Activities of "AI-Bot"

  • In ABP, audit properties like LastModifierId are set based on the current user, which is determined by the ClaimsPrincipal available via ICurrentPrincipalAccessor. In background jobs (such as Hangfire), there is no authenticated user by default, so audit logging will not automatically associate changes with a user unless you explicitly set the principal.

  • Your approach of using currentPrincipalAccessor.Change(newPrincipal) is correct and aligns with official ABP guidance. However, for audit logging to work, you must ensure:

    1. The ClaimsPrincipal you create contains at least the AbpClaimTypes.UserId claim.
    2. The code that modifies the entity and calls UpdateAsync runs inside the using block of currentPrincipalAccessor.Change.
    3. Auditing is enabled for the entity type (which you have configured).
  • If you still do not see audit logs for changes made in the background job, check the following:

    • Ensure that the AbpAuditingOptions.IsEnabledForAnonymousUsers is set to true if the principal is not fully authenticated, or that your ClaimsPrincipal is constructed with the correct authentication type.
    • Make sure the background job is not running in a separate scope where auditing is disabled or overridden.
    • Confirm that the database context used for the update is the same as the one configured for auditing.
  • Example pattern (from official docs and community articles):

var newPrincipal = new ClaimsPrincipal(new ClaimsIdentity(new[] { new Claim(AbpClaimTypes.UserId, user.Id.ToString()), new Claim(AbpClaimTypes.UserName, user.UserName) }, "CustomAuthType")); // Set an authentication type

using (currentPrincipalAccessor.Change(newPrincipal)) { // All repository updates here will use the specified user for audit logging await configurationRepository.UpdateAsync(configuration); }


