Activities of "AI-Bot"

  1. Solution
  • Root cause: In the MVC Book Store sample, the New Book button uses ABP’s ModalManager and generated JavaScript proxies. If the global proxy namespace isn’t initialized on the page, clicking “New book” won’t do anything. On some setups (often Linux or when script order/bundling differs), the proxy object path can be undefined, so the button appears but the click handler silently fails.

  • Quick fix in Pages/Books/Index.js:

    • Locate the line initializing the service proxy. It typically looks like: var bookService = bookStore.books.book;
    • Change it to use the correct global namespace that ABP emits: var bookService = window.myBookStore.books.book;
  • Ensure the page includes the generated JS proxies before Index.js:

    • In Pages/Books/Index.cshtml, verify the scripts section: @section scripts { <abp-script src="/Abp/ApplicationConfigurationScript" /> <abp-script src="/AbpServiceProxies.js" /> <abp-script src="/Pages/Books/Index.js" /> } This guarantees the proxies and application configuration are loaded before your Index.js.
  • Verify bundling isn’t stripping or reordering required scripts:

    • If you customized bundling, ensure Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Mvc.UI.Bundling includes AbpServiceProxies.js (either via default bundles or your bundle contributors) and that Index.js is loaded after it.
  • Double-check the selector and click handler wiring:

    • The button ID in Index.cshtml must match the code: <abp-button id="NewBookButton" ... />
    • In Index.js: $('#NewBookButton').click(function (e) { e.preventDefault(); createModal.open(); });
  • If the modal still doesn’t open:

    • Confirm the modal pages exist and are routable: new abp.ModalManager(abp.appPath + 'Books/CreateModal'); new abp.ModalManager(abp.appPath + 'Books/EditModal'); Ensure Pages/Books/CreateModal.cshtml and EditModal.cshtml are present and the Razor page routes match (no folder/area mismatch).
    • Check permissions: the button is often wrapped with permission checks. Make sure the current user has BookStore.Books.Create.
  • Note on OS differences (Linux vs Windows):

    • File name case sensitivity: On Linux, file paths are case-sensitive. Ensure the script and page file names and paths referenced in code exactly match their casing on disk (e.g., Index.js vs index.js; Books/CreateModal vs books/createmodal).
  1. Sources
  • ABP GitHub issue/workaround that matches the undefined proxy namespace problem on generated MVC CRUD (fix by using window.myBookStore.books.book):
    • https://github.com/abpframework/abp
  • Repro repository you shared:
    • https://github.com/magentuseu/abp-tests

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution
  • Why the markup looks different

    • You copied the free Account module’s Login.cshtml. However, you are using Account Pro Public Web (Volo.Abp.Account.Pro.Public.Web via the volo.abp.account.pro.public.web 9.0.2 package). The Pro Public Web module has different markup, partials, and styling hooks than the free module, so copying the free module’s page will visually regress the layout.
  • Get the correct, up-to-date view for Account Pro

    • Download the commercial module source code that matches your version, then copy the Login.cshtml from the Pro Public Web module as your starting point. ABP provides the theme/module source to commercial customers; use it to extract the exact Razor page used by your version so styles and structure remain intact.
    • Steps:
      1. Download commercial source packages for your licensed version (Account Pro + LeptonX/LeptonXLite if used).
      2. Locate the Razor page used by the login in Account Pro Public Web for your version. Path is typically under the module’s Pages/Account/Login.cshtml within Volo.Abp.Account.Pro.Public.Web.
      3. In your Auth Server project, create the override file at:
        • YourAuthServerProject/Pages/Account/Login.cshtml
      4. Copy the Pro Public Web Login.cshtml into your override.
      5. Ensure _ViewImports.cshtml includes ABP TagHelpers so the page compiles and renders correctly:
@addTagHelper *, Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.TagHelpers
       @addTagHelper *, Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Mvc.UI
       @addTagHelper *, Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Mvc.UI.Bootstrap
       @addTagHelper *, Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Mvc.UI.Bundling
6) Keep the original model type from the Pro page (don’t switch to the free module’s LoginModel). If you need to extend behavior, subclass the correct Pro LoginModel type and only change the @model accordingly.
7) Now, minimally customize only the external login section:
   - Find the external login block:
     - The form with asp-page="./Login" asp-page-handler="ExternalLogin" (or a dedicated partial used for external providers).
   - Insert your small changes (e.g., button text, icon, order), leaving all other markup intact to preserve styling.
  • If you only want to inject buttons without copying the whole page

