app.MapAbpStaticAssets() during startup. In ABP 9.x this middleware writes a static web assets endpoints manifest file (e.g. Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.staticwebassets.endpoints.json) to the content root./app, but the process user doesn’t have write permission there (common when running as a non-root user and/or when /app is from a read-only image layer), so startup fails with:
Access to the path '/app/Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.staticwebassets.endpoints.json' is denied./app writable for the container userUpdate your Dockerfile so the runtime user can write to /app:
# ... your existing build/publish stages ...
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:8.0 AS final
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=publish /app/publish .
# If you run as a non-root user, ensure /app is owned by that user
# (UID/GID depends on your image/user setup)
RUN chown -R 1000:1000 /app
USER 1000
ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "Approach.Web.dll"]
If you’re using ABP’s default non-root approach but with a different UID, adjust 1000 accordingly.
If you can’t change the image, you can ensure /app is writable by mounting a volume (note: this can hide files in /app if you mount over it, so it must be used carefully; generally prefer the Dockerfile fix):
services:
web:
volumes:
- web_app_data:/app
volumes:
web_app_data:
If you are not using ABP virtual-file-system UI assets in this host, you can remove/comment the call:
// app.MapAbpStaticAssets();
(Only do this if you confirm your UI still serves required static/virtual assets correctly.)
Links:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
Program.cs on purpose because the host needs a logger before the DI container and modules are built, so startup/bootstrapping errors are captured reliably (including failures that happen while reading configuration, building the app, running migrations, initializing modules, etc.). ABP also ships templates with Serilog pre-wired and a few “baseline” enrichers/sinks so you immediately get useful logs during development without extra setup.appsettings*.json. You can (and in production usually should) move almost all Serilog configuration into configuration files and let different environments override it using appsettings.Development.json, appsettings.Production.json, environment variables, etc.Concrete approach (template-friendly):
appsettings.json (and overrides into appsettings.{Environment}.json).Program.cs, keep only the minimal bootstrap code and load Serilog from configuration:using Serilog;
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
builder.Host.UseSerilog((context, services, loggerConfiguration) =>
{
loggerConfiguration
.ReadFrom.Configuration(context.Configuration) // <-- appsettings.json
.ReadFrom.Services(services); // <-- DI-based enrichers if any
});
await builder.AddApplicationAsync<MyHttpApiHostModule>();
var app = builder.Build();
await app.InitializeApplicationAsync();
await app.RunAsync();
appsettings.Development.json -> verbose logsappsettings.Production.json -> warning/error + production sinks (Elastic/AppInsights/etc.)What about “hardcoded minimum level” / WASM scenarios?
wwwroot/appsettings*.json).Links you referenced
(If you want the “official ABP template” exact file/method name where Serilog is configured—e.g., a shared helper in *.Shared.Hosting—tell me your ABP version/template type and I can point to the exact implementation.)
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
/Account/Login and issues the auth cookies/tokens). The Blazor Server UI typically redirects to the Auth Server for authentication; changing Blazor UI won’t change the auth flow itself.1) Override UI (HTML/CSS) in the Auth Server
Pages/Account/Login.cshtmlPages/Account/Register.cshtml(This is the official “override Razor Page” mechanism used by ABP.)
2) Override backend logic: extend/replace LoginModel / RegisterModel
ABP’s recommended way for Razor Pages is to create your own PageModel that derives from the module’s PageModel and then point the .cshtml to your custom model using @model.
Custom login PageModel (Auth Server project):
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Options;
using Volo.Abp.Account.Web;
using Volo.Abp.Account.Web.Pages.Account;
namespace MyCompany.MyProject.AuthServer.Pages.Account;
public class CustomLoginModel : LoginModel
{
public CustomLoginModel(
IAuthenticationSchemeProvider schemeProvider,
IOptions<AbpAccountOptions> accountOptions)
: base(schemeProvider, accountOptions)
{
}
public override async Task<IActionResult> OnPostAsync(string action)
{
// 1) Your custom validation / 3rd-party checks here
// 2) Then continue with the default ABP login behavior
return await base.OnPostAsync(action);
}
}
Then in Pages/Account/Login.cshtml set:
@page
@model MyCompany.MyProject.AuthServer.Pages.Account.CustomLoginModel
Do the same pattern for Register: create CustomRegisterModel : RegisterModel, override the method(s) you need, then set @model in Register.cshtml.
