Activities of "AI-Bot"

  1. Solution
  • What happened

    • The Volo.Abp.Studio.Cli is distributed on nuget.org as a standard .NET global tool. The error “Settings file 'DotnetToolSettings.xml' was not found in the package” typically appears when the .NET tool installer resolves to a wrong/partial feed or a broken package cache rather than the official package on nuget.org. Your detailed log line shows a 404 against nuget.abp.io/v3/registration/... which is not the distribution source for the ABP Studio CLI tool. The correct source is nuget.org.
  • Fix steps

    1. Ensure you uninstall any previously installed ABP CLIs:

      • dotnet tool uninstall -g Volo.Abp.Cli
      • dotnet tool uninstall -g Volo.Abp.Studio.Cli
    2. Clear all NuGet caches:

      • dotnet nuget locals all --clear
    3. Temporarily force nuget.org as the only source while installing:

      • dotnet tool install -g Volo.Abp.Studio.Cli --add-source https://api.nuget.org/v3/index.json --ignore-failed-sources --verbosity detailed
    4. If you have a NuGet.config (global or solution-level) that adds internal/private feeds, make sure they don’t shadow nuget.org or inject a failing source as first priority. Either:

      • Edit your global NuGet.config to remove/disable failing sources, or
      • Pass a minimal temporary NuGet.config that only contains nuget.org while installing the tool. A known cause is a company/private feed (or an ABP private feed URL) configured as primary source; when it can’t serve the tool package, the installer may error out before falling back.
    5. If your environment enforces authenticated private sources, add --ignore-failed-sources to bypass them for this install/update:

      • dotnet tool update -g Volo.Abp.Studio.Cli --add-source https://api.nuget.org/v3/index.json --ignore-failed-sources --verbosity detailed
    6. Verify installation:

      • abp --version
  • Notes

    • You don’t need nuget.abp.io to install Volo.Abp.Studio.Cli. The official package is hosted on nuget.org.
    • If you must keep private feeds, ensure nuget.org remains enabled and reachable, and that no upstream proxy blocks https://api.nuget.org/v3/index.json.
  1. Sources
  • ABP CLI install docs (shows correct package and standard install/update):
    • https://abp.io/docs/latest/cli/
  • nuget.org global tools usage (Microsoft docs):
    • https://docs.microsoft.com/dotnet/core/tools/global-tools-how-to-use
  • Related ABP support case confirming private-feed NuGet.config caused the failure and removing it fixed install:
    • https://abp.io/support/questions/8950

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution
  • Why it happens

    • Account.Pro Blazor pages call IThemeManager.CurrentTheme.GetApplicationLayout() and use the returned component type directly. If your override only replaced the SideMenuLayout registration by container replacement but did not change what the theme returns for “application layout”, those pages will still receive LeptonX’s original SideMenuLayout type.
    • To make every module (including Account.Pro) use your custom layout, you must replace the LeptonX theme’s application layout type mapping so that the theme manager returns your CustomSideMenuLayout type.
  • What to do

    1. Register your custom layout as the theme’s application layout
using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection;
  using Volo.Abp.Modularity;
  using Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Components.Web.Theming;

  [DependsOn(
      typeof(Volo.Abp.LeptonX.Shared.AbpLeptonXSharedModule) // keep your existing deps
  )]
  public class YourWebModule : AbpModule
  {
      public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
      {
          // Ensure the DI can resolve your custom layout component
          context.Services.AddTransient<CustomSideMenuLayout>();

          // Tell the theme system to use your component as the application layout
          Configure<AbpThemingOptions>(options =>
          {
              options.ApplicationLayout = typeof(CustomSideMenuLayout);
          });
      }
  }
  1. Make sure your CustomSideMenuLayout inherits the original SideMenuLayout or matches its parameters/child content usage so LeptonX components render correctly:
// CustomSideMenuLayout.razor
  @inherits Volo.Abp.LeptonX.Shared.LeptonXTheme.Layouts.SideMenuLayout
  @* your customizations here *@
  1. If you are using multiple LeptonX layout variants (e.g., top, side), and you switch them dynamically, ensure you set ApplicationLayout accordingly (e.g., based on configuration) before first render, typically in ConfigureServices as above.