    • Best practice is still to start from the Pro Login.cshtml (so you are aligned with structure and CSS classes). Keep the file as-is and restrict edits to the external providers area.
    • If the Pro module renders external providers via a partial or a section, prefer overriding that partial only. Otherwise, keep the full page and make minimal edits.
  • LeptonX/LeptonXLite account layout note

    • The visual frame of the login typically comes from the theme’s Account layout. If your goal is only the external login area, don’t change the theme Account layout; keep using the Pro login page + your small edits.
  1. Sources
  • Validated: How to customize/override Razor Pages in ABP (explains the override mechanism and TagHelpers requirement):
    • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/ui/mvc-razor-pages/customization-user-interface
  • Validated: Example login page source for the free module (for comparison only; do not copy for Pro):
    • https://github.com/abpframework/abp/blob/dev/modules/account/src/Volo.Abp.Account.Web/Pages/Account/Login.cshtml
  • Validated: Community thread confirming differences between Free vs Pro namespaces and customization via overriding:
    • https://abp.io/support/questions/2587
  • Validated: Community guidance on overriding account layouts/pages and ensuring _ViewImports when customizing:
    • https://abp.io/support/questions/6571

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution Your test failure is thrown while ABP initializes the test application and runs your custom data seeding (NullReferenceException inside SiteManagementDataSeedContributor.SeedAsync). This typically happens in ABP tests when:
  • Seed contributors assume services or data that aren’t available in the test environment.
  • Seeding runs outside the proper tenant context.
  • Seeding touches EF Core or repositories before the DbContext is ready or within an unexpected transaction.

Apply the following steps to make your integration tests deterministic and fix the failure:

  • Guard your seed contributor against nulls and run inside a unit of work
public class SiteManagementDataSeedContributor : IDataSeedContributor, ITransientDependency
  {
      private readonly IUnitOfWorkManager _uowManager;
      private readonly IRepository<Contact, Guid> _contactRepository; // example
      private readonly ICurrentTenant _currentTenant;

      public SiteManagementDataSeedContributor(
          IUnitOfWorkManager uowManager,
          IRepository<Contact, Guid> contactRepository,
          ICurrentTenant currentTenant)
      {
          _uowManager = uowManager;
          _contactRepository = contactRepository;
          _currentTenant = currentTenant;
      }

      public async Task SeedAsync(DataSeedContext context)
      {
          // Avoid host-only seeding when you expect tenant-only data
          // and/or ensure you seed for a specific tenant
          using (_currentTenant.Change(context?.TenantId))
          {
              using (var uow = _uowManager.Begin(requiresNew: true))
              {
                  // Defensive checks to prevent NREs
                  if (_contactRepository == null)
                  {
                      await uow.CompleteAsync();
                      return;
                  }

                  // Example: skip if already seeded
                  var count = await _contactRepository.GetCountAsync();
                  if (count == 0)
                  {
                      await _contactRepository.InsertAsync(new Contact(/* init fields */), autoSave: true);
                      // ... add more seed data
                  }

                  await uow.CompleteAsync();
              }
          }
      }
  }
  • Ensure your test base module seeds within OnApplicationInitialization and inside a scope
public class SiteManagementTestBaseModule : AbpModule
  {
      public override void OnApplicationInitialization(ApplicationInitializationContext context)
      {
          SeedTestData(context);
      }

      private static void SeedTestData(ApplicationInitializationContext context)
      {
          AsyncHelper.RunSync(async () =>
          {
              using var scope = context.ServiceProvider.CreateScope();
              var dataSeeder = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<IDataSeeder>();

              // Optionally seed for host or a specific test tenant
              await dataSeeder.SeedAsync(new DataSeedContext(/* tenantId: null or a tenant Guid */));
          });
      }
  }
  • If multi-tenancy is involved, make sure your tenant-scoped entities implement IMultiTenant If your Contacts (or any entity you seed/query in tests) are tenant-specific, the entity must implement IMultiTenant so ABP applies tenant filters and the correct connection (in database-per-tenant or split schemas) is used.
public class Contact : AggregateRoot<Guid>, IMultiTenant
  {
      public Guid? TenantId { get; set; }
      // other properties...
  }
  • Disable transactions in tests if you see transaction-related initialization errors Some providers/settings can cause issues with ambient transactions during seeding and initialization. In your EntityFrameworkCore test module, add:
public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
  {
      Configure<AbpUnitOfWorkDefaultOptions>(options =>
      {
          options.TransactionBehavior = UnitOfWorkTransactionBehavior.Disabled;
      });

      context.Services.AddAlwaysDisableUnitOfWorkTransaction();

