To achieve a layout similar to your screenshot (main menu on the left, submenu on top, and page actions), you need to customize your ABP application's layout. This is possible and supported, especially if you are using a theme like LeptonX.
Here’s how you can proceed:
abp get-source Volo.Abp.LeptonXTheme
lepton\aspnet-core\volo\src\Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Mvc.UI.Theme.LeptonX\Themes\LeptonX\Layouts
SideMenuLayout.cshtml or TopMenuLayout.cshtml (depending on your base)./Themes/LeptonX/Layouts/Application/SideMenuLayout.cshtml
Implement Submenu and Actions:
Optional: Organize Pages in Folders
Layout property at the top of the Razor file:@{
Layout = "/Themes/LeptonX/Layouts/MyCustomLayout.cshtml";
}
By following these steps, you can fully customize your application's layout to match your requirements, including main menu, submenu, and page actions.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To redirect file uploads from the default local (database) storage to Azure Blob Storage in an ABP Suite-generated application, while maintaining compatibility with the file components and metadata handling, follow these steps:
[DependsOn(
typeof(AbpBlobStoringAzureModule)
)]
public class YourAppNameApplicationModule : AbpModule
{
}
ConfigureServices method, configure the default blob container to use Azure:Configure<AbpBlobStoringOptions>(options =>
{
options.Containers.ConfigureDefault(container =>
{
container.UseAzure(azure =>
{
azure.ConnectionString = "Your_Azure_Connection_String";
azure.ContainerName = "your-container-name";
azure.CreateContainerIfNotExists = true;
});
});
});
.Application or .Web project).No Changes Needed in ABP Suite-Generated File Components
The ABP Suite-generated file upload logic (as shown in your screenshot) uses IBlobContainer. By configuring the default provider as above, all calls to _blobContainer.SaveAsync(...) will automatically use Azure Blob Storage instead of the local database.
File Metadata and Descriptors
The file metadata (such as FileDescriptor) will continue to be stored in your database as before. Only the binary content will be redirected to Azure Blob Storage. The framework will handle the association between the metadata and the actual file content.
Migration Note
Testing
This approach ensures seamless integration with ABP Suite-generated file components and maintains all metadata and descriptor handling.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
Yes, in ABP, even if a tenant has 2FA enabled or enforced, you can disable 2FA for a specific user account. This allows you to perform automation API testing with that user while keeping 2FA enabled for others.
You can manage this via the admin UI:
/Identity/Users).In the database, the relevant value is stored in the AbpUsers table, in the TwoFactorEnabled column. Setting this column to false for a user disables 2FA for that user, regardless of the tenant-wide setting.
This approach is recommended for backend API automation testing: create a dedicated test user with 2FA disabled, while keeping 2FA enabled for real users.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To deny access for JWT tokens with "alg": "none" in their headers, you should rely on the default behavior of the JWT Bearer authentication middleware used by ABP (which is based on ASP.NET Core and Microsoft.IdentityModel). By default, the middleware will reject tokens with "alg": "none" and will not treat them as valid, as this is a well-known security risk.
No additional configuration is required in ABP or ASP.NET Core to block "alg": "none" tokens, unless you have custom code that overrides the default token validation behavior. As long as you use the standard AddJwtBearer or AddAbpJwtBearer setup, tokens with "alg": "none" will be denied.
Example configuration (default, secure):
context.Services.AddAuthentication(JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)
.AddJwtBearer(options =>
{
options.Authority = "https://your-auth-server";
options.Audience = "YourAudience";
// No need to add custom logic for "alg": "none"
});
If you have not customized the token validation pipeline to allow "alg": "none", your application is already protected. Allowing "alg": "none" would require explicit, insecure customization, which is not present in ABP's default templates.
This will not break any ABP authentication or authorization features, as rejecting "alg": "none" is the secure and expected behavior.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To use a central ABP Auth Server and have another project's API Host accept tokens from this Auth Server, you must ensure the following key points are correctly configured:
API Resource Registration in Auth Server:
ReactAppService) and include the required scopes (such as ReactAppService, email, profile, etc.).Scope Usage in Token Request:
scope parameter must include the API resource scope (e.g., scope=ReactAppService offline_access), not just the client or SSO scope.MerkeziSSO offline_access, the access token may not be valid for the API Host.API Host Configuration:
appsettings.json, set the AuthServer:Authority to the central Auth Server's URL.AuthServer:RequireHttpsMetadata is set according to your environment.Audience Validation:
aud (audience) claim in the JWT. This must match the API resource name you registered in the Auth Server.Token Usage:
Authorization: Bearer header.Common Issues and Solutions:
Example Steps:
"ApiResources": {
"ReactAppService": {
"Scopes": [ "ReactAppService" ]
}
}
"Clients": {
"React_Client": {
"Scopes": [ "ReactAppService", "email", "profile", "offline_access" ]
}
}
"AuthServer": {
"Authority": "https://localhost:44387",
"RequireHttpsMetadata": true,
"ApiName": "ReactAppService"
}
POST /connect/token
client_id=React_Client
client_secret=1q2w3E*
grant_type=client_credentials
scope=ReactAppService offline_access
Authorization: Bearer {access_token}
Summary Checklist:
If you follow these steps and ensure the scopes and audiences are correct, your API Host should accept tokens from the central Auth Server.
No verified source available for this specific query.
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
When you access an ABP Integration Service endpoint from another backend service, the request must include a valid authentication token with the required permissions. If the endpoint is protected by [Authorize] or a permission attribute, and the calling service does not forward the user's access token or does not use a valid service-to-service token with the necessary claims, you will get a 401 Unauthorized error.
