Yes, exactly. It depends on how you want to implement the override. You can use the component replacement along with the NavbarComponent which may be shorter and easier.
You can also give a path reference in your tsconfig.json as in the screenshot.
Thank you for your clarification. You can use eThemeLeptonXComponents.Navbar key instead of Toolbar and Settings. If you override this component, you can also add your footer to the sidebar.
Can you perhaps just give me a direction to look for the sidebar or to customize this? I do not want to lose the sidebar which is pre-configured
If you do not want to override the whole navbar and create from scratch, you can check the NavbarComponent inside @volo/ngx-lepton-x.core package.
You can integrate the source code to your project by using this command abp add-package @volo/ngx-lepton-x.core --with-source-code.
Hello again, thank you for providing details. This is another problem which is going to be solved in the next release. You can use this style config to overcome this issue for the time being:
.lpx-header-bottom {
overflow: inherit !important;
}
I am refunding your ticket. Thank you for your cooperation.
You cannot technically move the footer to the sidebar for the time being. However, I can suggest you to add your custom footer to the Settings component key.
This approach would serve the hide/show requirement of the sidebar as in here. If you think that this does not cover your case, I can assist further.
if (!this.authService.isAuthenticated) {
this.replaceableComponents.add({
component: YourNewToolbarComponent,
key: eThemeLeptonXComponents.Toolbar,
});
this.replaceableComponents.add({
component: YourNewSettingsComponent,
key: eThemeLeptonXComponents.Settings,
});
}
Hello again, I am refunding your ticket. Thank you for your cooperation.
Hello,
You can use component replacement to achieve these points. You can find a reference in the documentation. I can also provide a sample implementation for the keys that you have been looking for:
import { AuthService, ReplaceableComponentsService } from '@abp/ng.core';
import { Component, inject } from '@angular/core';
import { eThemeLeptonXComponents } from '@volosoft/abp.ng.theme.lepton-x';
import { YourNewFooterComponent } from './your-new-footer/your-new-footer.component';
import { YourNewToolbarComponent } from './your-new-toolbar/your-new-toolbar.component';
import { YourNewSettingsComponent } from './your-new-settings/your-new-settings.component';
@Component({
selector: 'app-root',
template: `
...
`,
})
export class AppComponent {
private replaceableComponents = inject(ReplaceableComponentsService);
private authService = inject(AuthService);
constructor() {
this.replaceableComponents.add({
component: YourNewFooterComponent,
key: eThemeLeptonXComponents.Footer,
});
if (!this.authService.isAuthenticated) {
this.replaceableComponents.add({
component: YourNewToolbarComponent,
key: eThemeLeptonXComponents.Toolbar,
});
this.replaceableComponents.add({
component: YourNewSettingsComponent,
key: eThemeLeptonXComponents.Settings,
});
}
}
}
You can let us know if you need further assistance.
Thank you for your patience and for providing more details on your scenario — let’s wrap this up!
The antiforgery token mismatch issue you’re experiencing after logging out and trying to log back in from multiple tabs is expected behavior, tied to how browsers and the OpenID Connect flow handle session and cookie isolation.
Here’s why it happens:
Unfortunately, this behavior is inherent to browser security and not something ABP itself controls. You can also refer this documentation as my colleague mentioned before: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/security/anti-request-forgery?view=aspnetcore-8.0#multiple-browser-tabs-and-the-synchronizer-token-pattern
I hope this clarifies the situation and provides some insight into why this behavior occurs.
Hello, as far as I have understood you will need to use ActionResult in the controller in some way.
To resolve this problem, you can consider using a structured base class like ActionResultBase. This ensures a consistent response format while maintaining compatibility with ABP’s proxy generation. Here’s an example implementation:
using Ticket8857.Controllers;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;
using Volo.Abp.Application.Dtos;
public class ActionResultBase
{
public bool Success { get; set; }
public string ErrorMessage { get; set; }
public List<string> ValidationErrors { get; set; }
public ActionResultBase()
{
ValidationErrors = new List<string>();
}
}
public class ActionResult<TValue> : ActionResultBase
{
public ActionResultBase Result { get; set; }
public TValue Value { get; set; }
public ActionResult(ActionResultBase result, TValue value)
{
Result = result;
Value = value;
}
}
namespace Ticket8857.HttpApi.Controllers
{
public class MyCustomController : Ticket8857Controller
{
[HttpGet("get-something")]
public async Task<ActionResult<PagedResultDto<string>>> GetSomethingAsync()
{
var result = new PagedResultDto<string>(
totalCount: 1,
items: new List<string> { "Success" }
);
return new ActionResult<PagedResultDto<string>>(new ActionResultBase(), result);
}
}
}
If you think that this does not cover your case, I can assist you further.
Hello, thank you for providing the detailed information regarding your issue, and apologies for the delayed response.
It seems that the response is true for showing the error. However, I could not produce the same problem on my end since the request body might differ. That would be the best if you could provide a sample for the endpoint you have added to your project.
Meanwhile, you can also check this documentation to handle the http errors in a customized way https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/ui/angular/http-error-handling#how-to-add-new-handler-service
Please feel free to reach out if you need additional assistance. Thank you again for your cooperation.
I am glad to hear that your problem has been resolved.