      Configure<FeatureManagementOptions>(options =>
      {
          options.SaveStaticFeaturesToDatabase = false;
          options.IsDynamicFeatureStoreEnabled = false;
      });
      Configure<PermissionManagementOptions>(options =>
      {
          options.SaveStaticPermissionsToDatabase = false;
          options.IsDynamicPermissionStoreEnabled = false;
      });
  }
  • Keep test seeding minimal and deterministic

    • Avoid external services or configuration that are not present in tests.
    • Use repositories only after Unit of Work is started.
    • Prefer idempotent seeding (check existence before insert).
  • If you need tenant data during test, explicitly seed for that tenant

var tenantId = /* known test tenant Guid */;
  await dataSeeder.SeedAsync(new DataSeedContext(tenantId));

These practices address:

  • The NullReferenceException by defensive coding and proper DI usage.
  • Ensuring the correct tenant context is used during seeding.
  • Avoiding transaction-related issues that can surface during test initialization.
  1. Sources
  • https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Testing
  • https://abp.io/support/questions/8896
  • https://abp.io/support/questions/6135

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution
  • Keep your tenant resolvers (e.g., Cookie, Header, etc.) as-is. The tenant switcher UI is rendered by the theme’s Account layout. Override that layout and remove the switcher block so nothing flashes on first paint.

  • For LeptonX theme (most common in recent ABP versions), create the same-path view in your Web project and remove the tenant switcher section:

    Create file: Themes/LeptonX/Layouts/Account/Default.cshtml Copy the original content from the theme (you can scaffold it from the package or use the structure below) and delete the conditional that shows the tenant switch:

@* Remove or comment out this entire block *@
  @* 
  @if (MultiTenancyOptions.Value.IsEnabled &&
       (TenantResolveResultAccessor.Result?.AppliedResolvers?.Contains(CookieTenantResolveContributor.ContributorName) == true ||
        TenantResolveResultAccessor.Result?.AppliedResolvers?.Contains(QueryStringTenantResolveContributor.ContributorName) == true))
  {
      <div>
          <div class="row">
              <div class="col">
                  <span style="font-size: .8em;" class="text-uppercase text-muted">@MultiTenancyStringLocalizer["Tenant"]</span><br />
                  <h6 class="m-0 d-inline-block">
                      @if (CurrentTenant.Id == null)
                      {
                          <span>@MultiTenancyStringLocalizer["NotSelected"]</span>
                      }
                      else
                      {
                          <strong>@(CurrentTenant.Name ?? CurrentTenant.Id.Value.ToString())</strong>
                      }
                  </h6>
              </div>
              <div class="col-auto">
                  <a id="AbpTenantSwitchLink" href="javascript:;" class="btn btn-sm btn-outline-primary">@MultiTenancyStringLocalizer["Switch"]</a>
              </div>
          </div>
      </div>
      <hr />
  }
  *@

Leave the rest of the layout unchanged. This removes the tenant switcher UI entirely, so it won’t briefly appear, while your server-side tenant resolution (cookie resolver and any others) remains intact.

  • If you use the Basic theme or another theme, override its account layout in the equivalent path and remove the same tenant switcher section (it’s the same conditional block that checks MultiTenancyOptions and AppliedResolvers).

  • Do not clear AbpTenantResolveOptions unless you intend to replace all resolvers. Keep your cookie (and any other needed) resolvers registered so your custom logic that sets tenant (based on username/email) continues to work.

  1. Sources
  • Validated ABP Support answer showing how to override the LeptonX Account layout to customize/hide the tenant switcher:
    • https://abp.io/support/questions/9283

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution
  • In ABP v10.x, the “SaaS” module and Multi-tenancy are controlled by two different things:

    • SaaS module presence (adds Saas* tables) depends on whether the template includes Volo.Saas.* packages and calls builder.ConfigureSaas() in your DbContext mapping. If included, SaaS tables will be created regardless of MultiTenancy being enabled or not.
    • Multi-tenancy behavior (tenant filter, tenant resolution, etc.) is controlled by AbpMultiTenancyOptions.IsEnabled or the MultiTenancyConsts.IsEnabled flag in the template.
  • What happened in your case:

    • Creating an MVC app “with SaaS turned off” using CLI disables multi-tenancy (so the app behaves as single-tenant), but if the selected template variant still references SaaS module packages, migrations will create SaaS tables anyway. This is expected if the solution includes SaaS module; turning multi-tenancy off does not automatically remove SaaS module or its tables.
  • How to create a solution with both SaaS and Multi-tenancy off (no SaaS tables, no multi-tenant behavior):

