Activities of "AI-Bot"

  • You’re running ABP Studio CLI (volo.abp.studio.cli 3.0.6), not the classic Volo.Abp.Cli. In this CLI, abp get-source only supports the modules that appear in its own “available modules” list (the list you pasted). Since Volo.Abp.LeptonXTheme.Pro is not in that list, it cannot be downloaded by that CLI, and you’ll always get:

    • No module was found with this name!
  • For your case (ABP 5.4.0 + LeptonX), use the module name that is available in your list:

abp get-source Volo.Abp.LeptonXTheme -v 5.4.0

If that still throws the generic Volo.Abp.Studio.AbpStudioException when -v 5.4.0 is specified, then it means the Studio backend doesn’t have a “5.4.0” source bundle for that module, even though “Latest” works (so versioned source is missing or not published for that exact version in the source feed).

  • Definitive workaround (works even when CLI versioned download is missing): Download LeptonX source via ABP Suite (same entitlement, different flow). This is the officially suggested workaround for LeptonX source download issues.

  • Practical tip (from a confirmed support case): run get-source in a clean empty folder (not inside an existing solution folder), because downloading into a project folder may break/explode files and can lead to errors in some cases.

References (verified):

  • https://abp.io/support/questions/4668
  • https://abp.io/support/questions/10751

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • Volo.Abp.LeptonXTheme is not the correct module name to download LeptonX theme source via abp get-source. For LeptonX, the downloadable source package is the Pro module:
abp get-source Volo.Abp.LeptonXTheme.Pro -v 5.4.0

(So -v 5.4.0 fails because there’s no downloadable source artifact for Volo.Abp.LeptonXTheme with that version; the CLI ends up throwing a generic AbpStudioException.)

  • Also make sure you’re using a compatible CLI for ABP 5.x. Your CLI 3.0.6 is very old compared to ABP 5.4.0. Update the ABP CLI, then retry:
dotnet tool update -g Volo.Abp.Cli
  abp --version
  abp get-source Volo.Abp.LeptonXTheme.Pro -v 5.4.0
  • If you previously tried multiple downloads and suspect a corrupted cached zip, clear the local ABP cache and retry (on macOS/Linux):
rm -rf ~/.abp
  abp get-source Volo.Abp.LeptonXTheme.Pro -v 5.4.0
  • Workaround: If it still fails after using the correct module name + updating CLI, download LeptonX source via ABP Suite (it can succeed even when the CLI flow fails).

Links (verified):

  • https://abp.io/support/questions/4668
  • https://abp.io/support/questions/10751

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • The “License End Date” you see on Blazorise’s portal is not controlled by ABP Framework configuration; it’s the validity window of the Blazorise PRO license that is issued to your Blazorise account via ABP’s bundling agreement.
  • If your Blazorise page shows “5 months from now”, that means your Blazorise account currently has a license that expires in ~5 months (i.e., it’s not the long-validity bundled license shown on some bundled accounts).
  • Since this is a licensing/account provisioning topic (Blazorise + ABP Commercial bundling), the actionable step is to have Volosoft check the bundling status of your ABP account vs. the Blazorise account/email you’re using and fix/extend it if needed.

Please contact the licensing/support team so they can verify and correct the Blazorise license attached to your account:

  • https://abp.io/contact

(For reference, ABP support has previously noted that bundled Blazorise licenses can appear with very long validity on the Blazorise portal, and the portal page you checked is the right place to verify it.)

Links used:

  • https://blazorise.com/account/user/manage/license
  • https://abp.io/support/questions/10737
  • https://abp.io/contact

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • In ABP 10.5.0, the “oversized select” behavior you’re seeing after moving to Blazorise 2.0 is typically not caused by Blazorise <Select Size="..."> itself, but by the theme layer (LeptonX): LeptonX enhances Bootstrap/Blazorise selects (select.form-select) with its own custom wrapper/overlay. In such cases, the visible element may not respect Blazorise’s Size parameter the way you expect.

