Activities of "AI-Bot"

This tooltip issue ("You do not have permission to perform any action") after upgrading to ABP 9.2.0 is a known behavioral change related to permission checks in the Blazor UI's DataGrid and EntityAction components. In recent ABP versions, the framework shows this tooltip when no visible actions are available to the user due to permission restrictions.

However, in some cases, this tooltip may appear prematurely—before permissions are fully resolved—especially after a page refresh or initial load. This is a side effect of how permission checks and UI rendering are handled in the new version.

Workaround / Recommendations

  • This tooltip is triggered when all actions in the EntityAction group are hidden (typically due to permission checks).
  • If your users have the correct permissions but still see this tooltip, it may be due to asynchronous permission resolution or caching delays.
  • As a workaround, you can explicitly control the visibility of actions using the Visible property and ensure permission checks are completed before rendering the DataGrid or EntityAction components.

Example:

new EntityAction<MyEntity>(
    "Edit",
    L["Edit"],
    visible: context => PermissionChecker.IsGrantedAsync("MyPermissionName").Result // or use async pattern properly
)
  • If you are using custom actions, ensure that the Visible property is set based on the user's permissions and that permission checks are not delayed.

  • If the issue persists on built-in pages, it is likely a framework-level behavior. You can monitor the official migration guide and GitHub issues for updates or patches:

Currently, there is no official configuration to suppress this tooltip globally, but you can override the tooltip text or logic in your custom components if needed.

If this behavior is blocking your users, consider reporting it on the ABP GitHub repository or support channels, as it may be addressed in a future patch.

Sources:


This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • The .well-known/jwks endpoint returning 404 in ABP OpenIddict is typically due to missing or misconfigured signing/encryption certificates, or incorrect OpenIddict server setup—especially behind a proxy or API gateway.

Solution Steps:

  1. Certificate Configuration

    • Ensure you have configured production certificates for OpenIddict. If no valid signing certificate is loaded, the JWKS endpoint will not be available.
    • In your module, use:
      PreConfigure<OpenIddictServerBuilder>(serverBuilder =>
      {
          var flag = X509KeyStorageFlags.MachineKeySet | X509KeyStorageFlags.EphemeralKeySet;
          serverBuilder.AddProductionEncryptionAndSigningCertificate("openiddict.pfx", "YourCertificatePassword", flag);
      });
      
    • Make sure the openiddict.pfx file is present in your deployment and the password is correct.
  2. Proxy/Forwarded Headers

    • When running behind a proxy (like krakend or AKS ingress), configure forwarded headers in your ABP app:
      app.UseForwardedHeaders(new ForwardedHeadersOptions
      {
          ForwardedHeaders = ForwardedHeaders.XForwardedFor | ForwardedHeaders.XForwardedProto
      });
      
    • This ensures OpenIddict generates correct URLs and processes requests as expected.
  3. Check PathBase and Routing

    • If you use app.UsePathBase("/auth") or similar, ensure your proxy forwards the base path and that all OpenIddict endpoints are accessible under the correct path.
  4. Verify Endpoint Exposure

    • The JWKS endpoint should be exposed by default if OpenIddict is correctly configured. If you have custom endpoint configuration, ensure .well-known/jwks is not excluded.
  5. Restart and Logs

    • After making changes, restart your service and check logs for certificate loading errors or OpenIddict warnings.

References:

These steps should resolve the 404 on .well-known/jwks behind your proxy. If the issue persists, double-check certificate presence and permissions, and ensure your proxy is not stripping or rewriting the path.


This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

To upgrade your ABP microservice solution from version 4.2.2 to 9.0, follow these steps:

  1. Review Migration Guides

    • Carefully read the official ABP migration guides for each major version between 4.x and 9.0. Start with the ABP 9.0 Migration Guide and work backwards for each major version (5.x, 6.x, 7.x, 8.x). Apply all required breaking changes and manual steps for each version in sequence.
  2. Update .NET and ABP Packages

    • Upgrade your solution’s .NET version to .NET 9.0, as ABP 9.0 requires it.
    • Update all ABP NuGet and NPM packages in your solution to the latest 9.0 versions.
    • If you use the ABP CLI, run:
      abp update
      
    • Manually update any other dependencies (e.g., Microsoft, third-party packages) to versions compatible with .NET 9.
  3. Update Microservice Template Structure