    1. Generate the project without SaaS module:
      • Use a template/option that doesn’t include SaaS. In ABP CLI, select the “without SaaS” option during creation. If you already created the solution and SaaS came in, remove it:
        • Remove Volo.Saas.* package references from:
          • Your .Domain, .Application, .EntityFrameworkCore, .HttpApi, .HttpApi.Host (and .Web) projects.
        • Remove module dependencies:
          • Delete [DependsOn(typeof(AbpSaas…))] lines from your module classes.
        • Remove EF Core mappings:
          • In your DbContext(s), delete builder.ConfigureSaas(); calls.
        • Remove SaaS UI/menu/permissions if present.
        • Delete SaaS migrations or add a new clean migration after removing mappings.
    2. Ensure multi-tenancy is disabled:
      • In your Domain.Shared project’s MultiTenancyConsts.cs: public static bool IsEnabled = false;
      • Or in configuration: Configure<AbpMultiTenancyOptions>(options => options.IsEnabled = false);
    3. Regenerate migrations and database:
      • Delete existing migrations that include Saas* tables (and the database if it was created).
      • Add a new initial migration and update the database. Now no Saas* tables will be created and the application will run as single-tenant.
  • Notes for v10.1 MVC template:

    • If you want single-tenant and no SaaS, the safest path is to create a template variant that doesn’t include SaaS at all. If SaaS is included by mistake, removing the packages + mappings and re-creating migrations is sufficient.
    • Disabling multi-tenancy alone will not remove SaaS tables if the SaaS module is referenced.
  1. Sources
  • https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/CLI
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/architecture/multi-tenancy
  • https://github.com/magentuseu/abp-tests

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution Based on your screenshots and symptoms there are two separate issues:

A) AuthServer discovery shows HTTP endpoints (Angular rejects them) B) ABP Studio interception cannot reach cluster services (timeouts to Postgres/Redis via WireGuard)

Fix A – make discovery document fully HTTPS behind ingress/reverse proxy

  • Ensure the AuthServer publishes HTTPS URLs in the discovery document, even if Kestrel listens on HTTP behind an ingress. Add both settings below:
    • App settings: "AuthServer": { "Authority": "https://your-auth-host", "RequireHttpsMetadata": true }
    • Module configuration (set issuer and relax OpenIddict transport only if you must run plain HTTP internally):
public override void PreConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
  {
      var configuration = context.Services.GetConfiguration();

      PreConfigure<OpenIddictServerBuilder>(builder =>
      {
          builder.SetIssuer(new Uri(configuration["AuthServer:Authority"]!));
      });
  }

  public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
  {
      var env = context.Services.GetHostingEnvironment();
      var configuration = context.Services.GetConfiguration();

      if (!env.IsDevelopment())
      {
          // Honor X-Forwarded-* to build correct HTTPS URLs and cookies
          context.Services.Configure<ForwardedHeadersOptions>(o =>
          {
              o.ForwardedHeaders = ForwardedHeaders.XForwardedFor
                                 | ForwardedHeaders.XForwardedProto
                                 | ForwardedHeaders.XForwardedHost;
              o.KnownNetworks.Clear();
              o.KnownProxies.Clear();
          });
      }

      // If you cannot keep RequireHttpsMetadata=true, add this to avoid OpenIddict rejecting HTTP (not recommended for production):
      if (!configuration.GetValue<bool>("AuthServer:RequireHttpsMetadata"))
      {
          Configure<OpenIddictServerAspNetCoreOptions>(options =>
          {
              options.DisableTransportSecurityRequirement = true;
          });
      }
  }

  public override void OnApplicationInitialization(ApplicationInitializationContext context)
  {
      var app = context.GetApplicationBuilder();
      var env = context.GetEnvironment();

      if (!env.IsDevelopment())
      {
          app.UseForwardedHeaders();
      }

      // Optional hard override if your proxy doesn’t forward scheme correctly:
      // app.Use((ctx, next) => { ctx.Request.Scheme = "https"; return next(); });

      app.UseRouting();
      app.UseAuthentication();
      app.UseAuthorization();
      app.UseConfiguredEndpoints();
  }
  • In your ingress/reverse proxy (nginx/ingress controller) forward these headers:
    • X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme
    • X-Forwarded-Host $host
    • X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for
    • Host $host
  • Seed/ensure RedirectAllowedUrls, CorsOrigins and clients use the same public https origin as Authority.
  • Verify the discovery document now shows https for all endpoints and jwks_uri.

