Activities of "AI-Bot"

  • The error is caused by an incompatible @ng-bootstrap/ng-bootstrap version being installed/resolved in your Angular app.
    • Your ABP Angular packages (@volo/abp.ng.account, @volo/abp.ng.identity, etc.) are compiled against an ng-bootstrap version that exports module symbols like NgbNavModule, NgbDropdownModule, NgbPopoverModule, NgbDatepickerModule, NgbTooltipModule.
    • In your current dependency tree, TypeScript sees an ng-bootstrap package where these module exports don’t exist (hence “Did you mean NgbModule?”). This typically happens when yarn resolves a different major of @ng-bootstrap/ng-bootstrap than what the ABP Angular packages expect.

Fix (recommended)

  1. Force a compatible ng-bootstrap version for ABP 10.0.2 by pinning it in your angular/package.json and/or using Yarn resolutions.

    In angular/package.json:

{
     "dependencies": {
       "@ng-bootstrap/ng-bootstrap": "<PIN_TO_ABP_COMPATIBLE_VERSION>"
     },
     "resolutions": {
       "@ng-bootstrap/ng-bootstrap": "<PIN_TO_ABP_COMPATIBLE_VERSION>"
     }
   }

Then:

  • delete node_modules
  • delete yarn.lock
  • run yarn
  • run yarn start
  1. If you want a quick way to discover what yarn actually installed before/after pinning:
yarn why @ng-bootstrap/ng-bootstrap

Why this happens in your specific output

  • The failing .d.ts files are under: node_modules/@volo/abp.ng.account/...
  • The referenced ng-bootstrap types are being resolved from: node_modules/@volo/abp.ng.identity/node_modules/@ng-bootstrap/ng-bootstrap/...
  • That nested install strongly suggests multiple versions of ng-bootstrap are being pulled in, and at least one is not compatible with the ABP Angular packages you generated.

Notes

  • Don’t “fix” this by editing anything under node_modules/@volo/... (it will be overwritten and isn’t the root cause). The correct fix is to normalize/pin frontend package versions so only the compatible ng-bootstrap version is used.

Sources

  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/ui/angular/account-module

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

Answer
  • In ABP Angular apps, the login UI you see is not a page living in your Angular solution in many setups, because Angular typically uses OIDC/OAuth2 code flow and redirects to the Auth Server for login. So the “real” login page is served by the backend Account module / Auth Server, not by Angular.
  • You have two practical options:
  1. If you are using the redirect (code flow) login (most common): customize the backend login page

    • Customize/override the login page in the AuthServer / HttpApi.Host (the server that hosts the Account module UI).
    • This is why you can’t find a login page in Angular.
  2. If you want to customize the Angular login UI itself: use ABP Angular “component replacement” for Account components

    • ABP Angular’s account UI is built from replaceable components (logo, tenant box, login form, etc.).
    • You can replace these pieces using AddReplaceableComponent and eAccountComponents.* keys.

    Example (replace logo / tenant box / login form):

import { AddReplaceableComponent } from '@abp/ng.core';
   import { Component } from '@angular/core';
   import { Store } from '@ngxs/store';
   import { eAccountComponents } from '@volo/abp.ng.account';

   @Component({ template: `&lt;div&gt;MY CUSTOM LOGO&lt;/div&gt;` })
   class CustomLogoComponent {}

   @Component({ template: `&lt;div&gt;MY CUSTOM TENANT BOX&lt;/div&gt;` })
   class CustomTenantBoxComponent {}

   @Component({ template: `&lt;div&gt;MY CUSTOM LOGIN FORM&lt;/div&gt;` })
   class CustomLoginComponent {}

   @Component({
     selector: 'app-root',
     template: `
       &lt;abp-loader-bar&gt;&lt;/abp-loader-bar&gt;
       &lt;abp-dynamic-layout&gt;&lt;/abp-dynamic-layout&gt;
     `,
   })
   export class AppComponent {
     constructor(store: Store) {
       store.dispatch(
         new AddReplaceableComponent({ component: CustomLogoComponent, key: eAccountComponents.Logo }),
       );
       store.dispatch(
         new AddReplaceableComponent({ component: CustomTenantBoxComponent, key: eAccountComponents.TenantBox }),
       );
       store.dispatch(
         new AddReplaceableComponent({ component: CustomLoginComponent, key: eAccountComponents.Login }),
       );
     }
   }

Sources (verified):

  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/ui/angular/component-replacement
  • https://abp.io/support/questions/2935
  • https://abp.io/support/questions/306

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • This typically happens because ABP Studio still tries to launch Visual Studio via the old (VS 2022) registration/path, and after uninstalling VS 2022 there is no longer a valid “devenv”/shell association to open the solution.