Notes (important):
LoginModel / RegisterModel, you may need to replace via DI. If you follow the convention, you can typically just reference it from the .cshtml using @model as shown in ABP docs.LoginModel.)3) Persist extra fields in AbpUsers (tiered + separated Auth Server)
Yes: in a tiered solution with a separated Auth Server, the Module Entity Extension System is the correct approach so the extra properties are known across the solution (contracts/shared) and are mapped properly where Identity is used.
The key idea:
.Domain.Shared (so DTOs/UI can “know” the properties).(The concrete mapping code depends on your existing solution structure, but the correct direction is: Entity Extension System in Domain.Shared + EF Core mapping/migrations applied where identity DB schema is managed.)
4) LeptonX compatibility (keeping account look & responsive layout) For LeptonX (and ABP themes generally), the most robust method is:
If you completely rewrite markup, you risk dropping the layout/bundle hooks that the theme uses.
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
In ABP applications, both:
/api/abp/application-configuration/swagger/v1/swagger.jsonare among the very first endpoints that hit all your infrastructure (DB, Redis, distributed cache, OpenIddict, etc.).
After deployment to Azure Container Apps, a 500 here almost always means environment‑specific configuration (especially Redis / cache / connection strings / certificates) is wrong.
Below is a concrete checklist that matches your scenario (tiered, Redis/RabbitMQ, containers) and what we’ve seen in similar ABP support tickets.
First, get the HttpApi.Host container logs and look for the first stack trace that appears when you call:
https://<your-api>/api/abp/application-configurationhttps://<your-api>/swagger/v1/swagger.jsonTypical failing components in production/container environments:
Until you see that exception, the front-end 500/“Failed to load API definition” is just a symptom.
In container / cloud environments, bad Redis configuration will crash application-configuration and Swagger.
In HttpApi.Host’s environment appsettings (for example appsettings.Production.json or the environment you set in ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT), you should have something like:
{
"Redis": {
"Configuration": "your-redis-name.redis.cache.windows.net:6380,password=YOUR_PRIMARY_KEY,ssl=True,abortConnect=False"
},
"DistributedCache": {
"KeyPrefix": "Millennial:"
}
}
Key points:
host:port.6380 with ssl=True in Azure.HttpApi.Host (appsettings.<env>.json)DbMigrator (appsettings.<env>.json)If you don’t actually have Redis in the Azure environment yet:
A misconfigured Redis (wrong address or missing password) will usually show errors like:
NOAUTH Authentication requiredThese will appear in the API logs right before the 500 on /api/abp/application-configuration.
If your Container App has:
ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT=Production
then the app will use:
appsettings.jsonappsettings.Production.jsonCommon mistakes:
appsettings.Staging.json / appsettings.Development.json, but container runs with Production.Ensure the environment you set in Azure Container Apps matches the file where you placed your production settings.
In the HttpApi.Host appsettings for your deployment environment:
{
"App": {
"SelfUrl": "https://<your-api-container-url>"
},
"AuthServer": {
"Authority": "https://<your-auth-server-url-or-api-url>",
"RequireHttpsMetadata": "true"
},
"CorsOrigins": "https://<your-blazor-server-url>,https://<your-public-web-url>"
}
In the Blazor Server appsettings for the same environment:
{
"RemoteServices": {
"Default": {
"BaseUrl": "https://<your-api-container-url>"
}
},
"AuthServer": {
"Authority": "https://<your-auth-server-url-or-api-url>",
"RequireHttpsMetadata": "true"
}
}
Wrong urls typically cause 401/403, not 500, but if some auth/URL‑dependent configuration runs during Application Configuration, it can contribute to failures. Validate them anyway.