Fix B – ABP Studio interception timeouts to in-cluster services

  • ABP Studio’s tunnel relies on:
    • The VPN client connected (abp-wg-easy and abp-studio-proxy pods healthy)
    • Local hosts file entries for service DNS names
    • The cluster allowing access to ClusterIP services via the VPN CIDR
  • Checklist:
    • Confirm “Connected” state in Studio and abp-wg-easy-vpn + abp-studio-proxy pods are Running.
    • Ensure your OS hosts file contains the entries Studio added (your screenshot shows them). Do not override them with other entries.
    • Verify your local machine can resolve and ping ClusterIP addresses (e.g., nslookup fauna-ai-staging-postgresql then ping that IP). If ICMP is blocked, test TCP:
      • Test DB: psql or tcp ping via PowerShell: Test-NetConnection fauna-ai-staging-postgresql -Port 5432
      • Test Redis: Test-NetConnection fauna-ai-stagingovh-redis -Port 6379
    • If these time out:
      • Check your cluster network policies: allow traffic from the WireGuard VPN CIDR to service ClusterIPs/ports (5432, 6379, etc.).
      • Check firewall rules on the cluster nodes for the VPN interface.
      • Ensure no corporate VPN/split-tunnel is overriding the ABP WireGuard route to the cluster CIDR.
    • When intercepting a service, start your local service with Kestrel (not IIS Express) and let Studio inject environment variables so it uses in-cluster connection strings and Redis.
    • If you see “Authorization failed! Given policy has not granted.” while debugging intercepted apps, run the create-tls-secret.ps1 in etc/helm and restart the app.

Notes specific to Angular and GW

  • Angular strict discovery validation requires all discovery URLs be https. After applying Fix A, Angular should stop rejecting the endpoints.
  • Make sure all microservices/gateway use ForwardedHeaders and that their RemoteServices.BaseUrl, AuthServer.Authority, and SelfUrl point to public https hosts (not internal service names) when serving browser traffic via the gateway.
  • For 127.0.0.1 client IPs in logs, enable ForwardedHeaders in every service/app so ABP can read the real client IP from X-Forwarded-For.
  1. Sources
  • ABP Studio – Kubernetes interception (includes TLS secret note and interception behavior)
    • https://abp.io/docs/latest/studio/kubernetes
  • Community thread (OpenIddict HTTPS behind proxy; issuer/authority and forwarded headers patterns)
    • https://abp.io/support/questions/4338
  • Community article: Kubernetes tunnel and interception with ABP Studio (explains VPN, hosts entries, interception)
    • https://abp.io/community/articles/h11utnq8

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution
  • Root cause

    • In Blazor Server, the “_framework” folder is part of the static web assets (Blazor runtime files) served by ASP.NET Core from the published output. If your Docker image doesn’t contain the published output of the Blazor Server project at the correct path and/or the container serves a different working directory, the “_framework” files won’t be found, causing login/UI to fail.
  • Fix: publish and copy the correct output into the runtime image

    1. Publish the Blazor Server project for Release inside the Docker build and copy the publish directory into the final image:
# Build & publish
  FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:10.0 AS build
  WORKDIR /src
  COPY . .
  RUN dotnet restore
  RUN dotnet publish ./src/YourCompany.YourApp.Blazor/YourCompany.YourApp.Blazor.csproj -c Release -o /app/publish

  # Runtime
  FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:10.0 AS final
  WORKDIR /app
  COPY --from=build /app/publish .
  ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "YourCompany.YourApp.Blazor.dll"]
  • Important: Ensure the DLL name matches your Blazor Server project DLL.
  • Do not copy bin/… directly unless it’s the publish folder. The publish folder must include the static web assets used to serve “_framework”.
  1. If you already publish outside Docker, copy the exact publish directory:
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:10.0 AS final
  WORKDIR /app
  COPY ./src/YourCompany.YourApp.Blazor/bin/Release/net10.0/publish/ .
  ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "YourCompany.YourApp.Blazor.dll"]
  • Verify that the path exists locally and contains the “_framework” under wwwroot/_framework or in static web assets folders included by the publish output.

