Activities of "priyankasynapxe"

Hi, for dashboard authorization please refer to our documentation: https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/infrastructure/background-jobs/hangfire#dashboard-authorization

Hi, can you confirm if I'll update hangfire code, it will be applicable for all background jobs added in application ?

Yes. When you integrate Hangfire, it replaces the default background job manager, and Hangfire’s own job manager will be used instead.

Hi, I referred document, I added permission, but it is not working, I'm getting 401 status code on accessing the dashboard even if permission is added, it is working in local but after deployment as my UI and backend is deployed on different server, I'm not able to access, what is the possible solution with this scenario?

Can you please confirm one more thing, using hangfire will execute multiple jobs at the same time as multithreading?

Yes, Hangfire can execute multiple jobs concurrently using background threads. It utilizes multithreading based on the number of worker threads configured in the Hangfire Server. By default, Hangfire can process several jobs in parallel depending on your server's capacity and configuration.

It is working when I'm using [Queue("default")], is it fine to use default queue ?

Yes, it's perfectly fine to use the "default" queue in Hangfire. In fact, if you don't specify a queue explicitly, Hangfire will automatically use the "default" queue for all background jobs.

But it should normally work with other queues, I'll investigate this.

Hi, can you confirm if I'll update hangfire code, it will be applicable for all background jobs added in application ?

Also, for dashbaord I want to add below code

private void ConfigureAuthentication(ServiceConfigurationContext context, IConfiguration configuration) { context.Services.AddAuthentication(JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme) .AddAbpJwtBearer(options => { options.Authority = configuration["AuthServer:Authority"]; options.RequireHttpsMetadata = configuration.GetValue<bool>("AuthServer:RequireHttpsMetadata"); options.Audience = "MyProjectName"; });

context.Services.AddAuthentication()
    .AddCookie("Cookies")
    .AddOpenIdConnect("oidc", options =>
    {
        options.Authority = configuration["AuthServer:Authority"];
        options.RequireHttpsMetadata = configuration.GetValue<bool>("AuthServer:RequireHttpsMetadata");
        options.ResponseType = OpenIdConnectResponseType.CodeIdToken;

        options.ClientId = configuration["AuthServer:ClientId"];
        options.ClientSecret = configuration["AuthServer:ClientSecret"];

        options.UsePkce = true;
        options.SaveTokens = true;
        options.GetClaimsFromUserInfoEndpoint = true;

        options.Scope.Add("roles");
        options.Scope.Add("email");
        options.Scope.Add("phone");
        options.Scope.Add("MyProjectName");
    });

}

can you please help me to understand what should be the ClientId and ClientSecret as in my existing setting I'm not using these 2 properties.

Can you please confirm one more thing, using hangfire will execute multiple jobs at the same time as multithreading?

I'm trying to implement hangfire but as soon as I put Queue attribute, my job is not executing,

pls help me to understand if any other step is required, I'm following https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/infrastructure/background-jobs/hangfire

Hi, did you configure a storage for Hangfire as follows in your module class?:

      context.Services.AddHangfire(config =>  
      {  
          config.UseSqlServerStorage(configuration.GetConnectionString("Default"));  
      });  

Also, if you followed the Manual Installation process, then ensure your application has the related DependOn attribute with the hangfiremodule:

[DependsOn(typeof(AbpBackgroundJobsHangfireModule))]  

Yes, I have added
context.Services.AddHangfire(config => { config.UseSqlServerStorage(configuration.GetConnectionString("Default")); });

also, I used API CLI for installation abp add-package Volo.Abp.BackgroundJobs.HangFire

It is working when I'm using [Queue("default")], is it fine to use default queue ?

I'm trying to implement hangfire but as soon as I put Queue attribute, my job is not executing,

pls help me to understand if any other step is required, I'm following https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/infrastructure/background-jobs/hangfire

Hi, did you configure a storage for Hangfire as follows in your module class?:

      context.Services.AddHangfire(config => 
      { 
          config.UseSqlServerStorage(configuration.GetConnectionString("Default")); 
      }); 

Also, if you followed the Manual Installation process, then ensure your application has the related DependOn attribute with the hangfiremodule:

[DependsOn(typeof(AbpBackgroundJobsHangfireModule))] 

Yes, I have added context.Services.AddHangfire(config => { config.UseSqlServerStorage(configuration.GetConnectionString("Default")); });

also, I used API CLI for installation abp add-package Volo.Abp.BackgroundJobs.HangFire

Hi,

if I get 10 requests from users, so will it process 10 requests at the same time or it will process request picked by each server which means 2 requests at the same time.