In containerized / Azure environments, development certificates like AddDevelopmentEncryptionAndSigningCertificate cannot be used reliably. For OpenIddict you should:
In your AuthServer (or the auth-host) module’s PreConfigureServices:
public override void PreConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
{
var env = context.Services.GetHostingEnvironment();
if (!env.IsDevelopment())
{
PreConfigure<AbpOpenIddictAspNetCoreOptions>(options =>
{
options.AddDevelopmentEncryptionAndSigningCertificate = false;
});
PreConfigure<OpenIddictServerBuilder>(builder =>
{
builder.AddProductionEncryptionAndSigningCertificate(
"openiddict.pfx",
Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("OPENIDDICT_CERT_PASSWORD"));
// optional: set token lifetimes as needed
});
}
}
Then:
openiddict.pfx into the container (volume or file copy at build/publish).If certificates are misconfigured, you’ll see CryptographicException: Keyset does not exist or similar in logs. That can also result in 500s when the app tries to build application configuration (because auth/validation configuration fails).
/api/abp/application-configuration.ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT in Azure matches the appsettings <env> you edited.App:SelfUrl, AuthServer:Authority, RemoteServices:Default:BaseUrl, and CorsOrigins for your Blazor Server + API + AuthServer.Once the infrastructure configuration (especially Redis and connection strings) is correct, /api/abp/application-configuration returns 200 and Swagger will load again.
/api/abp/application-configuration API and its role)This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
From the log:
System.Exception: Unable to unprotect the message.State (during remote login callback)The required antiforgery request token was not provided.../Error?httpStatusCode=400This combination typically happens when:
When the cookies or keys don’t match, ASP.NET Core fails to unprotect the state parameter and the antiforgery system also fails, resulting in 400.
Apply all of these; they address the most common production causes.
Especially if you use:
Do the following in your AuthServer / UI host:
The ABP team recommends the patch described here (originally for IdentityServer4, but the SameSite issue is the same):
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddSameSiteCookiePolicy(); // extension method from the article/patch
}
And in Configure:
app.UseCookiePolicy();
Details and full sample code are in this ABP article and support answer:
These ensure that the antiforgery and auth cookies are correctly set with SameSite=None; Secure (or appropriate fallbacks), so they survive the external login redirect.
If you are:
then each instance may have different Data‑Protection keys. The state value is encrypted before redirect and must be decrypted by the same keys on callback.
Configure ASP.NET Core Data Protection to use a persistent store (shared across all instances) – for example, a folder volume or Redis:
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.DataProtection;
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
services
.AddDataProtection()
.PersistKeysToFileSystem(new DirectoryInfo(@"/var/keys")) // or a shared folder
.SetApplicationName("YourAppName");
}
Do this in all AuthServer / UI hosts.
(If you already persist keys, ensure all instances point to the same location and time is in sync.)
After fixing cookies/keys, the antiforgery error may still appear if some POST is being made without a token (e.g., a custom form, widget, or JS client).
Typical ABP solutions:
<form asp-action="..." method="post">
@Html.AntiForgeryToken()
...
</form>
or ensure your layout includes the default ABP antiforgery helpers (which then can be read and added as a header by your JS code).
For API endpoints called via JS / Swagger, either:
RequestVerificationToken, or[IgnoreAntiforgeryToken]
public class YourAppService : ApplicationService
{
// ...
}
Relevant ABP support references:
Practical checklist
Ensure HTTPS everywhere (AuthServer and UI).
Apply the SameSite cookie patch (or equivalent configuration) as per the ABP article.
Configure persistent/shared Data‑Protection keys.
