AbpSuiteVersion: ABP Suite v9.3.5
Hello, when we create an unrelation table in a sample microservice project, we do not have any problems, but when we want to add a relation table, using importContryProj.ManagementService.Shared; is added in our CountryControllerBase class, but since we have nothing related to shared, using also gives an error. Below, I am sharing the steps for creating an example. We kindly request your support
I sent you the sample project. Could it be due to a missing application that should be installed on the computer or an incompatible version?
Unfortunately, neither option worked. Do you have any other suggestions?
Hello, we have made the changes to angular.json and package.json as you requested.
Path "undefined" does not exist.
We are receiving the message.
Could I also get some information about the resolution date for this error? Since many of our projects are progressing on this structure, we don't want to experience problems in our projects.
Hello
We are creating a new microservice project, then running it to ensure it works. Next, we add the ManagementService microservice to our project and build it to ensure it works. We then run our project to ensure it runs without errors. After that, we create the Products table in ManagementService via AbpSuite.
Here, we see that the Generating proxies section shows 0 ms. After checking, we see that files like entity appService have been created on the ManagementService backend side, but when we check the projects folder in Angular, we only see the abp -solution1 folder created during the project's initial stage. We did not see any folder or file related to management-service. Similarly, we did not see any files related to the products table we added via AbpSuite. Consequently, we have no access to any products table in the panel! I would like to mention that we also followed the steps in the readme files provided after creating the project, such as generate-proxy.
We did not encounter this issue in our samples a few updates ago. Could you please advise us on the areas we should check?
Thanks.
Hello again. I've checked new updates but I've taken different error from angular. I press login button and then I saw this page. Please review this error.
Thanks.
Hello, today I created a new project, but I got an error again. Please review this problem and fix the errors in this version. Best regards.
Hello, our tenant will be obtained from an external form for our project. When the tenant is included in the system, a default edition assignment will be made, and we will want to control the permission statuses of this tenant. In the current scenario, we are conducting our tests by adding a tenant through the admin panel without using an external form and assigning the edition we created to this tenant.
Regarding the problem we are experiencing;
When a tenant is added to the system, role assignments are made by default. When there is no distinction in permissions for these role assignments (MultiTenancySide or RequiredFeature), all permissions are assigned to this role. However, we only want to assign permissions that contain features valid for editions assigned to the tenant to that tenant. For this reason, we use the RequiredFeature property, which you mentioned is available for permissions, to establish the connection between permissions and features. However, in this case, we encounter the following situation. We assign the edition we created with the desired features to the tenant. Afterwards, when we log into the system with the tenant assigned to the edition, we cannot access the menus included in the edition. Upon checking, we see that no record has been added to the PermissionGrant table. However, we noticed that if, for example, the Category permission exists and the project runs without adding the RequiredFeature tag to the permission beforehand, the Category permission is recorded in the PermissionGrant table for the tenant. Afterwards, when we add the RequiredFeature tag to the Category permission, we see that it works. After adding the RequiredFeature tag, we see that it works. However, when a new tenant arrives after this process, the RequiredFeature tag is present, so no record is added to the PermissionGrant table again. In short, what we want here is to be able to control the tenant's permission status on a feature-specific basis.
we kindly request your support.
thanks