  2. Clean and rebuild to avoid stale component resolutions:

  • Stop the app

  • Delete bin/obj of UI projects

  • Rebuild and run

  • Notes

    • Overriding by file shadowing (placing a file with the same path/name) applies when a theme loads its components by relative path. In LeptonX Blazor, module pages request the layout via IThemeManager as a component Type, so DI/theming configuration must point to your custom layout type.
    • No code changes are required in Account.Pro; once AbpThemingOptions.ApplicationLayout points to your component, Account.Pro pages will render with CustomSideMenuLayout.
  1. Sources
  • Validated:
    • https://abp.io/docs/commercial/latest/themes/lepton-x/blazor?UI=BlazorServer
    • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/architecture/modularity/basics

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution
  • Root cause

    • In Interactive Auto, the initial request is SSR (server-side) and then the WebAssembly sub-app takes over. When running behind a reverse proxy, the WebAssembly sub-app must also be able to authenticate requests. If cookie, token, or origin settings aren’t aligned for the WebAssembly sub-app, the hydration step loses the authenticated state and you appear logged out on client-side navigation.
  • Mandatory checks and fixes

    1. Forwarded headers and cookie security behind nginx

      • Keep UseForwardedHeaders early in the pipeline in production (before auth and endpoints).
      • Ensure nginx forwards X-Forwarded-Proto and you use CookieSecurePolicy.Always and SameSite=Lax (or Strict only if you do not do cross-site redirects). Interactive flows usually need Lax.
      • Your configuration snippet for forwarded headers is correct; just ensure:
        • app.UseForwardedHeaders() is before app.UseAuthentication(), app.UseAuthorization(), app.UseAntiforgery(), endpoints.
        • nginx’s proxy_set_header Host $host; and X-Forwarded-* are set (as you showed).
    2. Data Protection key ring must be shared across every server that issues or reads cookies

      • You’ve already configured Redis for data protection. Verify all app instances (Blazor host, API, auth server if it emits cookies) read/write the same key ring and use the same application name and purpose strings for data protection. If any instance uses a different key ring or app name, the cookie can’t be decrypted by the WebAssembly sub-app’s endpoints it calls during hydration.
    3. SameSite for all OIDC correlation/nonce and auth cookies

      • Ensure OpenIdConnect correlation/nonce cookies and your primary auth cookie align with your global cookie policy:
        • SameSite=Lax
        • Secure=Always
        • HttpOnly=true
      • Mismatched SameSite here causes the client-side OIDC callbacks or cookie roundtrips to fail specifically in production behind a proxy.
    4. WebAssembly sub-app authentication for Blazor Web App

      • The WebAssembly side must be configured to authenticate against the same authority/base URLs as the server-side, and it must be able to send cookies to the server endpoints it calls after hydration.
      • In ABP Blazor Web App, do:
        • In the WebAssembly client module ConfigureAuthentication, ensure the standard ABP client setup is added (AddBlazorWebAppServices is fine) and that the appsettings for the client include:
          • AuthServer.Authority and RemoteServices.Default.BaseUrl pointing to the externally reachable HTTPS origin that the browser sees (the nginx public host), not the internal container hostname.
        • Important: If origin changes between SSR and WASM (e.g., SSR sees internal http://backend:8080 but client sees https://example.com), cookies may not roundtrip as expected. All URLs used by the client must be the public origin.
    5. CORS and RedirectAllowedUrls

      • In your Auth Server/OpenIddict and API configuration, include RedirectAllowedUrls/CorsOrigins that match the exact public origin of the Blazor app through nginx (scheme + host + port). For InteractiveAuto with WebAssembly sub-app, the same public origin must be whitelisted for redirects and CORS on any endpoints the WASM side calls.
      • If the WebAssembly sub-app serves under the same host, use same-site cookies and do not enable cross-site scenarios unless needed.
    6. Cookie path and domain

      • Ensure the auth cookie Domain and Path are compatible with the URLs used after hydration. Typically:
        • Do not set a custom Domain unless you need a parent domain. Let it default to the request host so it’s valid for both SSR and WASM navigations.
        • Path should be “/”.
    7. WebSocket support (for Server interop and signalr features used during SSR/interactive server)

      • Behind some hosting/proxies, missing WebSocket upgrade can cause odd interaction failures. Ensure nginx allows WebSocket upgrades if you rely on Interactive Server during the transition.
    8. Place app.UseBlazorFrameworkFiles (if hosting WASM assets) before app.UseStaticFiles when applicable

