, including section headers (like "GOVERNANCE", "AUTOMATION") and menu items with icons

default sidebar/nav component with your custom one

- For custom component styles, use CSS variables or classes that respond to the current theme. 4

`) is added to the `` element.

Component({ selector: 'app-custom-component', template: ` Custom Component This is

I want to set nav header like i prvoide in the image and how do i control Darkmode ui and light mode

ui for custom component in angular * **Steps to reproduce the issue**:!

I want to set nav header like i prvoide in the image and how do i control Darkmode ui and light mode

hi What is your project type? Microservice?

The correct way to check for a permission in a Blazor component is to use the `@attribute [Authorize]

` without a policy name, or to use the `AbpAuthorizeView` component for permission checks

- To check for a specific permission, use the ABP permission name in the `AbpAuthorizeView` component

`, you must define the policy in your `Startup.cs` or `Program.cs`: ```csharp services.AddAuthorization

This is what we have: ``` @page "/" @using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization @attribute [Authorize(

#/AuthorizeView> The # is instead of < since CB does render it?

A bug in the Write component maybe?

``` This is the MyProject_Administration database, AbpPermissions table: !

the exception in the browser: !

or from the LeptonX theme source

**Replace the Content Area with RouterTabs** - In your custom layout, locate the section where the

main content is rendered (usually with `@Body` or a similar placeholder)

**Keep the Rest of the Layout Intact** - Do not modify the sidebar, menu, or toolbar sections in

- This ensures the look and feel of LeptonX is preserved except for the main content area. 5.

The problem is, I'm not sure how to change only the content area without affecting other parts of the

layout like the menu, sidebar, or toolbar...

How can I make the layout support RouterTabs in the content area, while keeping the rest of the layout

Are there any simple steps or tips for customizing just the content section in the **LeptonX Theme**?

I've attached an image to show what I’m trying to achieve with RouterTabs.

`) to ensure `close()` is only called if `this.uppy` is defined, preventing the crash.

This is a valid bug report and your suggested fix is correct.

Please consider submitting this as an issue or pull request to the ABP Framework team if you have not

Could you please provide the ABP version you’re using in your project, along with the theme you’ve applied

Please feel free to reach out if you have any further questions or need additional assistance.

When reloading the page at the route **/file-management**, the app in the browser crashes.

** using the navigation menu.

This is the browser console log: !

[image.png](/QA/files/3a1a7efdefdcbc737b916c1003d48ddf.png) The this.uppy was undefined. !

[image.png](/QA/files/3a1a7efe855ceb43f60da2620bbc48d5.png) The source code is the class UploadService

To run the AuthServer locally without requiring a certificate, you can disable the HTTPS metadata requirement

This allows the server to accept HTTP requests and operate without a certificate for development purposes

options.DisableTransportSecurityRequirement = true; }); } ``` This configuration disables the

Is it possible to run AuthServer locally without a certificate?

Yes, you can run the AuthServer locally with a hard-coded certificate so that certificates do not need

same certificate and password every time you run the AuthServer locally. - This prevents the need to

This method is supported and recommended for scenarios where you want consistent credentials across restarts

or deployments.

layered-web-application/deployment/openiddict-deployment) - [Fixing OpenIddict Certificate Issues in IIS or

Is it possible to run auth-server locally with hard-coded certificates, so certs don't need to be regenerated

I am doing exactly like Agent suggested, with a difference that I don't reference HttpApi.Client, I generated

IEmployeeIntegrationService" indicates that the client proxy for your integration service is not properly

configured or registered in your consuming microservice.

`) should match the remote service name used in your proxy registration. 4.

In general is not need it as I know, but I've implemented just in case: !

search on the homepage.

Provide us with the following info: 🧐 Hint: If you are using the ABP Studio, you can see all the information

ef * **Database Management System**: sqlserver * **Mobile Framework**: none * **Public Website**: No

Yes * **Kubernetes Configuration**: Yes * **Grafana Dashboard**: Yes * **Use Local References**: No

the following error: !

This means your custom microservice may continue to use the old value until the cache expires or is refreshed

Logging out/in or waiting may not help if the cache is still valid.

I get ; > There was no runtime pack for Microsoft.AspNetCore.App available for the specified RuntimeIdentifier

Is there something I'm missing?

Hello, Not sure if I was clear enough but I already tried that with no success.

