Activities of "AI-Bot"

1. Solution

There is no built‑in “auto‑provision DB + user + connection string + then run migrations” pipeline in ABP. The default MyAppTenantDatabaseMigrationHandler assumes the tenant’s connection string is already set before the TenantCreatedEto is published. In your flow it is not, so the handler behaves as designed and skips migrations.

You basically have two safe options:

Option A – Move provisioning + migrations into the tenant creation flow (recommended)

Instead of relying on TenantCreatedEto for this scenario, override the tenant creation application service so that:

1. Tenant is created (host DB).
2. DB/user is provisioned.
3. Tenant connection string is updated and committed.
4. Migrations are executed for that tenant.

The key point is to separate the “create tenant” transaction from the “provision + migrate” transaction so that the migration step sees a committed connection string.

A minimal outline:

public class MyTenantAppService : SaasTenantAppService
{
    private readonly ITenantRepository _tenantRepository;
    private readonly ICurrentTenant _currentTenant;
    private readonly IUnitOfWorkManager _unitOfWorkManager;
    private readonly IEnumerable<IMyAppDbSchemaMigrator> _dbSchemaMigrators;
    private readonly ITenantDatabaseProvisioner _provisioner;

    public MyTenantAppService(
        ITenantRepository tenantRepository,
        ICurrentTenant currentTenant,
        IUnitOfWorkManager unitOfWorkManager,
        IEnumerable<IMyAppDbSchemaMigrator> dbSchemaMigrators,
        ITenantDatabaseProvisioner provisioner,
        // ... base deps
        ) : base(/* ... */)
    {
        _tenantRepository = tenantRepository;
        _currentTenant = currentTenant;
        _unitOfWorkManager = unitOfWorkManager;
        _dbSchemaMigrators = dbSchemaMigrators;
        _provisioner = provisioner;
    }

    public override async Task<SaasTenantDto> CreateAsync(SaasTenantCreateDto input)
    {
        // 1. Create tenant in host DB
        var tenantDto = await base.CreateAsync(input);

        // 2. Provision DB/user + build connection string
        var tenantConnectionString =
            await _provisioner.ProvisionAsync(tenantDto.Id, /* host conn info, etc. */);

        // 3. Persist connection string in a SEPARATE UoW and commit
        using (var uow = _unitOfWorkManager.Begin(requiresNew: true))
        {
            var tenant = await _tenantRepository.GetAsync(tenantDto.Id);
            tenant.SetDefaultConnectionString(tenantConnectionString);
            await _tenantRepository.UpdateAsync(tenant, autoSave: true);
            await uow.CompleteAsync();
        }

        // 4. Run migrations for the tenant in its own UoW
        await MigrateAndSeedForTenantAsync(tenantDto.Id);

        return tenantDto;
    }

    private async Task MigrateAndSeedForTenantAsync(Guid tenantId)
    {
        using (_currentTenant.Change(tenantId))
        {
            using (var uow = _unitOfWorkManager.Begin(requiresNew: true, isTransactional: false))
            {
                foreach (var migrator in _dbSchemaMigrators)
                {
                    await migrator.MigrateAsync();
                }

                await uow.CompleteAsync();
            }

            // seed data here if needed, again with ICurrentTenant.Change in effect
        }
    }
}

Then disable/remove the default MyAppTenantDatabaseMigrationHandler (either don’t register it or replace it with an empty implementation), because you’re now explicitly handling migrations after connection string setup.

This avoids the race you are seeing: when migrations run, the tenant row (with connection string) is already committed and visible.

Option B – Publish a custom event after setting the connection string

If you strongly prefer an event‑driven approach:

1. Keep your local handler as is but end the UoW after you update the tenant (or explicitly create a requiresNew: true UoW when updating the tenant and complete it).
2. After the tenant connection string is successfully committed, publish a custom event (e.g. TenantDatabaseProvisionedEto).
3. Subscribe to TenantDatabaseProvisionedEto with a handler that:
   • uses _currentTenant.Change(tenantId)
   • starts its own requiresNew: true UoW
   • executes the migrators.