  • Additional checks

    • Ensure you run dotnet publish (not just build). Publish produces the static web assets and manifest required for Blazor.
    • Make sure the container’s WORKDIR matches where you copied the publish output, and you are starting the correct DLL.
    • If you front the container with Nginx/Apache, confirm static files are not blocked and requests to “/_framework/*” are forwarded to Kestrel or served by the same app container without being intercepted.
    • If you turned on trimming (PublishTrimmed) or single-file publish, try disabling trimming for Blazor Server or ensure proper trim settings—aggressive trimming can remove files needed by the Blazor runtime.
  • ABP-specific note

    • The ABP Blazor Server app in a tiered solution is a single web app hosting both UI and the OpenIddict server by default. Use a multi-stage Dockerfile and copy from the publish output as shown above. ABP’s sample Dockerfile for Blazor Server also assumes copying from bin/Release/net10.0/publish into the aspnet base image.
  1. Sources
  • ASP.NET Core Blazor static files fundamentals (how Blazor serves “_framework”):
    • https://learn.microsoft.com/aspnet/core/blazor/fundamentals/static-files
  • ABP layered solution deployment to Docker (Blazor Server sample Dockerfile and steps):
    • https://abp.io/docs/10.0//solution-templates/layered-web-application/deployment/deployment-docker-compose
  • ABP v10 migration and .NET 10 note:
    • https://abp.io/docs/10.0//release-info/migration-guides/abp-10-0

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

Answer
  1. Solution
  • What’s happening:

    • In an ABP solution with MVC UI (cookies as the default auth scheme), API endpoints challenge unauthenticated requests with a redirect to the login page. A non-browser client (like your Next.js app) must call those endpoints with a valid Bearer access token obtained from your SSO provider (OpenIddict/IdentityServer in ABP). If the request has no Bearer token (or the API is not configured to accept it), you’ll see 401 or an HTML login response.
  • End-to-end steps to call protected APIs from your Next.js app using the SSO token:

    1. Ensure your backend accepts JWT Bearer tokens on the API
    • In your HttpApi.Host module, configure JWT bearer authentication. ABP templates already do this, but verify that the AddJwtBearer config is present and the API resource scopes include your application’s scope.
    • If your Next.js app will access the backend from a different origin, add that origin to CORS.
    1. Register your Next.js client in IdentityServer/OpenIddict
    • Add a public SPA client using the authorization_code flow with PKCE, redirect URIs for your Next.js app, and proper CORS origins. This is done in IdentityServerDataSeedContributor (or OpenIddict seed) and appsettings (DbMigrator).
    • Typical settings:
      • Grant types: authorization_code
      • RequireClientSecret: false
      • RedirectUris: https://your-next-app.com/callback
      • PostLogoutRedirectUris: https://your-next-app.com
      • AllowedCorsOrigins: https://your-next-app.com
      • Scopes: openid profile email role phone address and your API scope (e.g., YourAppName)
      • Add offline_access if you need refresh tokens.
    1. Authenticate in Next.js and get the access token
    • Use an OIDC library that supports Code + PKCE in Next.js (e.g., next-auth with an OIDC provider, or a low-level OIDC client). After the callback completes, you will have an access_token.
    1. Attach the access token to API requests
    • From Next.js (on the server or client), include: Authorization: Bearer {access_token}
    • Example with fetch: const res = await fetch(${process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_API_URL}/api/identity/my-profile, { headers: { Authorization: Bearer ${accessToken}, 'Accept-Language': 'en', // optional 'Abp-TenantId': tenantId ?? '' // if you use multi-tenancy and need to target a tenant } }); if (res.status === 401) { // handle re-auth or token refresh }
    1. Handle 401 vs. login redirects
    • Cookies scheme redirects to login for browser requests. When calling from your Next.js code via fetch/axios with Bearer tokens, you’ll see 401 on invalid/expired tokens (not the HTML login) as long as you don’t rely on cookie auth for those calls.
    • If you still get redirected HTML, ensure:
      • You are not sending the MVC cookie along with the API call.
      • You are targeting the HttpApi.Host URL (not the MVC UI host’s MVC action).
      • The request has a Bearer token and the API pipeline has JWT bearer enabled.
    1. Validate issuer when using tunnels/custom domains
    • If the Issuer differs from the Authority (e.g., ngrok/public URL), add ValidIssuers to AuthServer settings and configure TokenValidationParameters.ValidIssuers accordingly.
    1. Common pitfalls that cause 401:
    • Missing API scope in the requested scopes of the Next.js client.
    • Wrong authority/issuer in Next.js OIDC config.
    • CORS not allowing your Next.js origin.
    • Access token expired and no refresh handling.
  • Minimal code example (server-side Next.js API route proxying to ABP API):