  • Fix it by re-establishing the Windows “open with Visual Studio” registration:

    1. Repair Visual Studio 2026
      • Open Visual Studio Installer → select Visual Studio 2026 → More → Repair.
        This re-registers Visual Studio shell commands and file associations that tools like ABP Studio rely on.
    2. Re-associate .sln files with Visual Studio 2026 (important even if VS opens manually)
      • Right-click any *.sln file → Open with → Choose another app → pick Visual Studio 2026 → check Always use this app.
    3. Restart ABP Studio (close it completely and open again) and try “Open in Visual Studio”.
  • If it still doesn’t work, the remaining reliable workaround is:

    • Open the solution directly by double-clicking the .sln (after the association above), or open VS first and use File → Open → Project/Solution.

Links (verified):

  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/studio
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/studio/release-notes
  • https://abp.io/get-started

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • Nothing in ABP v10 “intentionally” changes an expired/invalid access token response from 401 to 400.

  • The payload you posted is an ABP validation error (it’s coming from model binding/validation, not from authentication). The key clue is:

    validationErrors → member: "id" → "The value 'Error' is not valid."

    That means the request is reaching the action and ASP.NET Core is trying to bind a parameter/route value named id (likely Guid/int). Instead of a valid id, the literal string "Error" is being sent.

What’s most likely happening

When the token expires, your client is no longer calling the real endpoint URL, but a URL that contains "Error" in the {id} segment (or it is sending "Error" as a query/body field named id). Common causes after upgrades are:

  • an HTTP client / API proxy / interceptor that on 401 rewrites or retries the request incorrectly,
  • a custom “refresh token” handler that, on failure, returns "Error" and that value gets used as the id for the next request,
  • Blazor client-side code that navigates to an error route and then reuses the current route parameter as id.

So ABP returns 400 because the request is malformed (invalid id), before/independently of auth.

Fix (server-side + client-side)

  1. Client-side: ensure you don’t build URLs with an error string

    • Find the failing calls and log the final request URL when the token is expired.
    • Verify the {id} segment (or id parameter) is still a real Guid/int when you get the expired-token case.
  2. Client-side: handle 401 properly

    • When you receive 401, either:
      • refresh the token and retry, or
      • redirect to login,
      • but do not continue calling business endpoints with placeholder/error strings for route values.
  3. Server-side verification

    • Add logging (or inspect logs) to confirm the requested path when the issue occurs. You should see something like /api/.../Error/... or ?id=Error.

If after confirming the actual requested URL you still see ABP returning 400 while the request URL and route params are correct, then it would be something different—but with the error payload you posted, it’s a request validation/model-binding problem, not an auth-status-code change.

  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/infrastructure/csrf-anti-forgery

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • This exception is not caused by ABP Chat “breaking the app on every load”. What you’re hitting is the SignalR long-polling/connection lifecycle: when the browser navigates/reloads, it aborts the ongoing /signalr-hubs/chat request, and Kestrel can surface it as an IOException: The client reset the request stream if your debugger is configured to break on user-unhandled exceptions.
  • So the real “bug” is typically just the debugging experience: Visual Studio breaks even though the exception is expected during disconnects/reloads.

What to do (recommended)

  1. Do not treat this as an application error (it’s an expected disconnect/reset on page refresh).
  2. In Visual Studio, disable breaking on this exception:
    • Exception Settings → search System.IO.IOException
    • Uncheck Break when thrown (or add a condition/exception filter to ignore this specific message).
  3. If you are using an API Gateway / YARP in front of your app (common in Angular “Separated” setups), ensure the Chat SignalR endpoint is actually reachable and properly routed:
    • Route must include /signalr-hubs/chat/{**catch-all} (not only /api/chat/...), otherwise the client will constantly retry/connect-fail and you may see more noise/exceptions.

If you’re on a microservice / gateway setup (ABP Suite installed Chat)

  • There is a known Suite mis-install scenario where Chat SignalR gets installed to the wrong project; the fix is to ensure the chat host that should serve SignalR references the SignalR package/module (and the gateway routes exist). This was confirmed in ABP support for a reproducible Angular microservice case.

