The issue is caused by the Angular frontend being hosted at the root (client.StageDomain.com) and the API (HttpApi.Host) being hosted under a sub-path (client.StageDomain.com/api). ABP's ServiceProxyScript and other dynamic endpoints (like /Abp/ServiceProxyScript and /Abp/ApplicationConfigurationScript) are expected at the root of the API application, but when hosted under /api, the Angular app tries to load them from /Abp/ServiceProxyScript instead of /api/Abp/ServiceProxyScript.
This results in 404/500 errors and MIME type issues, as seen in your console logs, because the requests are routed incorrectly or the server returns an HTML error page instead of the expected JavaScript.
ABP's official documentation and templates assume that the API is either on a separate domain/subdomain or at the root of a site, not under a sub-path like /api. Hosting the API under a sub-path is not officially supported and leads to these issues.
To resolve this:
api.StageDomain.com) or at the root of a different site./api, but this is not recommended and not officially supported.For more details, see the official IIS deployment documentation:
In summary: Move your API to a root or subdomain, not a sub-path, for full ABP functionality.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
ABP Suite currently allows you to edit and customize code generation templates through the "Edit Templates" feature. These templates are embedded resources managed by the Volo.Abp.Commercial.SuiteTemplates package, and you can switch between UI and database provider templates as needed. However, there is no official community sharing area or "app store" for user-contributed templates at this time. Your suggestion aligns with common requests from the community, and it would be beneficial for collaborative template maintenance and sharing. You can follow updates on this feature in the official documentation and support channels.
Regarding your request for a template that uses a "filter" object (DTO) on the backend instead of multiple function-based filters: The current ABP Suite-generated code typically passes individual filter parameters to backend methods. Your approach—using a single filter DTO and AutoMapper for mapping—would indeed simplify maintenance and is a recognized best practice for complex filtering scenarios. While this is not the default behavior in ABP Suite, you can customize the templates to implement this pattern. If a community sharing platform for templates is introduced, it would make it easier to distribute and maintain such improvements collaboratively.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To integrate an OpenID Connect identity provider such as Okta or Auth0 for login in an ABP application, you can use the standard OpenIdConnect authentication middleware. ABP supports external authentication providers via OpenIdConnect, and the process is similar for any provider that implements the OpenID Connect protocol.
Here is a step-by-step guide:
Register Your Application with the Identity Provider
https://localhost:44300/signin-oidc).Configure appsettings.json Add a section for your OpenID Connect provider:
"OpenIdConnect": {
"Authority": "https://YOUR_PROVIDER_DOMAIN/",
"ClientId": "YOUR_CLIENT_ID",
"ClientSecret": "YOUR_CLIENT_SECRET",
"CallbackPath": "/signin-oidc"
}
Configure OpenIdConnect in ABP Module
In your HttpApi.Host (or .Web for MVC) project, update the authentication configuration:
public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
{
var configuration = context.Services.GetConfiguration();
context.Services.AddAuthentication()
.AddOpenIdConnect("Oidc", "OpenID Connect", options =>
{
options.Authority = configuration["OpenIdConnect:Authority"];
options.ClientId = configuration["OpenIdConnect:ClientId"];
options.ClientSecret = configuration["OpenIdConnect:ClientSecret"];
options.ResponseType = OpenIdConnectResponseType.CodeIdToken;
options.CallbackPath = configuration["OpenIdConnect:CallbackPath"];
options.RequireHttpsMetadata = true;
options.SaveTokens = true;
options.GetClaimsFromUserInfoEndpoint = true;
options.Scope.Add("email");
options.ClaimActions.MapJsonKey(System.Security.Claims.ClaimTypes.NameIdentifier, "sub");
});
}
Update Redirect URI in Provider Dashboard
CallbackPath and your application's base URL.Test the Integration
User Registration and Claims
email, sub).This approach works for any OpenID Connect-compliant provider, including Okta and Auth0. You only need to adjust the Authority, ClientId, and ClientSecret according to your provider's settings.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
In ABP MVC applications, throwing a UserFriendlyException should display a user-friendly dialog instead of the raw exception page. If you are seeing the raw exception after upgrading to .NET 9 or ABP Commercial Pro, it is likely due to a missing or misconfigured exception filter or middleware.
Ensure you have the AbpExceptionFilter enabled in your MVC pipeline. In your Startup.cs or module configuration, make sure you have:
services.AddAbpMvcExceptionHandling();
Also, check that you are not running in the Development environment, as the Developer Exception Page will override ABP's user-friendly dialog. In production, ABP's exception handling will show the dialog.
If you have custom error handling middleware or filters, ensure they do not interfere with ABP's exception handling.