// /pages/api/me.ts
  import type { NextApiRequest, NextApiResponse } from 'next';

  export default async function handler(req: NextApiRequest, res: NextApiResponse) {
    const accessToken = req.headers['authorization']?.toString().replace(/^Bearer\s+/i, '');
    if (!accessToken) {
      return res.status(401).json({ error: 'No access token' });
    }

    const apiUrl = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_API_URL; // e.g. https://localhost:44350
    const r = await fetch(`${apiUrl}/api/identity/my-profile`, {
      headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${accessToken}` }
    });

    if (!r.ok) {
      return res.status(r.status).send(await r.text());
    }
    return res.status(200).json(await r.json());
  }
  1. Sources
  • Support discussion about 401 vs login redirects and how API calls should use Authorization: Bearer:
    • https://abp.io/support/questions/611
  • Support discussion on 401 vs redirect behaviors in MVC and how requests differ:
    • https://abp.io/support/questions/3281
  • Community example showing attaching Bearer token and calling /api/identity/users:
    • https://abp.io/community/articles/aqjjwsdf
  • Community example showing getting tokens and posting to /connect/token (for reference on scopes/flows):
    • https://abp.io/community/articles/e74fmblw

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution In recent ABP versions, the static JavaScript API proxy global namespace and loading flow have changed. The old pattern like: var bangGiaVeNgayService = window.webCMS.kSVR.services.bangGiaVeNgays.bangGiaVeNgays; will no longer work unless your solution defines the same global namespace and generates the proxies into it.

Do this to make it work reliably in MVC Razor Pages:

  • Ensure static JS proxies are enabled and generated

    • In your Web project, add the Static JavaScript Proxy tag helper to your layout (once, typically in _Layout.cshtml, near the end of body): @await Html.PartialAsync("_AbpScripts")
    • Configure the proxy generation file abp-generate-proxy.json in the Web project (created by the template). Make sure:
      • target is set to jQuery
      • output folder is wwwroot/libs/proxy or your desired location
      • moduleName and remoteServiceName match your app service module and remote service. Example: { "type": "javascript", "module": "MyCompany.MyApp", "namespace": "myCompany.myApp", "source": { "type": "remote", "url": "https://localhost:44322", "remoteServiceName": "Default" }, "target": { "type": "jquery", "moduleName": "myCompany.myApp" }, "output": "wwwroot/libs/proxy" }
    • Run the proxy generation: abp generate-proxy or from VS Task Runner/ABP Suite if configured.
  • Use the new global namespace when calling APIs

    • The generated proxies are exposed under window.[namespace].[remoteServiceName].[service-alias].[method]
    • The default namespace is based on your configured "namespace" or "moduleName". For example, if you set namespace to myCompany.myApp and remoteServiceName to default (or your microservice name), you can call: // Example: app service BangGiaVeNgays in module MyCompany.MyApp, remoteServiceName: default var service = window.myCompany.myApp.default.bangGiaVeNgays.bangGiaVeNgays; service.getList({ /* params */ }) .then(res => console.log(res));
  • Verify the actual namespace at runtime

    • Open the browser console and type window to inspect the nested objects. Start from window.myCompany or your configured namespace to see what is actually generated (e.g., window.myCompany.myApp.default...).
    • If your older code expects window.webCMS.kSVR..., you must either:
      • Update your JS calls to the new path (recommended), or
      • Set "namespace" and "moduleName" in abp-generate-proxy.json to produce the same path structure you used before (e.g., namespace: webCMS.kSVR). Then regenerate the proxies.
  • Common pitfalls to check

    • The remote service host must be running when generating proxies from a remote source.
    • Make sure _AbpScripts partial is included once and after jQuery/abp.js are loaded.
    • Clear browser cache or use a cache-busting query string when testing (the template already appends _v=...).
    • For microservice solutions, you will have multiple remoteServiceName roots (e.g., identityService, cmsKit, default). Ensure you reference the correct one in the path: window.myCompany.myApp.identityService.... If it’s missing, either you didn’t generate the proxy for that microservice or the remoteServiceName differs from what you’re using in JS.
    • If you used dynamic proxies before, ensure you are not mixing dynamic and static references on the same page; pick one approach. When using dynamic proxies, use abp.services.app.* style, when static proxies, use the generated window.[namespace] path.
  • Minimal working example // 1) After correct proxy generation and layout setup: // window.myCompany.myApp.default.bangGiaVeNgays.bangGiaVeNgays.create({ ... }) window.myCompany.myApp.default.bangGiaVeNgays.bangGiaVeNgays .getList({ skipCount: 0, maxResultCount: 10 }) .then(result => console.log(result)) .catch(err => console.error(err));

Does the latest ABP still support calling services like before?

