Activities of "AI-Bot"

  1. Solution

The error NETSDK1004: project.assets.json not found indicates NuGet packages were not restored before ABP Studio tried to run EF Core’s Add-Migration during Database synchronization. Also, the path shows .NET SDK 10.0.100 (preview/next gen) which is not yet supported by ABP Studio templates. Do the following once, then retry Database synchronization from ABP Studio.

A) Ensure supported .NET SDKs are installed and selected

  • Install .NET 8.0 SDK (LTS) and .NET 9.0 SDK (if you target ABP versions that support it). Prefer .NET 8 for now.
  • Make the default SDK a supported one (e.g., 8.0.x):
    • If you have a global.json at the solution root, set it to a supported version: { "sdk": { "version": "8.0.403" } }
    • Or install 8.0.x and run EF/restore with that SDK explicitly.

B) Restore and build the solution before database sync

  • From the solution root (the folder that contains the .sln), run: dotnet restore dotnet build -c Debug
  • If you use a corporate proxy/private feed, ensure NuGet sources are accessible (NuGet.Config) and no authentication prompts are blocking restore.

C) Verify EF Core tools work against the DbContext project

  • From the EntityFrameworkCore project folder (…\src\YourApp.EntityFrameworkCore), run: dotnet ef migrations add Initial -s ..\YourApp.HttpApi.Host\YourApp.HttpApi.Host.csproj dotnet ef database update -s ..\YourApp.HttpApi.Host\YourApp.HttpApi.Host.csproj
  • If this succeeds, ABP Studio’s Database synchronization will also succeed.

D) Run ABP Studio from the solution root

  • Close ABP Studio.
  • Open a terminal at the solution root and start ABP Studio: abp studio
  • Open the solution in Studio, then use Database > Synchronize again.

E) If the task still fails in Studio

  • Open Studio > Logs (Background Tasks) and copy any EF/restore errors.
  • As a quick workaround, you can create and apply the initial migration manually (Step C), then continue using Studio thereafter.

Notes

  • This problem is consistent with missing restore and/or running with an unsupported SDK (the 10.0.100 path in the error). ABP Studio 0.9.x targets stable .NET SDKs; use .NET 8 LTS to avoid tooling issues.
  • Studio 0.9.6 added improvements around EF Core package installation and migration error visibility. If you’re on an older Studio, update to the latest release.
  1. Sources
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/studio/overview
  • https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/nuget/consume-packages/package-restore
  • https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/core/cli/dotnet
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/studio/release-notes

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution
  • Root cause

    • Hangfire.MySqlStorage (v2.0.3) does not support passing the queue name to RecurringJob.AddOrUpdate via options for a specific job. ABP’s HangfireBackgroundWorkerManager uses Hangfire’s RecurringJob.AddOrUpdate with a queue parameter for some internal background workers (e.g., token/audit cleanup), which triggers “Current storage doesn't support specifying queues directly for a specific job. Please use the QueueAttribute instead.” MySQL storage provider throws NotSupportedException in this case.
    • With Redis storage, specifying queues per job is supported; therefore it works.
  • What you can do

    1. Preferred: Switch to an implementation that supports per-job queues

      • Use a Hangfire storage provider that supports per-job queue selection (e.g., Redis, SQL Server). Your existing Redis setup already works.
    2. Or, keep MySQL but disable ABP’s Hangfire background workers and use a different background worker implementation in ABP

      • Replace ABP’s Hangfire-based background workers with Quartz for the “background workers” part, while still using Hangfire for BackgroundJobs if you need it. ABP allows mixing implementations:
        • Install and depend on AbpBackgroundWorkersQuartzModule in your Domain layer to run ABP’s internal workers (cleanup, etc.) with Quartz (which doesn’t use Hangfire queues).
        • Keep Hangfire only for BackgroundJobs (IBackgroundJobManager) if you still want Hangfire for enqueueing fire-and-forget jobs. If using MySQL storage for Hangfire, avoid per-job queue customization from your own jobs (or mark job classes with [Queue] attribute only if your storage supports it).

      Example module setup:

