To restore the previous "My Account" experience in your Angular UI after upgrading to ABP 9.2, you should ensure that the Angular Account Module is properly integrated and that the user menu is configured to use the Angular route for the account/profile page, not the MVC endpoint.
Starting from ABP v4.3, the "My Account" link in the user dropdown should route to the Angular account module page instead of opening the MVC profile page in a new tab. If it opens in a new tab or loses the left navigation, it usually means the menu item is still pointing to the MVC endpoint or is using a target that opens a new window.
How to fix:
Check Your Menu Contributor:
*.MenuContributor.ts (or similar), ensure the "My Account" menu item uses the Angular route, e.g., /account/manage, and does not set target: '_blank' or a full external URL.Example:
context.menu.addItem( new ApplicationMenuItem( 'Account.Manage', 'My Account', '/account/manage', // Angular route 'fa fa-cog', 1000 ) );
2. **Remove/Update Old Links:**
- If you have a link like `https://your-auth-server/Account/Manage?...` or set `target: '_blank'`, update it to use the Angular route and default target.
3. **Verify Account Module is Added:**
- Make sure `@volo/abp.ng.account` is included in your Angular project and imported in your `app.module.ts`.
```typescript
import { AccountConfigModule } from '@volo/abp.ng.account/config';
// ...
imports: [
// ...
AccountConfigModule.forRoot(),
]
Reference:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
sqlOptions.CommandTimeout(7200) in the Configure method is the correct approach for configuring EF Core command timeout in ABP Framework.DbContextOptions configuration as your runtime code.dotnet ef database update) and some ABP migration utilities may use a different context factory (e.g., UnifiedDbContextFactory or a design-time factory) that does not apply your runtime configuration, including the command timeout.Solution:
UnifiedDbContextFactory (or any IDesignTimeDbContextFactory) also sets the CommandTimeout value:public class UnifiedDbContextFactory : IDesignTimeDbContextFactory<UnifiedDbContext>
{
public UnifiedDbContext CreateDbContext(string[] args)
{
var builder = new DbContextOptionsBuilder<UnifiedDbContext>();
builder.UseSqlServer(
"YourConnectionString",
sqlOptions => sqlOptions.CommandTimeout(7200)
);
return new UnifiedDbContext(builder.Options);
}
}
This ensures that both runtime and migration/CLI tools use the same timeout.
If you are using ABP's migration system, make sure any custom context factory or migration handler also applies the timeout.
After making this change, re-run your migration command.
This approach aligns with common ABP and EF Core conventions for command timeout configuration in both runtime and migration scenarios, but specific official documentation for this exact scenario is not available.
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To override the login process in ABP (v9.1, .NET 9), you need to customize the SignInManager and/or the login page logic. This allows you to perform additional operations (such as calling an external API, registering the user if needed, etc.) before completing the login.
Here’s how you can achieve this:
Create a Custom SignInManager
Inherit from the default SignInManager and override the methods you need (e.g., PasswordSignInAsync). This is where you can add your custom logic, such as calling an external API and registering the user if they exist externally but not in your ABP database.
public class CustomSignInManager : Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity.SignInManager<Volo.Abp.Identity.IdentityUser>
{
public CustomSignInManager(
UserManager<Volo.Abp.Identity.IdentityUser> userManager,
IHttpContextAccessor contextAccessor,
IUserClaimsPrincipalFactory<Volo.Abp.Identity.IdentityUser> claimsFactory,
IOptions<IdentityOptions> optionsAccessor,
ILogger<SignInManager<Volo.Abp.Identity.IdentityUser>> logger,
IAuthenticationSchemeProvider schemes,
IUserConfirmation<Volo.Abp.Identity.IdentityUser> confirmation)
: base(userManager, contextAccessor, claimsFactory, optionsAccessor, logger, schemes, confirmation)
{
}
public override async Task<SignInResult> PasswordSignInAsync(string userName, string password, bool isPersistent, bool lockoutOnFailure)
{
// Call your external API here
var existsExternally = await CheckUserInExternalApi(userName);
if (existsExternally)
{
var user = await UserManager.FindByNameAsync(userName);
if (user == null)
{
// Register the user in ABP
user = new Volo.Abp.Identity.IdentityUser(Guid.NewGuid(), userName, userName + "@yourdomain.com", Guid.Empty);
await UserManager.CreateAsync(user, password);
// Assign roles, etc.
