Please do something about this service bot closing unresolved issues...
Correction, the missing data was on our end. What is not working, or rather does not seem possible to select in ABP Suite, is if Navigation properties should be listed in the List view like for normal properties. Please not that the Filterable option does not seem to affect this, ie it will happen even if you deselect that.
[maliming] said: The
LeptonX Lite LeptonXlink seems no problem.
That specific problem is for the MVC version.
[maliming] said: hi
I will provide feedback to the team.
I think we can add
footer.component.tsin the Angular app template.Thanks
Have not used the other templates in a while but I believe that it is something that would be nice to have for MVC/Blazor as well if there is a similar situation there. But still believe that it should not require an action to hide the Copyright Volosoft, rather if you wanted it to be shown.
Addint the footer.component.ts would probably be a nice workaround for now though, as well as updating the documentation so what is written for LeptonX Lite is also mentioned for the commercial package, as I would imagine that is where most commercial customers would look.
I notice there are some problems with the documentation in this regard, where the "LeptonX Lite" mentions stuff that isn't mentioned for LeptonX, like the stuff about Footer component.
https://abp.io/docs/latest/ui-themes/lepton-x-lite/angular
https://abp.io/docs/latest/ui-themes/lepton-x/angular
And from what I can see, there are no backlinks from the non Lite to to the Lite documentation
There is also a bit of confusion regarding the Naming, as in some places, LeptonX means only the commercial version and in others, there seem to be mentioned just "Lepton" with regards to the free version.
Hi and thanks for responding quickly,
I guess we will have to wait and see for the time being.
Please refund this ticket and mark it as a bug as I think we can all agree that there things not working as expected/intended here. And if possible, mark this so that it does not automatically get closed unless you manually type something ever X days.
Thanks.
Hi,
Thanks.
But why is this even needed? What is the reason for this being there to begin with as I find it hard to imagine a business case where any of your customers would want a Copyright Volosoft in their app? It is kind of like if Microsoft would add a Copyright Microsoft to every new document in Word by default and then let people know how to remove it if they ask for it :)
Also, I believe that the only way to find out what component to actually replace with component replacement would be to either ask for it or reverse engineer the LeptonX theme, both which seems unnecessary to me.
Seems like we must be missing something here compared to just not having to to this (or even better, have a optional Copyright message which you could both enable/disable and modify via settings).
Real support please
(BTW, the suggested AI response is incorrect as NgModule is no longer used from what I know)
Thank you for an honest answer and we appreciate that you take this seriously and that you confirm these as valid concerns. Also appreciate that you confirm that there is at least an intention for the React Native / Expo template to be up to par with the other ABP templates.
This has been an ongoing discussion for probably two years by now, during which there have been several promised about the template being fixed in the next version, followed by that is has been fixed in the last version etc. We really hope that this time it turns out to be true, but you have to forgive us for being a bit skeptical about this being the time when it actually happens. That said, no one would be happier than us if we were proven wrong this time.
We are not expecting the template to be perfect (even if it would be nice if it was), but being a paid commercial product, we at least expect it to be working out of the box. And we also find it concerning that it seems like despite the template containing breaking/stopping problems, it is still being released as "production ready" when it is more like a never ending beta version.
For this project, we have once again, after having spent a few too many hours on this, found that we have to find an alternative solution for our React Native / Expo app than the one provided by ABP. This is unfortunate for many reasons.
All this said, as mentioned above, we really hope that this is the time when we are finally proven wrong about our concerns and that you manage to release a React Native / Expo template we can actually use for a project intended for production. If we could assist in this by perhaps testing out new early releases etc. we would be willing to do so as much as we can manage.
What is the road map for the ABP Studio version being released that is intended to fix this?
Thanks.