This will depend entirely on your configuration. For example:

app.UseHangfireServer(new BackgroundJobServerOptions 
{ 
    WorkerCount = 10 // or any number you need 
}); 

You can configure the degree of parallelism manually like above. See more: https://docs.hangfire.io/en/latest/background-processing/configuring-degree-of-parallelism.html

When I'm processing the background job, I'm calling the external services, and I need to wait for the response to complete the request so with hangfire, will it also wait the existing request to complete, or it will start next request parallelly.

I am not an expert on Hangfire, but when I check their documentation, I see that you can add throttling or concurrency limiters. See: https://docs.hangfire.io/en/latest/background-processing/throttling.html

I'm trying to implement hangfire but as soon as I put Queue attribute, my job is not executing, pls help me to understand if any other step is required, I'm following https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/infrastructure/background-jobs/hangfire

Hi,

Would you consider to use RabbitMQ or HangFire provider for background jobs? It is possible to process messages in parallel with them. See: https://github.com/abpframework/abp/issues/5217 and https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/infrastructure/background-jobs/hangfire

Thank you, I'm considering hangfire but I want to understand how smooth will it be to switch from default ABP background job to hangfire, also how hangfire works? e.g. if I get 10 requests from users, so will it process 10 requests at the same time or it will process request picked by each server which means 2 requests at the same time. When I'm processing the background job, I'm calling the external services, and I need to wait for the response to complete the request so with hangfire, will it also wait the existing request to complete, or it will start next request parallelly.

ABP Framework version: v8.1.1

UI Type: React

Database System: EF Core (SQL Server)

Tiered (for MVC) or Auth Server Separated (for Angular): yes

Exception message and full stack trace: NA

Hi, I'm using ABP's background job manager and seems like it is picking job one by one, I have 2 servers, even though job is picked by both server it is running in sequence. Can you please suggest how can I make it parallel call because as it is processing the job one by one, it is taking time, we receive 1000+ request which slow down the process.

Thanks

protected override void HandlePropertiesBeforeSave() { var entries = ChangeTracker.Entries().ToList(); foreach (var entry in entries) { HandleExtraPropertiesOnSave(entry);

        if (entry.State.IsIn(EntityState.Modified, EntityState.Deleted)) 
        { 
            UpdateConcurrencyStamp(entry); 
        } 
    } 

    foreach (var entry in AbpEfCoreNavigationHelper.GetChangedEntityEntries().Where(x => x.State == EntityState.Unchanged)) 
    { 
        UpdateConcurrencyStamp(entry); 
    } 
} 

Hi, as it is override in dbcontext class, can you please confirm if it can impact the performance?

Hi, can you please confirm that there is a situation as described in this answer or not?

Hi, it seems like very similar case as I was not getting this error earlier. It is happening when load is high, also in my case too we have upgraded the version last year, but my class structure is below

    public class PatientPhoneNumber_TR : FullAuditedAggregateRoot<Guid>
    {
    [CanBeNull]
    public virtual string PhoneNumber { get; set; }
    public long? PhoneTypeId { get; set; }
    public long? EquipmentTypeId { get; set; }
    public long? PatientId { get; set; }
    
      public PatientPhoneNumber_TR()
    {

    }

    public PatientPhoneNumber_TR(Guid id, string phoneNumber)
    {
        Id = id;
        Check.Length(phoneNumber, nameof(phoneNumber), PatientPhoneNumber_TRConsts.PhoneNumberMaxLength, 0);
        PhoneNumber = phoneNumber;
    }
}  

I'm using parent's id as FK in child table.

Please let me know what can I do to fix it?

I have noticed same issue on save token too (screenshot of error is attached below), please help to fix both.