}
}
// Continue with the normal login process
return await base.PasswordSignInAsync(userName, password, isPersistent, lockoutOnFailure);
}
private async Task<bool> CheckUserInExternalApi(string userName)
{
// Implement your external API call here
return true;
}
}
Register Your Custom SignInManager
In your Web module, replace the default SignInManager with your custom one:
PreConfigure<IdentityBuilder>(identityBuilder =>
{
identityBuilder.AddSignInManager<CustomSignInManager>();
});
Angular UI Integration
The Angular login component will call the backend as usual. Your backend logic (now using the custom SignInManager) will handle the extra steps transparently.
This approach ensures that all login attempts go through your custom logic, allowing you to perform any checks or user provisioning before completing the sign-in.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
This issue is commonly related to the underlying SMTP client implementation or resource exhaustion in long-running applications. By default, ABP uses the .NET SmtpClient, which is known to have connection pooling and resource management issues, especially in cloud environments like Azure App Services. Over time, connections may not be released properly, leading to failures in sending emails until the application is restarted.
The ABP documentation strongly recommends using MailKit instead of the default SmtpClient for production scenarios. MailKit is more robust, supports modern protocols, and is less prone to these issues.
What to check and do next:
Volo.Abp.MailKit NuGet package in your host projects.[DependsOn(typeof(AbpMailKitModule))] public class YourModule : AbpModule { public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context) { Configure
- Remove or comment out any code that registers `NullEmailSender` or uses the default `SmtpClient`.
2. **Check for Resource Exhaustion**
- Monitor your application logs for exceptions related to sockets, timeouts, or resource limits.
- Ensure your App Service plan has sufficient resources and is not hitting connection or memory limits.
3. **Review Background Job Handling**
- If you use background jobs for email sending, ensure jobs are not piling up due to failures, which can cause further issues.
4. **Test Email Configuration**
- Use the ABP Setting Management UI or configuration files to verify your SMTP settings are correct and up to date.
5. **Restart as a Temporary Workaround**
- While restarting restores functionality, it is not a long-term solution. Migrating to MailKit is the recommended fix.
**References:**
- [ABP Emailing Documentation](https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Emailing)
- [ABP MailKit Integration](https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/MailKit)
- [Configuring for Production](https://abp.io/docs/latest/deployment/configuring-production)
---
_This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon._
Before a user is authenticated and a token is issued (i.e., before the /connect/token endpoint is called), the ABP Framework resolves the current tenant using tenant resolvers (such as domain, header, cookie, or query string). However, the ICurrentTenant.Id will only be set if the tenant can be resolved from the incoming request.
During the login process (before the token is issued), if the request does not contain sufficient tenant information (for example, the __tenant header, a tenant-specific subdomain, or a query string parameter), ICurrentTenant.Id will be null. This is by design: the tenant context is established based on the request, not the user credentials.
To ensure ICurrentTenant is set before authentication, you must configure and use a tenant resolver that can extract the tenant from the request (such as domain/subdomain, header, or query string). For example, in a multi-tenant Angular app, the frontend should send the __tenant header or use a tenant-specific subdomain.
If you need to access tenant information during the login process, make sure your frontend provides the tenant identifier in the request, and your backend is configured to resolve it.
Example configuration:
Configure<AbpTenantResolveOptions>(options =>
{
options.AddDomainTenantResolver("{0}.yourdomain.com");
options.AddHeaderTenantResolver();
options.AddCookieTenantResolver();
options.AddQueryStringTenantResolver();
});
ICurrentTenant.Id will remain null until after the user is authenticated and the token is issued.Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To obtain a JWT token from an ABP-based application, you typically use the /connect/token endpoint, which is provided by IdentityServer or OpenIddict in ABP solutions. The endpoint expects a POST request with the appropriate parameters, such as grant_type, client_id, client_secret, username, password, and scope.
Example request (using Resource Owner Password Credentials flow):
POST https://<your-abp-app>/connect/token
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
grant_type=password
&client_id=YourClientId
&client_secret=YourClientSecret
&username=admin
&password=YourPassword
&scope=YourApiScope
Replace the placeholders with your actual values. The response will include an access_token if the credentials are valid.
If you are using a development environment, make sure your API is running and accessible at the specified URL. Also, ensure that the client is configured in your IdentityServer/OpenIddict settings.
No verified source available for this specific query.