[DependsOn(
         typeof(AbpBackgroundWorkersQuartzModule), // run ABP workers via Quartz
         typeof(AbpBackgroundJobsModule) // keep generic jobs; add Hangfire only if you need it
         // typeof(AbpBackgroundJobsHangfireModule) // include only if you will use Hangfire for IBackgroundJobManager
     )]
     public class MyProjectDomainModule : AbpModule
     {
         public override void PreConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
         {
             // Configure Quartz persistence (e.g., MySQL/PostgreSQL/SQL Server)
             PreConfigure<AbpQuartzOptions>(options =>
             {
                 options.Configurator = cfg =>
                 {
                     cfg.UsePersistentStore(store =>
                     {
                         store.UseProperties = true;
                         store.UseJsonSerializer();
                         store.UseMySql("Your MySQL connection string"); // or other provider
                     });
                 };
             });
         }
     }
 - In your web host, remove AddHangfireServer if you don’t need Hangfire workers at all, or keep it only for background jobs that don’t specify per-job queue options in a way MySQL storage rejects.
 - ABP’s internal workers (Identity session cleanup, token cleanup, audit log cleanup, etc.) will run under Quartz and won’t call Hangfire. That sidesteps the Hangfire/MySQL queue limitation.
  1. If you must stay with Hangfire + MySQL for everything
    • This combination is currently incompatible with ABP’s internal workers that specify queues per job. There’s no knob in ABP to stop it from passing the queue to RecurringJob.AddOrUpdate for those workers.
    • Unless Hangfire.MySqlStorage adds support for per-job queue selection via recurring jobs, the only options are:
      • Contribute a PR to Hangfire.MySqlStorage to support queues passed during RecurringJob.AddOrUpdate, or
      • Fork ABP’s HangfireBackgroundWorkerManager to remove the queue parameter (not recommended; you’ll diverge from ABP).
  • Minimal change recipe (keeps MySQL, removes the crash)
    • Keep your Hangfire.MySqlStorage registration if you still want Hangfire to store BackgroundJobs.
    • Add Quartz for background workers and disable ABP’s Hangfire workers by not depending on AbpBackgroundWorkersHangfireModule anywhere. Ensure your Solution depends on AbpBackgroundWorkersQuartzModule.
    • Result: ABP internal workers run on Quartz; Hangfire remains usable for IBackgroundJobManager. No crash.
  1. Sources
  • HangfireBackgroundWorkerManager (ABP source – shows how ABP registers recurring jobs and passes queue):
    • https://github.com/abpframework/abp/blob/dev/framework/src/Volo.Abp.BackgroundWorkers.Hangfire/Volo/Abp/BackgroundWorkers/Hangfire/HangfireBackgroundWorkerManager.cs

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution Below are the verified, standard ways to customize the User Management UI in ABP. Choose the section that matches your UI stack.

A) MVC / Razor Pages (ABP Identity module) Goal examples:

  • Add fields (tabs/columns) to Users page and modals.
  • Fully replace a Razor Page (Index/Edit) of the Identity module.
  1. Extend the IdentityUser entity and surface properties in UI automatically
  • Define extra properties on the IdentityUser via module/entity extensions (Domain.Shared).
  • Map EF Core properties (EntityFrameworkCore layer) and run migrations.
  • Apply DTO extension to the Identity module’s DTOs so the UI receives/sends your properties.

Code outline:

  • Domain.Shared: Configure extra user properties.
ObjectExtensionManager.Instance.Modules().ConfigureIdentity(identity =>
  {
      identity.ConfigureUser(user =>
      {
          user.AddOrUpdateProperty<string>("Code");
          user.AddOrUpdateProperty<string>("Address");
          user.AddOrUpdateProperty<string>("Manager");
      });
  });
  • EFCore: Map properties for DB fields and migrate.
ObjectExtensionManager.Instance
      .MapEfCoreProperty<IdentityUser, string>("Code")
      .MapEfCoreProperty<IdentityUser, string>("Address")
      .MapEfCoreProperty<IdentityUser, string>("Manager");
  • Application.Contracts: Expose properties on Identity DTOs used by UI (Users CRUD and Profile if needed).
public class YourAppContractsModule : AbpModule
  {
      public override void PostConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
      {
          ModuleExtensionConfigurationHelper.ApplyEntityConfigurationToApi(
              IdentityModuleExtensionConsts.ModuleName,
              IdentityModuleExtensionConsts.EntityNames.User,
              getApiTypes: new[] { typeof(IdentityUserDto) },
              createApiTypes: new[] { typeof(IdentityUserCreateDto) },
              updateApiTypes: new[] { typeof(IdentityUserUpdateDto) }
          );
      }
  }

This makes the Identity Users CRUD automatically show your new properties on the list and modal when possible.

  1. Replace/override a specific Razor Page (full UI control)
  • Copy the embedded Razor page you want to customize from Volo.Abp.Identity.Web into your web project under the same path, then modify.
    • Example (Users list): copy pages/Identity/Users/Index.cshtml and related PageModel to your Web project (under Pages/Identity/Users/).
  • You can then:
    • Add new tabs/fields in the Create/Edit modal.
    • Convert modal workflows to a full-page Edit form by building a dedicated Edit page and changing the action links to navigate there (instead of opening modal).

Note:

  • The embedded original Users Index file (for reference) resides here: https://github.com/abpframework/abp/blob/dev/modules/identity/src/Volo.Abp.Identity.Web/Pages/Identity/Users/Index.cshtml

B) Blazor (Blazor Server/WebAssembly) Goal examples:

  • Add a new action to Users grid to navigate to your custom “Advanced Edit” page.
  • Replace the default modal editing with a custom page.

Approach: Extend entity actions and navigate to your page

[ExposeServices(typeof(UserManagement))]
[Dependency(ReplaceServices = true)]
public class CustomizedUserManagement : UserManagement
{
    protected override async ValueTask SetEntityActionsAsync()
    {
        await base.SetEntityActionsAsync();

        var advancedEdit = new EntityAction
        {
            Text = "Advanced edit",
            Clicked = data =>
            {
                // Navigate to your custom component/page with user Id in route/query.
                NavigationManager.NavigateTo($"/users/advanced-edit/{data.Id}");
                return Task.CompletedTask;
            }
        };

        EntityActions.Get<UserManagement>().Add(advancedEdit);
    }
}
  • Build your own AdvancedEdit.razor page using an EditForm with your custom fields (Code, Address, Manager, …), load/save via IIdentityUserAppService.
  • This avoids copying large internal UI code and gives a clean, maintainable customization.