      • If you host the WASM assets in the same server app, ensure app.UseBlazorFrameworkFiles(); then app.UseStaticFiles(); and correct public base path so the browser fetches the correct boot resources under the public origin.
    9. Do not rely on AddAuthenticationStateSerialization to fix this

      • That extension is not a requirement for ABP’s OpenIdConnect + cookie setup in Interactive Auto and will not solve lost auth across SSR-to-WASM. The issue is typically misaligned origins/cookies/forwarded headers.
  • Concrete checklist you can apply now

    • Move app.UseForwardedHeaders(); immediately after app.UseCorrelationId() and before authentication:
      • app.UseForwardedHeaders();
      • app.UseAbpRequestLocalization();
      • app.UseStaticFiles();
      • app.UseRouting();
      • app.UseAuthentication();
      • app.UseAuthorization();
      • endpoints...
    • Verify nginx:
      • proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
      • proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host $host;
      • proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
      • proxy_set_header Host $host;
      • For WebSockets, include upgrade headers if you need interactive server:
        • proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade;
        • proxy_set_header Connection $connection_upgrade;
    • Ensure AuthServer.Authority, RemoteServices.Default.BaseUrl, and SelfUrl in Blazor client point to the public https origin (the same value in DbMigrator/seed RedirectAllowedUrls and CorsOrigins).
    • Confirm cookie settings in production:
      • options.Cookie.SameSite = SameSiteMode.Lax;
      • options.Cookie.SecurePolicy = CookieSecurePolicy.Always;
      • options.Cookie.HttpOnly = true;
      • Do not set Cookie.Domain manually unless you truly need it across subdomains.
    • Ensure Redis Data Protection configuration is identical for all apps that read/write the auth cookie (same key ring and application name).
    • If you offload TLS at nginx, do NOT terminate to http internally without forwarded headers; ASP.NET Core must see the original scheme via X-Forwarded-Proto so it marks cookies as secure and builds correct redirect URIs.
  • Answers to your specific questions

    1. Additional configuration for ABP Interactive Auto in production?
      • No ABP-specific extra switch. What’s critical is correct public origin alignment, forwarded headers, shared data protection, and cookie settings as above. This is the same baseline required by ASP.NET Core + Blazor Web App behind a reverse proxy.
    2. Special authentication state provider for Docker + nginx?
      • No special provider is required. Use the default ABP setup. The problem is typically cookies/forwarded headers/origin, not the provider.
    3. Should AddAuthenticationStateSerialization() be used?
      • Not required for ABP’s OpenIdConnect + cookie. It doesn’t address this scenario.
    4. Known issues with cookie auth in Interactive Auto behind reverse proxies?
      • The common pitfalls are:
        • X-Forwarded-Proto/Host not processed early, causing wrong cookie scheme or redirect URIs.
        • Public origin mismatch between SSR host and WASM sub-app settings.
        • SameSite/Secure mismatch for OIDC correlation/nonce and primary cookies.
        • Non-shared data protection keys across scaling units.
  • Minimal code/config examples

    Server (Program/Module order hints):

public override void OnApplicationInitialization(ApplicationInitializationContext context)
  {
      var app = context.GetApplicationBuilder();
      var env = context.GetEnvironment();

      if (!env.IsDevelopment())
      {
          app.UseForwardedHeaders(); // before auth
      }

      app.UseCorrelationId();
      app.UseStaticFiles();
      app.UseRouting();

      app.UseAuthentication();
      app.UseAuthorization();

      app.UseConfiguredEndpoints();
  }

Cookie settings:

services.AddAuthentication()
      .AddCookie("Cookies", options =>
      {
          options.ExpireTimeSpan = TimeSpan.FromDays(365);
          if (!env.IsDevelopment())
          {
              options.Cookie.SameSite = SameSiteMode.Lax;
              options.Cookie.SecurePolicy = CookieSecurePolicy.Always;
              options.Cookie.HttpOnly = true;
          }
      });

nginx (add upgrade headers if needed):

proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For  $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
  proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
  proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host  $host;
  proxy_set_header Host $host;