Links (verified):

  • https://abp.io/support/questions/6782
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/real-time/signalr

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • What you see is expected: they are different UIs backed by different implementations.

    • Angular UI reads the header dropdown from the client-side currentUser info and typically displays userName.
    • The other screen (the “My Account for API”, MVC/Razor profile management page) uses server-side rendering and typically displays the full name (Name + Surname) and falls back to username if those are empty.
    • Also note: before ABP v4.3 the “My Account” link in Angular used to redirect to the MVC profile page; since v4.3, if you add the Angular Account Module, “My Account” is an Angular page instead. So mixing of pages/UIs can happen depending on which modules you use and which link you click.
  • Fixing the long username UI break / truncation (Angular):

    1. Change what is shown in the header user area (recommended): show full name (or whatever you want) instead of userName.
      • In your Angular layout/header template, locate the part similar to:
<strong>{{ (currentUser$ | async)?.userName }}</strong>
 - Replace it with name/surname (with fallback), e.g.:
<strong>
         {{
           ((currentUser$ | async)?.name || '') + ' ' + ((currentUser$ | async)?.surname || '')
             || (currentUser$ | async)?.userName
         }}
       </strong>
 - If your template doesn’t have `name`/`surname` available in the `currentUser` object, you can still solve the UI break with CSS (next step) or extend what you load into `currentUser` (project-specific).
  1. Prevent layout break via CSS (works even if you keep username):
    • Apply ellipsis truncation on the element that contains the username, for example:
.my-user-display-name {
         max-width: 180px;      /* adjust */
         display: inline-block;
         overflow: hidden;
         text-overflow: ellipsis;
         white-space: nowrap;
         vertical-align: bottom;
       }
   And wrap the displayed text:
<strong class="my-user-display-name">{{ (currentUser$ | async)?.userName }}</strong>
  • Changing which properties are shown in My Account / Manage Profile:
    • Angular My Account page (Account Module) is customizable by replacing/patching the relevant tab/component (so you can show userName, name, surname, etc. in a consistent way).
    • MVC/Razor profile management page is a separate UI and must be customized on the MVC side (different mechanism).

Sources:

  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/ui/angular/account-module

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • This is not an ABP Suite “wrong import” problem; it’s a TypeScript paths + Angular new application builder resolution problem that shows up only in modular/module-development scenario (where you reference module UI libs via tsconfig.paths to their projects/.../src/public-api.ts), and it can manifest as:

    • NG3004: Unable to import symbol PermissionDirective. The symbol is not exported from ... @abp/ng.core/index.d.ts
    • similar errors for other symbols (e.g., PageComponent, etc.)
  • Why it happens

    • With the newer Angular build system, mapping packages to node_modules (directly or indirectly) is stricter and local library builds can end up being resolved in a way that mixes two “copies” of ABP Angular packages (one from the main app’s node_modules, another from the module library build context).
    • When the Angular compiler/type-checker ends up analyzing .d.ts from one place but expects exports consistent with another resolution graph, you get “symbol declared here but not exported from index.d.ts” style errors (like your PermissionDirective case).
  • Definitive workaround (recommended by ABP community guidance): use symlinks instead of relying on paths to source projects

    1. Remove any tsconfig.json / tsconfig.base.json path mappings that try to “redirect” packages to node_modules (or that cause the library project to resolve ABP dependencies differently than the app).
    2. Keep your module UI packages referenced as local projects (as needed), but ensure the library projects resolve dependencies from the same node_modules as the main Angular app by symlinking dependencies into each library project.
    3. In practice, the approach is:
      • create a node_modules folder under each angular/projects/<your-module-lib> if it doesn’t exist
      • symlink required packages (at least @abp/*, @angular/*, rxjs, etc.) from the main app angular/node_modules into the library’s node_modules
      • then build/run as usual

    This matches the behavior you observed: when you bypass paths and consume the built output via file: dependency, everything works because module resolution becomes consistent again.

  • What to do in ABP v10.x

    • Until the template/codegen is adjusted for this scenario, the stable approach is:
      • either use the symlink strategy for “module development UI inside same workspace”
      • or build the module and consume it via file: (your current working approach), avoiding paths redirection.

Sources (validated)

  • https://abp.io/community/articles/5z2ate6e

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • In an ABP Angular (separated Auth Server) solution, a 20–30s “first response” delay is almost always server cold-start + first-time caches/build steps, not Angular rendering itself. The Angular app blocks on backend calls like OIDC discovery/token and especially GET /api/abp/application-configuration (ABP must load permissions, localization resources, settings, etc.). After that, subsequent navigations become fast because the server and caches are warm.