C) Angular (Manage Profile or Users UI customization)

  • Replace specific components or tabs with your own using the public replacement APIs.
  • For Manage Profile page, you can patch a tab’s component:
import { eAccountManageProfileTabNames, ManageProfileTabsService } from '@volo/abp.ng.account/public/config';

  export class AppComponent implements OnInit {
    constructor(private manageProfileTabs: ManageProfileTabsService) {}
    ngOnInit() {
      this.manageProfileTabs.patch(eAccountManageProfileTabNames.PersonalInfo, {
        component: CustomPersonalSettingsComponent,
      });
    }
  }
  • To send/receive extended properties, ensure you:
    • Add extra properties to IdentityUser (Domain.Shared + EFCore).
    • Apply DTO extensions on both IdentityUser DTOs and UpdateProfileDto if you want them on profile:
ModuleExtensionConfigurationHelper.ApplyEntityConfigurationToApi(
      IdentityModuleExtensionConsts.ModuleName,
      IdentityModuleExtensionConsts.EntityNames.User,
      getApiTypes: new[] { typeof(IdentityUserDto), typeof(ProfileDto) },
      createApiTypes: new[] { typeof(IdentityUserCreateDto) },
      updateApiTypes: new[] { typeof(IdentityUserUpdateDto), typeof(UpdateProfileDto) }
    );
  • In your Angular component, include the extra properties in the update payload (ExtraProperties or mapped fields, depending on your extension configuration).

D) Profile Management page (MVC) contributions instead of replacing everything

  • You can add/remove tabs via ProfileManagementPageOptions:
    • Add a new tab:
public class MyProfileManagementPageContributor : IProfileManagementPageContributor
    {
        public Task ConfigureAsync(ProfileManagementPageCreationContext context)
        {
            context.Groups.Add(new ProfileManagementPageGroup(
                "my-account-profile",
                "My account profile",
                typeof(MyPictureManagementGroupViewComponent)
            ));
            return Task.CompletedTask;
        }
    }

    public class MyModule : AbpModule
    {
       public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
       {
           Configure<ProfileManagementPageOptions>(options =>
           {
               options.Contributors.Add(new MyProfileManagementPageContributor());
           });
       }
    }
  • You can also remove an existing group (tab) by id, then add your replacement tab.

E) When moving from modal to page-based editing (MVC)

  • Create a dedicated Edit.cshtml Razor Page for Users and its PageModel to show an EditForm with your custom fields.
  • Update actions in Index.cshtml to navigate to your Edit page instead of opening ABP modals (change JavaScript/modal triggers to an anchor link or button targeting your new page).
  • Keep using IIdentityUserAppService to load/save user data, including ExtraProperties.

Key reminders

  • Always register DTO extension mappings for any API DTO you use for UI operations (IdentityUserDto, IdentityUserCreateDto, IdentityUserUpdateDto, ProfileDto, UpdateProfileDto).
  • For MVC Razor replacement, ensure file paths match the original embedded resource path so your file overrides the embedded one.
  • For Blazor, prefer extending entity actions and custom pages over copying internal components to reduce maintenance effort.
  1. Sources
  • Identity module Users page (reference for overriding embedded Razor Page): https://github.com/abpframework/abp/blob/dev/modules/identity/src/Volo.Abp.Identity.Web/Pages/Identity/Users/Index.cshtml

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution
  • If you use the built-in Identity UI (ABP Blazor), the recommended way to change the Users/Roles UI is to override the related Blazor components and/or extend the toolbars/actions instead of forking the module. ABP makes these components replaceable.
  • To replace the Users and Roles pages with your own components:
    1. Create new components that inherit the originals and mark them to replace the services. Example: override Users page
@using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization
  @using Volo.Abp.DependencyInjection
  @using Volo.Abp.Identity
  @using Volo.Abp.Identity.Blazor.Pages.Identity
  @attribute [Authorize(IdentityPermissions.Users.Default)]
  @attribute [ExposeServices(typeof(UserManagement))]
  @attribute [Dependency(ReplaceServices = true)]
  @inherits UserManagement

  <!-- Your customized Users UI goes here -->

Example: override Roles page

@using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization
  @using Volo.Abp.DependencyInjection
  @using Volo.Abp.Identity
  @using Volo.Abp.Identity.Blazor.Pages.Identity
  @attribute [Authorize(IdentityPermissions.Roles.Default)]
  @attribute [ExposeServices(typeof(RoleManagement))]
  @attribute [Dependency(ReplaceServices = true)]
  @inherits RoleManagement

  <!-- Your customized Roles UI goes here -->

You can fully redesign the UI (e.g., use MudBlazor, change dialogs to full-page EditForm, etc.) while reusing the base logic by calling the protected members like AppService, MapToCreateInput, MapToEditingEntity, GetListInput, and permission properties.

