Hello ABP Support Team,
I am working on implementing a test management system using the ABP.io framework with a commercial license, structured with hierarchical entities: Lesson - Test - Test Question - Test Answer. I have attempted to set up these relationships where Lesson acts as the master, Test as the child of Lesson, and Test Question as the child of Test.
However, I am encountering an issue where only the first child level (Test) is functioning correctly, and the nested deeper relationships (Test Question as child of Test) are not working as expected.
Could you assist me with the following:
Is there a known issue or limitation with nesting multiple levels of entities in ABP Suite that might be affecting my implementation? Could you provide guidance or best practices on configuring and managing deeply nested child entities within the ABP framework? Are there specific configurations or additional steps required to ensure that all levels of nested entities function correctly in CRUD operations? Any examples, documentation, or insights you could provide would be greatly appreciated, as they would help ensure that our educational content and assessments are managed effectively.
Thank you for your support.
Best regards, Lukáš Hanák
I have generated basic CRUD actions for our objects using default templates. When there is a string property of an object marked for generation as a textarea, input that handles bound data to that property is generated as MemoEdit component from Blazorise library. However, I would like to have a different component in place of MemoEdit, which is RichTextEdit. Is there any way to modify or override the generation process to specify which component should be used? I know it can be done manually, but those changes will not persist when things change and also it wouldn't be applied globally.