    • Compare your existing solution structure with a fresh ABP 9.0 microservice template (created via ABP Studio or CLI).
    • Migrate your custom microservices and code into the new structure, updating namespaces, dependencies, and configuration files as needed.
  4. Apply Breaking Changes

    • For each ABP version upgrade, apply the breaking changes listed in the migration guides. This may include:
      • Module and dependency registration changes
      • Configuration file updates
      • Code refactoring for deprecated APIs
      • Changes in authentication, authorization, and OpenIddict configuration
  5. Update Configuration Files

    • Update appsettings.json, DbMigrator settings, and other configuration files to match the new template and ABP 9.0 requirements.
  6. Database Migrations

    • Update your Entity Framework Core migrations to be compatible with the new ABP version.
    • Run the DbMigrator project to apply any new or updated migrations.
  7. Test and Validate

    • Thoroughly test all microservices, APIs, and UI applications.
    • Validate authentication, authorization, and inter-service communication.
  8. Leverage New Features

    • Optionally, refactor your code to use new ABP 9.0 features and improvements.

Tip:
Upgrade in small increments (one major version at a time), commit and test after each step, and use a source control system to track changes.

Sources:


This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

To use TenantId as part of a composite key in an ABP entity, you must consider that EF Core does not allow nullable properties in primary keys. Since IMultiTenant.TenantId is nullable (to support host entities), making it part of a composite key will cause issues when TenantId is null (i.e., for host-owned entities).

If you define your entity as:

public class MyEntity : Entity, IMultiTenant
{
    public Guid? TenantId { get; set; }
    public Guid EntityId { get; set; }

    public override object[] GetKeys()
    {
        return new object[] { TenantId, EntityId };
    }
}

You will encounter problems saving entities with a null TenantId, because EF Core does not support nullable columns in primary keys.

Workarounds:

  • Use a single, non-nullable key (e.g., EntityId as the primary key).
  • If you must use a composite key, ensure all parts are non-nullable. This would require making TenantId non-nullable, which breaks host/tenant separation in ABP.
  • Alternatively, use a unique index (not a primary key) for (TenantId, EntityId) and keep EntityId as the primary key.

Example:

public class MyEntity : Entity<Guid>, IMultiTenant
{
    public Guid? TenantId { get; set; }
    // EntityId is now the primary key (from Entity<Guid>)
}

// In your DbContext:
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder builder)
{
    base.OnModelCreating(builder);

    builder.Entity<MyEntity>()
        .HasIndex(e => new { e.TenantId, e.Id })
        .IsUnique();
}

This approach allows TenantId to be nullable and still enforces uniqueness for (TenantId, EntityId) without violating EF Core's primary key constraints.

Sources:


This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

To resolve the "This server only accepts HTTPS requests" error from OpenIddict when running your ABP AuthServer behind Nginx on Linux, you need to explicitly disable the HTTPS requirement in your configuration. By default, OpenIddict enforces HTTPS for security, but in reverse proxy scenarios (like Nginx terminating SSL), your backend app only sees HTTP traffic.

Solution:

  1. In your appsettings.json, set:

    "AuthServer": {
      "Authority": "https://auth.mysite.it",
      "RequireHttpsMetadata": "false",
      "SwaggerClientId": "WebGateway_Swagger"
    }
    
  2. In your AuthServer module, add the following configuration to disable the transport security requirement when RequireHttpsMetadata is false:

    if (!Convert.ToBoolean(configuration["AuthServer:RequireHttpsMetadata"]))
    {
        Configure<OpenIddictServerAspNetCoreOptions>(options =>
        {
            options.DisableTransportSecurityRequirement = true;
        });
    }
    
  3. Ensure your Nginx is correctly forwarding headers (X-Forwarded-Proto) so that ABP/OpenIddict can detect the original HTTPS scheme.

Note: The Authority should still be set to your public HTTPS URL (https://auth.mysite.it). Disabling the HTTPS requirement only affects backend validation, not the public endpoints.

Reference Implementation: https://abp.io/docs/latest/solution-templates/layered-web-application/deployment/openiddict-deployment

Summary:

  • Set "RequireHttpsMetadata": "false" in your config.
  • Add the DisableTransportSecurityRequirement code in your AuthServer.
  • Make sure Nginx forwards the correct headers.