Pseudocode in the provisioner:

// still inside the original tenant-created flow, but now we commit the connection string
using (var uow = _unitOfWorkManager.Begin(requiresNew: true))
{
    var tenant = await _tenantRepository.GetAsync(tenantId);
    tenant.SetDefaultConnectionString(tenantConnectionString);
    await _tenantRepository.UpdateAsync(tenant, autoSave: true);
    await uow.CompleteAsync();
}

// After commit, publish custom event
await _distributedEventBus.PublishAsync(
    new TenantDatabaseProvisionedEto { TenantId = tenantId });

Handler:

public class TenantDatabaseProvisionedHandler 
    : IDistributedEventHandler<TenantDatabaseProvisionedEto>, ITransientDependency
{
    private readonly ICurrentTenant _currentTenant;
    private readonly IUnitOfWorkManager _unitOfWorkManager;
    private readonly IEnumerable<IMyAppDbSchemaMigrator> _dbSchemaMigrators;

    public async Task HandleEventAsync(TenantDatabaseProvisionedEto eventData)
    {
        using (_currentTenant.Change(eventData.TenantId))
        using (var uow = _unitOfWorkManager.Begin(requiresNew: true, isTransactional: false))
        {
            foreach (var migrator in _dbSchemaMigrators)
            {
                await migrator.MigrateAsync();
            }

            await uow.CompleteAsync();
        }
    }
}

Because the connection string is already committed when this event is handled, _tenantStore.FindAsync / the connection resolver will see it correctly.

2. Sources

• Changing current tenant context for migrations/seeding:
  https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/architecture/multi-tenancy#change-the-current-tenant
• Example of handling tenant‑specific migrations & seeding via a custom TenantDatabaseMigrationHandler:
  https://abp.io/support/questions/8896

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

1. You can get the LeptonX 4.2.1 source code only from your ABP/LeptonX license area

   • The LeptonX theme source is not published as a public GitHub repo; it’s downloaded according to your license.
   • Follow these steps:
     1. Sign in to your account on abp.io with the user that owns the LeptonX (or ABP Commercial) license.
     2. Go to your License / Products section.
     3. Find LeptonX Theme (or the ABP Commercial package that includes it).
     4. In the LeptonX page, there will be a “Source Code” (or similarly named) download for the MVC UI and the specific version (e.g. 4.2.x).
     5. Download the MVC source package that matches your ABP/LeptonX version (4.2.1).

   The official documentation describes this in the “Source-Code” section for LeptonX MVC UI.

2. How this helps with customizing the side menu layout

   • Once you download and extract the LeptonX MVC source package:
     • You will see the theme project (typically a Razor Class Library) that contains:
       • Layout views (e.g. _Layout.cshtml, side menu partials, etc.).
       • The partials and tag helpers used to render the side menu and modules.
     • You can inspect the existing side menu layout partial to see:
       • How the menu is built from IMenuManager / ApplicationMenu.
       • How sections/partials are injected (where to plug your custom partial module).

   A common approach is:

   • Copy the relevant LeptonX layout/partial into your own MVC project (keeping folder structure under Views/Shared or Themes/LeptonX/… compatible with ABP’s view lookup rules).
   • Adjust it to render your custom partial where you need it in the side menu.
   • Ensure your MVC project uses your overridden layout/partial (ABP will pick your view first if the path & name match the theme’s one).

Sources

• LeptonX MVC UI docs (see “Source-Code” section):
  https://abp.io/docs/latest/ui-themes/lepton-x/mvc

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

1. Solution

• There is currently no official MCP (Model Context Protocol) / tool-calling server that exposes ABP documentation for external or local AI agents.

• ABP’s own AI-related features today are:

  • AI Infrastructure (workspaces): a unified way to use Microsoft.Extensions.AI (IChatClient) and Semantic Kernel (Kernel) inside your ABP apps.
  • AI Management Module (Pro): a UI + API module to configure AI workspaces dynamically, switch providers (OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Ollama, etc.), and use prebuilt chat widgets.

• In the AI Management Module roadmap, “MCP Support” is explicitly listed as a future goal, not something available now. That means:

  • There is no ready-made ABP MCP server for ABP docs at the moment.
  • MCP-based integration with ABP is planned but not yet released.

• If you want a local AI agent to “query ABP docs” today, you have to build it yourself by:

  1. Downloading or mirroring ABP docs you need.
  2. Indexing them with your own RAG/embedding pipeline.
  3. Exposing that via your own MCP server/tool schema.
  4. (Optional, inside an ABP app) using the AI Infrastructure / AI Management module to talk to your LLM and integrate the results into your UI or workflows.

There is no officially supported, public ABP-hosted MCP endpoint that ships ABP documentation as a tool.

