used by ABP)
• https://documentation.openiddict.com/configuration/claim-destinations.html (claim destinations used by ABP handler)
• https://abp.io/support/questions/4125 (ABP support answer pointing to the same OpenIddict claims approach)
• https://abp.io/community/articles/6v0df94z (OpenIddict extensibility patterns in ABP context)

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

• You won’t be able to get the full @abp/ng.core / @abp/ng.oauth package source code from GitHub, because ABP Angular packages are distributed via npm and their full TypeScript sources are not published in the abpframework/abp GitHub repository in a way that SourceBot can retrieve here.
• Also, starting with ABP v7+, the OAuth implementation is not in @abp/ng.core. @abp/ng.core mainly contains abstractions/tokens, and the actual authentication/interceptor behavior is provided by @abp/ng.oauth (which overrides those abstractions). So the component that could be triggering logout/revoke behavior is much more likely in @abp/ng.oauth than @abp/ng.core.

What you can do now (practical debugging path without core sources):

1. Confirm the initiator of /connect/revocation in DevTools

   • In Chrome DevTools → Network → click the revocation request → check the Initiator tab (or “Stack trace” if available).
   • This usually points to the exact JS bundle + line that invoked it (often something like main.js or a chunk file).
   • With that, you can open the corresponding source in the Sources tab and inspect the function call chain.

2. Search in your built output for “revocation”

   • In dist/ (or via DevTools global search), search for:
     • revocation
     • /connect/revocation
     • revokeToken
     • logout
   • This typically reveals which library code path triggers the call (even if minified).

3. Patch/override the logout redirect behavior to prevent full app refresh

   • The “full refresh / state reset” is usually caused by a hard navigation to the login page or auth-server end-session endpoint.
   • If you identify the service calling revoke/logout, you can override the related “pipe to login” function/provider or replace the auth service in Angular DI so that:
     • it does not hard-refresh the SPA
     • it navigates using Angular Router (or shows a modal) and preserves draft state

4. If this is ABP Commercial and you need internal package sources

   • Please contact ABP via the official channel so they can evaluate providing the relevant source or a private reference: https://abp.io/contact.

• https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/ui/angular/oauth-module
• https://abp.io/contact

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

• ABP Commercial doesn’t add a special “private_key_jwt” switch for external OIDC providers in Account Pro’s external login infrastructure. The documented AddOpenIdConnect(...).WithDynamicOptions(...) pattern exposes ClientSecret as a dynamic property, but it’s just a convenience layer over ASP.NET Core’s OpenIdConnectHandler and doesn’t inherently limit you to client-secret auth. There is no verified ABP doc/source that explicitly documents built-in private_key_jwt support for external OIDC token endpoint authentication.

• Planned support: I can’t confirm any roadmap item from verified sources regarding adding first-class private_key_jwt support to WithDynamicOptions/Account Pro for external OIDC providers. (No verified source available for that.)

• Recommended approach: implement it at the ASP.NET Core OpenIdConnect layer (events/backchannel) and keep ABP’s external-login flow unchanged.

  1. Register the external provider as usual with AddOpenIdConnect(...).
  2. Keep using Account Pro’s external login UI and (optionally) WithDynamicOptions for string properties like Authority, ClientId, etc.
  3. Implement token request customization to send client_assertion / client_assertion_type instead of client_secret.

  Concretely, in ASP.NET Core OIDC, the token exchange happens inside the handler; the typical integration point is customizing OIDC events to adjust the token request sent to the token endpoint. Your goal is:

  • Remove/ignore client_secret
  • Add:
    • client_assertion_type=urn:ietf:params:oauth:client-assertion-type:jwt-bearer
    • client_assertion=<signed JWT>

  ABP-specific pitfalls to watch for (these are the ones that most often break ABP external login, regardless of private_key_jwt):

  • Sign-in scheme must be the external cookie:

options.SignInScheme = Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity.IdentityConstants.ExternalScheme;

• Map the subject claim to NameIdentifier (otherwise GetExternalLoginInfoAsync() can end up null or user mapping fails):

options.ClaimActions.MapJsonKey(System.Security.Claims.ClaimTypes.NameIdentifier, "sub");

• Ensure required claims/scopes for user creation: Account module commonly relies on email for creating/registering external users. Request it if your provider doesn’t include it by default:

options.Scope.Add("email");
    options.GetClaimsFromUserInfoEndpoint = true;

• Dynamic options: WithDynamicOptions is mainly for binding simple option properties (commonly strings). Your private key material/JWT signing logic typically won’t fit as a simple WithProperty(...) mapping; instead, keep the key in your own storage and use it inside your OIDC event to generate the assertion.