  • To add extra buttons or commands without rewriting the whole page, use Page Toolbar Extensions or Entity Action Extensions:
    • Page toolbar example (add “Import users” on Users page):
public class UsersPageToolbarContributor : IPageToolbarContributor
    {
        public Task ConfigureAsync(PageToolbarContributionContext context)
        {
            if (context.PageName == IdentityPageNames.Users)
            {
                context.Toolbar.Items.Add(new PageToolbarItem
                {
                    Text = "Import users",
                    Icon = "upload",
                    OnClick = async () =>
                    {
                        // your import logic
                    }
                });
            }
            return Task.CompletedTask;
        }
    }
Register contributor in your module:
Configure<PageToolbarOptions>(opts =>
    {
        opts.Contributors.Add(new UsersPageToolbarContributor());
    });
  • If you extended IdentityUser (e.g., added Code, Address, Manager, etc.) and want these fields to appear on the Users page and also in profile management:
    1. Configure module extension mappings to include your extra properties in the relevant DTOs:
public override void PostConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
  {
      ModuleExtensionConfigurationHelper.ApplyEntityConfigurationToApi(
          IdentityModuleExtensionConsts.ModuleName,
          IdentityModuleExtensionConsts.EntityNames.User,
          getApiTypes: new[] { typeof(IdentityUserDto), typeof(ProfileDto) },
          createApiTypes: new[] { typeof(IdentityUserCreateDto) },
          updateApiTypes: new[] { typeof(IdentityUserUpdateDto), typeof(UpdateProfileDto) }
      );
  }
  1. In your overridden components, bind to those properties via ExtraProperties or strongly typed extension helpers (depending on how you defined them) and map them when creating/updating users.
  • About Identity Pro for Blazor:
    • If you own ABP Commercial and want to use Volo.Abp.Identity.Pro.Blazor, add the package to your Blazor UI project and depend on the module in your Blazor module:
[DependsOn(typeof(Volo.Abp.Identity.Pro.Blazor.AbpIdentityProBlazorModule))]
    public class YourBlazorModule : AbpModule
    {
        public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
        {
            // your customizations
        }
    }
  • Then use the same override technique if you need to change specific Pro components: create a component inheriting the Pro component class and annotate with:
[ExposeServices(typeof(TheProBaseComponentYouOverride))]
    [Dependency(ReplaceServices = true)]
  • You can still use PageToolbar and EntityAction extensions for Pro pages.

  • Notes and tips:

    • Overriding components requires the correct base class type in ExposeServices. For the Users page it’s UserManagement; for the Roles page it’s RoleManagement.
    • If you encounter missing symbol errors like “UserName not defined” when copying snippets from docs, ensure your .razor file inherits the correct base partial class (e.g., @inherits UserManagement) and you placed any backing partial class members or injected services expected by that markup.
    • Prefer extension points (toolbar/entity actions) for light customizations. For heavy UI redesigns, overriding the page component is fine.
    • For profile management (My Profile) changes, use ProfileManagementPage contributors to add/replace tabs without forking the Account module; if you want your user extra fields to save, include UpdateProfileDto/ProfileDto in ApplyEntityConfigurationToApi as shown above.
  1. Sources
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/architecture/modularity/basics
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/modules/identity
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/modules/identity-pro
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/ui/blazor/page-toolbar-extensions
  • https://github.com/abpframework/abp

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution
  • Root cause

    • Your method receives a file using ABP’s stream-friendly DTO (CreateFileInputWithStream with an IRemoteStreamContent/File field). Such endpoints must be exposed as multipart/form-data. In a Blazor Web App (WASM + Server host) solution, when you enable Static C# Proxies on the Blazor Server host, the Auto API/Swagger for the Server app can incorrectly describe that action as application/json and omit multipart/form-data. Calls made through the static proxy then send JSON, resulting in 415 Unsupported Media Type.
  • Fix: force the correct content type on the action and let Swagger describe it properly

    • Add FromForm to the file/stream input model argument so model binding selects multipart/form-data.
    • Add explicit Consumes attribute to the action to declare multipart/form-data.
    • Ensure your file input type in the DTO is IRemoteStreamContent (or IFormFile) so ABP’s formatter kicks in.

    Example:

using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;
  using Volo.Abp.Content;

  public class CreateFileInputWithStream
  {
      public string Name { get; set; }
      public IRemoteStreamContent File { get; set; }
      public ExtraPropertyDictionary ExtraProperties { get; set; }
  }

  [ApiController]
  [Route("api/app/organization-attachment")]
  public class OrganizationAttachmentController : ControllerBase
  {
      [HttpPost]
      [Consumes("multipart/form-data")]
      public async Task<AttachmentDto> CreateAsync(
          [FromQuery] Guid attachmentTypeId,
          [FromQuery] Guid entityId,
          [FromForm] CreateFileInputWithStream inputWithStream,
          [FromQuery] bool replaceByAttachmentType = false,
          [FromQuery] bool autoSave = false)
      {
          // call your service method here
          // return await _appService.CreateAsync(...);
          throw new NotImplementedException();
      }
  }

Notes:

  • If you’re using ABP Auto API Controllers (recommended), you don’t have to manually define the controller; you can annotate your application service method similarly:
[Consumes("multipart/form-data")]
    public virtual Task<TAttachmentDto> CreateAsync(
        Guid attachmentTypeId,
        TEntityKey entityId,
        [FromForm] CreateFileInputWithStream inputWithStream,
        bool replaceByAttachmentType = false,
        bool autoSave = false)
    { ... }
  • After adding Consumes + FromForm, re-run and check the Blazor Server Swagger. It should now show a multipart/form-data body with a binary File field, matching your HttpApi.Host/API swagger.

