To deactivate the automatic creation of LDAP users in ABP (Account Pro module), you need to override the default behavior of the LDAP external login provider. By default, ABP will attempt to create a new user if one does not exist when authenticating via LDAP. Since you want to handle user creation yourself and prevent ABP from creating users automatically, you should override the relevant service and suppress the user creation logic.
Here’s how you can achieve this:
Override the LdapExternalLoginProvider
Create a custom class that inherits from LdapExternalLoginProvider and override the CreateUserIfNotExistsAsync method to prevent user creation.
using Volo.Abp.Identity.Pro.Ldap;
using Volo.Abp.Identity.ExternalLoginProviders;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
public class MyLdapExternalLoginProvider : LdapExternalLoginProvider
{
public MyLdapExternalLoginProvider(
// inject required dependencies
) : base(
// pass dependencies to base
)
{
}
protected override Task<ExternalLoginUserInfo> CreateUserIfNotExistsAsync(
string userName,
string providerName,
ExternalLoginUserInfo externalUser)
{
// Prevent automatic user creation
// Optionally, throw a custom exception or return null
return Task.FromResult<ExternalLoginUserInfo>(null);
}
}
Register Your Custom Provider
In your module’s ConfigureServices method, replace the default service with your custom implementation:
context.Services.Replace(
ServiceDescriptor.Transient<LdapExternalLoginProvider, MyLdapExternalLoginProvider>()
);
Handle User Creation Manually
You can now create users manually in your own logic (e.g., in TryAuthenticateAsync). Since the overridden method returns null, ABP will not attempt to create the user again, and you will avoid the duplicate user creation error.
Error Handling
If you want to provide a user-friendly error when a user does not exist, you can throw a UserFriendlyException in your override.
Note: The actual class and method names may vary depending on your ABP version. The key is to override the method responsible for user creation and ensure it does not create users automatically.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To add space between the Search and Filter buttons in the Tenants page, you can use custom CSS. This is a common UI adjustment and can be achieved by adding a margin to the button elements. For example, you can add the following CSS to your global styles (e.g., global-styles.css):
/* Add space between search and filter buttons */
.tenant-search-form .btn + .btn {
margin-left: 0.5rem;
}
If your buttons are not wrapped in a specific class, you can target them more generally or add a custom class to the button group for more precise control.
After adding the CSS, the buttons will have the desired spacing between them.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To set up CI/CD with GitHub Actions for deploying your ABP-based Web and public.web apps to Azure App Services, and to resolve the package restore errors you encountered, follow these steps:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration>
<packageSources>
<add key="nuget.org" value="https://api.nuget.org/v3/index.json" />
<add key="abp-commercial" value="https://nuget.abp.io/[YOUR_ORG_ID]/v3/index.json" />
</packageSources>
<packageSourceCredentials>
<abp-commercial>
<add key="Username" value="your-email@example.com" />
<add key="ClearTextPassword" value="[YOUR_ABP_LICENSE_KEY]" />
</abp-commercial>
</packageSourceCredentials>
</configuration>
<PackageReference> entries, especially for Volo.Saas.Domain..github/workflows/azure-webapp.yml:
name: Build and deploy ASP.Net Core app to Azure Web App
on:
push:
branches:
- main
workflow_dispatch:
jobs:
build:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Setup .NET
uses: actions/setup-dotnet@v4
with:
dotnet-version: '9.x'
include-prerelease: true
- name: Restore dependencies
run: dotnet restore src/Tapp.Web/Tapp.Web.csproj --configfile NuGet.config
- name: Build
run: dotnet build src/Tapp.Web/Tapp.Web.csproj --configuration Release --no-restore
- name: Publish
run: dotnet publish src/Tapp.Web/Tapp.Web.csproj --configuration Release --output ./publish --no-build
- name: Upload artifact
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
with:
name: webapp
path: ./publish
deploy:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
needs: build
steps:
- name: Download artifact
uses: actions/download-artifact@v4
with:
name: webapp
path: ./publish
- name: Deploy to Azure Web App
uses: azure/webapps-deploy@v3
with:
app-name: '<YOUR_AZURE_APP_NAME>'
publish-profile: ${{ secrets.AZUREAPPSERVICE_PUBLISHPROFILE }}
package: ./publish
AZUREAPPSERVICE_PUBLISHPROFILE.This setup will enable automated CI/CD for your ABP Web apps with proper package restore and deployment to Azure App Service.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
In ABP applications, when running in the Development environment, detailed error messages (such as 401 Unauthorized) are shown by default. However, in the Production environment, ABP hides detailed error information and returns a generic 500 Internal Server Error for unhandled exceptions or unauthorized access, to avoid leaking sensitive information.
This behavior is by design for security reasons. If you want to return proper status codes (like 401) in Production, ensure that your exception handling and authentication middleware are configured correctly, and that you are not catching and re-throwing exceptions as generic errors.
Also, make sure your application is not exposing detailed errors in Production, as this is a security risk. The 500 error is a safe default.
For more details, see the official ABP documentation:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To achieve a shared user and tenant base across multiple ABP microservice applications (such as CRM and ERP), while keeping permissions, localization, and audit logs separate per application, you should:
Upgrade all your services and modules to the same ABP version (e.g., 9.1.3). This is required for compatibility, especially for shared modules like Identity and Saas.