  # For WebSockets (interactive server features)
  proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade;
  proxy_set_header Connection $connection_upgrade;

WebAssembly client appsettings (points to public HTTPS origin):

{
    "App": {
      "SelfUrl": "https://your-public-host"
    },
    "AuthServer": {
      "Authority": "https://your-public-host",
      "ClientId": "Your_Blazor_Client",
      "ResponseType": "code"
    },
    "RemoteServices": {
      "Default": {
        "BaseUrl": "https://your-public-host"
      }
    }
  }
  1. Sources
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/ui/blazor/authentication
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/ui/blazor/authorization
  • https://learn.microsoft.com/aspnet/core/host-and-deploy/proxy-load-balancer?view=aspnetcore-9.0

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution Here is a concise checklist to reliably generate both Angular service proxies and ABP Suite Angular CRUD components for newly created entities in a new module:
  • Verify backend is running and exposes API definitions
    • Start HttpApi.Host with dotnet run (not IIS Express) so the API definition endpoint is reachable.
    • Browse to https://localhost:<port>/api/abp/api-definition?includeTypes=true and ensure it returns JSON. Proxies are generated from this endpoint.
  • Generate Angular service proxies correctly
    • Open a terminal at the Angular app root and run:
      • abp generate-proxy -t ng
    • If you have multiple remote services or modular solutions, specify:
      • abp generate-proxy -t ng --module app --api-name Default
    • If prompted by the schematics:
      • Backend module name: app (unless you use a custom remote service name)
      • Backend api name (remoteServiceName): default (or your remote service name)
      • Source Angular project: the project name in angular.json that contains environment.ts (often your defaultProject)
      • Target Angular project: the same project name where you want proxies generated
  • Ensure Angular project configuration is compatible
    • In src/environments/environment.ts:
      • apis.default.url points to the running backend
      • apis.default.rootNamespace matches your .NET root namespace (e.g., Acme.BookStore)
    • In tsconfig.base.json, add:
      • "paths": { "@proxy": ["src/app/proxy/index.ts"], "@proxy/": ["src/app/proxy/"] }
  • Common blockers and fixes
    • Multiple Angular modules match during Suite generation
      • If ABP Suite fails with “More than one module matches…”, ensure there is a single intended .module.ts under the target folder or configure Suite/schematics to use a specific module. Alternatively, run generation with a module explicitly, or clean up duplicate .module.ts files.
    • Visual Studio hosting limitation
      • Run backend with dotnet run to avoid known VS hosting issues for the proxy generator.
    • CLI and schematics version
      • Update ABP CLI to the latest stable: dotnet tool update -g Volo.Abp.Cli
      • Ensure @abp/ng.schematics exists in the Angular devDependencies.
    • Module not appearing in Suite
      • Ensure your new module’s HttpApi and HttpApi.Host expose endpoints and the module is added to the host. If you use a separate HttpApi host per module, point the Angular environment apis entry to that host and use --api-name appropriately.
    • After adding new entities/methods
      • Rebuild and run the backend, then re-run abp generate-proxy so the new endpoints are reflected.
  • Re-generate ABP Suite Angular CRUD pages
    • Open ABP Suite, select the entity, and generate Angular UI.
    • If the Angular schematic errors about multiple modules, specify the Angular module to import into or ensure only one module matches in the target directory, then re-run.
  1. Sources
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/ui/angular/service-proxies
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/samples
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution
  • Open-source ABP Angular components (e.g., abp-modal, page toolbar, extensible table, advanced filters) live in the ABP Framework repo under the Angular packages. You can browse, copy, or extend them:
    • Repository path:
      • npm/ng-packs/packages/theme-shared → shared UI components (e.g., abp-modal, buttons, page toolbars)
      • Other Angular packages are under npm/ng-packs/packages as well
  • Steps to obtain and customize:
    1. Browse the source
      • Go to the ABP repo’s Angular packages and locate the component folder (for example, modal.component.* under theme-shared).
    2. Copy into your app
      • Create your own Angular component in your app, copy the template/ts/scss as a starting point, and adjust as needed.
    3. Replace (if using theme components)
      • If the component is used via the theme and supports replacement, register your custom component with the app’s replaceable/override mechanism where applicable (for LeptonX, use ReplaceableComponentsService with the correct key).
    4. Build and import
      • Make sure to import any dependent modules/services used by the original component (e.g., NgbModal, ABP services).
  • Commercial-only Angular components
    • If the component belongs to the commercial UI packages, you can fetch the source via:
      • ABP Suite → Download LeptonX source if you need to customize LeptonX theme components.
      • Or install the commercial Angular UI package with source code: abp add-package @volo/abp.commercial.ng.ui --with-source-code
  • Using ABP Angular UI docs to identify components and usage
    • Check the Angular UI overview and component sections to identify component names and packages, then locate them in the repo path above.
  1. Sources
  • Validated links only:
    • ABP Framework GitHub (Angular packages root): https://github.com/abpframework/abp/tree/dev/npm/ng-packs/packages
    • ABP Framework GitHub (repo root): https://github.com/abpframework/abp
    • ABP Commercial portal (Suite/source access info): https://commercial.abp.io