For more details, see the official documentation:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To manage user access across multiple tenants without requiring re-login in ABP Framework, you can use the Linked Accounts feature. This allows users to link their accounts from different tenants and switch between them seamlessly without logging in again.
Here's how it works:
This feature is built-in and supported in ABP Framework's account module.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
The error message:
System.Exception: This assembly is protected by an unregistered version of Eziriz's ".NET Reactor"! This assembly won't further work.
indicates that one of the assemblies in your solution was built or obfuscated using an unregistered (trial) version of Eziriz's ".NET Reactor" tool. This is not related to ABP Framework or ABP Studio itself, but rather to a third-party or custom assembly in your solution.
How to resolve:
Identify the problematic assembly:
Abc.ProjectionService).Replace or rebuild the assembly:
Clean and restore packages:
dotnet clean
dotnet nuget locals all --clear
dotnet restore
Check your NuGet sources:
Remove any trial/protected DLLs:
This is not an ABP-specific issue, but a general .NET assembly protection/licensing problem.
Sources (validated):
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
Based on your description and the error logs, the issue is related to ABP Suite's handling of the solution configuration, specifically a NullReferenceException when accessing the MigrationsMigrationsDbContext property. This is likely caused by a missing or corrupted configuration in the ABP Suite's appsettings.json for your solution, which can happen if the configuration file is out of sync or incomplete on some developer machines.
Your workaround—manually updating the configuration in ABP Suite's appsettings.json with the correct paths and values—directly addresses this. This ensures that ABP Suite can properly locate all required projects and context files, preventing the null reference error.
Recommended Steps:
appsettings.json.appsettings.json and re-add it using the working configuration.For more details on configuring and troubleshooting ABP Suite solution settings, refer to the official documentation:
This approach aligns with ABP Suite's expected configuration management and should resolve the issue for all team members.
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
This issue is caused by a false positive from BitDefender, which incorrectly flags the ABP Suite executable as malware. This is a known problem with some antivirus solutions and .NET tools.
As a workaround, you can ask your system administrator to whitelist the ABP Suite installation directory or the specific file in BitDefender. Temporarily disabling BitDefender during installation is another option, but whitelisting is the recommended long-term solution.
ABP Suite is safe to use if downloaded from the official source. You can always reinstall it using the following command:
abp suite install
For detailed installation steps, refer to the official documentation.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To resolve the CrashLoopBackOff issue with the abp-wg-easy container when integrating ABP Studio with a remote Kubernetes cluster, follow these steps:
Check PersistentVolumeClaim (PVC) Status:
pod has unbound immediate PersistentVolumeClaims. This means the required PVC (abp-wg-easy-config) is not bound to a PersistentVolume.kubectl get pvc -n waqar
Bound state. If not, you need to create a suitable PersistentVolume or check your storage class configuration.Review StorageClass and Volume Provisioning:
Check Container Logs for More Details:
kubectl logs abp-wg-easy-7d44c4b5fc-852bj -n waqar
Verify Resource Limits:
Network and Service Type:
WireGuard Password Consistency:
Clean Up and Retry:
Cluster Compatibility:
By addressing the PVC binding issue and ensuring your cluster supports the required service types and storage, the CrashLoopBackOff should be resolved.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
To ensure that the same warning message ("You are not allowed to log in! Your account is inactive or needs to confirm your email/phone number") appears for both local and external (Google) logins when a user is inactive, you need to implement user status validation in the external login flow as well.
In ABP, the local login typically checks user status in the LoginModel. For external providers, you should override the external login callback to perform the same validation. Here’s how you can do it:
Override the External Login Callback
In your LoginModel (or equivalent for external login), override the method that handles the external login callback. After retrieving the user from the external provider, check the IsActive property (or your custom status logic).
public override async Task<IActionResult> OnGetExternalLoginCallbackAsync(string remoteError = null)
{
// ... existing code to get externalLoginInfo and user
var user = await UserManager.FindByLoginAsync(externalLoginInfo.LoginProvider, externalLoginInfo.ProviderKey);
if (user != null && !user.IsActive)
{
Alerts.Danger("You are not allowed to log in! Your account is inactive or needs to confirm your email/phone number");
return Page();
}
// ... continue with the normal flow
}
Angular UI Handling
Make sure your Angular UI displays the error message returned from the backend. The ABP Angular template typically shows backend validation errors as toasts or inline messages.
Consistent Validation
Ensure that both local and external login flows use the same validation logic for user status. This avoids discrepancies in user experience.
Customizing the Error Message
If you want to customize the error message or localization, use the Alerts.Danger method or equivalent in your overridden method.
This approach ensures that inactive users receive the same warning regardless of the login method.
Sources:
This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.