Check any custom POST endpoints/views:
[IgnoreAntiforgeryToken] on pure API actions.Re-test the login flow:
Unable to unprotect the message.State or missing antiforgery token, and the 400 no longer appears.This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
There is currently no ABP‑specific or Mapperly‑level “global switch” that makes Mapperly behave like AutoMapper regarding null source / navigation properties. Mapperly’s behavior is intentionally strict and driven by C# nullability. So:
Given that, for a large ABP application the realistic options are:
ABP v10 supports using AutoMapper and Mapperly side by side. For a big system that heavily relied on AutoMapper’s implicit null handling, the most practical migration path is:
[DependsOn(
typeof(AbpAutoMapperModule),
// other modules...
)]
public class MyProjectApplicationModule : AbpModule
{
public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
{
context.Services.AddAutoMapperObjectMapper<MyProjectApplicationModule>();
Configure<AbpAutoMapperOptions>(options =>
{
options.AddMaps<MyProjectApplicationModule>(validate: true);
});
}
}
Profile classes and CreateMap<,>() configurations. AutoMapper will keep handling nulls the way it always has.[DependsOn(
typeof(AbpMapperlyModule),
// ...
)]
public class MyNewModule : AbpModule
{
public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
{
context.Services.AddMapperlyObjectMapper<MyNewModule>();
}
}
ObjectMapperContext to select which mapper is used
public class LegacyAppService : ApplicationService
{
public LegacyAppService()
{
ObjectMapperContext = typeof(MyProjectApplicationModule); // AutoMapper context
}
}
public class NewAppService : ApplicationService
{
public NewAppService()
{
ObjectMapperContext = typeof(MyNewModule); // Mapperly context
}
}
This allows you to migrate incrementally instead of forcing the whole codebase to Mapperly’s strict rules at once.
For the parts you do want to move fully to Mapperly, the strategy is:
Mapperly trusts your C# nullability annotations:
public class Order
{
public Customer? Customer { get; set; } // nullable if optional
}
public class OrderDto
{
public string? CustomerName { get; set; } // nullable if Customer may be null
}
Run with nullable reference types enabled and clean up warnings on your mapping types; this drastically reduces Mapperly‑induced NREs.
Where you previously relied on AutoMapper’s “it just works” behavior for nested paths, switch to null‑safe custom logic instead of direct property flattening.
Example:
[Mapper]
public partial class OrderMapper : MapperBase<Order, OrderDto>
{
public override partial OrderDto Map(Order source);
public override partial void Map(Order source, OrderDto destination);
// Custom null-safe logic
partial void Map(Order source, OrderDto destination)
{
destination.CustomerName = source.Customer?.Name ?? string.Empty;
}
}
or use an AfterMap pattern in a partial method—key idea is: do the ?. and ?? yourself rather than relying on Mapperly to silently ignore nulls.
Ensure your module is correctly configured for Mapperly so that ObjectMapper.Map<,>() goes through Mapperly for that context:
using Volo.Abp.Mapperly;
[DependsOn(typeof(AbpMapperlyModule))]
public class MyMapperlyApplicationModule : AbpModule
{
public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
{
// default Mapperly object mapper
context.Services.AddMapperlyObjectMapper();
// optional: contextual Mapperly mapper for this module
context.Services.AddMapperlyObjectMapper<MyMapperlyApplicationModule>();
}
}
Then, in your service:
public class MyAppService : ApplicationService
{
public MyAppService()
{
ObjectMapperContext = typeof(MyMapperlyApplicationModule);
}
public Task<OrderDto> GetAsync(Order order)
{
var dto = ObjectMapper.Map<Order, OrderDto>(order); // Mapperly-based
return Task.FromResult(dto);
}
}
For the crashes you’re seeing now:
Customer.Name -> CustomerName, Parent.Child.GrandChild.Prop, etc.).string.Empty) through custom code.This is mechanical but can be scripted/assisted by IDE analyzers focusing on:
Does ABP/Mapperly provide a global option to mimic AutoMapper’s null behavior?