- If you want to ensure auditing for anonymous/background users, set:

  ```csharp
Configure<AbpAuditingOptions>(options =>
  {
      options.IsEnabledForAnonymousUsers = true;
  });

Sources:

  • https://abp.io/community/articles/how-to-change-the-currentuser-in-abp-i3uu1m7g#gsc.tab=0
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/infrastructure/current-user
  • https://abp.io/support/questions/6298

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • The error message Invalid credentials. 80090308: LdapErr: DSID-0C090450, comment: AcceptSecurityContext error, data 52e, v2580 indicates that the LDAP server is rejecting the username or password provided. This is a standard LDAP error (code 49, data 52e) meaning "invalid credentials".

  • Common causes and solutions:

    1. Double-check the username and password you are using for LDAP authentication. Ensure there are no typos and the account is not locked or expired.
    2. Make sure the LDAP settings (server address, port, base DN, etc.) are correctly configured in your ABP application.
    3. If you are using Active Directory, the username format may need to be user@domain or DOMAIN\\user.
    4. Ensure the user account has permission to bind to the LDAP server.
    5. If you are running in a container, ensure all required native libraries (like libldap) are installed and compatible with your environment.
  • After installing missing packages (like libldap), restart your application and verify the configuration again.

  • If you have enabled LDAP login for a tenant, confirm that the feature is enabled in both the host and tenant, and that the settings are correct.

  • You can also check the AbpFeatureValues table and clear the cache if changes are not reflected.

  • For more details and troubleshooting steps, refer to the official documentation and support threads below.

Sources:


This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

Answer
  • If you use HangfireBackgroundWorkerBase directly, you do not need the HangfirePeriodicBackgroundWorkerAdapter. The adapter is only necessary when you want to run ABP's IBackgroundWorker implementations (such as AsyncPeriodicBackgroundWorkerBase) on Hangfire, bridging ABP's background worker system to Hangfire's infrastructure.

  • When you implement your workers by inheriting from HangfireBackgroundWorkerBase, you are using Hangfire's native recurring job mechanism, and jobs will appear in the dashboard as you define them, without the adapter's extra entries.

  • To avoid flooding the Hangfire dashboard with HangfirePeriodicBackgroundWorkerAdapter jobs, you can disable or remove the registration of ABP's background workers that use the adapter, and instead implement your recurring jobs directly using HangfireBackgroundWorkerBase.

  • In summary: HangfirePeriodicBackgroundWorkerAdapter is not required if you use HangfireBackgroundWorkerBase. You can disable the adapter by not registering ABP background workers that rely on it.

Sources:

  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/infrastructure/background-workers/hangfire

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

To restrict tenant access by domain in a multi-tenant Angular app using ABP Framework, and to prevent users from switching to other tenants, you should use the domain/subdomain tenant resolver both on the backend and frontend. This ensures that each tenant is only accessible from its assigned domain, and tenant switching is disabled.

Solution Steps:

  1. Frontend (Angular) Configuration:
    • Set the baseUrl in your environment configuration to use the {0} placeholder for the tenant name:

application: { baseUrl: "https://{0}.koimpact.tw", name: "Sroi" }

   - With this setup, when the app runs on `https://imm.koimpact.tw`, the tenant name will be resolved as `imm`. The Angular app will send the `__tenant` header automatically based on the subdomain.

   - When you use the `{0}` placeholder in `baseUrl`, the tenant switching component (e.g., on the login page) will be hidden, so users cannot switch tenants from the UI.

2. **Backend Configuration:**
   - In your backend (e.g., in `YourProjectNameHttpApiHostModule`), configure the domain tenant resolver:
     ```csharp
Configure<AbpTenantResolveOptions>(options =>
     {
         options.AddDomainTenantResolver("{0}.koimpact.tw");
     });
  • This ensures that the backend only resolves the tenant from the subdomain and does not allow switching tenants via headers or query strings.
  1. Identity Server / Auth Server:

    • Make sure your IdentityServer or OpenIddict client configuration allows redirect URIs for each tenant domain (e.g., https://imm.koimpact.tw).
    • Do not use wildcards like https://*.koimpact.tw in CORS or redirect URIs; instead, explicitly list each allowed tenant domain.
  2. Preventing Tenant Switching:

    • With the above configuration, the Angular app will not show the tenant switcher, and the backend will only resolve tenants by domain. Users cannot switch tenants by manipulating headers or query strings.

Summary:

  • Use {0} in baseUrl for tenant isolation.
  • Configure backend to resolve tenants only by domain.
  • List each tenant domain explicitly in your auth server's allowed origins and redirect URIs.
  • Tenant switching is automatically disabled in the UI with this setup.

Sources:


This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • In ABP, the antiforgery system is enabled by default and uses a cookie (default: XSRF-TOKEN) and a request header (default: RequestVerificationToken). Your custom header X-XSRF-TOKEN and cookie name are valid, but you must ensure the client-side code (JS or Blazor) reads the cookie and sends it in the header for every POST/PUT request. If the header is sent but the cookie is missing, validation fails.
  • The error “cookie token and request token were swapped” typically means the antiforgery system received the tokens in the wrong order, or the cookie was not present at all. This can happen if the browser blocks the cookie (e.g., due to SameSite=None without Secure, or proxy misconfiguration).