2. Sources

• AI infrastructure overview (workspaces, IChatClient, Semantic Kernel):
  https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/infrastructure/artificial-intelligence
• AI Management Module (features, roadmap with “MCP Support” listed under Future Goals):
  https://abp.io/docs/latest/modules/ai-management

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

1. Check the new 2FA behavior settings (v10 change)

In ABP 10.0, the Identity 2FA behavior directly controls whether the user‑side 2FA UI (including the “Two Factor” tab on the account/manage page) is shown. If 2FA is Forced or Disabled, or users are not allowed to change it, the 2FA options are hidden everywhere.

Do this for both Host and the relevant tenant:

a) Host‑level SettingManagement

1. Login as a host admin.

2. Navigate to:

   https://<host>/SettingManagement

3. Go to the Account tab.

4. Find the Two factor authentication section and make sure:

   • Behavior is set to Optional
     (NOT “Forced” and NOT “Disabled”)
   • Allow users to change their Two Factor is checked.

   Per docs, if you set behavior to Forced or Disabled,
   2FA UI elements are hidden from users:

   “if we set the two-factor authentication behavior to force or disable, this feature will be hidden from users wherever the 2FA setting is shown.”

5. Save the settings.

b) Tenant‑level features / settings

The same behavior can also be overridden per tenant:

1. As host admin, go to:

   https://<host>/Saas/Host/Tenants

2. For the tenant you’re testing:

   • Click Actions → Features.
   • In the feature modal, ensure the 2FA behavior for that tenant is also Optional (or at least not forcing it off/on in a way that hides the UI).

3. Then, login as a tenant admin and verify under:

   https://<tenant-host-or-path>/SettingManagement → Account tab

   that tenant‑side Two factor authentication is also Optional and Allow users to change their Two Factor is enabled.

4. Verify user‑side prerequisites

Even when the tab is present, a user can only use 2FA if:

• 2FA is enabled for the user, and
• they have at least one confirmed provider (confirmed email / confirmed phone / authenticator app).

But for your symptom (“the two factor options on the user account page” not visible at all), the usual cause after upgrade is the host/tenant behavior being set to Forced/Disabled, which hides the tab.

3. Why this appeared after 8.0 → 10.0

The underlying account page is still MVC/Account.Pro (so your WASM → Web App change is not the root cause). ABP 10 tightened the visibility logic so that:

• When 2FA setting is Forced or Disabled, the user‑level 2FA UI (tabs/sections on /Account/Manage) is hidden.
• Only in Optional mode, and when “Allow users to change their Two Factor” is true, the user gets the 2FA tab.

So the fix is to set behavior back to Optional and allow users to change it, at host and tenant level.

Sources

• Two Factor Authentication behavior and visibility rules (ABP 10.0):
  https://abp.io/docs/10.0/modules/identity/two-factor-authentication
• Manage Profile Tabs (TwoFactor tab is one of the standard tabs):
  https://github.com/abpframework/abp/blob/HEAD/docs/en/framework/ui/angular/manage-profile-page-tabs.md

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

1. Solution

You do not need to create your own API just to use ExtraProperties on AbpUser (IdentityUser).

ABP already wires ExtraProperties into the existing Identity user endpoints:

• POST /api/identity/users → IdentityUserCreateDto
• PUT /api/identity/users/{id} → IdentityUserUpdateDto

Both DTOs inherit from ExtensibleObject, and in IdentityUserAppService they are mapped to the entity like this:

// Create
input.MapExtraPropertiesTo(user);

// Update
input.MapExtraPropertiesTo(user);

So the flow is:

1. Define the extra properties on IdentityUser (required!)

   In your *.Domain.Shared project, usually in YourProjectModuleExtensionConfigurator.ConfigureExtraProperties():

using System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations;
   using Volo.Abp.ObjectExtending;
   using Volo.Abp.Identity;

   public static class YourProjectModuleExtensionConfigurator
   {
       private static readonly OneTimeRunner OneTimeRunner = new OneTimeRunner();

       public static void Configure()
       {
           ConfigureExtraProperties();
       }

       private static void ConfigureExtraProperties()
       {
           OneTimeRunner.Run(() =>
           {
               ObjectExtensionManager.Instance
                   .Modules()
                   .ConfigureIdentity(identity =>
                   {
                       identity.ConfigureUser(user =>
                       {
                           user.AddOrUpdateProperty<string>(
                               "MyCustomCode",
                               options =>
                               {
                                   options.Attributes.Add(new RequiredAttribute());
                                   options.Attributes.Add(new StringLengthAttribute(64));
                               });
                       });
                   });
           });
       }
   }