  • Ensure the WASM static proxy posts FormData

    • The generated WASM proxy for a parameter typed as IRemoteStreamContent or a DTO containing it posts multipart/form-data automatically. If you have a custom call, use FormData:
// In Blazor WASM
    var form = new MultipartFormDataContent();
    form.Add(new StringContent(attachmentTypeId.ToString()), "attachmentTypeId");
    form.Add(new StringContent(entityId.ToString()), "entityId");
    form.Add(new StringContent(input.Name), "inputWithStream.Name");
    form.Add(new StreamContent(fileStream) { Headers = { ContentType = new MediaTypeHeaderValue(fileContentType) }}, "inputWithStream.File", fileName);
    // plus ExtraProperties if needed
  • Prefer using the generated C# static proxy method for the service interface; once Swagger describes multipart/form-data correctly, the proxy will send the right content type and 415 will disappear.

  • If the Blazor Server host still shows the wrong content type

    • Clear and re-generate static proxies and swagger:
      • Stop the solution, delete bin/obj, rebuild.
      • Ensure you don’t have an outdated generated proxy/contract assembly altering ApiExplorer.
    • If you host client proxies on the Server app, make sure your HttpApi project references the Application.Contracts and your Blazor Server project references the HttpApi.Client (not Contracts) for consuming remote APIs.
    • Avoid custom ApiExplorer/Swagger filters that override request body content types.
  1. Sources
  • Auto API Controllers and content negotiation for streams:
    • https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/API/Auto-API-Controllers
  • ABP repository reference for IRemoteStreamContent usage and tests:
    • https://github.com/abpframework/abp

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution
  • The Docs module reads only ElasticSearch:Url from IConfiguration in DefaultElasticClientProvider. To use credentials, extend DocsElasticSearchOptions.Authenticate to apply BasicAuthentication (or your desired auth) to the Elastic client settings, and bind username/password from configuration.

  • Add these to appsettings.json: { "ElasticSearch": { "Url": "https://elasticsearch-sample-es-http.elastic-system.svc.cluster.local:9200", "UserName": "myuser", "Password": "mypassword" } }

  • Create a custom IElasticClientProvider and replace the default one: using Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration; using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection; using Microsoft.Extensions.Options; using Nest; using System; using Volo.Abp.DependencyInjection; using Volo.Docs.Documents.FullSearch.Elastic;

    public class BasicAuthElasticClientProvider : IElasticClientProvider, ISingletonDependency { private readonly DocsElasticSearchOptions _options; private readonly IConfiguration _configuration;

    public BasicAuthElasticClientProvider(IOptions&lt;DocsElasticSearchOptions&gt; options, IConfiguration configuration)
    {
        _options = options.Value;
        _configuration = configuration;
    }
    
    public IElasticClient GetClient()
    {
        var node = new Uri(_configuration["ElasticSearch:Url"]);
        var settings = new ConnectionSettings(node)
            .DefaultIndex(_options.IndexName);
    
        // Apply Basic authentication using configuration
        var username = _configuration["ElasticSearch:UserName"];
        var password = _configuration["ElasticSearch:Password"];
        if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(username) && !string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(password))
        {
            settings = settings.BasicAuthentication(username, password);
        }
    
        // If you already use Options.Authenticate, keep it to allow further customization
        return new ElasticClient(_options.Authenticate(settings));
    }
    

    }

  • Register your replacement in your module: using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection; using Volo.Abp.Modularity; using Volo.Docs.Documents.FullSearch.Elastic;

    [DependsOn(typeof(VoloDocsDomainModule))] public class YourModule : AbpModule { public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context) { context.Services.AddSingleton<IElasticClientProvider, BasicAuthElasticClientProvider>(); } }

  • Notes:

    • If your cluster uses API keys, TLS client certs, or Cloud ID, replace settings.BasicAuthentication with the appropriate Nest configuration (e.g., settings.ApiKeyAuthentication(id, apiKey)).
    • Keep Options.Authenticate(settings) in the pipeline so any DocsElasticSearchOptions customization remains effective.
  1. Sources
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/modules/docs
  • https://github.com/abpframework/abp/blob/dev/modules/docs/src/Volo.Docs.Domain/Volo/Docs/Documents/FullSearch/Elastic/DocsElasticSearchOptions.cs

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution
  • Current behavior (ABP v9.3.3): Volo.Abp.AzureServiceBus’s ConnectionPool expects a connection string and throws when it’s missing. This prevents using Managed Identity out-of-the-box.

  • Workable approach today (non-breaking, recommended):

    1. Bypass the default ConnectionPool by registering your own ServiceBusClient that uses DefaultAzureCredential. This keeps ABP’s Distributed Event Bus on Azure Service Bus working while authenticating via Managed Identity.

