You can also add this value into the cliams.https://github.com/abpframework/abp/blob/dev/modules/identity

I had tried to use the UserManager but obviously was too lazy to find its namespace so wasted a question

* **ABP Framework version:** v4.1.0 * **UI type**: MVC * **DB provider**: EF Core * **Tiered (MVC) or

Identity Server Seperated (Angular)**: no Hi, I feel like this is an easy one...

I have a new property (bool Active) on the User object, stored in ExtraProperties.

I want to reference it on the razor page, but the CurrentUser (ICurrentUser) object doesn't have it or

How can I read the value?

*ABP Framework version:**5.1.3 * **UI type**: Angular * **DB provider**: EF Core * **Tiered (MVC) or

Identity Server Separated (Angular)**: yes / no * **Exception message and stack trace**: * **Steps

to reproduce the issue**:" ****code **** import { Component } from '@angular/core'; import {eSaasComponents

Replacement of Login Page in angular is not working . i have follow the replacement documentation ,after

replacement still the page is redirect to Backend login page

Hi @cellero, please wrap your create and update methods with try-catch blocks and handle exception by

Hopefully this is being worked on to be handled by the ABP suite.

thanks for the feedback. this will be fixed in the next version. meantime you can add the marked code

%%entity-name%%Id = input%%entity-name-for-navigation-property%%.Id; Editing%%entity-name

%%AppService.UpdateAsync(Editing%%entity-name%%Id, Editing%%entity-name%%); await Get

Framework version:** v4.4.0 * **UI type**: Blazor Server * **DB provider**: EF Core * **Tiered (MVC) or

Identity Server Separated (Angular)**: no The create modal crashes when a required field is left

The bug is easy to replicate 1.

Use Abp Suite to create a simple entity with a required field/property !

this issue and can confirm it is a bug to be solved.

LeptonX Theme is a new theme therefore, there's no live project that I can show you in this phase.

By the time, we'll see many enterprises will use it on big projects.

My project's stakeholders want some reassurance before making the decision to upgrade from Lepton theme

Is there no way to add extra fields to the token error response?

We would like our front-end to be able to determine why the user was unable to authenticate and display

the appropriate message, e.g. to send an email confirmation token if the email has not been verified

Since we are using that library, it is better to ask in [identityserver 4 github issues](https://github.com

/IdentityServer/IdentityServer4/issues) if it is possible and what to override.

Is there any way we can customize the error response from the `/connect/token `endpoint depending on

For example right now the only way to determine if the user's password is incorrect or if the user has

not yet verified their email address is to look at the `error_description` field (which should not be

Identity Server Separated (Angular)**: no * **Exception message and stack trace**: * **Steps to reproduce

the issue**:"

Hi, Currently this is not supported. But it is in our short-term plans (planned for 2.7.0).

Hi, I just want to ask how can I generate mongoDb entity with type is "Collection" in Abp Suite or if

abp Suite UI is currently not supported, how do I change the files entities.json for generating ?

[image.png](/QA/files/342ed1a9a8af701ac95339fc539a8178.png) But i don't know to do that with this framework

*ABP Framework version:** v4.2.2 * **UI type**: Angulat * **DB provider**: EF Core * **Tiered (MVC) or

Identity Server Separated (Angular)**: no * **Exception message and stack trace**: * **Steps to reproduce

the issue**:

Perhaps I am missing some dependecies or configuration of dependency injection?

Can you show which dependecies is used in the working example you presented?

I am experiencing the same problem in a project build on the startup template (eventhandler and dependant

[billede.png](/QA/files/c6f6b00826adb6ad829839f85705414f.png) **Below is the full structure of our main

I think remote help is a very good idea – how do we set this up?

Im attempting to inject a repository generated with the ABP suite in a class which implements the IDistributedEventHandler

RabbitMQ is configured as the distributed event bus provider.

However when I inject repositories or other classes which is registered to dependency injection with

the ITransientDependency interface, the eventhandler is never instantiated.

or a constructor with IDistributedEventBus as parameter.

}; var supplierCreateDto = new SupplierCreateDto { Name

Guid.Parse("231c8aac-3355-4c8b-84d7-eabb4ceba041")); } ``` Also, below is

SCV.Litmus.ProfileManagement.CustomAuditingStore. ---- Autofac.Core.DependencyResolutionException : None of the

constructors found with 'Autofac.Core.Activators.Reflection.DefaultConstructorFinder' on type 'SCV.Litmus.ProfileManagement.CustomAuditingStore

' can be invoked with the available services and parameters: Cannot resolve parameter 'Volo.Abp.AuditLogging.IAuditLogRepository

int _requestCount = 5; private static readonly Regex InvalidSequenceTokenRegex = new Regex(@"The

given sequenceToken is invalid.

The next expected sequenceToken is: (\d+)"); public CustomAuditingStore( IAuditLogRepository

constructors found with 'Autofac.Core.Activators.Reflection.DefaultConstructorFinder' on type 'ProfileManagement.CustomAuditingStore

' can be invoked with the available services and parameters: Cannot resolve parameter 'Volo.Abp.AuditLogging.IAuditLogRepository

Hello, You can customize UI by downloading the source code. Please follow the steps below.

Run command below in your aspnet-core folder ```bash abp add-module Volo.Chat --with-source-code

Run the command below in your root folder and delete `modules` folder which is in aspnet-core folder.

Finally add the Chat module again to your project by running the below command in your `aspnet-core`

I have set up the chat feature by following this [documentation](https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/4.3

Everything is working as it is supposed to be.

But I need to customize the UI for chat component (I'm using **Angular UI** anyway).

I had looked for any documentation or guide to achieve it but couldn't find any.