Optionally, if you want a column instead of JSON-only storage, map it in your *.EntityFrameworkCore project (YourProjectEfCoreEntityExtensionMappings):

using Volo.Abp.Identity;
   using Volo.Abp.ObjectExtending;

   OneTimeRunner.Run(() =>
   {
       ObjectExtensionManager.Instance
           .MapEfCoreProperty<IdentityUser, string>(
               "MyCustomCode",
               (entityBuilder, propertyBuilder) =>
               {
                   propertyBuilder.HasMaxLength(64);
               });
   });

Then add a migration/update the DB.

2. Send values via existing Identity endpoints

   Once the module entity extension is configured, you can create/update users by sending extraProperties in the JSON body:

   Create:

POST /api/identity/users
   {
     "userName": "jdoe",
     "email": "jdoe@test.com",
     "password": "1q2w3E*",
     "name": "John",
     "surname": "Doe",
     "isActive": true,
     "lockoutEnabled": false,
     "roleNames": [],
     "extraProperties": {
       "MyCustomCode": "ABC-123"
     }
   }

Update:

PUT /api/identity/users/{id}
   {
     "userName": "jdoe",
     "email": "jdoe@test.com",
     "name": "John",
     "surname": "Doe",
     "isActive": true,
     "lockoutEnabled": false,
     "roleNames": [],
     "concurrencyStamp": "....",
     "extraProperties": {
       "MyCustomCode": "XYZ-999"
     }
   }

Even if Swagger shows extraProperties on the output DTO as read-only, the input DTOs still accept it and MapExtraPropertiesTo applies those values to the IdentityUser.ExtraProperties dictionary.

3. Using ExtraProperties in code (optional)

   From domain/application code you can also work directly with the entity’s extra properties:

using Volo.Abp.Identity;
   using Volo.Abp.ObjectExtending;

   public class MyUserService : ITransientDependency
   {
       private readonly IRepository<IdentityUser, Guid> _userRepository;

       public MyUserService(IRepository<IdentityUser, Guid> userRepository)
       {
           _userRepository = userRepository;
       }

       public async Task SetMyCustomCodeAsync(Guid userId, string code)
       {
           var user = await _userRepository.GetAsync(userId);
           user.SetProperty("MyCustomCode", code);
           await _userRepository.UpdateAsync(user);
       }

       public async Task<string> GetMyCustomCodeAsync(Guid userId)
       {
           var user = await _userRepository.GetAsync(userId);
           return user.GetProperty<string>("MyCustomCode");
       }
   }

Answer to your concrete question

does it mean at the moment there is no way to add/update these ExtraProperties on the AbpUser and I have to define my own Api to add/update values for this?

No.
Once you configure module entity extensions for IdentityUser, you can add/update ExtraProperties using the existing /api/identity/users POST/PUT endpoints. A custom API is only needed if you want totally customized behavior, not for basic ExtraProperties support.

2. Sources

• Object extensions for entities and DTOs
  https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/fundamentals/object-extensions
• Extending existing module entities (e.g., IdentityUser)
  https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/architecture/modularity/extending/customizing-application-modules-extending-entities

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

1. Solution

You are correct for projects created with the latest ABP Studio: the generated Angular UI is now standalone-based (no AppModule, no feature NgModules), while the BookStore Angular tutorial you linked is still NgModule-based. So the tutorial is conceptually valid, but structurally outdated for the new template.

To use the tutorial with your standalone Angular app, treat all “module” steps as feature + route steps, and translate them as follows:

1. Creating the “Books” feature

Tutorial says (example):

yarn ng generate module book --module app --routing --route books

For a standalone Angular ABP app, instead:

yarn ng generate component books/book-list --standalone --flat=false

This will create something like:

// src/app/books/book-list/book-list.component.ts
@Component({
  standalone: true,
  selector: 'app-book-list',
  templateUrl: './book-list.component.html',
  styleUrls: ['./book-list.component.scss'],
  imports: [
    CommonModule,
    // other Angular/ABP imports you need
  ],
})
export class BookListComponent { /* ... */ }

You do not create a BookModule or BookRoutingModule.