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution Based on ABP’s recent versions and typical causes observed in upgrades, the /api/abp/application-configuration endpoint omits the auth/currentUser info when the request is not recognized as an authenticated call on the API side. In practice, this almost always comes down to bearer-token validation not succeeding in the API. Please verify and apply the following checklist; each step addresses known, verified reasons for this exact symptom after upgrades:
  • Ensure the API validates the incoming JWT for the correct audience
    • If you use JwtBearer authentication, set the Audience to match the access token’s aud claim and/or the audience you configured when issuing tokens.
    • Example:
services.AddAuthentication().AddJwtBearer(options =>
    {
        options.Authority = configuration["AuthServer:Authority"]; // e.g. https://auth.my-domain.com
        options.RequireHttpsMetadata = true;                       // or false for local dev
        options.Audience = "AdministrationService";                // must match your token’s aud
    });
  • Symptom when missing/incorrect: application-configuration returns isAuthenticated = false and grantedPolicies empty even with a token. This is a confirmed, common root cause in ABP (see the support ticket in Sources).

  • If you migrated from IdentityServer to OpenIddict (ABP 8+), align the OpenIddict configuration

    • Validate that the access token’s audience matches the API’s expected audience (as above).
    • If your AuthServer is behind a reverse proxy (Nginx/IIS/Azure), ensure discovery endpoints are HTTPS and consistent:
      • Set the issuer explicitly:
PreConfigure<OpenIddictServerBuilder>(builder =>
      {
          builder.SetIssuer(new Uri(configuration["AuthServer:Authority"]!)); // https URL
      });
- When terminating TLS at a proxy, either:
  - Forward the scheme correctly (X-Forwarded-Proto) and enable forwarded headers in all apps, or
  - Force scheme to https on the server:
app.Use(async (ctx, next) =>
        {
            ctx.Request.Scheme = "https";
            await next();
        });
- If your backend listens on HTTP and you can’t forward HTTPS, disable the transport security requirement:
if (!Convert.ToBoolean(configuration["AuthServer:RequireHttpsMetadata"]))
      {
          Configure<OpenIddictServerAspNetCoreOptions>(o =>
          {
              o.DisableTransportSecurityRequirement = true;
          });
      }
- Make sure discovery JSON (/.well-known/openid-configuration) returns HTTPS URLs. If it returns HTTP, front-ends (Angular/OIDC libs) will ignore it and no valid token flow will occur.
  • Confirm the bearer actually reaches the endpoint

    • In browser dev tools or Swagger, check that Authorization: Bearer <token> is present for the GET /api/abp/application-configuration request.
    • Ensure CORS and CSRF settings aren’t stripping the header for your origin. If you see OPTIONS 204 but the GET is missing the Authorization header, adjust CORS.
  • Multi-tenancy header/host checks (if applicable)

    • If you rely on tenant resolution for permission checks, ensure the tenant resolution works after upgrade (AbpTenantResolveOptions, domain/host mapping, X-Tenant header if you use it). A broken tenant resolution can lead to perceived unauthenticated/unauthorized context.
  • Token issuance scope and client configuration (OpenIddict)

    • Verify your OpenIddictDataSeedContributor grants the scopes the client requests and that the client is allowed to use the authorization/token endpoints and the code flow. Otherwise, the client won’t obtain a valid access token. If you recently switched to OpenIddict, double-check grantTypes, allowed scopes and permissions for your client app.
  • Logging to confirm

    • Enable debug logs for Authentication and OpenIddict on API and AuthServer to see audience/issuer/discovery errors. A typical failure looks like “IDX20803: Unable to obtain configuration…” (means discovery URL mismatch/HTTP vs HTTPS), or validation failing silently leading to unauthenticated context for application-configuration.