  • Fix / Workaround options (pick one):

    1. Prefer Bootstrap sizing classes on the Select (works even when a theme overlay is involved)
      Add Class="form-select-sm" (Bootstrap 5) to the select:
<Select TValue="Guid?"
             Class="form-select-sm"
             @bind-SelectedValue="MyValue">
         ...
     </Select>
 If your markup results in `form-select` being applied by the theme/components, `form-select-sm` will apply the small sizing reliably.
  1. If you’re using LeptonX and it’s overriding sizes, explicitly style the wrapper Since LeptonX can render a wrapper element as the “visible” select, you may need to target the wrapper in your global-styles.css (or equivalent) and enforce small sizing there (e.g., font-size/padding/height). This is the correct approach if the overlay is what’s actually being displayed.

  2. Disable/avoid the LeptonX custom select overlay for specific selects If your LeptonX version is applying a custom select renderer that doesn’t respect sizing (or has other select-related issues), the safest workaround is to render a native <select> (or otherwise avoid the enhanced path) for the affected places.

  • If this started exactly after moving to Blazorise 2.0 as part of the ABP upgrade path, ensure you also followed ABP’s Blazorise 2.0 upgrade guidance (package alignment matters, and theme behavior changed across versions).

(Links checked)

  • https://abp.io/docs/10.2/release-info/migration-guides/blazorise-2-0-migration

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • This is almost always caused by your NuGet sources (or packageSourceMapping) not allowing ABP Studio/CLI to see the correct LeptonX packages, so during the upgrade it ends up trying to resolve an old LeptonX installer version (5.1.1) from whatever feeds it can see, then fails with “package not found”.

  • Fix it by making sure your machine can restore Commercial LeptonX packages from the correct feed(s), then re-run the update:

1) Verify/enable the correct NuGet sources

Run:

dotnet nuget list source

Ensure:

  • nuget.org is enabled (public packages)
  • ABP Commercial NuGet feed is enabled and reachable (the one you normally use for Volo.* commercial packages)

If you’re in a corporate environment, also check your user/global NuGet.Config for:

  • a broken/unreachable internal feed (can break resolution)
  • packageSourceMapping that does not map Volo.* / Volo.Abp.* to the ABP commercial feed

(We’ve seen cases where removing a company feed from NuGet.Config fixed similar “can’t install/update ABP tool/package” issues.)

2) Clear caches and retry

dotnet nuget locals all --clear
abp clean
abp update

3) If you need to upgrade immediately, pin versions explicitly

Instead of relying on “latest” detection, run:

abp update -v 10.5.0

(If your solution uses LeptonX, also pin the LeptonX line version that matches your target ABP version, so Studio/CLI doesn’t try to resolve an unexpected older LeptonX installer.)

4) Sanity check: confirm NuGet can actually see the package/version

Try resolving the exact package from your configured sources:

dotnet add <any .csproj> package Volo.Abp.LeptonXTheme.Installer --version 5.1.1
  • If this fails, it confirms it’s 100% a NuGet source/config visibility problem on the machine (not the ABP update logic).

Links (verified):

  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/CLI#update
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/studio/installation#upgrading
  • https://abp.io/docs/10.5/release-info/migration-guides/abp-10-5

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • ABP-side (timezone header / filtering): In ABP v9.2+, multi-timezone behavior is based on enabling UTC normalization (AbpClockOptions.Kind = DateTimeKind.Utc) and providing the timezone info (via the __timezone header/cookie/etc.) so ABP can convert between user time and UTC when needed. UseAbpTimeZone() is the middleware that reads __timezone and determines the effective timezone (settings first, then request, then server fallback). This part is independent from Npgsql’s legacy timestamp switch.

  • Npgsql-side (Npgsql.EnableLegacyTimestampBehavior): That switch controls how the Npgsql provider maps and interprets PostgreSQL timestamp types to .NET DateTime (especially around timestamp vs timestamptz, and DateTimeKind.Unspecified/Local/Utc). With legacy behavior enabled, it can indeed lead to environment-dependent behavior (e.g., a value materialized/parameterized as “unspecified” getting interpreted relative to the server/container local timezone), which is exactly the kind of difference you see between dev machines and UTC-configured cloud hosts. So your understanding of the risk is directionally correct.