2. Registering the route

In the tutorial, you would add the route into a feature routing module (e.g., book-routing.module.ts) and import that into AppModule.

In the standalone app, you instead add a route to your top-level routes configuration, typically app.routes.ts (or similar):

// src/app/app.routes.ts (or wherever your main routes are defined)
import { Routes } from '@angular/router';
import { BookListComponent } from './books/book-list/book-list.component';

export const routes: Routes = [
  // existing routes...

  {
    path: 'books',
    component: BookListComponent,
  },
];

Your main.ts should already use bootstrapApplication with provideRouter(routes), so you only need to modify the routes array.

3. Where the tutorial says “import the module”

Anywhere the tutorial says things like:

Add BookModule to the imports of AppModule.

In the standalone structure, the equivalent is:

• Ensure the route is configured (as above).
• Ensure any shared functionality that used to be in SharedModule is:
  • either imported directly into the standalone component via its imports: [...] array, or
  • provided globally in your bootstrapApplication call (e.g. via importProvidersFrom(...) in main.ts).

Example (if you have a shared ABP Angular module):

// main.ts
bootstrapApplication(AppComponent, {
  providers: [
    provideRouter(routes),
    importProvidersFrom(AbpCoreModule, ThemeSharedModule /* etc. */),
  ],
});

Then your feature components can use those services/directives without NgModules.

4. Backend and ABP-specific parts

All backend-related parts of the BookStore tutorial (EF Core, application services, DTOs, permissions, etc.) are still correct and can be followed exactly:

• Create the Book, Author entities, DbContext mappings.
• Create application services and DTOs.
• Expose them via controllers.
• Consume them in Angular via the generated proxies (ng generate proxy or existing @proxy usage).

On the Angular side, only adapt:

• “Create module” → “Create standalone component(s) in a feature folder”.
• “Add module to imports” → “Add route + import shared providers at bootstrap level or in component imports”.

2. Sources

• Verified tutorial (structure still module-based as you observed):
  https://abp.io/docs/latest/tutorials/book-store/part-02?UI=NG&DB=EF

• Angular UI overview (general ABP Angular info; not yet reflecting every standalone detail):
  https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/ui/angular/overview

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

1. Solution

• The Angular Book Store tutorial you referenced is aligned with the current ABP Angular UI template (ABP v10), which is still NgModule-based, even though Angular itself now recommends standalone APIs for new apps.
• That yarn ng generate module book --module app --routing --route books command and the module-based structure in the tutorial are therefore intentional and still correct for projects generated by ABP today.

So, for an ABP v10 Angular project:

• It is expected that:
  • You have AppModule, SharedModule, feature modules (like BookModule, AuthorModule, etc.).
  • You add new features using ng generate module ... and register routes in the generated routing modules.
• The tutorial matches this structure and you should follow it as-is if you are using the standard ABP Angular template.

If you specifically want to adopt standalone components in your ABP Angular application:

• You can manually refactor the generated Angular app to standalone style, but:
  • This is not yet the default or documented pattern in ABP’s official Angular tutorials.
  • You’ll need to adapt the tutorial steps (routing, declarations, imports) yourself to match a standalone architecture.

The docs and samples currently still reflect NgModule usage and are not yet updated to a fully standalone-first style; they are focused on matching the generated template rather than the latest Angular style guidance.

2. Sources

• Verified Book Store Angular tutorial:
  https://abp.io/docs/latest/tutorials/book-store/part-02?UI=NG&DB=EF
• ABP Angular UI overview (shows current module-based structure):
  https://abp.io/docs/latest/ui/angular/overview

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

1. Solution

All the packages in your error log are commercial (Pro) packages:

• Volo.Abp.Account.Pro.*
• Volo.Abp.Identity.Pro.*
• Volo.Abp.OpenIddict.Pro.*
• Volo.FileManagement.*
• Volo.Chat.*
• LeptonX theme packages, etc.

They are downloaded from a private NuGet feed:

https://nuget.abp.io/xxxx/v3/index.json

403 (Forbidden) means:

• Either your license / trial doesn’t include commercial NuGet access (for example, you only have an online demo of the product, not a trial license bound to your account), or
• Your commercial NuGet key is not valid anymore (expired, revoked, or not correctly associated with your current ABP account).