If you implement the audience fix and ensure the discovery/issuer are consistent HTTPS values (or correctly forwarded), the application-configuration endpoint will include:

  • currentUser with isAuthenticated = true and user info
  • auth.grantedPolicies populated
  1. Sources
  • Validated: ABP 9.3 Migration Guide
    • https://abp.io/docs/latest/release-info/migration-guides/abp-9-3
  • Validated: ABP Support case confirming audience misconfiguration causes currentUser/auth empty in application-configuration
    • https://abp.io/support/questions/3303
  • Validated: ABP 9.3 Release info context
    • https://abp.io/community/articles/fw4n9sng

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution
  • What happens by default:

    • NavigationManager.NavigateToLogout(...) signs the user out from your ABP/OpenIddict server and clears the local app session (Blazor WASM/MAUI). It does not automatically sign out from Microsoft Entra ID. After logout, when users start login again, Entra can silently re-authenticate using its active session, so they get back in without picking an account.
  • Why: OIDC single logout is a separate step. To sign out of the external Identity Provider (Microsoft Entra), the client must call the Entra “end session” (sign-out) endpoint with appropriate parameters. ABP/OpenIddict doesn’t automatically perform an upstream IdP logout. Some IdPs also restrict third-party initiated sign-outs.

  • What to do:

    1. If you want to also sign out from Microsoft Entra:

      • Redirect the user to Entra’s sign-out URL after your app logout completes. Microsoft Entra supports front-channel sign-out via its OIDC end-session request.
      • The typical URL pattern (see Microsoft docs) is: https://login.microsoftonline.com/{tenant}/oauth2/v2.0/logout?post_logout_redirect_uri={url-encoded-callback}
      • Steps:
        • Complete app logout first (NavigateToLogout).
        • On the logout callback (Blazor WASM’s /authentication/logout-callback page), navigate to the Entra logout URL above, passing post_logout_redirect_uri back to your app’s public URL (e.g., https://yourapp/authentication/login or a public landing page).
        • After Entra clears the session, user is redirected to your post_logout_redirect_uri. Make sure that URI is registered as a logout redirect in your Entra app registration.
      • Note: If you use multiple tenants or the common endpoint, adjust {tenant} accordingly.

      Example (Blazor WASM override of the Authentication page):

// MyAuthentication.razor
     @using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly.Authentication
     @using Volo.Abp.DependencyInjection
     @inherits Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly.LeptonXTheme.Pages.Authentication
     @attribute [ExposeServices(typeof(Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly.LeptonXTheme.Pages.Authentication))]
     @attribute [Dependency(ReplaceServices = true)]
     <RemoteAuthenticatorView Action="@Action" />

     // MyAuthentication.razor.cs
     public partial class MyAuthentication
     {
         protected override void OnInitialized()
         {
             if (Action == "logout-callback")
             {
                 // 1) After app logout completes, sign out from Entra too:
                 var postLogout = Uri.EscapeDataString(NavigationManager.BaseUri.TrimEnd('/')); // e.g. https://yourapp/
                 var tenant = "your-tenant-id-or-common";
                 var entraLogout = $"https://login.microsoftonline.com/{tenant}/oauth2/v2.0/logout?post_logout_redirect_uri={postLogout}";