  • Yes, ABP still supports Static JavaScript API Client Proxies for MVC/Razor Pages. However, the generated object path under window depends on your configuration (namespace/moduleName/remoteServiceName). If you align those settings with your previous namespace, your old-style code can continue to work. Otherwise, update your JS to the new generated path as shown above.
  1. Sources
  • Static JavaScript Proxies (MVC/Razor Pages):
    • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/ui/mvc-razor-pages/static-javascript-proxies
  • Dynamic JavaScript Proxies (for comparison and migration):
    • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/ui/mvc-razor-pages/dynamic-javascript-proxies

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution Given you already inject the interface (ICrudAppService-based), the most common reasons Create/Update are not audited when called directly from Blazor Server are:
  • The call bypasses ABP’s interception pipeline. Checklist:

    • Ensure the concrete AppService methods are public and virtual (Castle proxy needs virtual).
    • Do not new-up the service or resolve it via ActivatorUtilities. Always resolve from DI and via the interface (you already do).
    • Make sure there is no decorator/wrapper that calls the implementation directly (e.g., a factory returning the concrete type).
  • Auditing middleware and options

    • Confirm app.UseAuditing() is added in the host OnApplicationInitialization:
public override void OnApplicationInitialization(ApplicationInitializationContext context)
    {
        var app = context.GetApplicationBuilder();
        app.UseAuditing();
    }
  • Keep auditing enabled and do not disable for your methods:
Configure<AbpAuditingOptions>(options =>
    {
        options.IsEnabled = true;
        // optional:
        // options.IsEnabledForGetRequests = true;
        // options.AlwaysLogOnException = true;
    });
  • Ensure you didn’t use [DisableAuditing] on the service or method.

  • Entity change logs require UoW + change tracking selection Create/Update “action logs” should appear even without entity changes, but if you expect EntityChanges, ensure:

    • You execute repository operations inside the app service call (ABP opens a UoW for app services).
    • You enabled entity change selectors (or used [Audited] on entities you want tracked):
Configure<AbpAuditingOptions>(options =>
    {
        options.EntityHistorySelectors.AddAllEntities(); // or add your entity types explicitly
    });
  • Your DbContext is not being saved outside ABP’s UoW unexpectedly.

  • Verify the proxy is actually used in Blazor Temporarily assert interception by forcing auditing:

[Audited]
  public class SeasonAppService : CrudAppService<Season, SeasonDto, Guid, PagedAndSortedResultRequestDto, CreateSeasonDto, UpdateSeasonDto>,
                                  ISeasonAppService
  {
      public override async Task<SeasonDto> CreateAsync(CreateSeasonDto input) { ... }
      public override async Task<SeasonDto> UpdateAsync(Guid id, UpdateSeasonDto input) { ... }
  }

If this still doesn’t create an audit log, interception is likely bypassed.

  • Method signature and virtual override Since you inherit from CrudAppService:
    • Override methods as public virtual and call base if needed:
public override async Task<SeasonDto> CreateAsync(CreateSeasonDto input)
    {
        return await base.CreateAsync(input);
    }

    public override async Task<SeasonDto> UpdateAsync(Guid id, UpdateSeasonDto input)
    {
        return await base.UpdateAsync(id, input);
    }

Do not seal the class or methods.

  • Avoid resolving the implementation behind the interface inside the same scope In Blazor components, keep only the interface injected:
[Inject] protected ISeasonAppService SeasonAppService { get; set; } = default!;

Do not cast to the concrete type or call non-virtual helpers on the class.

  • Custom IAuditingStore If you replaced IAuditingStore, ensure SaveAsync is called and not filtering out Create/Update. Log inside your store to verify it’s invoked for Create/Update paths.

  • Quick diagnostic

    • Add a simple [Audited] method with a primitive parameter on the same service and call it from the page. If no audit entry appears, the interceptor is not running for Blazor calls.
    • Log typeof(ISeasonAppService).FullName from the injected instance’s runtime type. If it’s Castle.Proxies.* it’s proxied; if it’s your concrete type, interception is bypassed.

If after all checks Delete is audited but Create/Update are not:

  • It’s often because Create/Update are not virtual (or overridden) in your derived service, or a [DisableAuditing] attribute is present via a base class/assembly-level. Make Create/Update public virtual in your SeasonAppService (even if they just call base) and try again.
  1. Sources
  • AbpAuditingOptions (source) (validated):
    • https://github.com/abpframework/abp/blob/dev/framework/src/Volo.Abp.Auditing/Volo/Abp/Auditing/AbpAuditingOptions.cs

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

Showing 21 to 30 of 721 entries
Boost Your Development
ABP Live Training
Packages
See Trainings
Mastering ABP Framework Book
The Official Guide
Mastering
ABP Framework
Learn More
Mastering ABP Framework Book
Made with ❤️ on ABP v10.1.0-preview. Updated on December 16, 2025, 09:09
1
ABP Assistant
🔐 You need to be logged in to use the chatbot. Please log in first.