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To resolve this:
Check Redirect URI Configuration
https://your-app.azurewebsites.net/swagger/oauth2-redirect.html, this exact URI must be registered as a valid redirect URI for the Swagger client.Update Client Settings
DbMigrator's appsettings.json and/or in your database (OpenIddict/IdentityServer client table) to include the correct redirect URI.Remove Client Secret for Swagger
Restart Services
Verify with Correct URL
Example configuration for Swagger client in appsettings.json:
"Swagger": {
"ClientId": "YourApp_Swagger",
"RootUrl": "https://your-app.azurewebsites.net"
}
And in your client seeding logic:
await CreateClientAsync(
name: "YourApp_Swagger",
grantTypes: new[] { "authorization_code" },
requireClientSecret: false,
redirectUri: "https://your-app.azurewebsites.net/swagger/oauth2-redirect.html",
corsOrigins: new[] { "https://your-app.azurewebsites.net" }
);
If you still encounter issues, double-check that the redirect URI in the error message matches exactly with what is registered.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
Since you are using the new ABP Global Assets bundling system for Blazor WASM, and your logs confirm that both FontAwesome and Bootstrap Icons CSS files are being bundled and minified, the most common cause for icons not displaying (showing as empty squares or boxes) is that the font files themselves are not being copied or served correctly.
In ABP's new bundling system, CSS files that reference fonts (like FontAwesome or Bootstrap Icons) use relative URLs to load font files (e.g., .woff2, .ttf). If these font files are not present in the output (wwwroot/_content/...) or not mapped correctly, the icons will not render.
To resolve this, ensure the following:
If the font files are missing, you may need to update your abp.resourcemapping.js or ensure your nuget packages are up to date and not excluded from publish.
You can also try running abp install-libs to ensure all static assets are copied.
If you have custom BundleContributors, make sure you are not only adding the CSS files but also ensuring the font folders are included in the output.
Finally, clear your browser cache or do a hard refresh to ensure old/broken font files are not cached.
This approach aligns with common ABP conventions, but specific official documentation for this exact scenario is not available.
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
ABP Framework does not enforce a specific naming convention for PostgreSQL schemas by default. The official documentation and community articles confirm that ABP uses PascalCase for table and column names out of the box, which aligns with .NET conventions but not with PostgreSQL's typical snake_case style.
The UseSnakeCaseNamingConvention() method from EF Core can be used to apply snake_case naming, but it does not fully cover inherited properties (such as those from FullAuditedAggregateRoot). This is a known limitation, and some ABP internal queries and modules may still expect PascalCase names (e.g., "AbpPermissions"), leading to migration and runtime conflicts if the physical schema uses snake_case.
There is currently no official ABP guidance or built-in support for enforcing snake_case across all entities, including inherited and module-provided properties. The recommended approach is to use the default PascalCase naming to ensure compatibility with ABP modules and migrations.
Workarounds such as custom EF Core naming conventions, query interceptors, or database views are community-driven and not officially supported. These may help in specific scenarios but can introduce maintenance overhead and compatibility risks with ABP updates.
As of now, there is no official roadmap or announcement regarding improved or native snake_case support for PostgreSQL in ABP Framework. The best practice is to use the default naming conventions unless you are prepared to handle the additional complexity and potential issues with custom solutions.
For the FullAuditedAggregateRoot property casing issue, there is no officially supported workaround. If you must use snake_case, you will need to manually configure property mappings for all inherited properties and be aware of the risks with ABP module compatibility.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
In ABP, audit properties like LastModifierId are set based on the current user, which is determined by the ClaimsPrincipal available via ICurrentPrincipalAccessor. In background jobs (such as Hangfire), there is no authenticated user by default, so audit logging will not automatically associate changes with a user unless you explicitly set the principal.
Your approach of using currentPrincipalAccessor.Change(newPrincipal) is correct and aligns with official ABP guidance. However, for audit logging to work, you must ensure:
If you still do not see audit logs for changes made in the background job, check the following:
Example pattern (from official docs and community articles):
var newPrincipal = new ClaimsPrincipal(new ClaimsIdentity(new[] { new Claim(AbpClaimTypes.UserId, user.Id.ToString()), new Claim(AbpClaimTypes.UserName, user.UserName) }, "CustomAuthType")); // Set an authentication type
using (currentPrincipalAccessor.Change(newPrincipal)) { // All repository updates here will use the specified user for audit logging await configurationRepository.UpdateAsync(configuration); }
- If you want to ensure auditing for anonymous/background users, set:
```csharp
Configure<AbpAuditingOptions>(options =>
{
options.IsEnabledForAnonymousUsers = true;
});
For more details and verified patterns, see:
If you follow these steps and still do not see audit logs, double-check that your background job is not suppressing auditing or using a different DbContext or unit of work configuration.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