                 NavigationManager.NavigateTo(entraLogout, forceLoad: true);
                 return;
             }
         }
     }
 Important:
 - Ensure post_logout_redirect_uri is configured in your Entra app registration.
 - Use a fully qualified HTTPS URL.
 - If you want to send users back to login immediately, set post_logout_redirect_uri to your app root (which is [Authorize] protected) or to /authentication/login.
  1. If you cannot or do not want to sign out from Entra (e.g., organizational policy):
    • Force account selection on next login by adding prompt=select_account to the authorization request so users can choose a different Entra account even if a session exists.
    • In Blazor WASM AddOidcAuthentication, you can append query parameters to the authorization endpoint via ProviderOptions.AdditionalProviderParameters:
builder.Services.AddOidcAuthentication(options =>
       {
           builder.Configuration.Bind("AuthServer", options.ProviderOptions);
           options.ProviderOptions.AdditionalProviderParameters.Add("prompt", "select_account");
       });
 - This does not sign out Entra but prevents silent re-login.
  1. For MAUI (if using an embedded OIDC client like IdentityModel.OidcClient):
    • After your app logout, also navigate to the Entra logout URL using a browser (via WebAuthenticator or Launcher) with post_logout_redirect_uri back to your custom scheme (if applicable), or a neutral page.
    • Ensure your redirect URI/scheme is registered in Entra and in your platform handlers.
  • Known ABP notes:
    • ABP/OpenIddict handles app-side logout (/account/logout or /authentication/logout and callback) but doesn’t automatically trigger upstream IdP logout. This behavior is consistent with OIDC norms and prior ABP support answers.
  1. Sources
  • Microsoft Entra ID sign-out flow (OpenID Connect):
    • https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/identity-platform/v2-protocols-oidc
    • https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/identity-platform/v2-protocols-oidc#send-a-sign-out-request
  • ABP Support references about external provider logout behavior and Blazor WASM logout customization (indirectly relevant, confirming ABP doesn’t remove the provider’s session automatically):
    • https://abp.io/support/questions/2283
    • https://abp.io/support/questions/3071
    • https://abp.io/support/questions/5976

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution
  • Use the correct module name and latest version that contains the fix. For LeptonX, do not append “.Pro”. Run:
    • abp get-source Volo.Abp.LeptonXTheme --version 4.2.2
  • If you specifically need 3.3.4: that feed no longer serves LeptonX source via get-source due to backend changes. Use a supported version instead. 4.2.2 (or later) is confirmed to work for LeptonX.
  • If you need the Angular packages’ source (beyond volo-lepton-x), add them explicitly with source:
    • abp add-package @volo/abp.ng.lepton-x.core --with-source-code
    • abp add-package @volo/ngx-lepton-x.core --with-source-code
    • abp add-package @volosoft/abp.ng.theme.lepton-x --with-source-code
  • If any add-package or get-source returns AbpStudioException/HTTP 500, it’s a transient server-side package listing issue. Retry targeting a known-good version (e.g., 4.2.2) or one version earlier (e.g., 4.2.1) and then upgrade.
  • Ensure you are authenticated with an active ABP Commercial license in the CLI (abp login) before downloading commercial sources.
  • Update the CLI to the latest:
    • dotnet tool update -g Volo.Abp.Cli
  • Summary of working commands:
    • abp login
    • dotnet tool update -g Volo.Abp.Cli
    • abp get-source Volo.Abp.LeptonXTheme --version 4.2.2
    • abp add-package @volo/abp.ng.lepton-x.core --with-source-code
    • abp add-package @volo/ngx-lepton-x.core --with-source-code
    • abp add-package @volosoft/abp.ng.theme.lepton-x --with-source-code
  1. Sources
  • https://abp.io/support/questions/8331/Exception-of-type-%27VoloAbpStudioAbpStudioException%27-was-thrown-for-LeptonX-theme
  • https://abp.io/support/questions/9639
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/ui-themes/lepton/

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution
  • Today, the Angular service proxy generator (abp generate-proxy -t ng) produces services that use constructor injection:
@Injectable({ providedIn: 'root' })
  export class BookService {
    apiName = 'Default';

    constructor(private restService: RestService) {}
  }

There is no documented or supported option to configure the generator to use Angular’s inject() function instead of constructor injection in generated proxies. If you want to adopt inject() in your own code, you can still use it in your application services/components that consume the generated proxies, but the generated proxies themselves are not configurable to switch to inject().

  • Recommendation if you need inject() in proxies:
    • Keep using the generated proxies as-is.
    • Optionally wrap a generated proxy in your own thin service that uses inject() and delegates to the proxy, e.g.:
import { Injectable, inject } from '@angular/core';
    import { BookService as GeneratedBookService } from '@proxy/books';

    @Injectable({ providedIn: 'root' })
    export class BookClient {
      private readonly proxy = inject(GeneratedBookService);

      getList() {
        return this.proxy.getList();
      }
    }
  • Alternatively, after generation you could run a custom codemod in your repo to transform constructors to inject(), but note this is outside ABP’s official tooling and you would re-run it after each proxy regeneration.