  • Use this checklist (highest impact first) to reduce first-load and first-visit-per-module slowness:

    1. Run everything in Release mode (backend)

      • Make sure you are not deploying/running the HTTP API Host/Auth Server with Debug settings.
      • Publish with production-oriented settings (helps startup/JIT time):
        • Enable ReadyToRun (and optionally trimming/single-file depending on your constraints).
    2. Avoid expensive “run on startup” operations

      • Ensure you are not applying EF Core migrations automatically on startup in production.
      • If you seed a lot of data/permissions/localization at startup, move it to a one-time migrator or background job.
    3. Warm up the app (solve cold start)

      • If hosted on IIS/Azure/App Service/containers with scale-to-zero, the first request can easily take 20–30 seconds.
      • Use platform features such as:
        • “Always On” / keep-alive
        • app initialization/warmup pings (hit /api/abp/application-configuration once after deployment)
      • If you have multiple services (Auth Server + API Host), warm up both.
    4. Check Redis / distributed cache health & latency (if enabled)

      • ABP heavily uses caching for permissions/localization/config. If Redis is misconfigured, slow, or intermittently unavailable, the first load can degrade badly.
      • Verify Redis is reachable with low latency from both Auth Server and API Host.
      • If Redis is not stable, disable distributed cache temporarily to confirm the bottleneck.
    5. Reduce payload and work in /api/abp/application-configuration

      • First navigation triggers loading:
        • permissions (PermissionStore cache fill)
        • localization dictionaries
        • settings, features, etc.
      • If you have many localization resources or large dictionaries, this endpoint becomes heavier. Reduce unnecessary localization resource registrations/modules if possible.
    6. Angular-side: serve production build

      • For real measurement, test using ng build --configuration production (and serve the built assets), not dev server.
  • Practical way to pinpoint the exact cause (fastest confirmation):

    • Open browser DevTools → Network:
      • Identify which request takes ~20–30s (commonly: OIDC discovery/token, or application-configuration).
    • Check server logs with timing around that endpoint.

Sources (verified)

  • https://abp.io/community/articles/wa24j28e
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/ui/angular/quick-start

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • CMS Kit Pages (Dynamic Pages) do not support storing multiple language versions of the same page out-of-the-box.
    The built-in Pages feature stores a single content (Markdown/HTML) per page/slug. There isn’t a built-in PageTranslation (or similar) entity in the CMS Kit module to automatically resolve page content by the current UI culture.

  • Recommended approach to implement KB page localization (practical and ABP-aligned):

    1. Create one CMS page per language (separate records), e.g.:
      • /en/how-to-reset-password
      • /de/wie-passwort-zuruecksetzen
    2. Link them together using your own “translation group” concept. Typical options:
      • Add a custom entity like KnowledgeBasePage (your aggregate) that contains shared metadata (e.g., “group id”, canonical key, ordering, tags), and store per-language content in a child table like KnowledgeBasePageTranslation { Language, Title, Slug, Content }.
      • Or, if you want to keep CMS Kit’s page storage, store a custom property (or an extra mapping table) that relates CMS Kit Page IDs across languages (e.g., KbPageLocalizationMap { GroupId, Language, CmsPageId }).
    3. Resolve the correct page by current culture:
      • In your Angular UI, determine current culture (ABP localization already provides it) and navigate to the language-specific slug.
      • Optionally implement a fallback (e.g., if fr missing, fall back to en) in your own application service.
    4. (Optional) SEO/canonical: expose language in URL (like /en/...) and maintain a stable “canonical key” per article in your custom model.
  • Why this is the safe way with CMS Kit today:

    • CMS Kit gives you dynamic pages and slugs, but not multi-lingual content versions for the same page as a first-class feature. For localized, user-generated content, ABP generally expects you to model translations yourself (multi-lingual entity pattern).
  • If you want a ready pattern for “multi-lingual entity” in ABP (for your KB pages/translations tables), you can follow the approach shown in the community article and adapt it from “Book + BookTranslation” to “KbPage + KbPageTranslation”.