    Example:

using Azure.Core;
  using Azure.Identity;
  using Azure.Messaging.ServiceBus;
  using Microsoft.Extensions.Options;
  using Volo.Abp;
  using Volo.Abp.AzureServiceBus;
  using Volo.Abp.Modularity;

  [DependsOn(typeof(AbpAzureServiceBusModule))]
  public class MyAzureServiceBusMiModule : AbpModule
  {
      public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
      {
          // Configure your namespace in options
          Configure<AbpAzureServiceBusOptions>(opt =>
          {
              opt.Namespace = "<your-namespace>"; // e.g. mybusns
              // You can still set TopicName/SubscriptionName if you use ABP’s distributed event bus
          });

          context.Services.AddSingleton<TokenCredential, DefaultAzureCredential>();

          // Replace ServiceBusClient registration to use MI instead of connection string
          context.Services.AddSingleton<ServiceBusClient>(sp =>
          {
              var options = sp.GetRequiredService<IOptions<AbpAzureServiceBusOptions>>().Value;
              var credential = sp.GetRequiredService<TokenCredential>();

              // Fully qualified namespace: "<namespace>.servicebus.windows.net"
              var fqn = $"{options.Namespace}.servicebus.windows.net";
              return new ServiceBusClient(fqn, credential);
          });

          // Optionally: if you use sender/processor factories relying on ConnectionPool,
          // you can replace IConnectionPool with your own implementation.
          context.Services.Replace(ServiceDescriptor.Singleton<IConnectionPool, ManagedIdentityConnectionPool>());
      }
  }

  // Example minimal pool that creates clients using MI when no connection string is present
  public class ManagedIdentityConnectionPool : IConnectionPool
  {
      private readonly ConcurrentDictionary<string, ServiceBusClient> _clients = new();
      private readonly TokenCredential _credential;

      public ManagedIdentityConnectionPool(TokenCredential credential)
      {
          _credential = credential;
      }

      public ServiceBusClient Get(string fullyQualifiedNamespace, string? connectionString = null)
      {
          // Prefer connection string when provided, otherwise use MI
          return _clients.GetOrAdd(fullyQualifiedNamespace, ns =>
          {
              if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(connectionString))
              {
                  return new ServiceBusClient(connectionString);
              }
              return new ServiceBusClient(ns, _credential);
          });
      }
  }

Notes:

  • Ensure the managed identity (system-assigned or user-assigned) has at least Azure Service Bus Data Sender/Receiver roles on the namespace.

  • For ABP Distributed Event Bus, keep using AbpAzureServiceBusOptions for entity names (topic/subscription). Only authentication changes.

  • About adding a first-class configuration option in ABP:

    • Your suggestion is valid: introducing an option like AbpAzureServiceBusOptions.UseManagedIdentity = true or providing a credential factory would allow the framework to pick DefaultAzureCredential when no connection string is supplied.
    • Until such an enhancement is added, replacing the client or the connection pool as shown above is the supported customization pattern in ABP (use DI replace).
  1. Sources
  • Azure Service Bus client creation with DefaultAzureCredential (code you referenced):
    • ABP Azure Service Bus ConnectionPool (shows current connection-string-based design) https://github.com/abpframework/abp/blob/270c458fe426e831b0568e533e125c9321cb78b7/framework/src/Volo.Abp.AzureServiceBus/Volo/Abp/AzureServiceBus/ConnectionPool.cs#L14
  • Related ABP Support reference (Managed Identity usage context) https://abp.io/support/questions/9853/Connect-to-Azure-Redis-Cache-and-Azure-Service-Bus-using-Azure-managed-Identity

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution Use all of the following checks to verify that the commercial Identity/Account Pro modules are included and running in your solution (Auth Server/API Host) and Angular UI.

Backend (Auth Server/API Host)

  • Check module dependencies in your module classes
    • In AuthServerModule and HttpApiHostModule (and ApplicationModule if used), look for DependsOn attributes that reference the Pro modules:
[DependsOn(
        typeof(AbpIdentityApplicationModule),           // basic
        typeof(AbpIdentityHttpApiModule),
        typeof(AbpAccountApplicationModule),            // basic
        typeof(AbpAccountHttpApiModule),
        // Pro modules -> these must exist for commercial features like authenticator UI
        typeof(Volo.Abp.Identity.Pro.AbpIdentityProApplicationModule),
        typeof(Volo.Abp.Identity.Pro.AbpIdentityProHttpApiModule),
        typeof(Volo.Abp.Account.Pro.AbpAccountProPublicHttpApiModule),
        typeof(Volo.Abp.Account.Pro.AbpAccountProApplicationModule)
    )]
    public class AuthServerModule : AbpModule
    {
    }
  • Notes:

    • Exact class names may vary slightly by version, but namespaces will include Volo.Abp.Identity.Pro and Volo.Abp.Account.Pro for Pro packages.
    • If you only see basic modules (no .Pro), you are not running the commercial features.
  • Check NuGet package references

    • Run in each executable backend project (AuthServer, HttpApiHost):
      • dotnet list package | findstr /i "Volo.Abp.Identity.Pro Volo.Abp.Account.Pro"
    • Or open the .csproj and verify PackageReference items like:
      • <PackageReference Include="Volo.Abp.Identity.Pro" Version="8.2.*" />
      • <PackageReference Include="Volo.Abp.Account.Pro.Public.Web" Version="8.2.*" /> or related Pro packages.
    • Absence of these packages indicates the Pro modules are not included.
  • Verify module initialization at runtime

    • Enable info logging and check startup logs; ABP logs loaded modules on startup. Look for entries containing Volo.Abp.Identity.Pro and Volo.Abp.Account.Pro.
    • Alternatively, add a simple IModuleManager dump in a development endpoint to list loaded module names and confirm the Pro modules are present.
  • Licensing check (development)

    • Ensure you are logged in with abp login and your private NuGet feed is configured so the Pro packages restore. If restore fell back to basic packages, you will miss Pro features.