Use a shared Identity and Tenant Management service:
Isolate permissions, localization, and audit logs:
UI and API separation:
Multi-tenancy:
This architecture is fully supported by ABP. You only need to ensure all services use the same Identity and Saas backends, and that all modules are upgraded to the same ABP version.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
When using a separated AuthServer and Blazor UI in ABP, the most common cause for the login state not being preserved after redirection is a misconfiguration in the OpenIddict certificate, client settings, or cookie/token handling between the two applications.
Based on verified ABP support cases, here are the key points to check and resolve:
Ensure the OpenIddict signing certificate (e.g., openiddict.pfx) and its passphrase are identical and correctly configured in both the AuthServer and the Backend API. A mismatch or missing certificate will prevent token validation, causing the UI to not recognize the login state.
Double-check the client configuration in your AuthServer. The redirect_uri and post_logout_redirect_uri for your Blazor WebApp must exactly match the URLs used by your UI application.
If you cloned or deployed the solution, make sure the openiddict.pfx file is present in both projects and not ignored by source control or missing on the server.
If you see errors like SecurityTokenSignatureKeyNotFoundException or IDX10503 in logs, it indicates a certificate/key mismatch.
For local development, ensure both applications use the same domain or set up proper CORS and SameSite cookie policies.
If you are using HTTPS, ensure your certificates are trusted and valid for both domains.
Example fix (from verified ABP support):
Sources (validated):
This approach is confirmed by ABP support and documentation for separated AuthServer scenarios.
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To resolve the "System.Security.Cryptography.CryptographicException: Keyset does not exist" error when deploying an ABP-based API to Azure App Service, you need to ensure that the certificate is loaded in a way compatible with Azure's environment and permissions.
Solution Steps:
Upload the Certificate to Azure App Service:
.pfx certificate here.Configure Azure to Load the Certificate:
WEBSITE_LOAD_CERTIFICATES application setting to * (or the thumbprint of your certificate) in the App Service's "Configuration" > "Application settings".Load the Certificate from the Azure Certificate Store:
using System.Security.Cryptography.X509Certificates;
var store = new X509Store(StoreName.My, StoreLocation.CurrentUser);
store.Open(OpenFlags.ReadOnly);
var certs = store.Certificates
.Find(X509FindType.FindByThumbprint, "<YOUR_CERT_THUMBPRINT>", false);
if (certs.Count == 0)
throw new Exception("Certificate not found in store.");
var cert = certs[0];
<YOUR_CERT_THUMBPRINT> with your certificate's thumbprint.Use the Certificate in OpenIddict:
options.AddSigningCertificate(cert);
Important Notes:
X509KeyStorageFlags.MachineKeySet or file-based loading in Azure App Service, as the app may not have the required permissions.References:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To resolve the System.ArgumentOutOfRangeException from the AbpApplicationConfigurationScript endpoint after upgrading to ABP 9.2.1, follow these steps:
Check for Static Asset Middleware Changes
Startup.cs or program setup, replace:
app.UseStaticFiles();
with:
app.MapAbpStaticAssets();
Review the Migration Guide
Clear and Rebuild Static Assets
wwwroot or equivalent static assets output directory and rebuild your solution to ensure all assets are up to date.Check File System and Permissions
Review Application Configuration Script Endpoint
/Abp/ApplicationConfigurationScript endpoint provides configuration for SPA clients. If you have customizations or middleware affecting this endpoint, review them for compatibility with ABP 9.2.1.Compare Environments
Check for Known Issues
If the above steps do not resolve the issue, provide more details about custom middleware, deployment process, or any recent changes to static file handling.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
If you need to further customize or override module behavior, you can also use the extensibility and customization mechanisms provided by ABP, such as service replacement or module extension points.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
The Volo.Saas.Tenants.TenantManager.CreateAsync(string name, Nullable<Guid> editionId) method in ABP Commercial uses internal validation logic to ensure tenant names are valid and unique. The core of this validation is performed in the ValidateNameAsync method.
Here are the key validations performed by ValidateNameAsync:
BusinessException is thrown.TenantManager or repository, you may have additional custom rules (e.g., removing whitespace, regex checks).If any of these validations fail, a Volo.Abp.BusinessException is thrown, which is what you are seeing in your stack trace.
Example of a custom name validation (from community guidance):
public override async Task<Tenant> FindByNameAsync(string name, bool includeDetails = true, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default)
{
var tenants = await (await GetDbSetAsync())
.IncludeDetails(includeDetails)
.OrderBy(t => t.Id).ToListAsync();
return tenants
.FirstOrDefault(t => (t.Name == name || TestUrlNamingConvention(t.Name, name)));
}
private bool TestUrlNamingConvention(string tenantName, string inputName)
{
var i = string.Concat(inputName.Where(c => !char.IsWhiteSpace(c))).ToLowerInvariant();
var t = string.Concat(tenantName.Where(c => !char.IsWhiteSpace(c))).ToLowerInvariant();
return i == t;
}
This shows how you can extend or customize the validation logic.
Summary:
TenantManager or repository.Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.