The error "NullInjectorError: No provider for InjectionToken CORE_OPTIONS!" in your ABP Angular v9.1.3 migration is caused by missing or misconfigured ABP core providers. In ABP v9+, the dependency injection system for Angular was updated to use the new Angular standalone providers API, and all ABP modules must be registered using their new provide*Config or provide* functions.
Do not import ABP modules in the imports array of your components or modules.
Instead, use the new provideAbpCore and related provider functions only in the bootstrapApplication call in your main.ts.
Remove all ABP modules from the imports array in your @Component and @NgModule decorators.
For example, in your app.component.ts, remove:
imports: [
CoreModule,
ThemeSharedModule,
GdprConfigModule,
]
These should not be present.
main.ts using the new provider functions.bootstrapApplication(AppComponent, {
providers: [
provideAbpCore(withOptions({ environment, registerLocaleFn: registerLocale() })),
provideAbpOAuth(),
provideSettingManagementConfig(),
provideFeatureManagementConfig(),
provideAbpThemeShared(
withHttpErrorConfig({
errorScreen: {
component: HttpErrorComponent,
forWhichErrors: [401, 403, 404, 500],
hideCloseIcon: true,
},
})
),
// ...other provide*Config functions
importProvidersFrom(
BrowserModule,
BrowserAnimationsModule,
ThemeLeptonXModule.forRoot(),
SideMenuLayoutModule.forRoot()
),
provideAnimations(),
provideHttpClient(withInterceptorsFromDi()),
provideZoneChangeDetection({ eventCoalescing: true }),
provideRouter(routes),
],
});
If you comment out any provide*Config function, any dependent module will fail to resolve its options.
For example, if you use any ABP module (like Identity, Account, etc.), you must include its corresponding provide*Config function in the providers array.
Do not mix the old module-based imports with the new provider-based registration.
All ABP modules must be registered via providers only.
imports in app.component.ts and any other module/component.main.ts only.See the official ABP v9 Angular startup template for a working example:
By following these steps, the "No provider for InjectionToken CORE_OPTIONS!" error will be resolved, and your ABP Angular app will work as expected after migration.
This approach aligns with common ABP conventions, but specific official documentation for this exact scenario is not available.
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To resolve the [Project Not Found] Either define a default project in your workspace or specify the project name in schematics options error when running abp generate-proxy with Angular 19 and ABP 9.2.2, follow these steps:
Do NOT add defaultProject to angular.json
The Angular 16+ workspace schema no longer supports the defaultProject property, so adding it will cause a schema validation error.
Explicitly Specify the Angular Project
Since defaultProject is not allowed, you must use the --project (or -p) option to specify your Angular project name. In your case, the project name is MYPROJECT3.
Example:
abp generate-proxy -t ng --url https://localhost:44369 --target src/app/proxy --project MYPROJECT3 --all --force
--project matches exactly the key under projects in your angular.json (case-sensitive).Ensure the Angular Project Structure is Correct
angular.json must have the correct structure, and the project name must be present under the projects node.sourceRoot and root properties should be correct (as in your sample).Check for Workspace Issues
angular.json is located).--project.Update ABP CLI and Schematics
@abp/ng.schematics package:dotnet tool update -g Volo.Abp.Cli
npm install @abp/ng.schematics --save-dev
abp generate-proxy -t ng --url https://localhost:44369 --target src/app/proxy --project MYPROJECT3 --all --force
If you follow these steps and still encounter the error, double-check the spelling and casing of your project name in both the command and angular.json.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
The ABP Forms Module (Pro) is designed to provide a flexible, widget-like form creation experience for end users, allowing them to build and customize forms (such as event or counseling registrations) at runtime. However, as of the latest official documentation, the Forms Module does not natively support direct integration of application entities or enums as dropdown sources within the form designer UI. All form fields and dropdown options are defined within the form builder interface, and there is no built-in mechanism to bind dropdowns to existing enums or entities from your domain model. You would need to manually define dropdown options for each form, or consider extending the module if you require dynamic population from entities.
The Forms Module supports storing responses and allows you to export data. For advanced processing, you can subscribe to form submission events and map responses to your own entities (such as Event or Counseling Registration tables). This is a common pattern: capture the form response, process it in an application service or event handler, and persist the structured data as needed. Naming questions programmatically for mapping is not natively supported, but you can enforce naming conventions or use custom logic in your processing layer.
The abp-dynamic-form tag helper is compile-time and not intended for runtime user-driven form design. It is best suited for developer-defined forms that reflect model classes, and any changes require redeployment. Text Templating is primarily for generating text (e.g., emails) and is not suitable for interactive HTML form generation.
Recommendation:
Sources:
No verified source available for direct entity/enum integration in Forms Module dropdowns; this is based on current official documentation.
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
The error "There is no version found with given version: 6.0.2" indicates that the ABP Suite/CLI cannot find the project template for version 6.0.2. This typically happens if the template for the specified version was not published to the ABP template repository.
According to the official ABP documentation and release notes, the recommended way to create a new solution is to use the versions that are available on the ABP template server. If a specific version (such as 6.0.2) is not found, it means the template for that version was not published or is not available for download.