Links (verified):

  • https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Modules/Cms-Kit/Index
  • https://github.com/abpframework/cms-kit-demo
  • https://abp.io/community/articles/8glnk6vu

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

Implementing 2.2 (add the claim value to the principal for client_credentials) is best done by plugging into the OpenIddict Server event pipeline at token issuance time:

  • The extra property is stored on the OpenIddict application (client).
  • When /connect/token is called with grant_type=client_credentials, you read the current client_id, load its application record, get the extra property, then add a claim to the principal used to mint the access token.
  • Your existing IAbpOpenIddictClaimsPrincipalHandler (step 2.1) then ensures that claim is actually included in the access token via destinations.

Below is a concrete, working pattern.


1) Add a server event handler for client_credentials (AuthServer project)

Create a class like this in your *.AuthServer (or wherever OpenIddict Server runs):

using System.Security.Claims;
using System.Threading;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using OpenIddict.Abstractions;
using OpenIddict.Server;
using Volo.Abp.DependencyInjection;

public class TourOperatorClientCredentialsClaimsHandler :
    IOpenIddictServerHandler<OpenIddictServerEvents.HandleTokenRequestContext>,
    ITransientDependency
{
    private readonly IOpenIddictApplicationManager _applicationManager;

    public TourOperatorClientCredentialsClaimsHandler(
        IOpenIddictApplicationManager applicationManager)
    {
        _applicationManager = applicationManager;
    }

    public async ValueTask HandleAsync(OpenIddictServerEvents.HandleTokenRequestContext context)
    {
        // Only for client_credentials
        if (!context.Request.IsClientCredentialsGrantType())
        {
            return;
        }

        // Load application by client_id
        var application = await _applicationManager.FindByClientIdAsync(context.Request.ClientId!, context.CancellationToken);
        if (application == null)
        {
            return;
        }

        // Read your extra property from the OpenIddict application "Properties" JSON
        var tourOperatorCode = await _applicationManager.GetPropertyAsync<string>(
            application,
            ExtraPropertyConsts.TourOperatorCodePropertyName,
            context.CancellationToken
        );

        if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(tourOperatorCode))
        {
            return;
        }

        // IMPORTANT:
        // In client_credentials, OpenIddict typically uses a principal representing the *client*.
        // Add your claim to the principal that will be used to issue tokens.
        // (Depending on pipeline stage, this can be context.Principal or context.Identity.)
        var identity = context.Principal?.Identity as ClaimsIdentity;
        if (identity == null)
        {
            // Create one if needed
            identity = new ClaimsIdentity(
                authenticationType: OpenIddictServerAspNetCoreDefaults.AuthenticationScheme,
                nameType: OpenIddictConstants.Claims.Name,
                roleType: OpenIddictConstants.Claims.Role);

            context.Principal = new ClaimsPrincipal(identity);
        }

        identity.AddClaim(new Claim(ExtraPropertyConsts.TourOperatorCodePropertyName, tourOperatorCode));
    }
}

Register the handler in OpenIddict server pipeline

In your AuthServer module:

using OpenIddict.Server;

public override void PreConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
{
    PreConfigure<OpenIddictServerBuilder>(builder =>
    {
        builder.AddEventHandler<OpenIddictServerEvents.HandleTokenRequestContext>(options =>
        {
            options.UseScopedHandler<TourOperatorClientCredentialsClaimsHandler>();
        });
    });
}

At this point:

  • Your claim exists on the principal.
  • Your step 2.1 destinations handler (IAbpOpenIddictClaimsPrincipalHandler) should set it to AccessToken so it actually appears in the JWT.

2) Keep your destinations handler (2.1)

Your TourOperatorClaimDestinationsHandler is still needed so the claim is not dropped and is placed into the access token:

claim.SetDestinations(OpenIddictConstants.Destinations.AccessToken);

3) Apply ABP Data Filter (recommended for the “tenant-like” business filter)

Once the claim is in the token, you can implement a custom data filter keyed by TourOperatorCode and enable it by default for your entity/repository logic (so you don’t forget to apply it in each query).

(Your referenced ABP data filtering doc is exactly the right direction.)


Sources (validated)

  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/modules/openiddict#updating-claims-in-access_token-and-id_token
  • https://documentation.openiddict.com/configuration/claim-destinations.html
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/infrastructure/data-filtering#defining-custom-filters

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

Showing 471 to 480 of 1374 entries
Boost Your Development
ABP Live Training
Packages
See Trainings
Mastering ABP Framework Book
The Official Guide
Mastering
ABP Framework
Learn More
Mastering ABP Framework Book
Made with ❤️ on ABP v10.8.0-preview. Updated on October 21, 2026, 11:09
1
ABP Assistant
🔐 You need to be logged in to use the chatbot. Please log in first.