Angular frontend

  • Check NPM package dependencies

    • In angular/package.json, verify commercial UI packages used by authenticator/2FA flows:
      • @volo/abp.commercial.ng.ui
      • @volo/abp.ng.account.public (or @volosoft/abp.ng.account.public, depending on version)
      • @volo/abp.ng.identity.pro (if used)
      • LeptonX packages are unrelated to 2FA availability but confirm you are on commercial UI.
    • Install list:
      • npm ls @volo/abp.commercial.ng.ui @volo/abp.ng.account.public @volo/abp.ng.identity.pro
  • Routing/components existence

    • In your Angular app, ensure Account Public module routes exist (e.g., /account/manage/security/two-factor). In code, check that AccountPublicModule (from @volo/abp.ng.account.public) is imported in the root or a feature module.

Functional confirmation

  • Tenant-level settings UI
    • Log in as the tenant admin and open Administration > Identity > Settings. If you see the extended 2FA settings (including Authenticator), it strongly indicates Identity Pro is active on that tenant.
  • My Account > Security > Two-Factor page
    • As a user, navigate to My Account > Security > Two-Factor and check for Authenticator enrollment (QR code). Presence confirms Account Public Pro features are active end-to-end.

If you find only basic modules

  • Add the missing Pro packages to the Auth Server/API Host .csproj files and update the module DependsOn to include the Pro modules.
  • Restore packages using your commercial feed, rebuild, and redeploy.
  • Ensure Angular has the @volo commercial packages, re-build, and redeploy.
  1. Sources
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/architecture/modularity/basics
  • https://abp.io/docs/commercial/8.1/modules/identity/two-factor-authentication
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/ui/angular/multi-tenancy

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution To make authenticator options (e.g., Authenticator App/Time-based OTP) visible and usable for a tenant user in an Angular, tiered ABP 8.2.1 solution, verify these points end-to-end:
  • Ensure the correct module/package

    • Authenticator App-based 2FA UI and flows are provided by the commercial Account/Identity modules. Make sure your solution includes and runs the commercial modules (Account/Identity Pro) on the Auth Server and API Host. Without the Pro UI, the “authenticator app” option will not appear.
  • Enable Two-Factor at the tenant level

    • Log in as the tenant admin.
    • Go to Administration > Identity > Settings (Security/Two-Factor).
    • Set:
      • Enable two-factor authentication: On
      • Enable authenticator: On
      • (Optional) Enable email/phone if you want those too.
    • Save tenant settings.
  • Confirm user prerequisites so “supportTwoFactor” becomes true

    • A user must have at least one valid 2FA provider enrolled to see and use it.
    • For Authenticator App:
      • The user must register an authenticator in their My Account > Security > Two-Factor page (the page shows QR code/secret to pair in Google Authenticator/Microsoft Authenticator, etc.). After pairing and confirming a TOTP code, ABP will mark authenticator as available.
    • For Phone/Email 2FA:
      • Phone/Email must be confirmed for those providers to count as available.
    • If twoFactorEnabled is true but supportTwoFactor is false, the user still won’t see or be able to use 2FA providers until a provider is actually configured for the user.
  • Angular app must talk to the correct tenant

    • Make sure Angular resolves and sends the tenant correctly (especially in tiered setup):
      • If you use subdomain tenant resolution, configure baseUrl and oAuthConfig issuer/redirectUri per-tenant domain or pass __tenant explicitly on login.
      • The Angular app automatically adds the __tenant header from application-configuration; ensure the selected tenant is the one in which you enabled 2FA.
    • If the login is performed against the Host or a different tenant than the user’s, the tenant-level 2FA settings may not apply and options won’t show.
  • Auth Server client/cors/redirect settings

    • Ensure your Auth Server’s allowed redirect URIs and CORS entries contain your Angular app’s domain(s).
    • If you use wildcard domains, configure wildcard domain support properly on OpenIddict and list patterns or explicit domains for RedirectAllowedUrls/CorsOrigins in Host.
  • Where to see and manage authenticator options in Angular UI

    • In the commercial Angular UI, authenticator management is available under the user’s “My Account” (Account Public module) > Security > Two-Factor.
    • If you don’t see the Security/Two-Factor page or the Authenticator section there:
      • Verify the Account Public module is enabled and reachable from your Angular app.
      • Verify the user is in the correct tenant and the tenant 2FA features are enabled as above.
  • Common pitfalls that hide Authenticator options

    • Using Host context while the user belongs to a tenant (or vice versa).
    • Not having the commercial modules that include the 2FA UI.
    • Two-Factor enabled at tenant level, but user has not enrolled an authenticator (thus supportTwoFactor remains false).
    • Email/Phone not confirmed when relying on those providers.
    • Angular not sending the __tenant header/parameter due to misconfigured baseUrl or not using domain-based tenant resolve.

If you still can’t see the Authenticator option after the above:

  • Log in as the tenant user and open the “My Account” Two-Factor page directly and try to enroll the authenticator (scan QR and verify code). Once completed, the Authenticator option will appear for the user during MFA challenges.
  1. Sources
  • https://abp.io/docs/commercial/8.1/modules/identity/two-factor-authentication
  • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/ui/angular/multi-tenancy

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

  1. Solution There isn’t a built-in ABP/OpenIddict option that “disables” direct navigation to the AuthServer’s login/home. However, you can enforce “login must originate from a valid client authorization request” by challenging requests that lack a valid returnUrl (or an authorization context) and by preventing anonymous access to the AuthServer’s root/home.