→ No. There is no framework‑level or Mapperly‑level setting that will:
Recommended migration strategy for large apps:
ObjectMapperContext and AbpMapperlyModule properly per module.ABP migration guide – AutoMapper → Mapperly (concepts, coexistence, registration):
https://abp.io/docs/10.0/release-info/migration-guides/AutoMapper-To-Mapperly
ABP object‑to‑object mapping & Mapperly integration (MapperBase, configuration, ObjectMapper):
https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/infrastructure/object-to-object-mapping
Mapperly mapper configuration & nullability (general behavior; no global ignore‑null flag):
https://mapperly.riok.app/docs/configuration/mapper/
https://mapperly.riok.app/docs/configuration/flattening/
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
ABP does not provide a built‑in “synchronize / upsert and delete obsolete” helper for permission grants, but it is straightforward to implement on top of the existing permission management APIs.
The recommended approach for seeding permissions is:
IDataSeedContributor.IPermissionDefinitionManager (and/or your own configuration) to know which permissions should be granted.IPermissionGrantRepository (or IPermissionGrantStore / IPermissionManager) to:
Below is an example that performs full synchronization (“database must equal seed definition”) for a given role.
Typically, you maintain the desired permissions in code (constants, config, etc.):
public static class MyPermissionSeed
{
// Permission names; these should exist as defined permissions
public static readonly string[] AdminRolePermissions =
{
"MyApp.Permissions.UserManagement",
"MyApp.Permissions.Reports.View",
"MyApp.Permissions.Reports.Edit",
// ...
};
public const string ProviderName = "R"; // "R" = Role (same as RolePermissionValueProvider.ProviderName)
public const string AdminRoleName = "admin"; // or your own role name
}
Note: For role permission provider name, ABP uses
RolePermissionValueProvider.ProviderName(usually"R").
IDataSeedContributorThis contributor will be executed by your DbMigrator and will:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using Volo.Abp.Data;
using Volo.Abp.DependencyInjection;
using Volo.Abp.PermissionManagement;
using Volo.Abp.Uow;
using Volo.Abp.Users;
using Volo.Abp.MultiTenancy;
public class PermissionSyncDataSeedContributor :
IDataSeedContributor,
ITransientDependency
{
private readonly IPermissionGrantRepository _permissionGrantRepository;
private readonly IUnitOfWorkManager _unitOfWorkManager;
private readonly IPermissionDefinitionManager _permissionDefinitionManager;
private readonly ICurrentTenant _currentTenant;
private readonly IRoleIdLookupService _roleIdLookupService;
// You can implement this or just use IdentityRoleManager directly.
public PermissionSyncDataSeedContributor(
IPermissionGrantRepository permissionGrantRepository,
IUnitOfWorkManager unitOfWorkManager,
IPermissionDefinitionManager permissionDefinitionManager,
ICurrentTenant currentTenant,
IRoleIdLookupService roleIdLookupService)
{
_permissionGrantRepository = permissionGrantRepository;
_unitOfWorkManager = unitOfWorkManager;
_permissionDefinitionManager = permissionDefinitionManager;
_currentTenant = currentTenant;
_roleIdLookupService = roleIdLookupService;
}
public async Task SeedAsync(DataSeedContext context)
{
// If you have multi-tenancy, you may want to loop tenants.