So:

A) If you only requested an online demo

An online demo (just to see the product in the browser) does not give you access to commercial NuGet packages.
In that case:

• You cannot restore/build a Pro solution locally, because those packages require a valid commercial/trial license.
• To try ABP locally without commercial packages, create a solution without Pro template:

abp new MyProject -u blazor
# or mvc / angular / etc., but WITHOUT "-t app-pro"

This uses only free, open-source packages from nuget.org, so NuGet restore will work on any machine.

B) If you believe you have a valid trial/commercial license

Then a 403 usually means a license / feed problem on the server side, not your .NET installation. In that case:

1. Ensure you are logged in to the ABP CLI with the same account that owns the license:

abp logout
   abp login

2. Make sure your NuGet source URL in NuGet.Config matches the one shown in your ABP account (the GUID part must match).
3. If it still returns 403, this must be fixed from the ABP side (license / feed configuration).

For all license and commercial NuGet access issues, please contact the ABP team directly:

• https://abp.io/contact

Explain that:

• You get 403 Forbidden from nuget.abp.io for packages like Volo.Abp.Account.Pro.Admin.HttpApi 10.0.1.
• Mention whether you have only a demo request, or an actual trial / commercial license.

They can verify your license and NuGet feed and enable/fix access if appropriate.

2. Sources

• Commercial / licensing & NuGet access support:
  • https://abp.io/contact

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

1. Solution

ABP Studio’s HTTP client traces (like the POST http://localhost:38271/IStudioHub/Connect) come from the ABP Studio client integration, not from your own SignalR hub. You don’t need to remove the module; you can simply disable the link in non‑development environments.

Do this in your HttpApi.Host (or main web host) project.

A. Disable Studio link via configuration (recommended for prod)

In appsettings.Production.json (or any non‑dev environment config for your host):

{
  "AbpStudioClient": {
    "IsLinkEnabled": false,
    "StudioUrl": "http://localhost:38271"
  }
}

Key behavior:

• IsLinkEnabled = false → the application does not attempt to connect to IStudioHub/Connect, so no more connection attempts / noise / conflicts in production.
• You can keep IsLinkEnabled = true in appsettings.Development.json for local development.

Example appsettings.Development.json:

{
  "AbpStudioClient": {
    "IsLinkEnabled": true,
    "StudioUrl": "http://localhost:38271"
  }
}

ABP automatically binds this section to AbpStudioClientOptions, so no extra code is required.

B. (Optional) Disable via code instead (per environment)

If you prefer code-based control, you can configure options in your HttpApi.Host module:

using Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting;
using Volo.Abp.Modularity;
using Volo.Abp.Studio.Client;
using Volo.Abp;

[DependsOn(
    // other modules...
    typeof(AbpStudioClientAspNetCoreModule) // if you are using the Studio client package
)]
public class EduverseHttpApiHostModule : AbpModule
{
    public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
    {
        var env = context.Services.GetHostingEnvironment();

        Configure<AbpStudioClientOptions>(options =>
        {
            // Disable for non-development
            options.IsLinkEnabled = env.IsDevelopment();
            // options.StudioUrl = "http://localhost:38271"; // optional
        });
    }
}

This way:

• Local development (ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT=Development) → ABP Studio link enabled.
• Any other env (Staging, Production, etc.) → ABP Studio link disabled.

You can then safely restore app.UseAbpStudioLink(); without affecting production, because the middleware will see IsLinkEnabled = false and won’t attempt to connect.

2. Sources

• ABP Studio telemetry / client configuration (AbpStudioClientOptions, IsLinkEnabled, StudioUrl):
  https://github.com/abpframework/abp/blob/HEAD/docs/en/studio/monitoring-applications.md
• Environment-based configuration of AbpStudioClient__IsLinkEnabled and AbpStudioClient__StudioUrl in microservice templates:
  https://github.com/abpframework/abp/blob/HEAD/docs/en/solution-templates/microservice/adding-new-api-gateways.md

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

1. Solution

For ABP Studio 1.1.2 on macOS (Intel), you can use this download URL:

• macOS (Intel) installer:
  https://abp.io/api/abp-studio/download/r/osx/abp-studio-1.1.2-stable-full.nupkg

Download that package and install ABP Studio from it; this version maps to ABP 9.2.3, so new solutions you generate will target ABP 9.2.3 / .NET 9, matching your existing microservice stack.

2. Sources

• ABP Studio–ABP version mapping table:
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/studio/version-mapping

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.