There is no such feature now.

I have an ABP project that has been developed and is running.

Is there a way to not execute the abp login command, but a way to run the existing abp project.

Or create a new development account for partners to use, but this account cannot use abp suite.

I didn't find this kind of method in the official documentation and in the internet.

Connection-Strings 2: ABP provided a Saas module to management tenants, you can set connection strings for each tenant

latest/startup-templates/module/solution-structure 3: We don't have such a feature, you can allow the

ABP Framework version:** v5.41 * **UI type**: Angular * **DB provider**: EF Core * **Tiered (MVC) or

Server Separated (Angular)**: yes * **Exception message and stack trace**: * **Steps to reproduce the

seperatetely and will have following databases 1. host database called "hostdb" 2. tenant

database for each tenant called "tenantdb" where n is identifer of tenant 3. shared database

There is nothing on the browser console log.

It might not be about redis maybe yes as there is this case where there is no Redis: When I first run

> There is nothing on the browser console log.

> > It might not be about redis maybe yes as there is this case where there is no Redis: > > When

But there is still the issue that the page needs to be reloaded once, otherwise it doesn't work

**ABP Framework version:** v6.0.1 * **UI type**: Blazor * **DB provider**: EF Core * **Tiered (MVC) or

Identity Server Separated (Angular)**: no On Blazor server application the "Filter menu" do not work

in this 2 cases: - When I first run the application, I need to reload the page, otherwise the filter

do not work (with Edge Browser Version 107.0.1418.35) - When I add redis as explain on this doc, the

This should be done on the ABP Framework side.

All the modules should implement changes between v10 - v11.

I'm adding this into our roadmap, but it seems it can be published in v5.3 as the closest version. -

Also, you can follow the process from [here](https://github.com/abpframework/abp/issues/12144)

ABP Framework version:** v5.1.3 * **UI type**: Angular * **DB provider**: EF Core * **Tiered (MVC) or

Server Separated (Angular)**: yes * **Exception message and stack trace**: * **Steps to reproduce the

issue**:" Hi, We are using ELSA workflows in our ABP project and the latest version of ELSA is using

This causes exceptions when running the abp project: : Method not found: 'Void AutoMapper.IMemberConfigurationExpression

Is there a plan to upgrade the Automapper version in ABP or is there a workaround that can be used?

The concept of *Authentication Server* is the web server where the **IdentityServer** is hosted.

hosting its own login page) for your admin portal These applications will still authenticate against the

Also, what do you mean by *separating the work load of customer portal and admin portal*?

The point of AuthServer is authenticating your users from a single point.

Hi isn't possible to implement two authentication server with one identity server to separate the work

load of customer portal and admin portal if yes can you provide the solution?.

Hi, Make sure you have the `Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Mvc.UI.MultiTenancy` package reference.

*ABP Framework version:** v4.4.4 * **UI type**: Angular * **DB provider**: EF Core * **Tiered (MVC) or

Identity Server Separated (Angular)**: no / yes * **Exception message and stack trace**: N.A * **Steps

to reproduce the issue**:" N.A Hi, I need to override `AbpTenantAppService.FindTenantByNameAsync()

[image.png](/QA/files/493b14d6712afb80add63a058f2e7f79.png) These are links to the code I need to override

Hi **@balessi75** You can't reference any application layer in the domain layer.

You should use AppService interfaces since they're placed in the same layer and the runnable end application

registers their implementations if it's a client proxy or application service instance.

*As a note, if you convert your project to tiered or micro-service architecture, you have to know that

appservice interface implementation will be replaced with client proxy implementation and it'll make

Abp Commercial 5.2.0 / Blazor Server / EF Core / Non-tiered Hi, We are using the ObjectExtensionManager

to create a custom property on the IdentityUser entity and would like to do validation that requires

that custom validation can be accomplished with: ``` options.Validators.Add(context => {

The problem we are having is that ObjectExtensionManager is templated to reside in the Domain.Shared

Are we missing something here, or is there a better/recommended way of accomplishing what we are looking

See this [community article](https://community.abp.io/articles/how-to-use-primeng-components-with-the-abp-angular-ui-e35vnbae

) to learn how to use PrimeNG components with the ABP Angular UI.

Another question: How about the angular UI metronic component?

You can use any UI library with ABP framework by following its documentation.

*ABP Framework version:** v4.3.3 * **UI type**: Angular * **DB provider**: EF Core * **Tiered (MVC) or

Server Separated (Angular)**: yes * **Exception message and stack trace**: * **Steps to reproduce the

See the documentation: https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/latest/modules/identity/two-factor-authentication

If you are having a problem with the subject, we would like to help.

You can also find other related questions from the links below. * https://support.abp.io/QA/Questions

ABP Framework version:** v4.2.2 * **UI type**: Angular * **DB provider**: EF Core * **Tiered (MVC) or

Server Separated (Angular)**: yes * **Exception message and stack trace**: * **Steps to reproduce the

Currently your tests depend on `Quartz`, ie the behavior of a library, but this is not a good method.

schedule to the definition and do the rescheduling based on that info.

No other easy way to check * if the triggers are really the same. */ .WithDescription(

job already exists there might be changes to the schedule so reschedule the job if so IJobDetail

The problem is in the initalization, not in how I get the scheduler in my tests.

ABP Framework version:** 4.4.0 * **UI type**: Angular * **DB provider**: EF Core * **Tiered (MVC) or

thrown while activating λ:Quartz.IScheduler. -------- Quartz.SchedulerException : Scheduler with name

Whenever I run multiple tests where I initialize a backround worker the tests fail because the IScheduler

is already created with another test.

I realize that this is possibly a Quarz problem but is there a some way to change the Quarz initialization