Is there a way to make this work with dynamic proxy generation?

Is there a workaround for this, or does this need to wait for the patch?

There is no output in the logs besides !

Hi there. Yes it's still an issue.

I created a new solution on 9.2.0 and the issue is not there anymore.

Is there something missing in the startup configuration? Thanks in advance!

There is currently no ABP-specific abstraction or automation for bundling static files in Blazor Server

Could you please confirm if there are additional steps or configurations required to enable the latest

Could you please confirm if there are additional steps or configurations required to enable the latest

I don't have it in there anymore, but I previously also tried to get the DbMigrator line working (something

Not sure if there is anything I need to look out for there.

UI=MVC&DB=EF&Tiered=No), and it does work to deploy to Azure, but if I have the line there to

You can see all of your solutions there, and you can change the `DomainProjectDirectory` and other directories

domain-project-directory.png](/QA/files/3a1bdd8220fdfc63d10d0fcf4b643a47.png) Unfortunately, currently, there

Is there a way that we can customize this process to generate the code that we need?

Is there a fix for the problem described in #8818?

As far as I see, there is no problem on backend side.

was able to get a successful code response, but the redirect was still coming back as 192.16X.X.X and there

Recently I see that there is a mismatch on how the framework handle the Master/Child relation.

**Check the ABP 9.3 Migration Guide** Review the official migration guide for ABP 9.3, as there

hi There are no errors or exceptions in your logs.

Is there no way to call up a corresponding service method from the SaaS module directly from my AppService

With the first two, I get the error message: “**There is no user with username: admin!

But there I get a **404** error.

However, we want to call it directly via our dashboard, as we have a client list there and want to avoid

> If ABP Suite does not support, are there any other ways to define the type as DateTimeOffset without

Actually, there might be one tricky way to do that in the current structure: You can customize all DateTime

There is no built-in way in ABP Suite to define a property as DateTimeOffset without editing the code

There is no certain date or milestone for supporting the `DateTimeOffset` type.

[image.png](/QA/files/3a1bce96f7b7f1b85359de2f5d3aa49f.png) If ABP Suite does not support, are there

If there is no record in the AbpSettings table, the UI will show the default (which is "true" unless

If there is no record in the AbpSettings table, the UI will show the default (which is "true" unless

I've created a new layered MVC application and customized the related template, and the changes are there

[image.png](/QA/files/3a1bbfbe87cf74c131b8cd95c1871b30.png) * There is no "@" in the using * After the

Another project also has the public website MVC app and the same issue appears there

**Summary:** There is no built-in mechanism in ABP 9.0.5 to automatically bind backend AbpCookieConsentOptions

There is no built-in ABP or LeptonX setting to prevent this at the moment. 3.

Currently, there is no official ABP or LeptonX Angular configuration to automatically persist dialog

https://abp.io/support Please log in with your account, create a support ticket, and attach your logs there

> Is there a way to mark the event as failed after a maximum number of retries?

The UOW will rollback if there is an exception.

hi There is a problem when checking the handler type.

Is there an alternative way to test this setup without configuring HandleSelector?

- Is there a way to mark the event as failed after a maximum number of retries?