ABP Framework does not enforce a specific naming convention for PostgreSQL schemas by default. The official documentation and community articles confirm that ABP uses PascalCase for table and column names out of the box, which aligns with .NET conventions but not with PostgreSQL's typical snake_case style.
The UseSnakeCaseNamingConvention() method from EF Core can be used to apply snake_case naming, but it does not fully cover inherited properties (such as those from FullAuditedAggregateRoot). This is a known limitation, and some ABP internal queries and modules may still expect PascalCase names (e.g., "AbpPermissions"), leading to migration and runtime conflicts if the physical schema uses snake_case.
There is currently no official ABP guidance or built-in support for enforcing snake_case across all entities, including inherited and module-provided properties. The recommended approach is to use the default PascalCase naming to ensure compatibility with ABP modules and migrations.
Workarounds such as custom EF Core naming conventions, query interceptors, or database views are community-driven and not officially supported. These may help in specific scenarios but can introduce maintenance overhead and compatibility risks with ABP updates.
As of now, there is no official roadmap or announcement regarding improved or native snake_case support for PostgreSQL in ABP Framework. The best practice is to use the default naming conventions unless you are prepared to handle the additional complexity and potential issues with custom solutions.
For the FullAuditedAggregateRoot property casing issue, there is no officially supported workaround. If you must use snake_case, you will need to manually configure property mappings for all inherited properties and be aware of the risks with ABP module compatibility.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
In ABP, audit properties like LastModifierId are set based on the current user, which is determined by the ClaimsPrincipal available via ICurrentPrincipalAccessor. In background jobs (such as Hangfire), there is no authenticated user by default, so audit logging will not automatically associate changes with a user unless you explicitly set the principal.
Your approach of using currentPrincipalAccessor.Change(newPrincipal) is correct and aligns with official ABP guidance. However, for audit logging to work, you must ensure:
If you still do not see audit logs for changes made in the background job, check the following:
Example pattern (from official docs and community articles):
var newPrincipal = new ClaimsPrincipal(new ClaimsIdentity(new[] { new Claim(AbpClaimTypes.UserId, user.Id.ToString()), new Claim(AbpClaimTypes.UserName, user.UserName) }, "CustomAuthType")); // Set an authentication type
using (currentPrincipalAccessor.Change(newPrincipal)) { // All repository updates here will use the specified user for audit logging await configurationRepository.UpdateAsync(configuration); }
- If you want to ensure auditing for anonymous/background users, set:
```csharp
Configure<AbpAuditingOptions>(options =>
{
options.IsEnabledForAnonymousUsers = true;
});
For more details and verified patterns, see:
If you follow these steps and still do not see audit logs, double-check that your background job is not suppressing auditing or using a different DbContext or unit of work configuration.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
The error message Invalid credentials. 80090308: LdapErr: DSID-0C090450, comment: AcceptSecurityContext error, data 52e, v2580 indicates that the LDAP server is rejecting the username or password provided. This is a standard LDAP error (code 49, data 52e) meaning "invalid credentials".
Common causes and solutions:
user@domain or DOMAIN\\user.libldap) are installed and compatible with your environment.After installing missing packages (like libldap), restart your application and verify the configuration again.
If you have enabled LDAP login for a tenant, confirm that the feature is enabled in both the host and tenant, and that the settings are correct.
You can also check the AbpFeatureValues table and clear the cache if changes are not reflected.
For more details and troubleshooting steps, refer to the official documentation and support threads below.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
If you use HangfireBackgroundWorkerBase directly, you do not need the HangfirePeriodicBackgroundWorkerAdapter. The adapter is only necessary when you want to run ABP's IBackgroundWorker implementations (such as AsyncPeriodicBackgroundWorkerBase) on Hangfire, bridging ABP's background worker system to Hangfire's infrastructure.
When you implement your workers by inheriting from HangfireBackgroundWorkerBase, you are using Hangfire's native recurring job mechanism, and jobs will appear in the dashboard as you define them, without the adapter's extra entries.
To avoid flooding the Hangfire dashboard with HangfirePeriodicBackgroundWorkerAdapter jobs, you can disable or remove the registration of ABP's background workers that use the adapter, and instead implement your recurring jobs directly using HangfireBackgroundWorkerBase.
In summary: HangfirePeriodicBackgroundWorkerAdapter is not required if you use HangfireBackgroundWorkerBase. You can disable the adapter by not registering ABP background workers that rely on it.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To restrict tenant access by domain in a multi-tenant Angular app using ABP Framework, and to prevent users from switching to other tenants, you should use the domain/subdomain tenant resolver both on the backend and frontend. This ensures that each tenant is only accessible from its assigned domain, and tenant switching is disabled.
Solution Steps:
baseUrl in your environment configuration to use the {0} placeholder for the tenant name:
application: { baseUrl: "https://{0}.koimpact.tw", name: "Sroi" }
- With this setup, when the app runs on `https://imm.koimpact.tw`, the tenant name will be resolved as `imm`. The Angular app will send the `__tenant` header automatically based on the subdomain.
- When you use the `{0}` placeholder in `baseUrl`, the tenant switching component (e.g., on the login page) will be hidden, so users cannot switch tenants from the UI.