I'm trying to check if a feature is enabled or not within one of my custom microservice but the feature

Is there something i'm missing?

I want to have the feature value updated directly when check if the feature is enabled or not in my microservice

- Login into the host and notice the new feature is there in the features modal for my tenant - Login

Is there some caching that does not get invalidate when updaing the feature value?

, the client should have this exact redirect URI (no http/https, just the scheme). 2.

- Make sure you do not have typos or extra slashes in the redirect URI in both your app and ABP client

- If the redirect URI is not handled, or if the app is not opened when the OAuth server redirects

If it says the redirect_uri is invalid, it means there is a mismatch. 9.

{ "PortalSystem": { "Scopes": [ "PortalSystem" ], "UserClaims": [ "role", "email", "name

My react native expo app with abp oAuth flow does not redirect to login page, and I get: 400 Error

my request Url is: Auth request:', { url: 'https://xxx.com/connect/authorize?

My other files are as following: app.json: { "expo": { "name": "pisagorops-app", "

app accesses your photos to let you share them with your friends." } ] ],

Tiered=No const apiUrl = 'https://xxx.com'; const dev = { apiUrl: 'https://xxx.com', appUrl

**Solution:** You should replace the default `PermissionDataSeedContributor` with your own implementation

TenantId ); } } ``` - Replace the filter in `.Where(x => ...)` with your

is replaced.

This is handled by the attributes above. 3.

**Remove Manual Permission Removal:** You no longer need to manually remove permissions from the admin

permissionManager.SetForRoleAsync(roleName, permission, false); } } } } ``` when run migrator project it is

, it is likely due to how the default WithDetails behavior is implemented for your entity's repository

and loading issues with includeDetails.

There are no circular references. So AI answer is not enough for me.

is no significant debug log for ef core.

There are two dbCommand execution log for this request and after that no logs. ``` 2025-06-13 11:36:

But now the method is not responding.

While I am debugging, the execution gets stuck on the line where GetListAsync is called.

* If I remove the includeDetails parameter method continues. However it is not I want.

* Or if I change the dependency injection from IRepository to IReadOnlyRepository the method runs perfectly

If there is a better option to fix this problem please let me know. Thanks.

authenticating the ABP Hangfire Dashboard with OpenIdConnect, you must ensure that your AuthServer (

` table or via data seed), ensure: - The `RedirectUri` includes your API's `/signin-oidc` endpoint

**Clear Cache** - If you use Redis or another cache, clear it after updating the client settings.

We need to confirm the `client id` and `redirect_uri` Thanks.

but you can share me one template that is working using Hangfire dashoard with separate OAuth because

Hello, We need to add Authentication to the AbpHangfireDashboard We are using abp separated auth ,

project give me this Error error:invalid_request error_description:The specified 'redirect_uri' is

:https://documentation.openiddict.com/errors/ID2043 culture:en ui-culture:en Kindly provide me with

all client setting because the documentation didn't mention about the client settings or grant type

in order to Authenticate the /hangefire

You should check the Aumerial.EntityFrameworkCore documentation or NuGet page to determine which EF Core

The recommended approach to use IBM i Db2 in ABP projects is: - Integrate the Aumerial.EntityFrameworkCore

Since the Aumerial.EntityFrameworkCore provider is compatible with EF Core 8, I understand that I’ll

for working with EF Core 8 and the Aumerial provider for IBM i (Db2)?

8.3.4 Your code seems to have no problem.

CLI Version: 9.1.1 .NET Version: 9.0 Entity Framework Core Version: 9.x (default) My requirement is

to connect the solution to an IBM i (AS/400) Db2 database instead of the default PostgreSQL provider

Which version of Entity Framework Core is fully compatible with Aumerial.EntityFrameworkCore? 2.

If I use a compatible version of Entity Framework Core that works with Aumerial, will I be able to continue

What is the recommended approach to use IBM i Db2 in ABP projects?

To resolve issues after upgrading ABP from 7.3.2 to 9.2.0 with the new MongoDB driver (3.3.0+), you must

Ensure there are no old references to MongoDB.Bson or MongoDB.Driver from previous versions in your solution

The error regarding `IMongoQueryable` and missing types is likely due to version mismatches or breaking

You can upgrade your application with minimal changes by following the migration guide.

/MongoDB-Driver-2-to-3 Unfortunately, there is nothing else we can suggest; this change is caused by

WHile upgrading the ABP 7.3.2 to ABP 9.2.0, we are facing issue with Mongo, we have a code something

[image.png](/QA/files/3a1a753692534a83be89dfd740006eeb.png) But with the latest Mongo Driver (3.3.0)

we are getting ---> System.Reflection.ReflectionTypeLoadException: Unable to load one or more of the

The system cannot find the file specified.