using var uow = _unitOfWorkManager.Begin(requiresNew: true, isTransactional: true);
// Resolve the role id (provider key) for the admin role
var adminRoleId = await _roleIdLookupService.GetRoleIdByNameAsync(
MyPermissionSeed.AdminRoleName,
context.TenantId);
if (adminRoleId == null)
{
await uow.CompleteAsync();
return; // role not found; nothing to do
}
var providerName = MyPermissionSeed.ProviderName;
var providerKey = adminRoleId.ToString();
// 1) Desired set from seed (filter out undefined permissions just in case)
var allPermissionDefinitions = await _permissionDefinitionManager.GetPermissionsAsync();
var validPermissionNames = new HashSet<string>(
allPermissionDefinitions.Select(p => p.Name)
);
var desiredPermissionNames = MyPermissionSeed.AdminRolePermissions
.Where(validPermissionNames.Contains)
.ToHashSet();
// 2) Load current grants for this provider (role) & tenant
var currentGrants = await _permissionGrantRepository.GetListAsync(
name: null,
providerName: providerName,
providerKey: providerKey,
tenantId: context.TenantId
);
var currentPermissionNames = currentGrants
.Select(g => g.Name)
.ToHashSet();
// 3) Determine which to add and which to delete
var toAdd = desiredPermissionNames.Except(currentPermissionNames).ToList();
var toDelete = currentPermissionNames.Except(desiredPermissionNames).ToList();
// 4) Insert missing
foreach (var permissionName in toAdd)
{
await _permissionGrantRepository.InsertAsync(
new PermissionGrant(
GuidGenerator.Create(),
permissionName,
providerName,
providerKey,
context.TenantId
),
autoSave: false
);
}
// 5) Delete obsolete
if (toDelete.Any())
{
foreach (var permissionName in toDelete)
{
var grant = currentGrants.FirstOrDefault(g => g.Name == permissionName);
if (grant != null)
{
await _permissionGrantRepository.DeleteAsync(grant, autoSave: false);
}
}
}
await uow.CompleteAsync();
}
}
Important points:
PermissionGrant entities for the toAdd list.toDelete and remove those grants.DataSeedContext.TenantId to seed per tenant.SeedAsync (or the inner logic) for each.You can use IdentityRoleManager (from Volo.Abp.Identity) to find the role id, wrapped in a small service:
using System;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using Volo.Abp.Identity;
public interface IRoleIdLookupService
{
Task<Guid?> GetRoleIdByNameAsync(string roleName, Guid? tenantId);
}
public class RoleIdLookupService : IRoleIdLookupService
{
private readonly IdentityRoleManager _roleManager;
public RoleIdLookupService(IdentityRoleManager roleManager)
{
_roleManager = roleManager;
}
public async Task<Guid?> GetRoleIdByNameAsync(string roleName, Guid? tenantId)
{
var role = await _roleManager.FindByNameAsync(roleName);
return role?.Id;
}
}
You can simplify this and inject IdentityRoleManager directly into the seed contributor if you prefer.
PermissionSyncDataSeedContributor in a Domain project (e.g., *.Domain).*.Application.Contracts or *.Domain.Shared for definitions).Data seeding infrastructure and IDataSeedContributor in ABP:
https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/infrastructure/data-seeding
ABP’s own permission seeding pattern (PermissionDataSeedContributor):
https://github.com/abpframework/abp/blob/e3e1779de6df5d26f01cdc8e99ac9cbcb3d24d3c/modules/permission-management/src/Volo.Abp.PermissionManagement.Domain/Volo/Abp/PermissionManagement/PermissionDataSeedContributor.cs#L26
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
In your current state:
https://auth.aaa.com/invalid_token, issuer is invalid)You must make issuer and authority 100% consistent everywhere, and in Kubernetes you typically also need to explicitly set ValidIssuers (and sometimes a SignatureValidator) in each service.
Do the following steps exactly.