2. **Backend Configuration:**
- In your backend (e.g., in `YourProjectNameHttpApiHostModule`), configure the domain tenant resolver:
```csharp
Configure<AbpTenantResolveOptions>(options =>
{
options.AddDomainTenantResolver("{0}.koimpact.tw");
});
Identity Server / Auth Server:
https://imm.koimpact.tw).https://*.koimpact.tw in CORS or redirect URIs; instead, explicitly list each allowed tenant domain.Preventing Tenant Switching:
Summary:
{0} in baseUrl for tenant isolation.Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
XSRF-TOKEN) and a request header (default: RequestVerificationToken). Your custom header X-XSRF-TOKEN and cookie name are valid, but you must ensure the client-side code (JS or Blazor) reads the cookie and sends it in the header for every POST/PUT request. If the header is sent but the cookie is missing, validation fails.SameSite=None without Secure, or proxy misconfiguration).Cookie.SameSite = None and Cookie.SecurePolicy = Always is correct for cross-site scenarios, but only if HTTPS is enforced end-to-end. If any hop is HTTP, the browser will not send the cookie.UseForwardedHeaders is the very first middleware.X-Forwarded-Proto header is set to https by the ingress.Request.IsHttps == true).Set-Cookie: XSRF-TOKEN=...; SameSite=None; Secure header.UseForwardedHeaders. However, if the pipeline is misordered or the request is not seen as HTTPS, the cookie may not be set.X-XSRF-TOKEN, ensure all client-side code (including Blazor and any JS) uses this header.Microsoft.AspNetCore.Antiforgery and Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Mvc.AntiForgery at the Debug or Trace level in your logging configuration.Troubleshooting Steps:
XSRF-TOKEN cookie with SameSite=None; Secure.XSRF-TOKEN cookie and the X-XSRF-TOKEN header.Request.IsHttps).Example: Logging Configuration
// appsettings.json
"Logging": {
"LogLevel": {
"Default": "Information",
"Microsoft.AspNetCore.Antiforgery": "Debug",
"Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Mvc.AntiForgery": "Debug"
}
}
References:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
This error ("An internal error occurred during your request!" with a NullReferenceException in ABP Suite's CRUD Page Generator) is a known issue, especially in modular or microservice solutions, and is often related to the way ABP Suite parses your solution's structure and DbContext extension files.
Check for Multiple *DbContextModelCreatingExtensions.cs Files
*DbContextModelCreatingExtensions.cs file per module. If you have more than one (e.g., both LeadsDbContextModelCreatingExtensions.cs and LeadsCustomDbContextModelCreatingExtensions.cs), Suite may fail with a NullReferenceException.Verify File Paths in Suite Configuration
.abp/suite/appsettings.json points to the correct paths for your DbContext and extension files.Check for Missing or Misnamed Files
LeadsDbContextModelCreatingExtensions.cs) exist and are not excluded from the project.Remove and Re-Add Solution in Suite
Update to Latest Suite and ABP Version
If You Need Custom EF Core Configurations
These support threads contain detailed discussions and workarounds for similar issues.
If you follow these steps and ensure only one *DbContextModelCreatingExtensions.cs file exists per module, the error should be resolved. If you need to keep custom configurations, consider merging them into the single extension file or waiting for an official fix that supports custom/extended files.
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
The error you are encountering is because the ExcelService and UserSessionsComponent are not exported in the public API of the @volo/abp.ng.identity package. This means you cannot import them directly in your custom component, as shown by the module not found errors in your screenshots.
To resolve this, these services and components must be explicitly exported in the package's index.ts files (as you illustrated in your last screenshot). Until the maintainers add these exports and publish a new version, you will not be able to use them directly from the package.
As a workaround, you can:
For long-term maintainability, it is best to request the ABP team to export these in the next release, as you have done.
Sources (validated):
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To resolve the password update issue in your ABP system, please follow these steps:
Verify Password Policy:
Check for User Record Issues:
AbpUsers table in your database.Reset or Re-seed User Data (if needed):
DbMigrator application or the migrate-database.ps1 script.Use the Correct Old Password:
1q2w3E* (case-sensitive) unless it has been changed.Review Error Messages:
Additional Troubleshooting:
If the issue persists after these steps, please provide the exact error message or check the application logs for more details.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To implement a fully customized login flow such as OTP-based (passwordless) login in ABP Framework, you need to override the default Account module's login logic and UI. Below are the steps and references for both ABP 4.x and 8.x versions. The Lepton theme's account flow source code is not distributed directly, but you can override and customize the login page and logic as shown below.
Override the Login Page and Model:
CustomLoginModel inheriting from LoginModel.Login.cshtml under Pages/Account to override the default UI.Example:
public class CustomLoginModel : LoginModel
{
public CustomLoginModel(
IAuthenticationSchemeProvider schemeProvider,
IOptions<AbpAccountOptions> accountOptions)
: base(schemeProvider, accountOptions)
{
}
// Override methods to implement OTP logic here
}
@page
@model YourNamespace.Pages.Account.CustomLoginModel
<!-- Custom OTP UI here -->
Implement OTP Logic:
CustomLoginModel, implement the logic to send and verify OTP.Customize the UI:
Lepton Theme Source:
Sample Projects:
Version Differences:
Lepton Source Code Access:
You can find the default login page source and customization guides at the following links:
Sources:
For Lepton theme source code and commercial modules, please use your ABP Commercial customer portal or contact support for direct access.
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