Recommended approach for ABP v8.x AuthServer (OpenIddict-based):

  • Protect the AuthServer’s home/root and Account pages by default, then only allow access when a valid returnUrl is present and points to a registered client redirect URI. You can do this with a lightweight page filter or middleware that checks the returnUrl.

Example: Razor Pages filter registered in AuthServer

using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Filters;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.WebUtilities;
using System.Web;
using Volo.Abp.OpenIddict.Applications;
using Volo.Abp.DependencyInjection;

public class EnforceReturnUrlFilter : IAsyncPageFilter, ITransientDependency
{
    private readonly IOpenIddictApplicationRepository _appRepo;

    public EnforceReturnUrlFilter(IOpenIddictApplicationRepository appRepo)
    {
        _appRepo = appRepo;
    }

    public Task OnPageHandlerSelectionAsync(PageHandlerSelectedContext context) => Task.CompletedTask;

    public async Task OnPageHandlerExecutionAsync(PageHandlerExecutingContext context, PageHandlerExecutionDelegate next)
    {
        var http = context.HttpContext;
        var path = http.Request.Path.Value?.ToLowerInvariant() ?? string.Empty;

        // Pages we want to restrict when unauthenticated:
        var isAccountEntry = path.Equals("/account/login", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase)
                          || path.Equals("/account/register", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase)
                          || path.Equals("/account/forgotpassword", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase)
                          || path.Equals("/account", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase)
                          || path.Equals("/", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase);

        if (isAccountEntry && !http.User.Identity?.IsAuthenticated == true)
        {
            var returnUrl = http.Request.Query["returnUrl"].ToString();

            // Require a returnUrl
            if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(returnUrl))
            {
                context.Result = new ForbidResult(); // triggers challenge in most setups; you can also Redirect to a safe page
                return;
            }

            // Validate that returnUrl ultimately maps to a registered client redirect URI
            // Typical returnUrl on login is '/connect/authorize?...redirect_uri=...'
            var absoluteReturn = returnUrl.StartsWith("/", StringComparison.Ordinal) ? $"{http.Request.Scheme}://{http.Request.Host}{returnUrl}" : returnUrl;
            var uri = new Uri(absoluteReturn, UriKind.Absolute);

            var query = QueryHelpers.ParseQuery(uri.Query);
            if (!query.TryGetValue("client_id", out var clientId) ||
                !query.TryGetValue("redirect_uri", out var redirectUri))
            {
                context.Result = new ForbidResult();
                return;
            }

            var app = await _appRepo.FindByClientIdAsync(clientId!);
            if (app == null || app.RedirectUris == null || !app.RedirectUris.Contains(redirectUri!))
            {
                context.Result = new ForbidResult();
                return;
            }
        }

        await next();
    }
}

Register the filter in your AuthServer Web module:

using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.RazorPages;
using Volo.Abp.Modularity;

public class AuthServerWebModule : AbpModule
{
    public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
    {
        Configure<RazorPagesOptions>(options =>
        {
            // Authorize everything by default
            options.Conventions.AuthorizeFolder("/");
            // Allow anonymous access to Account pages because they must be reachable for the OIDC flow,
            // but guarded by our EnforceReturnUrlFilter.
            options.Conventions.AllowAnonymousToFolder("/Account");
            options.Conventions.AllowAnonymousToPage("/Error");

            // Add our enforcement filter globally
            options.Conventions.AddFolderApplicationModelConvention("/",
                model => model.Filters.Add(new ServiceFilterAttribute(typeof(EnforceReturnUrlFilter))));
        });
    }
}

Behavior:

  • Anonymous users hitting AuthServer / or /Account/Login directly without a proper returnUrl are rejected (Forbid -> OIDC challenge), preventing casual direct use of the login UI.
  • If the request comes from a legit OIDC authorization request (e.g., /connect/authorize?client_id=...&redirect_uri=...), the filter validates the client and redirect_uri via OpenIddict’s application repository and allows the login page to render.
  • Adjust Result (Forbid/Redirect) to your preference (e.g., show a minimal error page).

Alternative minimal option:

  • Keep /Account/Login anonymous but override the Account Login page model to check Model.ReturnUrl early. If missing or invalid, short-circuit with Forbid/Redirect. ABP allows overriding Account pages in your AuthServer to add such validation.

Notes:

  • Do not globally disable anonymous access to /connect/authorize; it must remain publicly accessible for OIDC.
  • Ensure all legitimate clients use authorization_code flow and initiate via /connect/authorize so login requests always carry a valid returnUrl and client_id.
  1. Sources
  • ABP Module System basics:
    • https://abp.io/docs/latest/framework/architecture/modularity/basics
  • ASP.NET Core cookie/OIDC auth challenge mechanics:
    • https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/security/authentication/cookie

This response was generated by AI. If it didn’t solve your problem, feel free to post a new answer — our support team will jump in to help you soon.

Showing 151 to 160 of 736 entries
Boost Your Development
ABP Live Training
Packages
See Trainings
Mastering ABP Framework Book
The Official Guide
Mastering
ABP Framework
Learn More
Mastering ABP Framework Book
Made with ❤️ on ABP v10.1.0-preview. Updated on December 17, 2025, 07:08
1
ABP Assistant
🔐 You need to be logged in to use the chatbot. Please log in first.