Can you please advise. as we dont want to change across multi servies and pages which have which is difficult

in ABP Suite typically indicates a problem with the entity JSON file or a mismatch in the expected structure

property) to isolate if the issue is with the entity definition or the environment

For reference, the package.json of the .suite schematics currently shows: > > "name": "@volo/abp.ng.suite

The package.json of the schematics still shows up as the following though: ```json "name": "@volo/

Alternatively, is there a way I can privately send our project to see if you can reproduce the error

Checking the logs output shows that the step is failing due to some sort of error in the .suite\schematics

Note that the package.json of the .suite schematics is: `"name": "@volo/abp.ng.suite", "version":

node_modules\execa\lib\error.js:60 error = new Error(message); ^ Error: Command failed with

Fabwerx/modules/core/angular/.suite/schematics/run-schematics.mjs:6:20 { shortMessage: 'Command failed with

Check changed files to see that Angular UI is not generated and confirm by looking at ABP Suite Log output

ABP Crud Page Generator fails to generate frontend with error: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading

No, ABP's IBackgroundWorker is not tenant-safe by default.

When you implement a background worker in a multi-tenant ABP application, the worker runs in the host

context unless you explicitly change the tenant context.

ABP does not automatically isolate or scope background workers per tenant.

This ensures that all services resolved within the using block operate under the correct tenant.

Hi team, I'm currently working on a multi-tenant application using the ABP Framework and I would like

Is IBackgroundWorker tenant-safe by default?

tenant has its own isolated instance or context when the worker is running?

If not, what is the recommended or best practice to trigger a BackgroundJob for each tenant from within

Would an approach like the one below be correct?

**Compare with a New Template Project** - As recommended in the ABP migration guide, create a new

ABP Blazor project with the same version and compare project files and settings.

Stopping and starting resolves the issue (but the project is fairly big so takes awhile to build).

I made a small change and ran it and no break points were reachable.

or try Rider to see if this is directly related to the ABP source-code

I am increasingly having the issue where when I make changes to my ABP Blazor Server project (recently

upgraded to 9.x) and press "Start Debug" in Visual Studio it almost always runs an old version of the

This is now happening on both of my ABP projects (now that they've been upgraded?).

Only after debugging sometimes several times does it catch the new code.

I'm not sure how to make a "demonstration" of the issue without a large complex project.

token is equivalent to what is returned from /connect/token), you should not manually create tokens

necessary parameters (user ID, 2FA code, provider, etc

, just like the password or refresh_token grant types. 2.

&provider=... ``` This way, the token returned is fully compatible with ABP's authorization system and

the styling of default pages (like forgot password), you can override the relevant Razor pages or Blazor

Hello Team ABP, we are happy to use ABP and consuming framework with multiple projects and we are also

tokenid but payload not returns the token and i also trying to create jwt token with the existing onpeniddict

token will not works on [authorize] services calling from one appservice to another appservice below is

the mentioned code with 2 approaches openiddict and jwt process.

applicationManager.FindByClientIdAsync("Hazlewood\_Mobile"); if (application == null) { throw new BusinessException("Invalid client ID

However, I have searched a bit and unfortunately there is no other solution as far as I can see.

options => { options.ConfigureDefaultConvention((dbContext, builder) => { // This action is

DbContexts. }); options.ConfigureConventions((dbContext, builder) => { // This action is

); options.ConfigureDefaultOnModelCreating((dbContext, builder) => { // This action is

. }); options.ConfigureOnModelCreating((dbContext, builder) => { // This action is

* **Exception message and full stack trace**: * **Steps to reproduce the issue**: Script-DbContext

, CreationTime, etc., but your database is missing them—likely because the ABP 9 migration dropped or

Clear All Caches: - You already restarted the Redis cache, which is good.

Verify Connection Strings: - Ensure your ABP 8.2.3 application is pointing to the restored (pre-ABP

Rebuild and Redeploy: - Rebuild your ABP 8.2.3 solution and redeploy all services to ensure no ABP

- If columns are missing, the database restore may not have completed or the wrong backup was used

We check the code deployed to app container, the ABP version is 8.2.3.

We delete the redis cache pod, and create a new one, the error is still there.

Invalid column name 'CreationTime'. Invalid column name 'CreatorId'.

Invalid column name 'DeleterId'. Invalid column name 'DeletionTime'.

Invalid column name 'IsDeleted'. Invalid column name 'LastModificationTime'.