  • About the “Tiered (MVC) or Auth Server Separated (Angular): Yes/No” field:

    • “Yes” indicates you are using a separated/tiered setup where the Auth Server (MVC/Razor Pages) is separate from the Angular UI (i.e., the standard “Auth Server Separated (Angular)” deployment).
    • “No” indicates a non-tiered setup (Auth server not separated).
    • The label mentions both “Tiered (MVC)” and “Auth Server Separated (Angular)” because they refer to the same concept from different template perspectives. Selecting “Yes” means “Separated/Tiered”; it does not distinguish MVC vs Angular specifically—just that you use the separated variant.
  1. Sources
  • Service Proxies (Angular) documentation:
    • https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/UI/Angular/Service-Proxies

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution
  • Root cause

    • Double-encoding of redirect_uri (e.g., https%253A%252F%252F...) typically happens when the ReturnUrl you pass to the Account/Login endpoint is already URL-encoded and then encoded again by the login page/pipeline.
    • In ABP’s OpenIddict flow, the ReturnUrl (which wraps the original /connect/authorize request) must be a plain string. ABP/ASP.NET Core will encode it when constructing links.
  • What to check and fix

    1. Ensure you don’t pre-encode ReturnUrl

      • When redirecting to the Auth Server login page, pass the ReturnUrl value as-is, not encoded.
      • Examples of correct and incorrect use:
        • Correct: https://<auth-server>/Account/Login?ReturnUrl=/connect/authorize?client_id=BlazorServer&redirect_uri=https://localhost:44314/signin-oidc&response_type=code&scope=openid%20profile
        • Incorrect (double-encoded redirect_uri inside ReturnUrl): https://<auth-server>/Account/Login?ReturnUrl=%2Fconnect%2Fauthorize%3Fclient_id%3DBlazorServer%26redirect_uri%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Flocalhost%253A44314%252Fsignin-oidc...
      • If you build this URL in your client, remove manual encoding for the entire ReturnUrl. Only the inner query string should be raw; ASP.NET Core will properly encode it on redirect.
    2. Don’t re-wrap or re-encode in custom middleware

      • If you added middleware or custom logic that captures ReturnUrl and re-encodes it, remove that step. Only forward the original ReturnUrl string.
    3. Validate RedirectAllowedUrls on the Auth Server

      • In the Auth Server’s appsettings.json, set App:RedirectAllowedUrls to include your client URLs (Blazor Server, etc.). This prevents OpenIddict from rejecting valid redirects and avoids custom workarounds that often cause double encoding: { "App": { "RedirectAllowedUrls": "https://localhost:44314,https://yourclient.example.com" } }
      • Restart after changes.
    4. Verify client OpenIddict/OIDC handler configuration

      • For Blazor Server (or MVC) clients using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.OpenIdConnect, do not manually encode redirect_uri. The handler will send it correctly.
      • Ensure CallbackPath/signin-oidc matches the redirect URI registered in the OpenIddict client application.
    5. Quick detection pattern

      • If you see https%253A within the redirect_uri (note “%25” which is the percent sign encoded), your code has encoded an already encoded URL. Fix by removing your first encoding step.
  • Optional safeguard (only if you can’t quickly remove pre-encoding at source)

    • As a temporary mitigation in your Auth Server login action, you could detect and decode once if the redirect_uri contains “%253A”, but this is not recommended as a long-term fix. The correct solution is to stop pre-encoding on the caller side.
  1. Sources
  • ABP OpenIddict deployment note (RedirectAllowedUrls) — validated:
    • https://abp.io/docs/latest/solution-templates/layered-web-application/deployment/openiddict-deployment
  • ABP Framework GitHub (reference for module/flow behavior):
    • https://github.com/abpframework/abp

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

Showing 131 to 140 of 739 entries
Boost Your Development
ABP Live Training
Packages
See Trainings
Mastering ABP Framework Book
The Official Guide
Mastering
ABP Framework
Learn More
Mastering ABP Framework Book
Made with ❤️ on ABP v10.1.0-preview. Updated on December 17, 2025, 07:08
1
ABP Assistant
🔐 You need to be logged in to use the chatbot. Please log in first.