Integration Services are not exposed by default and typically do not require authorization, but if you add [Authorize] or permission attributes, you must ensure the caller is authenticated and authorized. When you call the endpoint directly (e.g., via Postman), you provide a valid token, so it works. When called from another backend service, unless you explicitly forward the user's token or use a client credentials flow, the call is unauthenticated.
Solution:
Forward the User's Access Token:
IAccessTokenProvider or similar mechanism to retrieve and forward the token.Use Client Credentials (Service-to-Service):
Check Integration Service Exposure:
AbpAspNetCoreMvcOptions.ExposeIntegrationServices = true in your module configuration to expose integration services.Security Note:
[Authorize], the endpoint is open to anyone, which is a security risk. Always require authentication and proper permissions.Example: Forwarding the Token
// In backend service A, when calling the integration service:
var client = _httpClientFactory.CreateClient("IntegrationService");
client.DefaultRequestHeaders.Authorization =
new AuthenticationHeaderValue("Bearer", userAccessToken); // Forward user's token
References:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To ensure the tenant is correctly passed during login in an ABP Angular application, you must configure both the backend and frontend to resolve and transmit the tenant information. If you replace the login component but do not handle tenant resolution and transmission, the login will default to the host.
Solution Steps:
Frontend (Angular) Configuration:
__tenant header with each request. This is handled automatically if you use the {0} placeholder in your baseUrl and configure the backend for domain/subdomain tenant resolution.SessionStateService to set the tenant before login, or pass the __tenant parameter when calling authService.navigateToLogin().Example:
import { AuthService, SessionStateService } from '@abp/ng.core';
// ...
constructor(private authService: AuthService, private sessionState: SessionStateService) {}
login() {
const tenantId = this.sessionState.getTenant().id;
this.authService.navigateToLogin({ __tenant: tenantId });
}
__tenant header or query string:Configure<AbpTenantResolveOptions>(options =>
{
options.AddHeaderTenantResolver();
options.AddQueryStringTenantResolver();
// Add domain resolver if using subdomains
});
Check Environment Configuration:
{0} in your baseUrl. Instead, ensure the tenant is set in the session and passed during login.Disable Tenant Switcher (Optional):
Summary:
SessionStateService to set/get the tenant.navigateToLogin as shown above.Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To achieve your goal of exposing multiple ABP services (Host, Auth, Web) under a single domain and port using a reverse proxy, you need to ensure that:
In each ABP application's Startup.cs (or Program.cs for .NET 6+), add the Forwarded Headers Middleware at the top of the middleware pipeline:
app.UseForwardedHeaders(new ForwardedHeadersOptions
{
ForwardedHeaders = ForwardedHeaders.XForwardedFor | ForwardedHeaders.XForwardedProto
});
This ensures the application correctly interprets the original request's scheme and host.
Configure your reverse proxy to map paths as follows:
/api → Host Server (https://localhost:44342)/auth → Auth Server (https://localhost:44339)/ → Web Server (https://localhost:44378)For example, in IIS, you can use URL Rewrite rules or in YARP (Yet Another Reverse Proxy) you can define routes in appsettings.json.
App:SelfUrl, AuthServer:Authority, and RemoteServices:Default:BaseUrl in each app's appsettings.json to use the public-facing URL (https://localhost:44378).This approach is required for correct operation behind a reverse proxy, especially for authentication and URL generation.
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
The official ABP Framework documentation provides release information, migration guides, and the roadmap, which include details about supported versions and upgrade paths. However, as of now, there is no dedicated page that explicitly lists End-of-Support (EOS) or End-of-Life (EOL) dates for each version. The documentation focuses on the latest releases, migration guides, and upgrade instructions.
To determine which versions are currently supported, refer to the release notes and migration guides. The roadmap page outlines upcoming releases and planned support.
For the most accurate and up-to-date information on supported versions and upgrade recommendations, consult the following official documentation pages:
If you require explicit EOS/EOL dates, it is recommended to contact ABP support directly, as this information is not published in a dedicated lifecycle policy document.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To resolve the "Volo.Abp.Http.Client.AbpRemoteCallException: An internal error occurred during your request!" error after adding the Payment module, follow these steps to ensure correct configuration:
Install Required NuGet Packages
Volo.Payment.* and Volo.Payment.Stripe.* in Application, Application.Contracts, HttpApi, HttpApi.Client, Domain, Domain.Shared, and Web projects.Volo.Payment.EntityFrameworkCore in the EntityFrameworkCore project.Update Module Dependencies
[DependsOn(typeof(AbpPaymentWebModule), typeof(AbpPaymentStripeWebModule))] to your Web module class.Configure Payment in appsettings.json
"Payment": {
"Stripe": {
"PublishableKey": "pk_test_xxx",
"SecretKey": "sk_test_xxx",
"WebhookSecret": "whsec_xxx",
"PaymentMethodTypes": []
}
}
HttpApi.Host module:Configure<AbpSaasPaymentOptions>(options =>
{
options.IsPaymentSupported = true;
});
PreConfigureServices:public override void PreConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
{
var configuration = context.Services.GetConfiguration();
Configure<PaymentWebOptions>(options =>
{
options.RootUrl = configuration["App:SelfUrl"];
options.CallbackUrl = configuration["App:SelfUrl"] + "/PaymentSucceed";
});
}
Database Migration
Check Permissions
Restart All Services
If you still encounter errors, check the inner exception details and ensure all URLs and endpoints are accessible from your environment.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.