- Template: app
- Created ABP Studio Version: 2.1.2
- Current ABP Studio Version: 2.1.6
- Tiered: No
- Multi-Tenancy: Yes
- UI Framework: blazor-webapp
- Theme: leptonx
- Theme Style: system
- Theme Menu Placement: side
- Database Provider: ef
- Database Management System: postgresql
- Separate Tenant Schema: No
- Mobile Framework: maui
- Public Website: Yes
- Social Login: Yes
- Include Tests: Yes
- Kubernetes Configuration: Yes
- Distributed Event Bus: rabbitmq
- Use Local References: No
- Optional Modules:
- GDPR
- FileManagement
- TextTemplateManagement
- LanguageManagement
- AuditLogging
- Chat
- OpenIddictAdmin
- Selected Languages: Arabic, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English, English (United Kingdom), French, German (Germany), Hindi , Italian, Russian, Spanish
- Default Language: Arabic
- Create Command: abp new Jdoe.Pci -t app --ui-framework blazor-webapp --mobile maui --database-provider ef --database-management-system postgresql --theme leptonx --skip-migration --skip-migrator --public-website --without-cms-kit --sample-crud-page --dont-run-install-libs --dont-run-bundling -chat -file-management
I have a module and entities defines within that modules which some extend from IMultiTenant. I wonder what would be the best approach to load tenant details for a record when returning result to ui via Dto? I dont think it would be a good practice to add a navigation property on the the entity to the Tenant. I also dont have access to the ITenantRepository in the application in my module to query the tenant, which again I dont believe it would be a best approach when trying to follow the DDD.
8 Answer(s)
-
0
- Do not add a navigation property from your entity to
Tenant
In ABP’s SaaS model, the tenant is part of the SaaS / infrastructure context, not your domain. For entities implementing
IMultiTenant, the recommended design is:public class Order : AggregateRoot<Guid>, IMultiTenant { public Guid? TenantId { get; set; } // from IMultiTenant // other domain properties, no Tenant navigation here }Your module’s domain model should only know the
TenantId. It should not depend onTenantaggregate orITenantRepositoryin the domain layer.
- Where to load tenant details (e.g. Name) for DTOs
The tenant details are a read concern / UI concern, so resolve them in the application layer, not in domain entities:
Option A – Use
ITenantRepositoryin your Application ServiceIf your module is allowed to depend on the SaaS domain package (
Volo.Saas.Domain), injectITenantRepositoryin your app service and map the tenant info into your DTOs:using Volo.Saas.Tenants; using Volo.Abp.Application.Dtos; public class MyEntityDto : EntityDto<Guid> { public Guid? TenantId { get; set; } public string? TenantName { get; set; } // other fields } public class MyEntityAppService : ApplicationService { private readonly IRepository<MyEntity, Guid> _myEntityRepository; private readonly ITenantRepository _tenantRepository; public MyEntityAppService( IRepository<MyEntity, Guid> myEntityRepository, ITenantRepository tenantRepository) { _myEntityRepository = myEntityRepository; _tenantRepository = tenantRepository; } public async Task<MyEntityDto> GetAsync(Guid id) { var entity = await _myEntityRepository.GetAsync(id); var dto = ObjectMapper.Map<MyEntity, MyEntityDto>(entity); if (entity.TenantId.HasValue) { var tenant = await _tenantRepository.FindAsync(entity.TenantId.Value); dto.TenantName = tenant?.Name; } return dto; } }Notes:
ITenantRepositoryis used only in the application layer, which is fine in DDD.- Your domain entities remain independent and only know
TenantId.
If you need this in list endpoints, batch-load tenants to avoid N+1 (e.g. get all distinct
TenantIds, query tenants once, then map names).
Option B – Call SaaS Application Service instead of Repository
If you don’t want your module to depend on Saas domain, but you allow dependency on its application layer, you can inject
ITenantAppService(from the Saas module) and use its DTOs:using Volo.Saas; public class MyEntityAppService : ApplicationService { private readonly IRepository<MyEntity, Guid> _myEntityRepository; private readonly ITenantAppService _tenantAppService; // inject ITenantAppService }Then resolve tenant names via
ITenantAppService.GetAsync(id)(again, preferably in batch).This keeps your module depending only on SaaS application contracts, which is also a valid DDD-style boundary.
- When you need richer tenant data frequently
If you often need tenant-related info (e.g. name + some extra fields) together with your entities, a common pattern is:
- Keep your domain entities with
TenantIdonly. - Create a read model / projection in your own module (e.g.
TenantSummarytable) and keep it in sync with SaaS via:- data seeding, or
- distributed events from SaaS when tenant changes.
- Query that read model from your app service and project into DTOs.
This avoids a hard dependency on the SaaS domain model and is suitable for more complex or performance-critical scenarios.
- What not to do
- Don’t add a navigation property like
public Tenant Tenant { get; set; }on your entities. - Don’t use
ITenantRepositoryinside domain services or entities. - Don’t rely on
ICurrentTenantwhen you need the tenant of an arbitrary entity;ICurrentTenantis only for the current context.
Summary
- Keep entities
IMultiTenantwith onlyTenantId. - Load tenant details in the application layer:
- Either via
ITenantRepository(domain-level dependency from app layer), or - via SaaS application service (
ITenantAppService).