This will allow your OpenIddict endpoints (like /.well-known/jwks) to be accessible behind a reverse proxy using HTTPS, even though your backend listens on HTTP.

Sources:

  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/solution-templates/layered-web-application/deployment/openiddict-deployment

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

To deactivate the automatic creation of LDAP users in ABP (Account Pro module), you need to override the default behavior of the LDAP external login provider. By default, ABP will attempt to create a new user if one does not exist when authenticating via LDAP. Since you want to handle user creation yourself and prevent ABP from creating users automatically, you should override the relevant service and suppress the user creation logic.

Here’s how you can achieve this:

  1. Override the LdapExternalLoginProvider
    Create a custom class that inherits from LdapExternalLoginProvider and override the CreateUserIfNotExistsAsync method to prevent user creation.

    using Volo.Abp.Identity.Pro.Ldap;
    using Volo.Abp.Identity.ExternalLoginProviders;
    using System.Threading.Tasks;
    
    public class MyLdapExternalLoginProvider : LdapExternalLoginProvider
    {
        public MyLdapExternalLoginProvider(
            // inject required dependencies
        ) : base(
            // pass dependencies to base
        )
        {
        }
    
        protected override Task<ExternalLoginUserInfo> CreateUserIfNotExistsAsync(
            string userName, 
            string providerName, 
            ExternalLoginUserInfo externalUser)
        {
            // Prevent automatic user creation
            // Optionally, throw a custom exception or return null
            return Task.FromResult<ExternalLoginUserInfo>(null);
        }
    }
    
  2. Register Your Custom Provider
    In your module’s ConfigureServices method, replace the default service with your custom implementation:

    context.Services.Replace(
        ServiceDescriptor.Transient<LdapExternalLoginProvider, MyLdapExternalLoginProvider>()
    );
    
  3. Handle User Creation Manually
    You can now create users manually in your own logic (e.g., in TryAuthenticateAsync). Since the overridden method returns null, ABP will not attempt to create the user again, and you will avoid the duplicate user creation error.

  4. Error Handling
    If you want to provide a user-friendly error when a user does not exist, you can throw a UserFriendlyException in your override.

Note: The actual class and method names may vary depending on your ABP version. The key is to override the method responsible for user creation and ensure it does not create users automatically.

Sources:


This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

To add space between the Search and Filter buttons in the Tenants page, you can use custom CSS. This is a common UI adjustment and can be achieved by adding a margin to the button elements. For example, you can add the following CSS to your global styles (e.g., global-styles.css):

/* Add space between search and filter buttons */
.tenant-search-form .btn + .btn {
    margin-left: 0.5rem;
}

If your buttons are not wrapped in a specific class, you can target them more generally or add a custom class to the button group for more precise control.

After adding the CSS, the buttons will have the desired spacing between them.

Sources:


This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

To set up CI/CD with GitHub Actions for deploying your ABP-based Web and public.web apps to Azure App Services, and to resolve the package restore errors you encountered, follow these steps:

  1. Ensure Your NuGet Sources Are Correct
  • ABP Commercial packages (like Volo.Abp.Identity.Pro.HttpApi, Volo.Saas.Domain, etc.) are not available on nuget.org. You must add your ABP Commercial NuGet source (https://nuget.abp.io/...) with your license key in your NuGet.config.
  • Example NuGet.config:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
    <configuration>
      <packageSources>
        <add key="nuget.org" value="https://api.nuget.org/v3/index.json" />
        <add key="abp-commercial" value="https://nuget.abp.io/[YOUR_ORG_ID]/v3/index.json" />
      </packageSources>
      <packageSourceCredentials>
        <abp-commercial>
          <add key="Username" value="your-email@example.com" />
          <add key="ClearTextPassword" value="[YOUR_ABP_LICENSE_KEY]" />
        </abp-commercial>
      </packageSourceCredentials>
    </configuration>
    
  • Make sure this file is present in your repository root and referenced in your GitHub Actions workflow.
  1. Remove Duplicate PackageReferences
  • Edit your .csproj files to remove any duplicate <PackageReference> entries, especially for Volo.Saas.Domain.
  1. Example GitHub Actions Workflow for ABP + Azure App Service
  • Place this in .github/workflows/azure-webapp.yml:
    name: Build and deploy ASP.Net Core app to Azure Web App
    
    on:
      push:
        branches:
          - main
      workflow_dispatch:
    
    jobs:
      build:
        runs-on: ubuntu-latest
        steps:
          - uses: actions/checkout@v4
    
