Activities of "464199480"

Hi

Which version to use?

I used when 9.0.0 to create an empty template, but no Account External Provider

The template has confirmed that SSO is enabled

  context.Services.AddAuthentication()
      .AddGoogle(GoogleDefaults.AuthenticationScheme, options =>
      {
          options.ClaimActions.MapJsonKey(AbpClaimTypes.Picture, "picture");
      })
      .WithDynamicOptions<GoogleOptions, GoogleHandler>(
          GoogleDefaults.AuthenticationScheme,
          options =>
          {
              options.WithProperty(x => x.ClientId);
              options.WithProperty(x => x.ClientSecret, isSecret: true);
          }
      )
      .AddMicrosoftAccount(MicrosoftAccountDefaults.AuthenticationScheme, options =>
      {
          //Personal Microsoft accounts as an example.
          options.AuthorizationEndpoint = "https://login.microsoftonline.com/consumers/oauth2/v2.0/authorize";
          options.TokenEndpoint = "https://login.microsoftonline.com/consumers/oauth2/v2.0/token";

          options.ClaimActions.MapCustomJson("picture", _ => "https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/me/photo/$value");
          options.SaveTokens = true;
      })
      .WithDynamicOptions<MicrosoftAccountOptions, MicrosoftAccountHandler>(
          MicrosoftAccountDefaults.AuthenticationScheme,
          options =>
          {
              ////options.WithProperty(x => x.ClientId);
              options.WithProperty(x => x.ClientSecret, isSecret: true);
          }
      )
      .AddTwitter(TwitterDefaults.AuthenticationScheme, options =>
      {
          options.ClaimActions.MapJsonKey(AbpClaimTypes.Picture, "profile_image_url_https");
          options.RetrieveUserDetails = true;
      })
      .WithDynamicOptions<TwitterOptions, TwitterHandler>(
          TwitterDefaults.AuthenticationScheme,
          options =>
          {
              options.WithProperty(x => x.ConsumerKey);
              options.WithProperty(x => x.ConsumerSecret, isSecret: true);
          }
      );

It's not just the frame itself

For example, https://account.abp.io/, I want to log in through Google or Twitter and bind my own account, but the account name already exists.

I also want to unbind the associated SSO account and re-bind it

This feature helps to increase the functionality of the website

Although I can implement it myself, if the framework itself implements it, I don't have to maintain it myself

Hope the abp team can pay attention to it

Thanks

Does it mean that we need to add @ctrl/tinycolor to package.json in future versions

Has the issue been fixed?

hi Please advise the last version number that is no longer maintained If the latest is not available, I will give up updating the module

abp get-source Volo.Abp.IdentityServer.Pro throw exception

[14:35:06 ERR] Downloading source code failed for: Volo.Abp.IdentityServer.Pro
Volo.Abp.Studio.AbpStudioException: Exception of type 'Volo.Abp.Studio.AbpStudioException' was thrown.
  at async Task Volo.Abp.Studio.Modules.Installing.SourceCodeDownloader.DownloadSourceCodeAsync(string moduleName, string targetFolder, string version, bool includeNightly)
  at async Task Volo.Abp.Studio.Cli.Commands.StudioGetSourceCommand.ExecuteAsync(CommandLineArgs commandLineArgs)                                                           
  at async Task Volo.Abp.Studio.Cli.StudioCliService.RunInternalAsync(CommandLineArgs commandLineArgs)                                                                      
  at async Task Volo.Abp.Studio.Cli.StudioCliService.RunAsync(string[] args) 

This did not meet expectations. Maybe my problem is this is a new requirement. If a user login into their current account, they want to be able to provide an entry point to bind to an external provider

For example, in the system, there is a user@admin.com, which needs to be bound to a microsoft account. not register account

  • ABP Framework version: v8.0.4
  • UI Type: Angular
  • Database System: EF Core
  • Tiered (for MVC) or Auth Server Separated (for Angular): no
  • Exception message and full stack trace:
  • Steps to reproduce the issue:

only register a new user name and cannot bind an existing user name

I think CurrentPrincipalAccessorBase increase async can be solved, like this

protected abstract Task<ClaimsPrincipal> GetClaimsPrincipal();

Delete MauiCurrentPrincipalAccessor GetClaimsPrincipal method returns read SecureStorage code, it works

Showing 41 to 50 of 63 entries
Boost Your Development
ABP Live Training
Packages
See Trainings
Mastering ABP Framework Book
The Official Guide
Mastering
ABP Framework
Learn More
Mastering ABP Framework Book
Made with ❤️ on ABP v10.0.0-preview. Updated on September 04, 2025, 16:11