  • Your configuration for Cookie.SameSite = None and Cookie.SecurePolicy = Always is correct for cross-site scenarios, but only if HTTPS is enforced end-to-end. If any hop is HTTP, the browser will not send the cookie.
  • When running behind Azure Container Apps (Envoy), ensure that:
    • UseForwardedHeaders is the very first middleware.
    • The X-Forwarded-Proto header is set to https by the ingress.
    • The application always sees requests as HTTPS (Request.IsHttps == true).
  • If the antiforgery cookie is not being set or sent, check:
    • The initial GET to the login page must return a Set-Cookie: XSRF-TOKEN=...; SameSite=None; Secure header.
    • The browser must accept and store this cookie. Use DevTools to confirm.
    • The POST request must include both the cookie and the header.
  • There is no ABP middleware that rewrites or clears the antiforgery cookie after UseForwardedHeaders. However, if the pipeline is misordered or the request is not seen as HTTPS, the cookie may not be set.
  • The Account Public login page expects the antiforgery header to match the configured name. If you changed it to X-XSRF-TOKEN, ensure all client-side code (including Blazor and any JS) uses this header.
  • No additional ABP setting is required for Envoy/ACA, but you must ensure forwarded headers and HTTPS are handled correctly.
  • For more detailed tracing, enable logging for Microsoft.AspNetCore.Antiforgery and Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Mvc.AntiForgery at the Debug or Trace level in your logging configuration.
  • ABP does not use a different antiforgery token pattern; it uses the standard ASP.NET Core antiforgery system.
  • If Elsa Studio WASM is served from the same domain and shares cookies, it could interfere if it changes or clears cookies, but this is unlikely unless it explicitly manipulates the antiforgery cookie.

Troubleshooting Steps:

  1. Confirm the initial GET to the login page sets the XSRF-TOKEN cookie with SameSite=None; Secure.
  2. Confirm the POST request includes both the XSRF-TOKEN cookie and the X-XSRF-TOKEN header.
  3. Ensure all requests are seen as HTTPS by the app (check Request.IsHttps).
  4. If using a custom header, ensure all ABP and client code use the same header name.
  5. If the problem persists only in incognito or after a cold start, it may be a timing or caching issue—ensure the cookie is set before the POST.
  6. If using multiple containers or instances, ensure all share the same data protection keys and application name/discriminator.

Example: Logging Configuration

// appsettings.json
"Logging": {
  "LogLevel": {
    "Default": "Information",
    "Microsoft.AspNetCore.Antiforgery": "Debug",
    "Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Mvc.AntiForgery": "Debug"
  }
}

References:


This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

This error ("An internal error occurred during your request!" with a NullReferenceException in ABP Suite's CRUD Page Generator) is a known issue, especially in modular or microservice solutions, and is often related to the way ABP Suite parses your solution's structure and DbContext extension files.

How to Resolve

  1. Check for Multiple *DbContextModelCreatingExtensions.cs Files

    • ABP Suite expects only one *DbContextModelCreatingExtensions.cs file per module. If you have more than one (e.g., both LeadsDbContextModelCreatingExtensions.cs and LeadsCustomDbContextModelCreatingExtensions.cs), Suite may fail with a NullReferenceException.
    • Solution: Keep only one such file per module and move all configuration methods into it.
  2. Verify File Paths in Suite Configuration

    • Ensure that your solution's .abp/suite/appsettings.json points to the correct paths for your DbContext and extension files.
    • If you have moved or renamed files, update the paths or remove and re-add your solution in Suite.
  3. Check for Missing or Misnamed Files

    • Make sure the expected files (like LeadsDbContextModelCreatingExtensions.cs) exist and are not excluded from the project.
  4. Remove and Re-Add Solution in Suite

    • Sometimes Suite caches old paths. Remove your solution from Suite and add it again to refresh its internal cache.
  5. Update to Latest Suite and ABP Version

    • Ensure both ABP Suite and your project packages are on the latest compatible versions.
  6. If You Need Custom EF Core Configurations

    • Since Suite overwrites the extension file, you can temporarily move your customizations to a separate method or file, then re-apply them after code generation.

References and More Details

These support threads contain detailed discussions and workarounds for similar issues.


If you follow these steps and ensure only one *DbContextModelCreatingExtensions.cs file exists per module, the error should be resolved. If you need to keep custom configurations, consider merging them into the single extension file or waiting for an official fix that supports custom/extended files.


This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • The error you are encountering is because the ExcelService and UserSessionsComponent are not exported in the public API of the @volo/abp.ng.identity package. This means you cannot import them directly in your custom component, as shown by the module not found errors in your screenshots.

  • To resolve this, these services and components must be explicitly exported in the package's index.ts files (as you illustrated in your last screenshot). Until the maintainers add these exports and publish a new version, you will not be able to use them directly from the package.

  • As a workaround, you can:

    • Create your own implementations or wrappers for the missing services/components if you need urgent access.
    • Or, fork the package, add the necessary exports, and use your fork until the official package is updated.
  • For long-term maintainability, it is best to request the ABP team to export these in the next release, as you have done.

Sources (validated):


This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

Answer

To resolve the password update issue in your ABP system, please follow these steps:

  1. Verify Password Policy:

    • Double-check the password requirements set in your system (length, uppercase, lowercase, digit, special character, etc.).
    • Ensure your new password meets all these criteria.
  2. Check for User Record Issues:

    • Ensure your user record exists in the AbpUsers table in your database.
    • If you have multiple tenants, verify the user exists in the correct tenant database.
  3. Reset or Re-seed User Data (if needed):

    • If you suspect the password is incorrect or the user record is corrupted, you can delete the user record and re-seed the initial data using the DbMigrator application or the migrate-database.ps1 script.
  4. Use the Correct Old Password:

    • Make sure you are entering the correct current password. The default admin password is usually 1q2w3E* (case-sensitive) unless it has been changed.
  5. Review Error Messages:

    • If the error message provides specific details (e.g., "password does not meet requirements"), adjust your password accordingly.
    • If the error is generic, check the application logs for more information.
  6. Additional Troubleshooting:

    • If you have recently upgraded ABP or changed password policies, clear your browser cache and try again.
    • If you are using a custom UI, ensure the frontend and backend password validation rules are synchronized.

If the issue persists after these steps, please provide the exact error message or check the application logs for more details.

Sources:

  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/kb/can-not-login-with-admin-user
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/get-started

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

To implement a fully customized login flow such as OTP-based (passwordless) login in ABP Framework, you need to override the default Account module's login logic and UI. Below are the steps and references for both ABP 4.x and 8.x versions. The Lepton theme's account flow source code is not distributed directly, but you can override and customize the login page and logic as shown below.

  1. Override the Login Page and Model:

    • Create a new CustomLoginModel inheriting from LoginModel.
    • Place your custom logic (e.g., OTP validation) in this model.
    • Add a new Login.cshtml under Pages/Account to override the default UI.

    Example:

public class CustomLoginModel : LoginModel
   {
       public CustomLoginModel(
           IAuthenticationSchemeProvider schemeProvider,
           IOptions<AbpAccountOptions> accountOptions)
           : base(schemeProvider, accountOptions)
       {
       }

       // Override methods to implement OTP logic here
   }
@page
   @model YourNamespace.Pages.Account.CustomLoginModel
   <!-- Custom OTP UI here -->
  1. Implement OTP Logic:

    • In your CustomLoginModel, implement the logic to send and verify OTP.
    • You may need to add new endpoints or handlers for sending OTP and verifying it.
  2. Customize the UI:

    • Copy the default login page source from the ABP repository and modify it as needed:
    • For Blazor or other UI types, follow similar override patterns.
  3. Lepton Theme Source:

    • The Lepton theme is a commercial product. For ABP Commercial subscribers, the source code for the theme and account flow is available in your commercial package download area or via the ABP Commercial GitHub (if you have access).
    • For open-source reference, you can use the default Account module's login page as a base and apply your Lepton theme styles.
  4. Sample Projects:

  5. Version Differences:

    • The override approach is similar in both 4.x and 8.x, but always check the constructor parameters and dependencies for your specific ABP version.
    • For ABP 8.x, you may need to inject additional services or use updated APIs.
  6. Lepton Source Code Access:

    • For ABP Commercial, source code for Lepton and other commercial modules is provided via your customer portal or private repository access. If you have not received it, please contact ABP Commercial support directly through your customer portal for access.

You can find the default login page source and customization guides at the following links:

Sources:

For Lepton theme source code and commercial modules, please use your ABP Commercial customer portal or contact support for direct access.


This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

Answer

ABP Framework provides flexible support for implementing the CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation) pattern, but it does not enforce it by default. ABP's architecture, especially its application service layer, naturally aligns with CQRS principles by encouraging the separation of commands (write operations) and queries (read operations).

  • You can implement CQRS in ABP by creating separate application services or methods for commands and queries.
  • ABP does not provide a built-in CQRS library, but it is compatible with popular .NET CQRS libraries such as MediatR. You can integrate MediatR or similar libraries into your ABP project for more advanced CQRS scenarios.
  • ABP's modular and DDD-friendly structure makes it easy to organize your code according to CQRS best practices.

Example: Using MediatR in an ABP module

[DependsOn(typeof(AbpAspNetCoreMvcModule))]
public class MyModule : AbpModule
{
    public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
    {
        context.Services.AddMediatR(typeof(MyModule).Assembly);
    }
}

You can then define your command and query handlers as usual with MediatR.

Sources:

  • https://abp.io/docs/en/abp/latest/Domain-Driven-Design#cqrs
  • https://abp.io/docs/en/abp/latest/Application-Services#cqrs
  • https://abp.io/docs/en/abp/latest/Best-Practices#cqrs

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

Showing 371 to 380 of 556 entries
Boost Your Development
ABP Live Training
Packages
See Trainings
Mastering ABP Framework Book
The Official Guide
Mastering
ABP Framework
Learn More
Mastering ABP Framework Book
Made with ❤️ on ABP v10.1.0-preview. Updated on November 04, 2025, 06:41