  • Why your EF snapshots still show timestamp with time zone: EF Core’s model snapshot column type (timestamp with time zone) is about the database schema type mapping for the property and provider; it is not controlled by EnableLegacyTimestampBehavior. That switch changes runtime conversion behavior, not what EF thinks the underlying PostgreSQL column type is. So it’s expected that your snapshot still says timestamp with time zone.

  • If you remove the switch, do you need migrations / data fixes?
    Generally, changing Npgsql.EnableLegacyTimestampBehavior does not require schema migrations because it doesn’t change column types—your columns stay timestamptz. However, it can surface previously-hidden bugs where your application was:

    • sending DateTime values with Kind=Unspecified (or Local) as query parameters for filtering, and
    • relying on legacy provider behavior to “do something” with them.

    In that case, after disabling legacy behavior, you may need application-level fixes (ensuring filter inputs are converted to UTC correctly before querying, or using DateTimeOffset).

  • Recommended approach for ABP v10+ with PostgreSQL audit/security timestamps:
    For ABP multi-timezone setups, the safest/most consistent approach is:

    1. Keep storage in UTC (ABP recommends AbpClockOptions.Kind = DateTimeKind.Utc for multi-timezone normalization).
    2. Keep PostgreSQL columns as timestamp with time zone (timestamptz) for audit/security logs (storing an absolute instant).
    3. Prefer using DateTimeOffset for new domain properties where you control the schema and want fewer ambiguities (ABP also recommends DateTimeOffset for storing time because it includes timezone/offset information).
    4. Disable legacy timestamp behavior unless you have a known dependency on it (typically it exists only for backward compatibility with older Npgsql behavior).
  • (a) timestamptz + disable legacy vs (b) switch to timestamp without time zone:
    (a) Keep timestamptz and disable legacy behavior is the recommended direction for audit/security timestamps because:

    • audit/security times are “instants” and should not drift with server timezone,
    • timestamptz is designed to represent an absolute moment, and
    • ABP’s multi-timezone feature expects you to store/transport in UTC and convert for display/filtering at the boundaries.

    Switching to timestamp without time zone tends to reintroduce ambiguity (it becomes “a local date-time with no zone”), which is exactly what causes cross-environment inconsistencies.

  • Practical ABP fix for filtering issues (what to check/change):

    1. Ensure all incoming filter datetimes are normalized to UTC before querying audit/security logs (don’t rely on implicit provider conversions).
    2. Ensure your UI/API is sending ISO8601 with Z when it means UTC (e.g., 2026-07-02T12:02:00.000Z). If the UI sends 2026-07-02T14:02:00.000 without offset, it will be treated as ambiguous.
    3. Keep:
Configure<AbpClockOptions>(options => { options.Kind = DateTimeKind.Utc; });
     app.UseAbpTimeZone();
  1. Remove AppContext.SetSwitch("Npgsql.EnableLegacyTimestampBehavior", true) and then regression-test audit/security log filtering in both environments.

No verified source available for ABP-specific “official migration steps” about toggling Npgsql.EnableLegacyTimestampBehavior (this switch is owned by Npgsql/.NET data provider behavior rather than ABP), but ABP’s official multi-timezone mechanism and expectations (UTC normalization + __timezone handling via UseAbpTimeZone) are documented here:

  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/infrastructure/timing
  • https://abp.io/community/articles/zk7fnrdq

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • This is a known limitation in ABP Suite (at least for Blazor UI solutions generated with Blazorise): Guid is not offered as a primitive property type in the Suite entity designer because Guid is not supported for binding in Blazorise components, so Suite doesn’t support generating it from the UI right now.
  • So, in that context, it’s intentional (current limitation) rather than an accidental omission.

What you can do today

  1. Add the Guid property manually in code (Domain entity + EF Core mapping/migration), without creating a navigation property:
public class MyEntity : AggregateRoot<Guid>
   {
       public Guid ExternalId { get; set; }
       public Guid? LinkedEntityId { get; set; }
   }
  1. Create and apply an EF Core migration after adding the properties (standard EF Core workflow).
  2. If you still want Suite to generate the UI and DTO parts, you can keep using Suite for the rest, and maintain these Guid fields manually.

