[david1] said: @EngincanV is there also some way to be notified when this issue will be fixed? For example, is there a GitHub issue that we can follow to be notified when it's fixed in an upcoming release?
Hi @david1,
Unfortunately, we don’t have such a system in place. However, we provide a Pro Releases page on our website, which shows which internal issues have been fixed in which version. You can follow the status there for now.
[kfrancis@clinicalsupportsystems.com] said: Moving to 9.2.2 is a little better, but still confusing why there are positives on the list: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/6fd3da75a2e2ff69257f96ab3b02a9432697cff78caa319290b28accedffbf9a?nocache=1
Hi, thank you for the detailed information and all your checks. We had encountered this “virus” alert with Kaspersky and similar tools before, and since it was a false positive, we contacted them. It’s no longer being reported on their side.
However, seeing it flagged by Windows Defender is new to us. I’ll inform our test team about this, and we’ll investigate the situation further.
By the way, antivirus programs often perform heuristic checks, which means if they don’t recognize a file, they may flag it as suspicious by default. This might be the case here, but we’ll investigate further.
[nacho] said: Hi Engican, do you need this question to be opened or is it OK to close it?
Hi @nacho, thanks for reminding. I think we can close this question, we have an internal issue, which will be included in the 9.3-final.
Regards.
Update: I've identified the problem and will fix it asap. (Internal issue number: #20257)
[nacho] said: Hi! I just reopened what the bot closed :) Just a reminder of something that I realized and wrote in my fist comment: "I do not see the option to get the solution configuration with ABP Studio, the button is not visible now" I created a new solution with ABP Studio and the option "Solution Configuration" is available
Hi, this feature was added with v0.7.6+, and it basically puts configuration into your *.abpsln file while creating an application (section name: creatingStudioConfiguration). So, probably your solution was created before v0.7.6 and this is the reason why you don't see the "Solution Configuration" context menu item.
Hi, do you have any specific configuration in your web.config file that causes this problem? (Also, please check: https://abp.io/docs/latest/solution-templates/layered-web-application/deployment/deployment-iis?UI=NG&DB=EF&Tiered=No#rewrite-for-getenvconfig)
[rexhxiao] said: Yes, in earlier versions, the downloaded project included other source code I needed. However, in the latest version of the Angular project I downloaded, those source files are missing.
Hi, you can use the abp add-package @volosoft/ngx-lepton-x --with-source-code command to add the package with the source code.
[brauerj@gc.adventist.org] said: I would be curious to know the reasoning behind the function call approach (vs filter object). I would think the templates should be designed to more EASILY allow direct editing rather than more obfuscation and forcing us to always depend on ABP Suite.
Hi, I completely understand your perspective on preferring a more direct editing approach rather than working through multiple function calls, which can feel like a form of "obfuscation." Your concern about potential reliance on ABP Suite is also valid, and I actually agree with you on that point.
When we started developing ABP Suite, one of our main goals was to provide an editable template system, allowing developers to easily customize the templates they work with. We do currently support that capability. However, with the addition of new template types (such as custom code, file upload, master-child, etc.), the growing number of templates can indeed make it challenging to locate and update the right one efficiently.
I'll go ahead and create an internal issue for this, and we’ll evaluate how we can improve the customization experience in upcoming versions.
Thanks for your feedback.
[user5.abpio] said:
(we suggest composing all UIs in the main application, and our tutorials also explain in that way, but you can make some modifications to make your services as independent UI apps)
I will run a test on this, thanks for your response.
Thanks. Please let me know if you need help.
Regards.
[sghorakavi@cpat.com] said: Hi EngincanV, Let me try to access from Host instead of getting from AuthServer. That way, Web server might get the image as well. Thank you, Sudha
Yes, this might be a better and easier solution. Please let me know if you need help.
Regards.