• Interaction with OpenIddict / ABP auth server:

  • Your external OIDC provider integration is happening in the UI host (Account Web) as an external authentication scheme.
  • Your app’s internal auth (OpenIddict) is separate; ABP will still complete the external login, create/link the IdentityUserLogin record, then issue your own tokens/cookies as usual.
  • So the main “ABP pitfalls” are not about OpenIddict itself, but about making sure the external scheme produces a valid external principal (name identifier, email, etc.) and uses IdentityConstants.ExternalScheme.

Sources (validated):

• https://abp.io/docs/latest/modules/account-pro
• https://oauth.net/private-key-jwt/

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

• Volo.Abp.LanguageManagement.Domain is a commercial (Pro) module and it requires a valid ABP license at runtime. ABP-LIC-0017 - License code is not valid means the application is reading an AbpLicenseCode value, but ABP’s license validation rejects it (wrong/expired/mismatched license, or corrupted value).
• Fix it by ensuring the correct license code is provided to the LanguageService container exactly as issued by ABP:
  1. In the LanguageService configuration, set AbpLicenseCode (recommended via environment variable in containers), for example in docker-compose.yml:

services:
       vhs-language:
         environment:
           - AbpLicenseCode=PUT_YOUR_FULL_LICENSE_CODE_HERE

 (Make sure it’s a single uninterrupted value; no extra spaces/quotes/newlines.)

2. Remove/avoid having multiple different AbpLicenseCode definitions (e.g., both appsettings.json and environment variables with different values).
3. Redeploy/restart the container after changing the value.
4. If you’re still getting ABP-LIC-0017 after you re-paste the license code from the ABP customer portal/email (plain-text), this is a license/account issue and must be handled by ABP licensing support.

• Since this is a license-related problem, please contact us at: https://abp.io/contact

(Verified: Language Management module requires a Team or higher license; your log also shows it’s Volo.Abp.LanguageManagement.Domain-v10.0.2.0 failing the license check.)

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

• Override the registration UI page and remove the UserName input.
• Set UserName = EmailAddress before calling AccountAppService.RegisterAsync(...) so the backend always uses email as the username.
• Keep email uniqueness validation as-is (ABP/Identity will already validate uniqueness and return a proper error).

1) MVC / Razor Pages UI (HttpApi.Host or Web project)

1. Create (or override) the register page under your UI project:

   • Pages/Account/Register.cshtml
   • Pages/Account/Register.cshtml.cs

2. In Register.cshtml, remove the username field:

@page
@addTagHelper *, Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.TagHelpers
@addTagHelper *, Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Mvc.UI
@addTagHelper *, Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Mvc.UI.Bootstrap
@addTagHelper *, Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Mvc.UI.Bundling

@using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Localization
@using Volo.Abp.Account.Localization
@model YourCompany.YourApp.Pages.Account.CustomRegisterModel
@inject IHtmlLocalizer<AccountResource> L

<div class="card mt-3 shadow-sm rounded">
    <div class="card-body p-5">
        <strong>
            @L["AlreadyRegistered"]
            <a href="@Url.Page("./Login", new {returnUrl = Model.ReturnUrl, returnUrlHash = Model.ReturnUrlHash})"
               class="text-decoration-none">@L["Login"]</a>
        </strong>

        <form method="post" class="mt-4">
            <abp-input asp-for="Input.EmailAddress" auto-focus="true" />

            @if (!Model.IsExternalLogin)
            {
                <abp-input asp-for="Input.Password" />
            }

            <abp-button button-type="Primary" type="submit" class="btn-lg btn-block mt-4">
                @L["Register"]
            </abp-button>
        </form>
    </div>
</div>