          - name: Setup .NET
            uses: actions/setup-dotnet@v4
            with:
              dotnet-version: '9.x'
              include-prerelease: true
    
          - name: Restore dependencies
            run: dotnet restore src/Tapp.Web/Tapp.Web.csproj --configfile NuGet.config
    
          - name: Build
            run: dotnet build src/Tapp.Web/Tapp.Web.csproj --configuration Release --no-restore
    
          - name: Publish
            run: dotnet publish src/Tapp.Web/Tapp.Web.csproj --configuration Release --output ./publish --no-build
    
          - name: Upload artifact
            uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
            with:
              name: webapp
              path: ./publish
    
      deploy:
        runs-on: ubuntu-latest
        needs: build
        steps:
          - name: Download artifact
            uses: actions/download-artifact@v4
            with:
              name: webapp
              path: ./publish
    
          - name: Deploy to Azure Web App
            uses: azure/webapps-deploy@v3
            with:
              app-name: '<YOUR_AZURE_APP_NAME>'
              publish-profile: ${{ secrets.AZUREAPPSERVICE_PUBLISHPROFILE }}
              package: ./publish
    
  • Store your Azure publish profile as a GitHub secret named AZUREAPPSERVICE_PUBLISHPROFILE.
  1. Troubleshooting
  • If you see errors like "Unable to find package ...", double-check your NuGet.config and ensure your ABP Commercial source and credentials are correct.
  • For duplicate package warnings, clean up your .csproj files.
  1. Reference
  • Full step-by-step guide:
    • https://abp.io/docs/latest/solution-templates/layered-web-application/deployment/azure-deployment/step3-deployment-github-action

This setup will enable automated CI/CD for your ABP Web apps with proper package restore and deployment to Azure App Service.

Sources:

  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/solution-templates/layered-web-application/deployment/azure-deployment/step3-deployment-github-action

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • In ABP applications, when running in the Development environment, detailed error messages (such as 401 Unauthorized) are shown by default. However, in the Production environment, ABP hides detailed error information and returns a generic 500 Internal Server Error for unhandled exceptions or unauthorized access, to avoid leaking sensitive information.

  • This behavior is by design for security reasons. If you want to return proper status codes (like 401) in Production, ensure that your exception handling and authentication middleware are configured correctly, and that you are not catching and re-throwing exceptions as generic errors.

  • Also, make sure your application is not exposing detailed errors in Production, as this is a security risk. The 500 error is a safe default.

  • For more details, see the official ABP documentation:


This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

To achieve a shared user and tenant base across multiple ABP microservice applications (such as CRM and ERP), while keeping permissions, localization, and audit logs separate per application, you should:

  1. Upgrade all your services and modules to the same ABP version (e.g., 9.1.3). This is required for compatibility, especially for shared modules like Identity and Saas.

  2. Use a shared Identity and Tenant Management service:

    • Both CRM and ERP applications should use the same Identity and Saas microservices for authentication and tenant resolution.
    • This ensures users and tenants are managed centrally and are accessible from both applications.
  3. Isolate permissions, localization, and audit logs:

    • Each application (CRM, ERP) can define its own permissions, roles, and policies. ABP's permission system is modular and supports per-application configuration.
    • Localization resources can be separated by module or application, so each app can have its own translations.
    • Audit logging is also modular; each service can log its own actions independently.
  4. UI and API separation:

    • Each application can have its own UI and API, with separate permission sets and features, but still rely on the central Identity and Tenant Management.
  5. Multi-tenancy:

    • ABP's multi-tenancy system ensures that all data is tenant-scoped, and users are associated with tenants, regardless of which application they use.

This architecture is fully supported by ABP. You only need to ensure all services use the same Identity and Saas backends, and that all modules are upgraded to the same ABP version.

Sources:


This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

Showing 591 to 600 of 717 entries
Boost Your Development
ABP Live Training
Packages
See Trainings
Mastering ABP Framework Book
The Official Guide
Mastering
ABP Framework
Learn More
Mastering ABP Framework Book
Made with ❤️ on ABP v10.1.0-preview. Updated on December 16, 2025, 09:09
1
ABP Assistant
🔐 You need to be logged in to use the chatbot. Please log in first.