The ABP team usually publishes templates for major and minor versions, but not always for every patch version. If you require 6.0.2 specifically, but the template is missing, you will not be able to create a new project directly with that version using ABP Suite or CLI.
The recommended approach is:
abp update to ensure all dependencies are aligned.If your organization requires strict versioning, you must ensure the template exists for that version before starting a new project. Otherwise, use the closest available template and update dependencies as described.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To use the ABP Blob Storing module (such as AWS S3) in a non-ABP .NET Core Web API project, you must ensure that all required dependencies and module registrations are present. The error you are seeing indicates that the BlobStoring provider (e.g., AWS) is not fully registered, specifically the required services for IBlobContainerFactory.
In your custom module, you must add a dependency on the AWS Blob Storing provider module. For AWS, this is AbpBlobStoringAwsModule. You must also install the NuGet package Volo.Abp.BlobStoring.Aws and add the module dependency:
[DependsOn(typeof(AbpBlobStoringAwsModule))]
public class NxPBlobStoringAwsModule : AbpModule
{
}
[DependsOn(typeof(NxPBlobStoringAwsModule))]
public class NxPAipModule : AbpModule
{
public override void PreConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
{
Configure<AbpBlobStoringOptions>(options =>
{
options.Containers.Configure<DocumentBlobContainer>(container =>
{
container.UseAws(aws =>
{
aws.Region = "eu-west-2";
aws.CreateContainerIfNotExists = true;
aws.UseClientSideEncryption = false;
aws.AccessKeyId = "";
aws.SecretAccessKey = "";
aws.ContainerName = "nxp-staging-1";
});
});
});
}
}
Most importantly, you must ensure that the AWS Blob Storing provider module is initialized by the ABP module system. If you only register your own modules, but not the official provider module, the required services (like IBlobContainerFactory) will not be available, resulting in the error you see.
In your Program.cs, when creating the application, make sure you use your main module (NxPAipModule) and that all dependencies are resolved:
using (var application = AbpApplicationFactory.Create<NxPAipModule>(options =>
{
options.UseAutofac();
}))
{
application.Initialize();
// ... your code
}
Double-check that you have installed the following NuGet packages:
If you still encounter issues, ensure that your DocumentBlobContainer class is defined as:
using Volo.Abp.BlobStoring;
[BlobContainerName("document-blob-container")]
public class DocumentBlobContainer
{
}
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To customize the alert messages on the login page in an ABP MVC UI application (including with Account.Pro), you have several options:
Change the Position and Style of Default Alert Messages:
Themes/LeptonX/Components/PageAlerts/Default.cshtml. Copy this file into your project under the same path and modify its markup and CSS as needed to change the position and style.PageAlertsViewComponent.cs) if you need to change logic.Handle Alerts on the Client Side for Custom Messages:
Login.cshtml).LoginModel to set custom messages in the model, which you then render in your own way in the view.Recommended Approach:
References:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
The error message in your screenshot, System.OperationCanceledException with a stack trace involving StackExchange.Redis.RedisCache.GetAsync, indicates that your services are unable to connect to the Redis server. This is a common issue in ABP microservice solutions, as Redis is used for distributed caching and data protection.
In the ABP microservice template, Redis is a required dependency. If Redis is not running, misconfigured, or unreachable, you will see these types of exceptions and your services may fail to start.
How to resolve:
Ensure Redis is running:
Check your connection string:
appsettings.json or environment variables and verify the Redis connection string is correct for your environment."Redis": {
"Configuration": "localhost:6379"
}
Kubernetes/Containerized environments:
Restart your services:
Check for other dependencies:
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
The ABP team recommends using a single microservice solution (mono-repo) for most scenarios, especially when your business requirements are closely related and you want to minimize overhead in managing multiple repositories and infrastructure duplication. The ABP Microservice template is designed to support large-scale solutions with many microservices, and it is common to organize the solution into distinct business sections (modules or folders) within the same repository.
Using a single solution allows you to:
Creating separate ABP microservice solutions for each business section is only recommended if the business domains are entirely independent, have different release cycles, or need to be managed by completely separate teams with minimal overlap.
For your scenario (9 business sections, 50+ microservices, shared infrastructure), the recommended approach is to use a single ABP microservice solution and organize your business microservices into logical folders or modules within that solution.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
The error message "There is no version found with given version: 6.0.2" indicates that ABP Suite cannot find the project template or source code for ABP Framework version 6.0.2. This usually happens if the required version is not available on the template server or your local cache.
Since you do not want to update the version, here are some steps you can try:
%USERPROFILE%\.abp\templates folder (on Windows) or ~/.abp/templates (on Linux/macOS).If the problem persists, it may be that the template for version 6.0.2 is not available on the ABP template server. In that case, you may need to consider using a different version or contact ABP support for the specific template file.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
System.UriFormatException: Invalid URI: The URI is empty. occurs when ABP Studio attempts to open a file dialog but receives an empty or invalid path/URI. This is not directly related to abp-dynamic-form or dynamic forms in ABP, but rather to the file picker functionality in ABP Studio.How to resolve:
For more on dynamic forms in ABP, see the official documentation:
If the issue is specific to ABP Studio's file dialog, it may be a bug. In that case, report it on the ABP GitHub issues page with your OS details and ABP Studio version.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