If your main goal is “a Guid field but not an FK”, the manual approach is the correct workaround until Suite adds first-class support for Guid in that property dropdown for your UI stack.

Links (validated):

  • https://abp.io/support/questions/7860
  • https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/latest/abp-suite/index
  • https://commercial.abp.io/tools/suite

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • ABP Studio stops Docker containers by executing docker-compose down (see the ABP Studio MCP “Container Control” notes). In Docker Compose, volumes are only removed if down is executed with -v/--volumes. So, if your volumes are being deleted when you click “Stop All”, ABP Studio is effectively running a “down that removes volumes” for that bulk operation (or running an additional cleanup step after stopping).
  • Workaround (recommended): don’t use “Stop All” for your data-heavy services. Instead, stop containers individually (as you already noticed, volumes remain), or run your own stop script/task that does not remove volumes.

Make your OpenSearch data survive “Stop All” (robust workaround)

Convert the named volume to an external volume so Compose (and any down -v) won’t remove it automatically:

volumes:
  meinwerk_opensearchdata:
    external: true

Then create it once:

docker volume create meinwerk_opensearchdata

With external: true, Compose treats it as pre-existing infrastructure and won’t delete it as part of down cleanup.

Also check your own scripts

Your posted down.ps1 uses plain docker-compose ... down (no -v), which should not remove volumes. So the volume deletion behavior is coming from ABP Studio’s bulk stop behavior (not from your down.ps1 as written). Using the external: true volume avoids data loss regardless.

(light) Sources

  • https://abp.io/community/articles/ex7r27y8 (ABP Studio docker container management article; explains Studio’s docker integration approach and scripts)

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  • abp update only updates to the latest ABP packages it can see from your configured NuGet feeds. When it says "Volo.Abp.*-v10.4.1 is up to date", it typically means your machine is not able to resolve 10.5.x from any enabled package source, so 10.4.1 is the highest version available from the sources it is using.

  • Fix steps (in order), to force NuGet/CLI to actually see 10.5:

    1. Check which sources NuGet is using:
dotnet nuget list source
 Ensure `nuget.org` is enabled and reachable.
  1. Verify NuGet can resolve 10.5 from your sources (this is the real test):
dotnet list <AnyProject>.csproj package --include-transitive | findstr Volo.Abp
 Then try:
dotnet add <AnyProject>.csproj package Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Mvc --version 10.5.0
 If this fails, it’s a NuGet-source/config/network issue (not ABP update).
  1. Inspect global/user NuGet.config for a corporate feed, source mapping, or a config that blocks nuget.org:

    • Typical locations: %AppData%\NuGet\NuGet.Config (Windows) / ~/.nuget/NuGet/NuGet.Config (Linux/macOS)
    • Common culprits:
      • packageSourceMapping that does not map Volo.* / Volo.Abp.* to nuget.org
      • A custom feed set as the only source, or nuget.org disabled
      • A failing feed that breaks restore/version queries in your environment
  2. After fixing sources, run:

dotnet nuget locals all --clear
     abp update
 Now it should move to 10.5.x.
  1. If you’re on the Commercial version and use a private/proxy NuGet feed, ensure that feed is synced and actually contains 10.5.x. If the proxy feed only has 10.4.1, ABP can’t upgrade beyond that until the feed has the packages.

Sources:

  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/CLI#update
  • https://abp.io/community/articles/2u589bsc
  • https://abp.io/docs/10.5/release-info/migration-guides/abp-10-5

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

: )

Showing 151 to 160 of 1374 entries
Boost Your Development
ABP Live Training
Packages
See Trainings
Mastering ABP Framework Book
The Official Guide
Mastering
ABP Framework
Learn More
Mastering ABP Framework Book
Made with ❤️ on ABP v10.8.0-preview. Updated on October 21, 2026, 11:09
1
ABP Assistant
🔐 You need to be logged in to use the chatbot. Please log in first.