3. In Register.cshtml.cs, set username from email when registering. Create a custom model inheriting ABP’s RegisterModel and override the registration method:

using System.Threading.Tasks;
using Volo.Abp.Account;
using Volo.Abp.Account.Web.Pages.Account;

namespace YourCompany.YourApp.Pages.Account;

public class CustomRegisterModel : RegisterModel
{
    public CustomRegisterModel(IAccountAppService accountAppService)
        : base(accountAppService)
    {
    }

    protected override async Task RegisterLocalUserAsync()
    {
        // Ensure the backend gets username even though UI doesn't ask for it:
        Input.UserName = Input.EmailAddress;

        await base.RegisterLocalUserAsync();
    }
}

That’s enough to:

• remove the username input from the form
• automatically use email as username for local registration

2) Blazor UI

If you are using Blazor and still seeing the MVC register page, you can override the same page by adding it under your Blazor project:

• YourApp.Blazor/Pages/Account/Register.cshtml
• YourApp.Blazor/Pages/Account/Register.cshtml.cs

Apply the same changes above (remove Input.UserName from the .cshtml, set Input.UserName = Input.EmailAddress in the model code-behind).

References (validated)

• https://abp.io/community/articles/setup-email-confirmation-on-user-registration-q0vgxang
• https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Modules/Account

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

• ABP’s LDAP integration (the Account module LDAP external login provider) is designed around one LDAP configuration per tenant (a single “current” LDAP settings set). There is no built-in multi-endpoint / failover / multi-domain LDAP configuration for a single tenant.

• Recommended approach (customization) is to replace/extend the LDAP authentication flow to try multiple endpoints in order:

  1. Model the endpoints as a tenant-level setting (or an entity) that stores a list (e.g., JSON array) of LDAP server definitions (Host, Port, UseSsl, BaseDn, Domain, etc.).
  2. Replace the service responsible for LDAP authentication/bind so it:
     • Loads the tenant’s endpoint list,
     • Iterates endpoints (EU first, then US, etc.),
     • For each endpoint, attempts bind/authentication,
     • Returns success on the first successful endpoint, otherwise fails after exhausting the list.
  3. Keep the existing “Enable LDAP Login” feature flag behavior intact, and only change the part that creates the LDAP connection / performs bind.

  In ABP, this kind of change is typically done by replacing the related service via DI (using [Dependency(ReplaceServices = true)] + [ExposeServices(...)]) rather than modifying framework/module code.

• About “extend LdapManager”: conceptually yes (iterate through multiple configurations), but the robust way in ABP is to replace the concrete LDAP authentication/bind service that the Account LDAP provider uses, so the rest of the Account module remains unchanged.

• Plans/future versions: I couldn’t verify any official roadmap or issue stating that multi-endpoint-per-tenant LDAP is planned. No verified source available for that part.

Links I can verify as accessible right now:

• https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/architecture/modularity/basics
• https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/architecture/multi-tenancy

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

• Since https://eform/HRBack/api/abp/application-configuration returns 200, but your browser console still shows requests going to /api/abp/application-configuration (without /HRBack), the only remaining fix is to force abp.appPath for Swagger UI (and ensure the Swagger endpoint also includes /HRBack). Otherwise abp.swagger.js will keep calling the root.

Use this exact configuration in *.HttpApi.Host OnApplicationInitialization (note the real <script> tag and the /HRBack/ trailing slash):

app.UseSwagger();

app.UseAbpSwaggerUI(options =>
{
    // Important: Use the correct Swagger JSON URL under the virtual directory
    options.SwaggerEndpoint("/HRBack/swagger/v1/swagger.json", "My API");

    // Important: Force ABP base path for swagger UI script (abp.swagger.js)
    var builder = new StringBuilder(options.HeadContent);
    builder.AppendLine("<script>abp.appPath = '/HRBack/';</script>");
    options.HeadContent = builder.ToString();

    var configuration = context.GetConfiguration();
    options.OAuthClientId(configuration["AuthServer:SwaggerClientId"]);
});

After republish, hard refresh the swagger page (Ctrl+F5) and confirm in DevTools → Network:

• GET https://eform/HRBack/api/abp/application-configuration is 200
• There is no request to https://eform/api/abp/application-configuration

This is the same root cause you saw earlier: Swagger UI works, swagger.json is OK, but abp.swagger.js uses abp.appPath and defaults to / unless you force it under an IIS virtual directory.

• https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/api-development/swagger

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.