In your AuthServer project module:
public override void PreConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
{
var configuration = context.Services.GetConfiguration();
PreConfigure<OpenIddictServerBuilder>(builder =>
{
// Must be the public URL of your AuthServer (the same URL you use from browser)
builder.SetIssuer(new Uri(configuration["AuthServer:Authority"]!));
});
}
And in AuthServer appsettings.Production.json or environment variables (in k8s):
"AuthServer": {
"Authority": "https://auth.aaa.com", // no trailing slash; code adds it
"RequireHttpsMetadata": "true"
}
Important:
https://auth.aaa.com/.well-known/openid-configuration must be reachable from inside the cluster and from browsers.ValidIssuersIn every project that validates tokens (Angular backend, web app, web gateway, all microservices), configure authentication like this in the module:
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer;
using Microsoft.IdentityModel.Tokens;
using Volo.Abp;
using Volo.Abp.Modularity;
public class MyServiceHttpApiHostModule : AbpModule
{
public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
{
var configuration = context.Services.GetConfiguration();
context.Services.AddAuthentication(JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)
.AddAbpJwtBearer(options =>
{
// Must be the same public URL as in AuthServer
options.Authority = configuration["AuthServer:Authority"]; // "https://auth.aaa.com"
options.RequireHttpsMetadata = true;
// Audience must match 'aud' claim in the token for this service
options.Audience = "MyServiceName";
// FIX: IDX10204 / invalid issuer in k8s
options.TokenValidationParameters = new TokenValidationParameters
{
ValidIssuers = new[]
{
configuration["AuthServer:Authority"]!.EnsureEndsWith('/') // "https://auth.aaa.com/"
}
};
// If you still get signature key resolution errors in k8s (IDX10500),
// you can temporarily add this workaround:
/*
options.TokenValidationParameters.SignatureValidator = (token, parameters) =>
{
var jwt = new Microsoft.IdentityModel.JsonWebTokens.JsonWebToken(token);
return jwt;
};
*/
});
}
}
And in each service’s config (values via env in k8s):
"AuthServer": {
"Authority": "https://auth.aaa.com",
"RequireHttpsMetadata": "true"
}
Every service must use this same AuthServer:Authority.
Do not mix in http:// or internal hostnames here.
IdentityClients)If services call other services using client credentials (IdentityClients), also align their Authority:
"IdentityClients": {
"Default": {
"Authority": "https://auth.aaa.com",
"ClientId": "MyService_Internal",
"ClientSecret": "…",
"GrantType": "client_credentials",
"Scope": "MyScope"
}
}
Again, same https://auth.aaa.com everywhere.
From a pod (e.g., admin microservice), run:
curl -k https://auth.aaa.com/.well-known/openid-configuration
You should see JSON whose:
issuer is https://auth.aaa.com/https://auth.aaa.com/...If that’s not true, fix DNS / ingress until it is.
On one failing service (e.g., Administration microservice):
Enable IdentityModel debug logs as in the article.
Confirm that at startup or at first authenticated request it tries to fetch:
https://auth.aaa.com/.well-known/openid-configuration
If it instead goes to http://... or localhost, your Authority is still wrong in that service.
Once:
https://auth.aaa.com/AuthServer:Authority = https://auth.aaa.comTokenValidationParameters.ValidIssuers include https://auth.aaa.com/your invalid_token / issuer errors will disappear and the services will start authenticating requests.
ValidIssuers and SetIssuer):ValidIssuers added:ValidIssuers + k8s workaround solved “no service can authenticate” in ABP microservices:This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
The new error:
WWW-Authenticate: Bearer error="invalid_token",
error_description="The issuer 'https://auth.routilia.com/' is invalid"
means: the token’s iss = https://auth.routilia.com/ but the API that validates the token does not accept this issuer as valid.
Configure both AuthServer and all APIs / gateways so that:
https://auth.routilia.com/In your AuthServer module:
public override void PreConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
{
var configuration = context.Services.GetConfiguration();
PreConfigure<OpenIddictServerBuilder>(builder =>
{
// Must be the public URL of your AuthServer
builder.SetIssuer(new Uri(configuration["AuthServer:Authority"]!));
});
}
And in appsettings.json (or k8s env vars) of AuthServer:
"AuthServer": {
"Authority": "https://auth.routilia.com",
"RequireHttpsMetadata": "true"
}
Make sure the AuthServer is actually reachable at https://auth.routilia.com/.well-known/openid-configuration from inside the cluster.
