Activities of "viswajwalith"

hi

You can share the logs of authserver now without set level.

You can close this ticket, We found the issue, we missed adding options.Conventions.AuthorizePage("/XXXXService/XXXXManagements/Edit/Index", XXXXServicePermissions.XXXXManagements.Default); after adding so it worked fine.

hi

It seems the logs don't contain authserver website.

Can you share the logs of all website? Thanks

Also set the level to Debug will be best.

public async static Task<int> Main(string[] args) 
{ 
    Log.Logger = new LoggerConfiguration() 
        .MinimumLevel.Debug() 
        .Enrich.FromLogContext() 
        .WriteTo.Async(c => c.File("Logs/logs.txt")) 
        .WriteTo.Async(c => c.Console()) 
        .CreateLogger(); 

for this we had to deploy the code, will share that tomorrow

hi

Please share the full logs.txt of your video, I guess the return url has wrong.

liming.ma@volosoft.com

Thanks

Sent a logs to ur email, let me know if anything is needed more on this

Thanks

shared the screen recording to ur email malimings@gmail.com

hi

Please share some info first. Then we can join a zoom meeting.

ok, will send

hi

I do not understand it very well. Can you share some screenshots, code and logs? Thanks

Is it possible to have a screenshare session ?

hi

Please share the logs.

There is a RedirectAllowedUrls in the AppUrlOptions

You can add your URL to it or override the IsRedirectAllowedUrl method of IAppUrlProvider.

I think there is small miss communication, when users are clicking on the application URL link, they are able to login and navihate to the application.

but our requirement is redirect to Specific Module specific URL after successful login. In our case this is perfectly working for Service A but not behaving same for Service B and ABP. Forms module.

In case of service B, the user is able to login and just landed to Default/Home page not the module sepcific page https://test.com/ServiceBMyObjectA/Edit/?id=d1268bec-b1ae-8397-c175-3a0e9c194353

Hello viswajwalith,

Could you please share some more steps to reproduce the issue?

Hi Anjali,

We dont have any specific steps to reproduce, but this happening in our hosted environment. After some deployments we observed that delete flag for some records in AbpTextTemplateContents is setting up to 1, so supecting something with migrator. We are sure no user updated this but this is happening automatically. any idea what are the possible scenerios/steps which updateds this flags?

Hi We got the exact issue identified and fixed at our end. This is an issue with ABP logic in updating the email content.

In TemplateContentAppService.cs , as per the existig logic, for every Content update old record are getting deleted and new one is getting created. That is fine. But in case someone clicks on save without changing any content. Old record are getting deleted but new one are not creating because of return statement in case of no content change.

In nut shell in case of no content change we should not dlete the old one as well, So we have moved the delete logic after the retunr statment (in case of no content change)

I am not sure how it was in Latest versions of ABP, make I think this should be handled at framework level only. Let us know in case of any more details needed.

Hello viswajwalith,

Could you please share some more steps to reproduce the issue?

Hi Anjali,

We dont have any specific steps to reproduce, but this happening in our hosted environment. After some deployments we observed that delete flag for some records in AbpTextTemplateContents is setting up to 1, so supecting something with migrator. We are sure no user updated this but this is happening automatically. any idea what are the possible scenerios/steps which updateds this flags?

hi

You can override this service to cache the result.

https://github.com/abpframework/abp/blob/dev/framework/src/Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Mvc/Volo/Abp/AspNetCore/Mvc/ApplicationConfigurations/AbpApplicationConfigurationAppService.cs#L86

Thanks for the input, but I think we had to cache based on user right ???