- Either via
- Optionally introduce your own read model if you need richer or more optimized tenant info.
Sources
- Multi-tenancy concepts and
IMultiTenantusage:
https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/architecture/multi-tenancy
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
- Do not add a navigation property from your entity to
-
0
how can I have a reference to the ITenantAppService from my module though? should I add a specific abp package via Nuget?
-
0
- To which assembly should you reference?
ITenantAppServiceis defined in the SaaS module’s application contracts:- Namespace:
Volo.Saas - Assembly / package:
Volo.Saas.Application.Contracts
From your own module’s Application layer, you should depend on this contracts package (or project), not on the SaaS implementation.
- Add the dependency (NuGet or project reference)
a) If you are using the commercial SaaS module as NuGet
In your
<YourModule>.Applicationproject:.csproj
<ItemGroup> <PackageReference Include="Volo.Saas.Application.Contracts" Version="*" /> </ItemGroup>(Use the same version as the rest of your ABP packages.)
Module class
using Volo.Saas; [DependsOn( typeof(SaasApplicationContractsModule) // <- important )] public class MyModuleApplicationModule : AbpModule { }Now you can inject
ITenantAppServiceanywhere in this application module:using Volo.Saas; public class MyEntityAppService : ApplicationService { private readonly ITenantAppService _tenantAppService; public MyEntityAppService(ITenantAppService tenantAppService) { _tenantAppService = tenantAppService; } // use _tenantAppService.GetAsync(id) etc. }
b) If your solution has a separate
Saas.Application.ContractsprojectIn that case, instead of NuGet, add a project reference from your module’s
*.Applicationproject to theSaas.Application.Contractsproject, and still annotate your module with:[DependsOn(typeof(SaasApplicationContractsModule))] public class MyModuleApplicationModule : AbpModule { }Everything else is the same; you can inject
ITenantAppServicenormally.
- Why this is OK in DDD terms
- Your domain layer stays independent of tenants (other than the
TenantIdvalue). - Your application layer is allowed to depend on other bounded contexts’ application contracts (like SaaS), so calling
ITenantAppServicehere is a standard and recommended pattern.
2. Sources
- https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/architecture/multi-tenancy
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
-
0
there is no package name as Volo.Saas.Application.Contracts but there is one as Volo.Saas.Host.Application.Contracts which is already added in the main module of my solution. Should I add the package in my module Application.Contracts project?
-
0
- Which package/module to reference
In the app template with SaaS host side,
ITenantAppServiceis in the host contracts package:- Assembly / NuGet:
Volo.Saas.Host.Application.Contracts - Module class:
SaasHostApplicationContractsModule - Namespace of the interface:
Volo.Saas
So you should depend on
Volo.Saas.Host.Application.Contracts, not on a non‑existingVolo.Saas.Application.Contracts.
- Where to add the reference
You normally need
ITenantAppServiceonly in your Application layer, where you build DTOs and orchestrate calls.- Add the package/project reference to your module’s
*.Applicationproject. - Do not add it to your module’s
*.Application.Contractsproject unless you really need to expose SaaS DTOs in your own public contracts.
a)
MyModule.Application.csprojIf you’re using NuGet packages:
<ItemGroup> <PackageReference Include="Volo.Saas.Host.Application.Contracts" Version="x.y.z" /> </ItemGroup>(Use the same
x.y.zABP/Commercial version as the rest of your solution.)Or, if you have a
Saas.Host.Application.Contractsproject in the solution, just add a project reference instead of NuGet.b) Application module class
In your module’s Application project:
using Volo.Abp.Modularity; using Volo.Saas.Host; // for SaasHostApplicationContractsModule [DependsOn( typeof(SaasHostApplicationContractsModule) // other dependencies... )] public class MyModuleApplicationModule : AbpModule { }Now you can inject
ITenantAppServicein your app services:using Volo.Saas; public class MyEntityAppService : ApplicationService { private readonly ITenantAppService _tenantAppService; public MyEntityAppService(ITenantAppService tenantAppService) { _tenantAppService = tenantAppService; } public async Task<MyEntityDto> GetAsync(Guid id) { var entity = await Repository.GetAsync(id); var dto = ObjectMapper.Map<MyEntity, MyEntityDto>(entity); if (entity.TenantId.HasValue) { var tenantDto = await _tenantAppService.GetAsync(entity.TenantId.Value); dto.TenantName = tenantDto.Name; } return dto; } }
- Should you add it to your
Application.Contractsproject?
- Usually no.
Application.Contractsof your module should define your own DTOs and service interfaces and stay relatively clean. - Add
Volo.Saas.Host.Application.Contractsthere only if:- You want to use SaaS DTO types in your public service contracts, or
- You need to expose some tenant DTO as part of your own DTOs.
If you just need tenant info internally to build DTOs, referencing it only from
*.Applicationis the cleaner approach.
Sources
- Multi-tenancy basics:
https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/architecture/multi-tenancy - SaaS module docs:
https://abp.io/docs/latest/modules/saas
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
-
0
hi
Please ignore the AI answer.
You can query the entities from your module.
then you can get
TenantId, then inject theITenantStoreservice to query tenant info byTenantId.Thanks.
-
0
Great! Thanks!
-
0
: )