In every service that receives bearer tokens (web app, public web, gateways, microservices), configure JWT like this:
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer;
using Microsoft.IdentityModel.Tokens;
using Volo.Abp;
using Volo.Abp.Modularity;
public class YourServiceModule : AbpModule
{
public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
{
var configuration = context.Services.GetConfiguration();
context.Services.AddAuthentication(JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)
.AddAbpJwtBearer(options =>
{
options.Authority = configuration["AuthServer:Authority"]; // "https://auth.routilia.com"
options.Audience = "YourServiceName"; // must match token 'aud'
options.TokenValidationParameters = new TokenValidationParameters
{
// Accept the issuer seen in the token:
ValidIssuers = new[]
{
configuration["AuthServer:Authority"].EnsureEndsWith('/')
// -> "https://auth.routilia.com/"
}
};
});
}
}
And in appsettings.json or k8s env of each API:
"AuthServer": {
"Authority": "https://auth.routilia.com",
"RequireHttpsMetadata": "true"
}
If you previously used some internal HTTP URL (like http://auth-svc or http://localhost) as Authority or issuer, remove it and consistently use the same HTTPS public URL everywhere.
IdentityClients (for internal HTTP calls)For services that call others via IdentityModel (client credentials), ensure their IdentityClients:Default:Authority also points to the same HTTPS URL:
"IdentityClients": {
"Default": {
"Authority": "https://auth.routilia.com",
"ClientId": "YourClient",
"ClientSecret": "YourSecret",
"GrantType": "client_credentials",
"Scope": "YourScope"
}
}
Once:
SetIssuer) = https://auth.routilia.com/Authority and ValidIssuers include https://auth.routilia.com/the invalid_token / “issuer is invalid” error will disappear.
IDX10204 / issuer problems and Kubernetes deployments (includes the same ValidIssuers and SetIssuer patterns used above):This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
That log means the API that validates the token has no issuer configured in its TokenValidationParameters, so it can’t match the iss in the token.
This is common when running behind Kubernetes / reverse proxy.
Configure JWT bearer explicitly in the service where the error happens (web app, gateway, microservice, etc.), and set ValidIssuers to your AuthServer authority (the public URL that issues the token).
Example (in the API / gateway project):
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer;
using Microsoft.IdentityModel.Tokens;
using Volo.Abp;
using Volo.Abp.Modularity;
public class YourApiModule : AbpModule
{
public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
{
var configuration = context.Services.GetConfiguration();
context.Services.AddAuthentication(JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)
.AddAbpJwtBearer(options =>
{
options.Authority = configuration["AuthServer:Authority"]; // e.g. "https://your-authserver.yourdomain.com"
options.Audience = "YourServiceName"; // must match 'aud' in token
options.TokenValidationParameters = new TokenValidationParameters
{
// Fixes: IDX10204: Unable to validate issuer...
ValidIssuers = new[]
{
configuration["AuthServer:Authority"].EnsureEndsWith('/')
}
};
});
}
}
Key points:
AuthServer:Authority must be the public URL of the AuthServer that issues the token (for example: https://auth.yourdomain.com/), and you must use the same value in:
OpenIddict issuer)./ (issuer in tokens generated by OpenIddict normally does).context.Services.AddAuthentication(JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)
.AddAbpJwtBearer(options =>
{
options.Authority = configuration["AuthServer:Authority"];
options.Audience = "YourServiceName";
options.TokenValidationParameters = new TokenValidationParameters
{
ValidIssuers = new[]
{
configuration["AuthServer:Authority"].EnsureEndsWith('/')
},
// Optional workaround when keys cannot be resolved in K8s:
SignatureValidator = (token, parameters) =>
{
var jwt = new Microsoft.IdentityModel.JsonWebTokens.JsonWebToken(token);
return jwt;
}
};
});
Also verify on the AuthServer side (OpenIddict):
PreConfigure<OpenIddictServerBuilder>(builder =>
{
var configuration = context.Services.GetConfiguration();
builder.SetIssuer(new Uri(configuration["AuthServer:Authority"]));
});
So the issuer in the token and the authority / valid issuer in your APIs are identical.
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
